Today, Microsoft launched a public beta of their search offering, MSN Search. New features include integration with other Microsoft sites (e.g. Encarta, MSN Music), basic questions search (e.g. What is the capital of Turkey? -> result from Encarta), and a useful search builder tool to help build advance queries fully utilising all the features on offer. The search currently has an index of 5bn pages. Whilst Neowin was in Paris last week, Microsoft told us that one of the key features would be keeping the index fresh, and made a provisional pledge to update it every 7 - 10 days (max); the problems of letting an index go stale were highlighted by Google earlier in the week.
Microsoft has clearly stated that their goal with MSN Search is "to help customers find what they want faster". They want to give people better results, clearer results (i.e. cut out the chaff), and give a more personalized set of results. Apparently, it takes the average user 11 minutes to find what they wanted on a search engine. Yet the other goal is the whole issue of fighting back against Google's 60% market share (MS have 9.6% of the search market). Microsoft has admitted they neglected search technology (they previously licensed search from Inktomi), and over the last few years have invested a lot of money into improving their offering.
But, today isn't just about MSN Search. Not to be out done, Google announced they had doubled the size of their index to 8bn pages. Often said, it's not the size that counts, but how you use it. If Google can continue to return useful results to users, many will see no reason to switch. Microsoft fight an uphill battle in that they have to first persuade users to use their search, and secondly return better results than the competition. However, part of this is quite simple; integration into MSN.com (default homepage for many IE users) and a variety of other sites means that a lot of users will be using MSN search without even knowing they switched. MSN Search will also be integrated with future desktop search solutions, which Microsoft will be releasing in the months to come.
View: MSN Search (Beta) | Google.com
View: MSN Search Beta Groups (Thanks Bink)
Microsoft has clearly stated that their goal with MSN Search is "to help customers find what they want faster". They want to give people better results, clearer results (i.e. cut out the chaff), and give a more personalized set of results. Apparently, it takes the average user 11 minutes to find what they wanted on a search engine. Yet the other goal is the whole issue of fighting back against Google's 60% market share (MS have 9.6% of the search market). Microsoft has admitted they neglected search technology (they previously licensed search from Inktomi), and over the last few years have invested a lot of money into improving their offering.
But, today isn't just about MSN Search. Not to be out done, Google announced they had doubled the size of their index to 8bn pages. Often said, it's not the size that counts, but how you use it. If Google can continue to return useful results to users, many will see no reason to switch. Microsoft fight an uphill battle in that they have to first persuade users to use their search, and secondly return better results than the competition. However, part of this is quite simple; integration into MSN.com (default homepage for many IE users) and a variety of other sites means that a lot of users will be using MSN search without even knowing they switched. MSN Search will also be integrated with future desktop search solutions, which Microsoft will be releasing in the months to come.
Cont...
Digital Illusions recently bought out New York based Trauma Studios, which created the popular Desert Combat modification for Battlefield 1942, paying $500,000 for the studio according to today's announcement, which confirmed that the studio is working on a new PC title based on the Battlefield 2 engine.
The company also today revealed that it has signed a contract for a next-generation console title, targetted at Xbox 2 and PlayStation 3, which will launch in late 2006 or early 2007 and will also have PS2 and Xbox SKUs created by the firm's Canadian studio.
This is in addition to an action game which had initially been targetted at PS2 and Xbox, but has recently been upgraded to being a PS3 and Xbox 2 game aimed at a 2007 launch. Like the other next-gen title, this will be developed at the firm's Swedish studio.
Both of these titles are signed to Electronic Arts, which owns a significant stake in Digital Illusions, and today's announcement provides firm proof that the giant company is already looking ahead to the next generation - although particularly interesting is the apparent intention to keep supporting the Xbox and PS2 right through into late 2006, even building SKUs of next-generation titles for the older platforms.

Some of the nice features I found are:
You can search by longitute, latitude
http://beta.search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=...d%2C+OR&FORM=QB
Match calculations
http://beta.search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=...24%29&FORM=QBRE
Freshness of search results (using the search builder button)
http://beta.search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=...00%7D&FORM=QBRE
Looking for more...
im just saying that ms shouldn't be trying to promote their other stuff by using windows, it should be promoted seperatly.
Beta.search.msn.com
Bink.nu article
I've tried out the MSN Search now and it seems it still has quite a bit to go for me to switch with too many downright bugged features. I'll come back to check when it's done though...
well, actually, MSN managed to put my blog in page 1 of the search(no.7 on the page), while Google only managed to put it at the end of page 2.
one up for msn.
the rest of the search that I gave me the same results.
google still rules with the "I'm Feeling Lucky" thingy.
Especially in Firefox where typing something in the address bar makes a I'm Feeling Lucky search.
I really like that feature and it's so clever you wonder why it hadn't been done before.
Type "neowin" and Google tells Firefox it's Neowin.net you want to, type "windows xp" and you go to http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/default.mspx.
It's among my favorite features in that browser.
Didn't get the results you expected? Help us improve.
bom cha
Minimalistic and unobstructive, yet beautiful!!!
But search doesn't work for me at the moment.
Not the most auspicious of starts!
MSN has to run search.msn.com along with this new beta servers.
Wierdly, They also see to be running a third techpreview and a sandbox site. Go figure.
http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20041111MicrosoftCrawlingGoogleResultsForNewSearchEngine.html
It sounds feasible. I wouldn't put anything past Microsoft - especially when they might be beat at something...
why do they bother using a DOCTYPE anyway then ..
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.search.msn.com%2F
Just 1 error!
That is the most complaint webpage I have come across.
Anyways any web developer who want to supports all new and legacy browsers (Netscape 4 being the worst) knows that the validator is pretty much useless.
Good job MSN.
Last edited by 32225 on 11 Nov 2004 - 18:24
http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20041111MicrosoftCrawlingGoogleResultsForNewSearchEngine.html
For those who were wondering it is Ankara, not Istanbul.
See what the new Microsoft search thinks is the best operating system.
MSN will NEVER EVER come close to replacing google until it starts returning meaningful search results. I find 80% of MSN Search results to be ads or spam-like dribble. It's actually quite ridiculous.
lick my hairy beanbag microsoft
They just don't get it. It isn't enough to pour the money in and hope a search engine will come out on the other end. As ever, MS's answer to everything is: put some money into it. If it doesn't work well enough, no problem, you just have to make people believe it's what they want - which has also been one of MS's first marketing points over the years. And there's where their money can buy success.
What MS doesn't do now, somebody else does it. When that somebody else is good enough to be a threat, they will start doing it themselves too. If they can't do good enough, they buy out everybody else. Then say they wer ethe first ever to do that, and when somebody disagrees, they pay them out.
Let's just see what will they do about Google's and for example Firefox's superiority iin two aspects which are becoming the most wanted these days: good search and browse functionality.
I just cross my fingers.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.