Posted by lardiop on 18 October 2004 - 14:30 · 14 comments & 562 views
The long awaited Intel roadmaps, which specify details of its shift from the Pentium 4 to dual core processors, have been shown to its OEM customers.

And it appears that when the first "Smithfield" dual core processors are launched in the third quarter of next year, they will be called the x20, the x30 and the x40. An x20 is a twin 1MB L2 cache processor supporting EM64T extensions and the "execute disable" bit. Clock speed for the x20 will be 2.80GHz, for the x30 3GHz and for the x40 3.20GHz - they will have 800MHz system buses and use the LGA775 socket.

Meanwhile, Intel's 630, 640, 650 and 660 processors, which have 2MB of L2 cache and 800MHz system buses, will be launched in the first quarter, but we don't expect to see them in systems until Q2. They will cost $225, $270, $400 and $600 respectively.

News source: The Inq


The e-mail appears in your normal Inbox folder, and the file is attached as an e-mail attachment. GMail Drive periodically checks your mail account (using the GMail search function) to see if new files have arrived and to rebuild the directory structures.

But basically GMail Drive acts as any other hard-drive installed on your computer.
You can copy files to and from the GMail Drive folder simply by using drag'n'drop like you're used to with the normal Explorer folders.

Because the GMail files will clutter up your Inbox folder, you may wish to create a filter in GMail to automatically move the files (prefixed with the GMAILFS letters) to your archived mail folder.

Please note that GMail Drive is still an experimental tool. There's still a number of limitations of the file-system (such as total filename size must be less than 40 characters), and it doesn't make full use of the secure internet protocols available.



There are 14 additional comments
Advertisement
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by cjrciadt on 18 Oct 2004 - 14:46
Nice but here is are cliche (write it in pencil not ink)
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by rIaHc3 on 18 Oct 2004 - 14:47
Is this for mainstream (eg HP and computers sold in stores) or is this for commercial and big producition companies?
Quote this comment #2.1 Posted by vetlardiop on 18 Oct 2004 - 14:48
Mainstream
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by slapnuts_ox on 18 Oct 2004 - 15:06
nice....i can't wait for dual cores to become the standard. i am also looking foward to seeing how the AMD chips perform against these chips.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by qdave on 18 Oct 2004 - 15:27
nice stuff!
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by aristotle-dude on 18 Oct 2004 - 15:42
WTF? 800Mhz bus? Why?
Quote this comment #5.1 Posted by thenay on 18 Oct 2004 - 16:01
this is stupid, why 800mhz? and why 1mb l2 cache when they are releasing 2mb l2 cache on chips at the start of next yr... hmmm... it might be cos each chip has 1mb cache on each core but still... oh well... lol
Quote this comment #5.2 Posted by VikingStorm on 18 Oct 2004 - 18:14
The 6xx's aren't dual-core, just a continuation of the single-cores.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by jpcahn on 18 Oct 2004 - 20:30
Wow these speeds spell bad news for Intel in my opinion. That is IF AMD actually has their dual core procs out by then. If AMD can come out with a Dual core 3 GHZ processor it's gonna eat Intel alive. I'll put AMD 3ghz VS even Intel 3.4 and if Both are dual core you know Intel is dead meat. I think we need to start a letter writing campaign to get Dell to start carrying AMD processors. It's not right that it looks like Intel is gonna ride on their name alone next fall.
Quote this comment #6.1 Posted by rIaHc3 on 18 Oct 2004 - 22:23
ok fanboy we get your point
(3 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #7 Posted by Shibby on 18 Oct 2004 - 21:14
when i saw the title i tought GREAT, intel finaly going to get some class chips out.
and well nothing to shout WOW and write home to.
i think AMD have now got the market hold in custom pcs.
intel seems like it's going slow
Quote this comment #7.1 Posted by rIaHc3 on 18 Oct 2004 - 22:23
[QUOTE]ok fanboy we get your point [/QUOTE]
Quote this comment #7.2 Posted by jpcahn on 19 Oct 2004 - 04:12
OK Genius. Fanboy means I think a Ford Mustang can beat a Vette when it's obviously not true. Here is a link to Hard OCP showing a 2.2 GHZ Athlon beating or coming close to the 3.2 Extreme Edition Pentium 4 in nearly every Application. So your saying that if I speed the Athlon up to 3.0 GHZ and keep the Intel at 3.2 that Intel won't get beat like a dog? Sounds like your the Fanboy.
Heres the link and I did qualify my statement with IF AMD can get a dual core 3.0 by next fall they will win big time.
Hard OCP
Quote this comment #7.3 Posted by Shibby on 19 Oct 2004 - 16:14
LOL
i'm an intel man my shelf and just think intel are now starting to lose.
jeez why must everyone call everyone a fan boy, geez it not like i was shoveing it down your throat. i was just saying what i think and if you don't like it well i just don't care
[1]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


Scroll to the Top
....
My Preferences
....
Communicating with server
Loading
Please Wait...
....
Loading
 X 
....