Ending speculation about whether it was shifting to a paid model, Microsoft said on Tuesday that it will provide customers with its new anti-spyware software for free.

The pledge, made by Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates during his keynote speech kicking off the RSA Conference 2005 here, comes after the company had been testing its AntiSpyware application--technology it acquired with its purchase of security software maker Giant Software.

"Just as spyware is something that we have to nip down today, we have decided that all licensed Windows users should have that protection at no charge," Gates said. The initiative is part of Microsoft's efforts to strengthen security for home and business users of its Windows desktop software. Consumers are not always aware of the dangers of such threats as spyware, viruses and "phishing." A study published last October found that more than 80 percent of consumers had been infected by spyware.

News source: C|Net News.com


The announcement in full (also available at the IE Team Web Blog)

Featured Community Site Owners,

Today at RSA, Bill Gates talked about Internet Explorer 7. As the guy responsible for IE, I wanted to say a couple of things about it.

First, some basics: we’re committing to deliver a new version of Internet Explorer for Windows XP customers. Betas of IE7 will be available this summer. This new release will build on the work we did in Windows XP SP2 and (among other things) go further to defend users from phishing as well as deceptive or malicious software.

Why? Because we listened to a lot of customers, analysts, and business partners. We heard a clear message: “Yes, SP2 makes the situation better. We want more, sooner. We want security on top of the compatibility and extensibility IE gives us, and we want it on XP. Microsoft, show us your commitment.”

I think of today’s announcement as a clear statement back to our customers: “Hey, Microsoft heard you. We’re committing.”

Why are we talking about it today? Because our customers have asked us, with increasing urgency, what our plans are. We want to convey our intentions to our customers clearly and in a timely way.

I’ve gotten questions about the ship date. We know that feedback from customers and partners is crucial. We’re going to release a beta and listen, then refresh the beta and listen some more. We’ll ship when the product is right.

I’ve gotten other questions about support for Windows 2000. Right now, we’re actively listening to our major Windows 2000 customers about what they want and comparing that to the engineering complexity of that work. That’s all I can say on that topic.

Please know that the IE team is working hard. We’re eager to improve and better secure the web experience for the hundreds of millions of IE users around the world. We delivered on XP SP2. We are actively delivering on our part of a great 64-bit Windows client. We continue to deliver on security updates for customers who have not moved to XP SP2. We’re going to deliver on IE7.

Dean Hachamovitch

General Manager, IE Core Development Team



There are 81 additional comments
Advertisement
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by joseph0324 on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:31
Go Microsoft!!!!
Quote this comment #1.1 Posted by lotus22 on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:47
Microsoft Anti-Spyware in my opinion is the best out right now. Detects stuff Ad-Aware and Spybot doesn't. Great product. Props to MS for keeping it free.
Quote this comment #1.2 Posted by riscy on 17 Feb 2005 - 21:03
I beg to differ, I found that the MS Beta version didn't pick up a whole raft of spyware and Adaware was required to clean the computer. I use both now.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by b0m8er on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:32
Excellent. So what's the release date?
Quote this comment #2.1 Posted by Mr. Dee on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:24
One more beta to go before final release. The first beta is suppose expire by July.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by rajputwarrior on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:34
that is good to here, but the beta they are running now is still the best so i am in no real rush to get it
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by CeruleanCowboy on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:36
that's great news. its about time Microsoft offered something really good for free!
Quote this comment #4.1 Posted by theyarecomingforyou on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:12
I couldn't seem them charging for it, really. It wouldn't have made sense to buy the company and then only bundle it with MSN or some other charge service.

I think this is good news... particularly as other anti-spyware apps are starting to look questionable, making deals with particular companies.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by Daninku on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:39
Yay... I like this. I can see some improvements from Microsoft lately Wee need more hehe!!
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by WinMacLin on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:45
This is so cool!!

Now all we need is a free Antivirus! (I bet Microsoft could give better antivirus since well they did make windows the system being infected)
Quote this comment #6.1 Posted by Shining Arcanine on 17 Feb 2005 - 00:34
Microsoft would probably be sued for giving away a free AntiVirus.
Quote this comment #6.2 Posted by bush on 17 Feb 2005 - 13:58
why so?
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #7 Posted by mcman on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:51
This is good news.

Hopefully they will not try and add it into windows, or they will find them self's in court again
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #8 Posted by PeteWhite on 16 Feb 2005 - 16:53
hmmm, I don't want to be the pessimistic one, but I can see another law suit on it's way!!
Quote this comment #8.1 Posted by chisss on 16 Feb 2005 - 18:16
as long as they do not bundle it with windows there is no reason for a lawsuit
Quote this comment #8.2 Posted by Shining Arcanine on 17 Feb 2005 - 00:35
Everything in Windows XP is intergraded rather than bundled.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #9 Posted by Oogle on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:00
Free is great. Just don't force-bundle it on me like Windows Movie Maker. Give me a choice to not install it. (There's no way in hell that someone can convince me that a movie maker is an integral part of the OS.)
Quote this comment #9.1 Posted by tiagosilva29 on 16 Feb 2005 - 20:39
#Roger
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #10 Posted by Jason on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:01
Why not quote the real source to where it reported the Antispyware program was free ??


http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/feb05/02-15RSA05KeynotePR.asp

"expanding anti-spyware protection by including the Windows® AntiSpyware technology at no additional charge as part of the Windows value proposition"
(7 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #11 Posted by Pabs(Sco) on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:07
free!!! Good!!! Cause they messed up the OS in the first place, if the OS was better secured then we wouldn't need it.
Quote this comment #11.1 Posted by Sierra Sonic on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:16
You do know as the OS becomes more popular it gets more and more attacked, Windows is just as secure as any linux or macintosh computer.

Firefox is already proving that Open Source programs are just as safe as Closed Source programs. FF is getting spyware now, and soon it would be worse off than IE. It all about popularity and how big of a target you are to hackers.
Quote this comment #11.2 Posted by sdkaneda on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:22
actually, in the webserver world, linux is the majority. a lot of the remote exploits that work on consumer versions of windows also work fabulously on server versions of windows, therefore linux is the more secure choice for servers. it's also the more secure choice for a consumer operating system, though only by virtue of its relative obscurity in that case.
Quote this comment #11.3 Posted by Treefrog on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:51
QUOTE
You do know as the OS becomes more popular it gets more and more attacked, Windows is just as secure as any linux or macintosh computer.

Firefox is already proving that Open Source programs are just as safe as Closed Source programs. FF is getting spyware now, and soon it would be worse off than IE. It all about popularity and how big of a target you are to hackers.


You do know you're just spouting long disproven FUD? Right?
Quote this comment #11.4 Posted by PCyr on 16 Feb 2005 - 23:47
This is typical FUD. I can understand statements like this for exploits, but for spyware, it is just stupid. You can prevent spyware, but you wouldn't be able to install any programs, or change system settings. Your system would be essentially locked down. You could run things, but not make ANY modifications.

Pabs(Sco) obviously does not understand how spyware works.
Quote this comment #11.5 Posted by threedaysdwn on 17 Feb 2005 - 00:57
QUOTE
actually, in the webserver world, linux is the majority. a lot of the remote exploits that work on consumer versions of windows also work fabulously on server versions of windows, therefore linux is the more secure choice for servers. it's also the more secure choice for a consumer operating system, though only by virtue of its relative obscurity in that case.


Umm... no?

In fact, nearly every exploit that has affected Windows XP over the last two years has had no (or significantly mitigated) impact on Windows Server 2003.

Furthermore, as web servers go, Linux is far from the top of the security list. Windows and FreeBSD kick its butt. But even FreeBSD can't fix all the problems with Apache.
Quote this comment #11.6 Posted by bush on 17 Feb 2005 - 14:01
yeah, well i'm actually waiting for the moment when all this open-source bubble will(probably) blow up and everyone will realise, that open-source is much more dangerous than the closed one(again probably)
Quote this comment #11.7 Posted by Octol on 17 Feb 2005 - 15:59
QUOTE
...if the OS was better secured then we wouldn't need it.

Ever heard the expression about, "Putting your brain in gear before engaging your mouth"?

Probably not.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #12 Posted by koocha on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:08
lovely stuff. I was using GIANT before Microsoft bought it
(10 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #13 Posted by sdkaneda on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:18
the best anti-spyware measure you can get has been out for free for some time now!

Quote this comment #13.1 Posted by BigCheese on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:24
go away troll
Quote this comment #13.2 Posted by Jason on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:36
http://news.com.com/Spyware+takes+aim+at+Mozilla+browsers/2100-7349_3-5569635.html
Quote this comment #13.3 Posted by Angry_Badger on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:50
Wow, a piece of spyware that attempts to install itself on Firefox. It wont get very far since xpi's need to be manually added to a whitelist first. The rest of the article is pure speculation

"stealth spyware targeted at Firefox is bound to happen as hackers are currently working hard trying to find security holes in the open-source browser"

Really? Well next time you've got your crystal ball out why not predict how many exploits that allow remote code execution will appear in IE this year. (ie had 5 last year alone, FF and opera had none)
Quote this comment #13.4 Posted by joseph0324 on 16 Feb 2005 - 18:09
Yeah, because FireF*^&ingFox is combination of firewall+Anti Virus+Anti Spyware.

F?%& off, you ignorant typical Firefox troll.
Quote this comment #13.5 Posted by markjensen on 16 Feb 2005 - 18:10
Jeez. Regardless of *which* browser you choose to use, it is a good idea to have anti-spyware.

Quit trolling.
Quote this comment #13.6 Posted by Ava3ar on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:13
everyone should use links, no spyware for that
Quote this comment #13.7 Posted by threedaysdwn on 17 Feb 2005 - 01:02
Most spyware isn't installed because of a browser vulnerability. It's installed because the user runs it.

For instance, the most common entry points for spyware are:
AOL Instant Messenger
Messenger Plus
Ares
Kazaa
Grokster
"Free pop-up blocker/toolbar/weather checker/bonzai buddy crap"

All of those things are installed by the user, and it doesn't matter what browser you're using. EVEN if you're using an LUA account, if you are actively trying to install something (like AIM or Kazaa), naive users will input their Admin passwords freely.

I think, not necessarily the software but rather the functionality, should be built in to Windows.

Windows should alert you EVERY time ANYTHING tries to add itself to an automatic startup list, no matter where. A simple "allow/disallow" box should show up. That's exactly what makes MS AntiSpyware so great... it will tell users exactly what a program is trying to change on their system.
Quote this comment #13.8 Posted by lare2 on 17 Feb 2005 - 01:15
Can't beleive that he even include an image to his troll post.
Quote this comment #13.9 Posted by Denver_80203 on 17 Feb 2005 - 06:18
Why would you say he's trolling? Since I switched to FF I have gone from regualr infestations of crapware to ZERO. instantly. I still update/run Ad-aware from time to time and I was convinced that ad-aware was either broken or not updating properly. Not so.

I'm no linux fanboy MS hater.. I just see absolutely no reason to use IE. I have no problems with secure pages (bank, etc) no poorly rendered pages, no nothing.

On top of that I have a better experience. Tabbed browsing, gestures, no find dialog box geting in the way, better results printing, NO banner ads blinking and bouncing, no loss of content... It's CHANGED me. Same thing happened to netscape ages ago... it's going to take a lot to reel me back in. I've lost trust in MS when it comes to IE.

Heck my machine runs better.
Quote this comment #13.10 Posted by SquareSoft0 on 17 Feb 2005 - 07:55
If you have spyware problems with IE then you have much more problems with your brain.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #14 Posted by bangbang023 on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:19
Hmm, now maybe I will have to look into using it.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #15 Posted by quick on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:28
Thats great... Very surprising though.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #16 Posted by kronik on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:44
wow Microsoft's recent focus on security has been quite impressive
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #17 Posted by nic on 16 Feb 2005 - 17:57
Microsoft should be focussed on security as much as automobile makers need to be focussed on safety.

The majoridy of Microsoft's user base would fall under that category of n00b. (Not trying to critisise windows users; it's just that everyone and their dogs use it). They really need to create a safe environment for the n00bs to use their computer's and access the internet w/o the violation of the user's privacy and keeping the user's data safe. This really needs to come before new features, or eye candy is added. So far, Microsoft has failed these n00bs horribly. People, like most of us, that are in the know haven't had many problems.

I just felt like stating the obvious.
Quote this comment #17.1 Posted by frankchn on 17 Feb 2005 - 09:55
but all n00bs want is new features OR eye candy
Quote this comment #17.2 Posted by Ji@nBing on 17 Feb 2005 - 12:52
That's simply not true. MS is not focusing mostly on new features and eye candy. Just look at the beta one of longhorn. It's not even going to have the eye candy and such implemented. The whole focus of it is on security and stability. Then they will add the eye candy and such in future betas. Security and stability are now MS's #1 priority and that's a good thing.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #18 Posted by hashonboat on 16 Feb 2005 - 18:15
I've been actually using this at work on production machines and it is VERY promising and already very good in it's current form...
(4 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #19 Posted by Mr. Dee on 16 Feb 2005 - 18:38
Any information about IE 8 yet?
Quote this comment #19.1 Posted by Jason on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:05
We know nothing of IE 7 yet.
Quote this comment #19.2 Posted by finalcoolman on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:05
Quote this comment #19.3 Posted by i like chips on 16 Feb 2005 - 20:09
ahaha......ahahahahaha.......AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHA 8/10 for effort.
Quote this comment #19.4 Posted by lare2 on 17 Feb 2005 - 01:16
Going to fast buddy
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #20 Posted by kowcop on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:21
*******s!! there HAs to be something devious behind this, come on it's Microsoft the devil!! How dare they, I am going to sue... hehe..

Good on you MS. :0) I cant wait for the final version
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #21 Posted by Help on 16 Feb 2005 - 19:48
Pay version is version 2.
The point: Spread the software (cause they can't ship it with the OS), than make'em pay.
Quote this comment #21.1 Posted by frazell on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:14
Except you forget that MS, unlike many companys, isn't cash strapped. Offering this software for free is not going to hurt their bottom line. Just as offering Windows Media Player for free dosen't hurt their bottom line, while Real sells Real Player, because their bottom line depends on it.

I doub't AntiSpyware will go paid, simply because it makes Windows more attractive...
Quote this comment #21.2 Posted by threedaysdwn on 17 Feb 2005 - 01:04
Microsoft won't charge users for this. I expect it to show up on Windows Update in a few months. And I expect the upcoming "Microsoft Update" services to work in conjunction with it (although it seems to do a good job keeping itself up to date regardless).

I expect they'll include it with Longhorn (or at least the functionality).

Despite what you may hear, Microsoft doesn't want to "force" people into using inferior technology. They want you to CHOOSE their products because they're the best. It's not like they're going to pass up an opportunity to make their customers happier. That is, after all, the best way to keep them.


Last edited by 30311 on 17 Feb 2005 - 02:43
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #22 Posted by Another_Paul on 16 Feb 2005 - 20:27
Cool. I hope they were going to do that.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #23 Posted by xUnix on 16 Feb 2005 - 20:28
Finally... Micro$oft is doing something!
(3 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #24 Posted by King Rilian on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:18
Um, I downloaded this almost a week ago. Here's the link for the beta.

If that doesn't work, try this. It should be the first one listed. And no, you don't need to validate your Windows, you'll see. You can just download it. I don't know why they have that link there when you don't need to do it.

I can't believe I got the obvious news scoop before Neowin news did. WOOT!
Quote this comment #24.1 Posted by versiondub on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:41
Sorry bro - the news is that microsoft is offering this for free. The fact that they released a beta of this software is old news, and was on neowin a month or two ago. Nice try though...
Quote this comment #24.2 Posted by lare2 on 17 Feb 2005 - 01:18
Before wasting your time writing this post. waste it reading the article
Quote this comment #24.3 Posted by ev0| on 17 Feb 2005 - 04:23
QUOTE
I don't know why they have that link there when you don't need to do it.


They're gonna remove that soon, and it will be mandatory. Might as well validate now, get it over with
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #25 Posted by eilegz on 16 Feb 2005 - 21:46
its good news i expected that they would charge too bad that its only for windows 2000 and up no windows 98 version
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #26 Posted by Stunod7 on 16 Feb 2005 - 22:14
I hope that their MMC snap in is free too. That would be the tits.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #27 Posted by olger901 on 16 Feb 2005 - 23:52
As often said Nothing a commercial company offers you is for free (Santa Claus doesn't exist). The only thing you will get for free is Sunrise and Sunset. There is always a fine print. With this case aswell. If you actually read the fine prints in the Windows License Agreement, you would know that you pay for all parts of windows; All apps in Windows are included in the Windows License fee. (You know the 219 dollars you paid for XP Pro?) That is why many people told microsoft to remove IE, Windows Media Player, Windows Movie maker and all other useless bloatware out of windows. Why? Because if it wasn't there, there would have been less developping costs meaning the OS could have had a cheaper price.
Quote this comment #27.1 Posted by Ideas Man on 17 Feb 2005 - 05:01
Um, no. They are bundled to make it more compelling to purchase, you don't pay for it. Take the EU example, WMP is taken out, but it costs the same.
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #28 Posted by Magallanes on 17 Feb 2005 - 00:51
Everyone saw:

MS tried to push the spywarers out of their windows machine.

And the truth is:
... and MS tried to put themself like the only one spyware, in fact the anti-spyware came (i think so) with automatic update (connecting to redmond microsoft from xxx windows with yyy serial number....) ;-)


Anyways, windows updated, a iexplorer correctly configured and NOT TO SAY "YES" TO ANY QUESTION is enough for stay secure of spywares (at least in browsing). I ran ad-aware (updated) just to check my pc, i found almost 50 o 60 "spywares", checking it i found that the "spywares" was only cookies. Cookies can show datas only of the webpages checked (or from the ads), if you find some paranoid then you can delete the cookies daily, for the rest of the users, cookies means nothing, with the cookies they cannot obtain your datas, your passwords.. they just see "some ip visit x pron page many times".. Using Mozilla is also a solution (updated of course).

Sadly spywares also can be installed by programs, such Kazaa (no lite), Exeem and such, the only protection against it is NOT INSTALL IT. In some cases there are not solution, for example c-dilla macrovision from Autocad (a semi-spyware) without it, autocad don't run.



Quote this comment #28.1 Posted by hax0red on 17 Feb 2005 - 04:51
yes, but not everyone knows that. the average user doesn't even know what a browsing cookie is, let alone activex.
Quote this comment #28.2 Posted by Ideas Man on 17 Feb 2005 - 05:05
That's true. I wouldn't be suprised if most of the 'spyware' that user's get with IE is cookies, so they switch to firefox to get away from them. There's a simple fix for that, boost the cookie level.

I run this on my computer at school, I've had 0 spyware for 3 years on it, running IE etc. Note: No need to turn this into a browser war, if you want to do that with your childish firefox crap, go somewhere else.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #29 Posted by snips on 17 Feb 2005 - 02:15
Great news!
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #30 Posted by Osiris on 17 Feb 2005 - 02:25
Well I don't see how anyone can not be happy with this news. MS could have made money off this, as the fact is despite their being free ones, people would have paid for this. I think its a good move by MS. I tip my hat to them.
Quote this comment #30.1 Posted by Ideas Man on 17 Feb 2005 - 05:07
Yeah, Lavasoft. They offer that free version, but lock out lots of features to try to get you to pay for it. The Microsoft one is better in many ways than their paid software, and it's free.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #31 Posted by Xerxes on 17 Feb 2005 - 03:24
This is excellent news, been using the beta version of it for a while now and I'm very impressed by it
(3 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #32 Posted by shichiroji4 on 17 Feb 2005 - 05:27
Typical bullying tactic by M$ trying to bundle their stuff together with the OS in an attempt to drive other smaller companies out of business.

"Free!?" No chance. M$ Antispy is about as free as IE or WMP - i.e. you are paying for them when your purchase the OS. It takes a noob not to see pass this silly gimick.
Quote this comment #32.1 Posted by hosebeast on 17 Feb 2005 - 05:36
Except that the OS price isn't going up, and when I bought my OS, I made the decision without knowing that this freebie was coming. Therefore, it truly is free.

The fact that you need to be a licensed user of Windows to get the freebie is a no-brainer. Who else would have any (legal) use for a free copy of Windows-based software besides licensed users of Windows??
Quote this comment #32.2 Posted by SquareSoft0 on 17 Feb 2005 - 08:02
Poor trolling attempt shichi, I really want you to hit the books at the Troll University.

The version of Windows WITHOUT WMP costs the SAME as the one WITH WMP. This software currently IS free, and will continue to be so for licensed Windows users.
Quote this comment #32.3 Posted by eilegz on 17 Feb 2005 - 14:12
agree with shichi nothing coming from microsoft its free but as i criticize that microsoft its doing wrong i can say that the decision to giving free the antispyware its a very good one and i praise them.

Just to avoid problems they just should not include this into the OS and let it dl for free like they r doing now.

well with ie7 and antispyware coming what its the next thing we could expect (microsoft antivirus and beef and windows firewall 3)
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #33 Posted by Samoa on 17 Feb 2005 - 08:04
I forsee the EU suing Microsoft for offering free anti-spyware software with Windows.
Quote this comment #33.1 Posted by BigCheese on 17 Feb 2005 - 10:16
Well, Microsoft aren't supplying it with windows. Its a separate free download.
Quote this comment #33.2 Posted by eilegz on 17 Feb 2005 - 14:13
yeah agree with big cheese stay like it and nothing bad and wrong will happen no lawsuit and it would be a paradise i guess
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #34 Posted by bush on 17 Feb 2005 - 13:56
hate the word phishing
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #35 Posted by SniperX on 18 Feb 2005 - 01:40
Same old same old from where I'm sitting. Release it as free, let users get dependant on it, then charge for it in a year or two. Watch this space...
[1]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


Scroll to the Top
....
My Preferences
....
Communicating with server
Loading
Please Wait...
....
Loading
 X 
....