main

Sun Grants Patent Access to Open Source Community

Mr magoo   on 26 January 2005 - 15:06 · 20 comments & 3482 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Sun, following in IBM's footsteps, have announced the company will grant open source projects access to over 1,600 patents, the largest single release of I.P. ever. Sun CEO Scott McNealy said "Today represents a huge milestone for Sun, for the community, for developers and for customers."

In a statement today, Sun said that they were allowing access to increase innovation and to level the playing field to software developers. They also commented that the move was in reaction to their growing concern at broad patents over software code, and an over-worked international patent system. The company appeared to be agreeing with a growing view that the system needs serious reform to continue working effectively and in the manner they were originally intended. Sun hope that this move will also reduce customer concerns about potential liability from using Open Source software.

Stacey Quandt, a Senior Business Analyst at The Robert Frances Group said "By gaining access to these Solaris OS patents, participants in the open-source community now have a tremendous opportunity to build unique and innovative technologies for a wide range of markets. An IP contribution of this magnitude has the potential to deliver exceptional value to developers and strengthens the overall open source community."

Sun said that the patents being offered ranged from kernel technology to network management, as well as newer Sun technology like anticipated Dynamic Tracing. The patents are being offered under the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL). Exactly how useful the access will be to developers is un-known; nor exactly how self-interested this move really is. The patent release comes as part of Sun's efforts to completely open source the Solaris operating system.

View: Sun Homepage


What's New in This Release:

1 View/change XP Key
2 View/Change MS office Key
3 View Win98 Key
4 view Win2000 Key
5 View .Net Key
6 View Win2003 Key
7 Back up WinXP Activation
8 Save Your Product Key By Encrypting It
9 Generate Unique Passwords By Entering your Combination of KeyCode
10 and many More

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 20 additional comments
#1 tiagosilva29 on 26 Jan 2005 - 15:21
Go, Open-Source!
#2 BigBoy on 26 Jan 2005 - 15:38
I guess Sun figured that with Solaris just being a failure looking long term - they can at least score some PR brownie points off of it.
(14 replies) #3 shichiroji4 on 26 Jan 2005 - 15:50
A desperate attempt by another dying company to go for the open source elixir. Why do these peeps always go open source when they are in deep ****? They don't have the spirit of sharing, all they want is to make a quick buck using people'shard work.
#3.1 B-52Stratofortress on 26 Jan 2005 - 15:52
I didn't know that IBM and Sun are dying?
#3.2 Jason on 26 Jan 2005 - 16:46
Sun obviously are.
#3.3 Soleen on 26 Jan 2005 - 16:58
Sun are not dying, it gained a lot of profit for the last year.
And for this year, after they fired over 30% of their programers(2 years ago), they are pretty much in a good shape, they even hiring back programmers.
#3.4 markjensen on 26 Jan 2005 - 17:05
Sun appears to be trying to re-invent itself and turn around from a slump and potential disaster. Novell seems to be off to a good start with their acquisition of SUSE Linux. IBM is putting weight behind Open Source. Firefox has risen from the ashes of Netscape (who released their code as open source as they died) and is making an impact on world-wide web browsing. Even OpenOffice.org is starting to be used by several people here where I work.

We may be starting to see the beginnings of a paradigm shift in the computing world.
#3.5 Jason on 26 Jan 2005 - 17:09
Hopefully not.
#3.6 ichi on 26 Jan 2005 - 17:18
QUOTE
Hopefully not.


Why not? (just out of curiosity).
#3.7 Jason on 26 Jan 2005 - 17:22
I do not like open source software and the geek image it has.

Software shouldn't be free (computers are not so why should software be?)and the source code that someone spent many many hours on should be his own personal property.
#3.8 WingZero on 26 Jan 2005 - 18:03
No one is denying that it is their property, as in the end it's their choice to share the code or not.
#3.9 bucko on 26 Jan 2005 - 18:04
And all of us college/school students are to pay for this how? I'm doing Interactive Design, how can I afford Photoshop 8 and 3D Studio Max without a job Jason?
#3.10 Knight' on 26 Jan 2005 - 18:04
@Jason

Ahh sounds like a scared commercial developer to me. The answer is simple however, just make better software. Competition is always good. The only thing it is bad for are the people it squeezes out
#3.11 Jason on 26 Jan 2005 - 18:16
I am a server admin not a programmer, just never been a fan of open source software, I don't agree with sharing someones hard work for free.

Bucko there are things called education licences also you'll learn that you can't always have what you want if you cannot afford it.
#3.12 bucko on 26 Jan 2005 - 19:02
education licences pfffft still money

e.g. MS Office Standard 2003 Academic Boxed Product £105.98

Jason I've already learned that, that's why I use Linux.
#3.13 markjensen on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:41
Ok, I know from past conversations that Jason is a big Microsoft fan and supporter. But let's make sure we keep discussing this without ganging up on the poor guy.

As a sysadmin, he will still be getting paid for his work in an Open Source world. In fact, others who write software get paid for their work, too (like OO.o writers are paid by Sun, Linux kernel writers are paid by IBM, Red Hat, Novell and others). Sure there are people who write in bits for free because they want to fix a bug, or add a feature. Some may ever just enjoy coding all day long (those are the stererotypical 'Star Trek fans who never leave their parent's basement).

In the Open Source 'gift economy' model, the payment of the development work for one piece of software is made, and the return on this 'investment' is made when others add features, too. Plus, you get to also use a wide variety of other apps you may not have performed development work on, but get to freely use - for example, an OO.o developer gets to freely use the Linux kernel, Apache webserver, MySQL and PHP to perhaps host his site that he shares his work on. Payment 10-fold for a bit of work helping the community on another project.

The computing paradigm shifted from proprietary hardware to commodity hardware with IBM's PC and it's open archetecture. And it has been good, as it made personal computing possible and affordable. The same might start to take place in software, as well. Even today there is a place for the proprietary computing hardware (we have many robots where I work that use a custom computer to run), and the future will hold a place for proprietary computing sofware, as well. Open Source will not take over 100% of software, but can be a hugely significant market in the next 10 years.
#3.14 open_coder on 31 Jan 2005 - 00:31
Markjensen brings up a great point, Jason. Computing is what it is today because of open sourcing technology. Way back when, the first IBM computer was the first personal computer. They opened up their architecture to all of us. If IBM hadn't done so, it would be like Apple. IBM would be the only people who made pcs. Are you saying that this is how it should be. I personally like being able to choose different manufacturers and companies for the many parts of my computer.

--Alex
(1 reply) #4 nw_raptor on 26 Jan 2005 - 15:50
Suddently Sun is gaining my sympathy!
#4.1 Soleen on 26 Jan 2005 - 17:00
Most of Sun projects are open source,
they even are going to make Solaris and Java to be open source by the end of the summer. Yet, they will develop these projects them self, and not make an open source community to develop those for them.
#5 Knight' on 26 Jan 2005 - 18:08
Forget Solaris, open source Java FFS!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)