main

Gates: Microsoft to offer anti-spyware

malebolgia   on 02 October 2004 - 19:45 · 56 comments & 5218 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft plans to offer its own anti-spyware software, Chairman Bill Gates said Friday.

Gates said Microsoft will offer software to detect malicious applications and that the company will keep it up-to-date on an ongoing basis. He did not say when the software would be available or whether Microsoft would charge for it.

Although progress is being made against spam and viruses, Gates said the adware and malware problem is getting worse. "This malware thing is so bad," he said in a speech at the Computer History Museum here. "Now that's the one that has us really needing to jump in." It's also a problem that has affected Gates personally. He said his home PCs have had malware, although he has personally never been affected by a virus.

News source: C|Net News.com


Gamespot interview with Rooster Teeth

GameSpot: Burnie, how much have you had to change your usual MO, given that you are no longer creating video for the heck of it, but for largest game publisher in the world.

Burnie Burns: Well, going from the largest software company in the world, Microsoft, to working with the largest game company in the world is not that big a change. It’s not like we’re having any new challenges or anything like that.

GS: But the games are worlds apart; Halo and The Sims 2.

BB: Yes, the biggest thing, as far as what changes, is that The Sims 2 is a Teen-rated game, whereas Halo is a Mature-rated game. And so to keep in tune with the game itself, we’ve agree to make [the videos] Teen rated. But that fits with the humor anyway. Whenever we write stuff, we like to have it fit in with the audience that already likes the game.

GS: Are you still doing work based on the Halo universe?

BB: I want to make it clear that we’re still doing Red vs Blue. It’s not like we’re stopping. In fact, we’re about to start season three.

GS: What's it been like working on The Sims and with EA?

BB: Everything so far has been great. Everything we’ve done so far has been lots of fun. When we first started talking about [The Sims 2], they had seen Red vs Blue. EA were fans of Red vs Blue. That helped a lot. It wasn’t just like somebody told them that they should get in contact with us. They contacted us because they liked Red vs Blue. They’ve been very, very cool to us.

GS: How are you approaching the creative challenge? And what are your goals with this new project?

BB: Well, with Machinima, you have to work within this limited world. We can’t really go in and make The Sims characters fight with guns or anything like that. That’s something we can do in Halo, but in Halo you can’t put them on a couch or things like that.

When we were writing Red vs Blue over the last year and a half, we’d come up with things that were funny that we wanted to use, some concepts we wanted to make fun of, things that we wanted to parody, but that we just weren’t able to do.

Now, with the strangerhood, we can make fun of sitcoms, make fun of reality shows, poke fun at stuff that we were just not able to in Red vs Blue.

GS: Sounds good.

BB: The project is a really good fit. We actually have a lot of stuff already written out. Hopefully, as we start to work with The Sims 2 engine, we’re going to be able to use that. But the way Machinima works, you never know. The game’s not built to make movies, that’s what the creative process is…we try to milk all that out of [the limited palatte]. Some things you can do and some things you can’t, but that’s part of the fun challenge.

GS: Besides posting the movies that you make using The Sims 2 engine, are you going to be providing any other sorts of content gamers can read or watch?

BB: If there’s any inspiration, it’s going to be inspiration by example I think.

We don’t have a problem talking with people on our forums about how we do things, but we have a commitment to not to do too much stuff that’s outside of the game engine. We try to keep it so that anybody can replicate what we do in the game engine. That’s the really cool part about Machinima.

GS: In general, what do you hear from your fan base?

BB: We get a lot of email from young filmmakers who are wanting to tell a story but who don’t have the money to go out and buy even a video camera. But they may already have a PC game or an Xbox game so they can sit down and create. With The Sims 2, the cool thing is, they’ve already got all this stuff built in. You just hit a button and you can record your gameplay footage. You don’t need any kind of external video capturing equipment…anything like that.

GS: Do you end up answering lots of reader mail that poses "how-to" questions?

BB: We answer questions as they come up but we don’t really put too many tutorials out there because there’s lots of great Machinima sites like machimina.org…they talk about how Machinima works and they offer free tools and things like that.

GS: How many Strangerhood episodes are planned?

BB: Our goal is always to try to treat any series like a TV series, so we try to do 22 episodes in a season. That’s what we’re planning to do here. As far as continuing seasons and things like that, as long as the game company will put up with us then we’ll be happy to do more.

GS: Any fear of losing your core fan base?

BB: We got emails as soon as we put the strangerhood videos up; people were real positive, they were liking it. We thought perhaps the change from a first-person shooter to a more sitcom’y looking cartoon might [alienate] some people, but so far they’ve been real excited about it.

GS: Burnie, that character you call Tovar, he looks a bit like Sims creator Will Wright. Is that intentional?

BB: [laughs] I don’t know, I don’t think so! I might be a little colored by the fact that I know what Tovar’s character is really like. Trust me, if he looks like Will Wright, I don’t think he acts anything like Will Wright. And if he does act like Will Wright, I definitely want to get a job working for Will very, very soon.

GS: Thanks, Burnie.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 56 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Mav Phoenix on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:50
Good deal.
#1.1 mlauzon on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:54
I just hope they don't make it part of the OS, like everything else lately....


Michael

Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:41
#1.2 CheeseCow on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:56
What's with the link spamming? If nobody thinks that it is wrong, I will start adding URLs to my posts too.
#1.3 Mav Phoenix on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:59
^Yeah, the link spamming isn't allowed.
#1.4 dotnetjunkie on 03 Oct 2004 - 09:48
@mlauzon: why not?!

I really really hope they make this part of the OS, it's where it belongs.
(8 replies) #2 CheeseCow on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:55
It's also a problem that has affected Gates personally. He said his home PCs have had malware, although he has personally never been affected by a virus.
With his superhuman strength, I believe him!
But this is good. It would be an useful addition to Windows, and keeping up the pace from their latest Service Pack.
#2.1 Mav Phoenix on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:59
Are you kidding? Gates just lowers his glasses with a glare and viruses destroy themselves!
#2.2 Post-It Note on 02 Oct 2004 - 22:22
I've never got any viruses as well.
#2.3 nX07 on 02 Oct 2004 - 22:24
Lmao, that was great!
#2.4 MegaManXcalibur on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:05
QUOTE
Are you kidding? Gates just lowers his glasses with a glare and viruses destroy themselves!


And here I always thought he shots laser beams from his eyes.
#2.5 EduardValencia on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:43
i've never been affected by viruses hehe ,always updated
#2.6 Mav Phoenix on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:44
^On occasion.
#2.7 Alpha Binary on 03 Oct 2004 - 02:37
i don't have a single anti-virus software installed and i have never been infected by a virus, unless i deliberately run it (a worm, a trojan, etc.). (well i do run a full system scan from time to time.)
it's only a matter of how you use the computer. give some n00b (my sister for example) a nice, clean one with anti-virus softwares, firewalls, ad-aware and stuffs, and she will still contaminate it in a few days of using.
#2.8 8-n-1 on 04 Oct 2004 - 13:51
QUOTE
And here I always thought he shots laser beams from his eyes.



I thought they were dollar bills... ?


(2 replies) #3 neostyle on 02 Oct 2004 - 19:57
adware and malware is like windows : its everywhere ....
#3.1 mlauzon on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:00
ROTFLMAO


Michael

Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:42
#3.2 OKPC on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:03
...i catched like 100's of virus knocking in my doorm but never had any probs too, its not needed to be a BG or a super human...all it take a is a nice protection...
about the malware....man... thats a nother story
(10 replies) #4 Ramses on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:00
Finally Microsoft proposes to do something good. Let's hope then that it will be included in the EULA of the OS and will not be something we have to purchase.

QUOTE
It's also a problem that has affected Gates personally. He said his home PCs have had malware


Supposing one could exploit all the security holes, and cause all bugs on the personal PCs of Bill Gates, I think everything will be fixed in no time.

With kind regards



Rames (x_terminat_or_3)
#4.1 mlauzon on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:02
He may say he's using Ad-Aware, which runs on Windows...but have you ever wondered if he only runs Windows?!


Michael

Last edited by 98 on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:42
#4.2 noyb on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:10
I am in two minds about MS including anti-spyware software in the OS but leaning more towards NOT being included. I am sure though that AV software should not be part of the OS as its a cheap and nasty way of beating down competition and would only result in another stagnant product with little enhancment or innovation once MS has dominated the sector. Besides my point of view im pretty sure that fair trade regulators would not allow it to happen and McAfee and Norton would not go down without a legal, not development fight.

To clarify before any fan boys jump on my post, i have no problem with MS entering this or any other market as long as they compete on fair grounds by selling standalone products not including said features into the OS.
#4.3 Ramses on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:28
I think you're wrong on the
QUOTE
I am sure though that AV software should not be part of the OS as its a cheap and nasty way of beating down competition
part.

For those of you old enough to remember Ms Dos, you'll remember that it came shipped with Anti-Virus software, and Windows 3.1 had the Windows version of the Anti-Virus. I don't see how this will be beating down competition.

A great many software titles are made to replace existing windows programs; either because they provide not all the functionality needed, either because of flaws.

If Microsoft releases it's new toy, it will only encourrage competing av makers to do better!

With kind regards


Ramses (x_terminat_or_3)
#4.4 pdog on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:31
I REMEMBER THAT!!! Man that was long ago!
#4.5 noyb on 02 Oct 2004 - 21:40
First off: You cannot compare the good old days of DOS (I still have to use it on one of my machines) with modern day computing. Computers have moved on from that time both in levels of usage and in function, how many households had computers back then and how big was the threat from virus's considering that a machine being connected to any other computer was a rare thing.

Secondly: what chance do you think that Norton or a similar AV producer would have if MS bundled their software into the OS, consumers will only use what you put in front of them and those that choose to use something else will not be in the numbers to compete in a real commercial sense.

Thirdly: I would imagine the situation to be similar to IE in both competition terms and updated software, by bundling IE into the OS they killed any serious competition then once they had dominated the market they just gave up on the consumer and didn't bother updating the software and now even when competition rears its head albiet a small threat, they still are yet to show any proof that they can even be bothered to bring out something better for us, despite the 101 press releases that they produce saying that their working on it.
#4.6 MoRiA on 02 Oct 2004 - 23:43
There are still plenty of people out there with no anti-virus software at all.

It's a tricky problem. On one hand someone (probably MS) needs to get anti-virus software on everyone's PCs, but on the other hand the easiest way of doing this (bundle it with Windows), would bring the whole "monopoly, putting other companies out of business" point up again.
#4.7 Mav Phoenix on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:42
^Point that at Apple someone please.
#4.8 noyb on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:51
As their are no virus's for OS X their is no AV software included and they offer McAfee subscriptions as an option. The only thing i could say Apple takes the piss on is Garageband being included with new Macs and any software coming with a Mac is a different matter as they are classed as an OEM rather than just a software company.

I was only guessing at what you were getting at so if im wrong please elaborate on your point.
#4.9 Tews on 03 Oct 2004 - 02:38
With the most effective spyware obliterating software ( Spybot S&D ) being free, I cant see many ppl getting excited over MS's latest offering..
#4.10 Treefrog on 03 Oct 2004 - 03:48
QUOTE
Computers have moved on from that time both in levels of usage and in function, how many households had computers back then and how big was the threat from virus's considering that a machine being connected to any other computer was a rare thing.


I'm assuming you never did alot of BBS'ing back in the day. Me, and everyone I knew were all online, all the time, way before the www.
#5 pdog on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:30
yeah if they integrate it into a service pack, that will suck big time. it will probably be quicker too, because microsoft know the "secret" hooks on the kernel, that it uses in MS office and such. it would be nice if it has realtime protection also.
#6 Cyranthus on 02 Oct 2004 - 20:36
what a surprise! not...
(2 replies) #7 mlauzon on 02 Oct 2004 - 21:31
#7.1 Rockett15 on 02 Oct 2004 - 21:52
irrelivant link spamming
#7.2 PKHelloNasty on 03 Oct 2004 - 16:08
i never noticd this crap until now. Wow people can be amazing retards sometimes.
#8 Saadu on 02 Oct 2004 - 22:17
Mr Gates, try to patch IE rather go around trying to fix the mess the other way around.
#9 shift on 02 Oct 2004 - 22:59
Good move.
(1 reply) #10 supersaiyanjericho on 02 Oct 2004 - 23:15
just wondering...

are "tracking cookies" (detected by Ad Aware) considered spyware or adware?

#10.1 MoRiA on 02 Oct 2004 - 23:44
Can't answer that directly, but to get rid of them (100% in my experience), just disable 3rd party cookies in the Privacy tab of Internet Options. Works like a dream
#11 ZeroHertz on 02 Oct 2004 - 23:47
I don't see what the problem is if MS is going to include the AntiSpyware AND the AV with the OS. It's good for customers who cannot afford a good AV on top of the OS. Besides... if MS is developing its own AV.. let's see Norton and McAfee develop their own OS

The "advanced" Windows Media Player's been shipping with Windows since Windows ME, but don't people still use other media players? As long as it's worth being "called" an AV (like WMP being worth called a good MP) I'd be glad if MS was gonna include it in their OS.

Last edited by 66983 on 03 Oct 2004 - 01:40
#12 tronmaster on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:11
This is a good job on Microsoft's part!!
#13 SyntheticDarkness on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:13
Whatever the sp2 popup and active x blockers do real good i just hope they keep it up!
(2 replies) #14 oo420oo on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:27
I work for a major ISP in the call center and based on the calls I am not installing SP2 until you guinnea pigs root out the bugs.
#14.1 Mav Phoenix on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:41
Self snipped.

Last edited by 14238 on 03 Oct 2004 - 00:48
#14.2 andy2004 on 03 Oct 2004 - 22:44
lemme geuss you work for AOL ?
#15 slimy on 03 Oct 2004 - 01:11
kool, they could just buy spybot, spysweeper and lavasoft and converge them
:wakes up from dream:
#16 Hekx on 03 Oct 2004 - 01:21
Spybot still has my attention.
#17 altermind on 03 Oct 2004 - 02:06
only one viris... and that was in 1994... 10 years ago... me = carefull
#18 nexx on 03 Oct 2004 - 02:24
Haha let me guess..they are going to charge for it?

Only one other kind of people charge you for protection against the problems they create...the mafia
(2 replies) #19 embj on 03 Oct 2004 - 04:20
Will it remove Windows?
#19.1 cyruspoonawala on 03 Oct 2004 - 06:28
ROFL!
#19.2 lare2 on 03 Oct 2004 - 06:37
LOL
#20 mattking on 03 Oct 2004 - 08:39
Great news, I know some people hate all the ideas of integration but I pray for time when I don't have loads of utilities running, just Windows.
#21 Ifoow on 03 Oct 2004 - 10:44
Indeed, this is great. I think Windows should include Anti-virus and Anti-Spyware software. The damage that is caused by virusses because people do not bother to install any anti virus is huge. If every computer was packed with anti virus and anti spyware virusses would have much smaller chance to spread. And who cares about companies like Norton going bankrupt they make money out of a market that should not be there anyway.
#22 Ideas Man on 03 Oct 2004 - 12:49
Integrating it with Windows would be great, as already outlined, it helps all the computer users out there who know nothing about spyware and viruses by giving them protection, it also helps protect the computing industry as a whole because if the viruses are removed, they can't spread, which means some lucky people won't accidently receive one, and if it keeps up, then the world may be much safer.

And Norton really needs a kick up the backside, their products are sh$t. Norton/Symantec antivirus is soooooooooo slow and sooooooo resource intensive that many will turn the thing off to do tasks. By integrating it, they may code the thing better, release updates more regularly (Once a week is not good enough) and release a better product. For a real antivirus, try NOD32.

Nothing stops the consumer from choosing a different product over the Microsoft version, but having it there adds to convenience and some sort of protection at least i.e. the Windows Firewall may not be the best out there, but anyone can replace it with what they want such as ZoneAlarm, does this effectivly kill the firewall industry? NO! Can the user install something else? Yes. People such as the EU also need to get that in their heads, it's about convenience, not everyone has the same computer knowledge and by including it, Microsoft helps people out aren't experienced enough to understand the dangers or possibilities. They don't kill the competition, the competition kills itself by not introducing something better.
#23 Randall_Lind on 03 Oct 2004 - 19:21
old news really last year they says they would put AV back in windows.
#24 PhantasyRPG on 03 Oct 2004 - 20:12
<<removed>>

Last edited by 1798 on 03 Oct 2004 - 20:28
#25 OptiPlex on 04 Oct 2004 - 00:09
I wonder if this will be a plus or more lawsuits

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)