main

Microsoft sends out Windows Server 2003 R2 beta invites

Tom Warren   on 25 November 2004 - 19:53 · 22 comments & 4383 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft are slowly selecting potential testers for their next Windows Server release, code named R2. In an email to testers today the software giant begins:

"Due to the outstanding contributions you made during the recent Windows SP1 beta, the Microsoft® Windows Server 2003 Beta Team would to extend the opportunity to participate in the upcoming "R2" beta program. The core of this release is built on the Windows Server 2003 SP1 platform and adds optionally-installable components that our customers have requested. This beta will all incorporate a number of key features that are of interest to customers who want to take advantage of new technologies available in the next release of Microsoft® Windows Server 2003."

According to Microsoft the beta will begin in the "early part of December" and will finish in Q4 of 2005. Microsoft have issued several Guest ID's for this beta but in order to prevent leaks the ID's are different (capital letters in different places).

News source: Microsoft Beta Place


Build 11 24 November 2004

* Made code to start/stop programs and services multi-threaded for faster execution
* Added a few more descriptions for possible error messages when starting/stopping services
* Fixed bug that caused crash in GUI when loading a profile with a filename longer than 20 characters
* Added auto-arrange to the main profile window (icons will arrange themselves as the window is resized)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 22 additional comments
#1 Mx² on 25 Nov 2004 - 19:57
This beta should be good
#2 cpu killer on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:08
Got my invite , can't wait .
#3 cjb1118 on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:09
Nice
#4 Jason on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:12
Lets hope only people that use 2003 Server as a real server in a production enviroment get no the beta.
#5 Mr. Dee on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:19
I use it in a real production environment, a mixture of NT, 2000, and Server 2003 and I didn't get in!

I hope Microsoft opens up on this one, I really, really, really want to test it.
#6 neufuse on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:21
I just hope people that get the invites actually have a domain network to actually *test* this on. not just people that feel they need it just to have it to say they tested it. Because when it's not in a true domain environment for testing and just someones home server or computer, we really don't get everything that is in the system close to being tested.
(1 reply) #7 Jugalator on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:25
I wonder how crazy people would get if they added an exclusive "cool" stylish theme for it, even if it's mostly just supposed to sit there on an unmonitored server. It would be interesting to see, pretty sure a whole lot would go "omg i need to get this" just because of that alone, like it was some kind of toy to rest your eyes on.

Personally, I don't really see the fun in testing a server OS. Seems a bit too risky to actually *test* it in a real environment, and if you don't, you aren't really testing it so you basically aren't helping out and just wasting Microsoft's resources.
#7.1 configure on 26 Nov 2004 - 11:36
QUOTE
I wonder how crazy people would get if they added an exclusive "cool" stylish theme for it,

Considering that the Theme service was turned off by default in 2K3, it will be very unlike for a new VS to be introduced. Beside, people who will be deploying Server OS aren't really the right audience for the new VS introduction.

QUOTE
Personally, I don't really see the fun in testing a server OS. Seems a bit too risky to actually *test* it in a real environment, and if you don't, you aren't really testing it so you basically aren't helping out and just wasting Microsoft's resources.

I don't think that Microsoft expect anyone to be testing this product in the production environment. Larger networks usually have an isolated network for testing purposes such as this one.

#8 chriscustom on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:27
this means sp1 almost final...
(1 reply) #9 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#9.1 neufuse on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:28
not everything has guest id's. testers were given beta id's for a reason.
#10 Mr. Dee on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:36
We currently use Standard Server, I would like to test out the Clustering features in Enterprise R2 to see what improvements they have made, also, I want see how well, patch management have been improved plus deploying active directory and server roles.

A few months back, I requested greater improvements in Server roles depending on the department of an organization, I need a better out of the box experience if I'm setting it up for a finance or purchasing department, it needs to be more aware. It would also be nice if they finally include Process Control, only available to Datacenter Server into both Standard and Enterprise edition, we admins running Standard and Enterprise want to tune our applications too to better take advantage of TCP/IP based Services and applications.

The branch management features should also be something to check out.
(2 replies) #11 Mr. Dee on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:44
Testers were specifically picked out because they were testing SP1 for Server 2k3. I guess Microsoft is already satisfied with the feed back they are getting from those set of testers, so they just decided, what the heck, lets stay with this group, we don't need anyone else.

Microsoft has also admitted this isn't a major difference from Server 2003, you can still use your existing CALs, plus its really just a role up of all the out of band technologies, Active Directory User Mode, Windows SharePoint Team Services released after Server 2003 to give Admins a break on the unnecessary downloading. Features such as the next generation Terminal Services, NAT were dropped for Longhorn Server instead.
#11.1 Jason on 25 Nov 2004 - 20:48
Still required more than a home user to test though.
#11.2 Mr. Dee on 25 Nov 2004 - 21:25
Obviously, you are not gonna put beta software in a production environment, probably make it join as a member server. I don't see the problem if even only one user test it on one computer, its still possible to find bugs anywhere you put it.

But the real problems are found mostly for Server betas when you put them in a network environment.

For features such as branch management, you might have to use your kitchen, living room, bathroom and bedroom for that.
#12 divertom15 on 25 Nov 2004 - 21:02
i got mine cant wait.
#13 P!mp$d on 25 Nov 2004 - 23:32
It makes one wonder how genuine this post is, when there are so many typos in the supposed quote.
#14 Sn4k36 on 26 Nov 2004 - 00:50
I hope i get a invite into this beta, I was on the beta testing team for windows server 2003 a few years back.
#15 matthelmi on 26 Nov 2004 - 14:35
i woder what will be new in r2
(2 replies) #16 CdCViRus on 26 Nov 2004 - 18:08
QUOTE
the Microsoft® Windows Server 2003 Beta Team would to extend the opportunity to participate in the upcoming "R2" beta program.


LOL
#16.1 Mr. Dee on 26 Nov 2004 - 18:16
Well, thats not strange, I have seen mis-spelling on Microsoft advertising (Small Business Server 2003, Quick Start Guide).

Plus, its done by a human being, we are not all perfect.
#16.2 blime on 26 Nov 2004 - 22:41
"Due to the outstanding contributions you made during the recent Windows SP1 beta, the Microsoft® Windows Server 2003 Beta Team would to extend the opportunity to participate in the upcoming "R2" beta program. The core of this release is built on the Windows Server 2003 SP1 platform and adds optionally-installable components that our customers have requested. This beta will all incorporate a number of key features that are of interest to customers who want to take advantage of new technologies available in the next release of Microsoft® Windows Server 2003."

What is Windows SP1? Really now...
#17 Hills420 on 27 Nov 2004 - 02:40
For some reason, I didn't get my invite

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)