main

Intel’s Desktop Dual-Core Chips to be Clocked at 3.20GHz

malebolgia   on 24 October 2004 - 00:43 · 9 comments & 760 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Intel’s code-named Smithfield dual-core desktop processors will be clocked at around 3.00GHz clock-speed and will support 64-bit capability, claims report at AnandTech web-site, however, the chips will not sport Hyper-Threading technology along with high-speed processor system bus.

Future dual-core microprocessors for desktops from Intel Corp. that are projected to emerge in the third quarter, 2005, will run at 2.80GHz, 3.00GHz and 3.20GHz, integrate 2MB of unified cache, utilize 800MHz processor system bus and feature LGA775 form-factor. The dual-core desktop processor internally called Smithfield will be made using 90nm process technology, each processing engine will use the same architecture with the current Pentium 4 “Prescott” chip, however, the new central processing unit will feature “arbitration logic that will balance bus transactions between the two CPUs”.

News source: X-bit labs


Thanks to Morgan and Carlo for the heads-up on this one!

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 Ajapi on 24 Oct 2004 - 01:59
no HT and old FSB? i dont see why they would do that.....
#1.1 zivan56 on 24 Oct 2004 - 02:15
Why would you need HT? HT just emulates dual cores...you get dual physical cores with this.
#1.2 Mav Phoenix on 24 Oct 2004 - 02:28
^Or 2 physical and 2 virtual.
#1.3 Dayon on 24 Oct 2004 - 03:05
They only needed the two logical processors to cover up various design flaws. A properly designed chip would never use HyperThreading.
#1.4 Mav Phoenix on 24 Oct 2004 - 05:36
^HT helps me every day to use multiple apps without a hint of lag. So whatever.

By the way...

I'm currently encoding a 1h:40m video from QuickTime to MPEG2 for DVD as I type this and it's as if the encoding process wasn't even going on.
#1.5 Spitfire_x86 on 24 Oct 2004 - 17:22
QUOTE
I'm currently encoding a 1h:40m video from QuickTime to MPEG2 for DVD as I type this and it's as if the encoding process wasn't even going on.

You will feel same with non-HT processors if you know how to manage tasks. Give the encoder lowest priority, and you can surf web without feeling that something is being encoded.
#1.6 sphbecker on 25 Oct 2004 - 13:14
Dual Cores is the next generation of HT. HT lets a single core use two pipelines so that the processor can be more fully utilized (ie, traditional processors can only use one register at a time). Dual Cores takes it to a new level by allowing the processor actually do everything in parallel, not just some things.

Anyone who says that HT was covering up a design flaw is smoking something. An HT processor's only flaw is that it is now as powerful a true dual processors. But, if you don't like HT, just turn it off in the BIOS and your processor will still perform better then older units that didn't support HT.
(1 reply) #2 c00ly on 24 Oct 2004 - 18:15
I'm comfused, I have 2 P4 CPU's 3.2ghz E, with Hyper Threading, whats the difference?
#2.1 Munkeymon on 24 Oct 2004 - 21:59
Both of those cores will be on the same die and (I think) share the same cache, so you only have one socket. It will also probably cost less than your current setup and perform better as well.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)