Microsoft plans to offer its own anti-spyware software, Chairman Bill Gates said Friday.
Gates said Microsoft will offer software to detect malicious applications and that the company will keep it up-to-date on an ongoing basis. He did not say when the software would be available or whether Microsoft would charge for it.
Although progress is being made against spam and viruses, Gates said the adware and malware problem is getting worse. "This malware thing is so bad," he said in a speech at the Computer History Museum here. "Now that's the one that has us really needing to jump in." It's also a problem that has affected Gates personally. He said his home PCs have had malware, although he has personally never been affected by a virus.
News source: C|Net News.com
Gates said Microsoft will offer software to detect malicious applications and that the company will keep it up-to-date on an ongoing basis. He did not say when the software would be available or whether Microsoft would charge for it.
Although progress is being made against spam and viruses, Gates said the adware and malware problem is getting worse. "This malware thing is so bad," he said in a speech at the Computer History Museum here. "Now that's the one that has us really needing to jump in." It's also a problem that has affected Gates personally. He said his home PCs have had malware, although he has personally never been affected by a virus.
Gamespot interview with Rooster Teeth
GameSpot: Burnie, how much have you had to change your usual MO, given that you are no longer creating video for the heck of it, but for largest game publisher in the world.
Burnie Burns: Well, going from the largest software company in the world, Microsoft, to working with the largest game company in the world is not that big a change. It’s not like we’re having any new challenges or anything like that.
GS: But the games are worlds apart; Halo and The Sims 2.
BB: Yes, the biggest thing, as far as what changes, is that The Sims 2 is a Teen-rated game, whereas Halo is a Mature-rated game. And so to keep in tune with the game itself, we’ve agree to make [the videos] Teen rated. But that fits with the humor anyway. Whenever we write stuff, we like to have it fit in with the audience that already likes the game.
GS: Are you still doing work based on the Halo universe?
BB: I want to make it clear that we’re still doing Red vs Blue. It’s not like we’re stopping. In fact, we’re about to start season three.
GS: What's it been like working on The Sims and with EA?
BB: Everything so far has been great. Everything we’ve done so far has been lots of fun. When we first started talking about [The Sims 2], they had seen Red vs Blue. EA were fans of Red vs Blue. That helped a lot. It wasn’t just like somebody told them that they should get in contact with us. They contacted us because they liked Red vs Blue. They’ve been very, very cool to us.
GS: How are you approaching the creative challenge? And what are your goals with this new project?
BB: Well, with Machinima, you have to work within this limited world. We can’t really go in and make The Sims characters fight with guns or anything like that. That’s something we can do in Halo, but in Halo you can’t put them on a couch or things like that.
When we were writing Red vs Blue over the last year and a half, we’d come up with things that were funny that we wanted to use, some concepts we wanted to make fun of, things that we wanted to parody, but that we just weren’t able to do.
Now, with the strangerhood, we can make fun of sitcoms, make fun of reality shows, poke fun at stuff that we were just not able to in Red vs Blue.
GS: Sounds good.
BB: The project is a really good fit. We actually have a lot of stuff already written out. Hopefully, as we start to work with The Sims 2 engine, we’re going to be able to use that. But the way Machinima works, you never know. The game’s not built to make movies, that’s what the creative process is…we try to milk all that out of [the limited palatte]. Some things you can do and some things you can’t, but that’s part of the fun challenge.
GS: Besides posting the movies that you make using The Sims 2 engine, are you going to be providing any other sorts of content gamers can read or watch?
BB: If there’s any inspiration, it’s going to be inspiration by example I think.
We don’t have a problem talking with people on our forums about how we do things, but we have a commitment to not to do too much stuff that’s outside of the game engine. We try to keep it so that anybody can replicate what we do in the game engine. That’s the really cool part about Machinima.
GS: In general, what do you hear from your fan base?
BB: We get a lot of email from young filmmakers who are wanting to tell a story but who don’t have the money to go out and buy even a video camera. But they may already have a PC game or an Xbox game so they can sit down and create. With The Sims 2, the cool thing is, they’ve already got all this stuff built in. You just hit a button and you can record your gameplay footage. You don’t need any kind of external video capturing equipment…anything like that.
GS: Do you end up answering lots of reader mail that poses "how-to" questions?
BB: We answer questions as they come up but we don’t really put too many tutorials out there because there’s lots of great Machinima sites like machimina.org…they talk about how Machinima works and they offer free tools and things like that.
GS: How many Strangerhood episodes are planned?
BB: Our goal is always to try to treat any series like a TV series, so we try to do 22 episodes in a season. That’s what we’re planning to do here. As far as continuing seasons and things like that, as long as the game company will put up with us then we’ll be happy to do more.
GS: Any fear of losing your core fan base?
BB: We got emails as soon as we put the strangerhood videos up; people were real positive, they were liking it. We thought perhaps the change from a first-person shooter to a more sitcom’y looking cartoon might [alienate] some people, but so far they’ve been real excited about it.
GS: Burnie, that character you call Tovar, he looks a bit like Sims creator Will Wright. Is that intentional?
BB: [laughs] I don’t know, I don’t think so! I might be a little colored by the fact that I know what Tovar’s character is really like. Trust me, if he looks like Will Wright, I don’t think he acts anything like Will Wright. And if he does act like Will Wright, I definitely want to get a job working for Will very, very soon.
GS: Thanks, Burnie.

Michael
Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:41
I really really hope they make this part of the OS, it's where it belongs.
With his superhuman strength, I believe him!
But this is good. It would be an useful addition to Windows, and keeping up the pace from their latest Service Pack.
And here I always thought he shots laser beams from his eyes.
it's only a matter of how you use the computer. give some n00b (my sister for example) a nice, clean one with anti-virus softwares, firewalls, ad-aware and stuffs, and she will still contaminate it in a few days of using.
I thought they were dollar bills... ?
Michael
Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:42
about the malware....man... thats a nother story
Supposing one could exploit all the security holes, and cause all bugs on the personal PCs of Bill Gates, I think everything will be fixed in no time.
With kind regards
Rames (x_terminat_or_3)
Michael
Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:42
To clarify before any fan boys jump on my post, i have no problem with MS entering this or any other market as long as they compete on fair grounds by selling standalone products not including said features into the OS.
For those of you old enough to remember Ms Dos, you'll remember that it came shipped with Anti-Virus software, and Windows 3.1 had the Windows version of the Anti-Virus. I don't see how this will be beating down competition.
A great many software titles are made to replace existing windows programs; either because they provide not all the functionality needed, either because of flaws.
If Microsoft releases it's new toy, it will only encourrage competing av makers to do better!
With kind regards
Ramses (x_terminat_or_3)
Secondly: what chance do you think that Norton or a similar AV producer would have if MS bundled their software into the OS, consumers will only use what you put in front of them and those that choose to use something else will not be in the numbers to compete in a real commercial sense.
Thirdly: I would imagine the situation to be similar to IE in both competition terms and updated software, by bundling IE into the OS they killed any serious competition then once they had dominated the market they just gave up on the consumer and didn't bother updating the software and now even when competition rears its head albiet a small threat, they still are yet to show any proof that they can even be bothered to bring out something better for us, despite the 101 press releases that they produce saying that their working on it.
It's a tricky problem. On one hand someone (probably MS) needs to get anti-virus software on everyone's PCs, but on the other hand the easiest way of doing this (bundle it with Windows), would bring the whole "monopoly, putting other companies out of business" point up again.
I was only guessing at what you were getting at so if im wrong please elaborate on your point.
I'm assuming you never did alot of BBS'ing back in the day. Me, and everyone I knew were all online, all the time, way before the www.
are "tracking cookies" (detected by Ad Aware) considered spyware or adware?
The "advanced" Windows Media Player's been shipping with Windows since Windows ME, but don't people still use other media players? As long as it's worth being "called" an AV (like WMP being worth called a good MP) I'd be glad if MS was gonna include it in their OS.
Last edited by 66983 on 03 Oct 2004 - 01:40
Last edited by 14238 on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:48
:wakes up from dream:
Only one other kind of people charge you for protection against the problems they create...the mafia
And Norton really needs a kick up the backside, their products are sh$t. Norton/Symantec antivirus is soooooooooo slow and sooooooo resource intensive that many will turn the thing off to do tasks. By integrating it, they may code the thing better, release updates more regularly (Once a week is not good enough) and release a better product. For a real antivirus, try NOD32.
Nothing stops the consumer from choosing a different product over the Microsoft version, but having it there adds to convenience and some sort of protection at least i.e. the Windows Firewall may not be the best out there, but anyone can replace it with what they want such as ZoneAlarm, does this effectivly kill the firewall industry? NO! Can the user install something else? Yes. People such as the EU also need to get that in their heads, it's about convenience, not everyone has the same computer knowledge and by including it, Microsoft helps people out aren't experienced enough to understand the dangers or possibilities. They don't kill the competition, the competition kills itself by not introducing something better.
Last edited by 1798 on 03 Oct 2004 - 20:28
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.