main

Microsoft drops MSBlast writer's $500,000 penalty

Brad Wardell   on 30 March 2005 - 18:50 · 52 comments & 3520 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Jeffrey Lee Parson, the teen convicted of writing a variant of the MSBlast worm, won't have to pay $500,000 in restitution.

The damages were to be paid to Microsoft for the teen's actions, which piggybacked on a worm that temporarily downed the software giant's Web site in 2003. The tech behemoth has asked that the 19-year-old's punishment be converted from the fine to 225 hours of community service.

View: Full Story


iPOD’s secret is marketing. iPOD won its first battle in 2002 when it surpassed Creative’s hard-disk based MP3 player which even had a smaller price. The secret weapon? The marketing team behind iPOD managed to promote the idea that iPOD is not just an equipment for playing music, but a whole concept. In December 2002, iPOD launches models that bear the signatures of stars like Madonna, Beck, Tony Hawk and No Doubt. All the celebrities fell in love with the little player, which made a career in video clips, music magazine, even at Oprah’s shows. Where could you get a better marketing?

iPOD’s second secret was Microsoft’s Windows. The first iPOD models launched in October 2001 only worked with Macs and iTunes program which copied CDs and then transferred to iPOD. Apple thought then that this combination will be enough to ensure the player’s success. By July 2002, 150,000 units had been sold. People were not ready to buy a Mac fro the sake o a MP3 player.

In July 2002 realized that and launched Windows compatible models which used as transfer software MusicMatch. In less than two years, iPod sales reached 2 million units. Microsoft found out too late what had happened and HP declared that is too late to think about an alternative and prefers to launch an iPOD version together with Apple. iTunes Music Store and the download revolution owe iPOD their celebrity and not the other way around.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 52 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Netrack on 30 Mar 2005 - 18:51
i like what MS did there....they didnt need the money so give it to the community
#1.1 mealbundy on 30 Mar 2005 - 21:09
Very odd, very odd indeed. MS with moral value? Teach instead of punish? nah, cant be MS.
#1.2 MaceX on 31 Mar 2005 - 02:04
probably because he didn't create MS Blaster as the article's title implies. He just slightly modified the source code to upload stuff to his website or something like that.
#2 binarylime on 30 Mar 2005 - 18:58
yeah, well I hope he enjoys the 18 months in prison...
(3 replies) #3 lotus22 on 30 Mar 2005 - 18:58
what is a behemoth
#3.1 paulhaskew on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:01
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=behemoth
#3.2 Surr3al on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:58
http://www.tfd.com/behemoth
#3.3 Caleb on 31 Mar 2005 - 06:14
That's a huge b*tch.
#4 Gowcra on 30 Mar 2005 - 18:58
Yes, Indeed. MS do give back to the community. Or probally realized the little ******* wouldnt be able to pay it back,
#5 binarylime on 30 Mar 2005 - 18:59
a really huge thing... like: Parsons was a bohemoth of a kid... fat... house-like... not with cat-like reflexes...
(1 reply) #6 binarylime on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:00
he'll be paying for it... in other ways...
#6.1 Lucida on 31 Mar 2005 - 07:35
yeah, you're right
(6 replies) #7 SunnyB on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:02
Maybe MS isn't the greedy, overbearing, steamrolling mega-corp that they
have been portrayed. 225 hours of service doesn't amount to $500,000
in my book. The kid should thank heaven and Microsoft for the break.

I wonder how much Microsoft donates to charities every year?
Good guys, Microsoft.

#7.1 markjensen on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:10
Yeah. Calculating it out, this virus writer is getting paid $2,222 an hour! (and will probably get hired somewhere if he hasn't already)
#7.2 epple on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:31
How is he making $2'222 an hour?
#7.3 C_Guy on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:41
He "makes" it this way:

225 hours @ $2,222 per hour = $500,000, his initial fine. He's "making" $2,222 an hour because after 225 hours he has re-paid his 1/2 mil debt to society.

Wish I could get a job like that!


...C_Guy
#7.4 lester_kun on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:07
My goodness, why it has to be a punishment? I would be really happy earning US$2,222 per hour.
#7.5 M2Ys4U on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:12
he's not earning, he's just not paying
#7.6 Skyfrog on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:22
QUOTE
He's "making" $2,222 an hour


Uh, no. He is not paying off his fine by doing community service. There is no fine now, it's gone. The community service he's doing is to pay for the crime he commited.

Last edited by 3601 on 31 Mar 2005 - 04:26
(8 replies) #8 Shadow Dragon on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:07
Yep, this once again shows that "M$" aren't "evil" at all, as soo many braindead haters claim.
#8.1 BigCheese on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:24
Yeah, I just don't understand why everyone hates Microsoft so much.
#8.2 M2Ys4U on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:13
jelousy, evny...
#8.3 D-j-M on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:20
I think the real reason is because someone else does. Sheep.
#8.4 Jonax on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:34
The only ones who hate Microsoft outright are the bandwagoners really.

I'll admit that I am one to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt usually, but the fact is that they have done a great deal of development - DirectX (those who knew what PC games were like pre-DX would know what I mean), the Sidewinder hardware line (although sadly discontinued ), the Xbox (although the hardcore PS2 & GC fanboys might call it the devil).

Just that for every good thing that Microsoft makes, there's usually something made that has a considerable problem - Windows is stable for the more simpler users, outside of that there's a 50% chance of it becoming less stable than home-made napalm. IE is the main target for many internet ****tards making it the most unsafe browser to use*, although it is intergrated down to the system. WMP is a decent media player, but even if I want to use something else I'm stuck with it on my system when I could use the space for something else. And the Palladium plan** doesn't really need to be said.

Hating parts of Microsoft is having your own opinion - Hating all of Microsoft is most likely climbing on the bandwagon. Hell, even Blake Ross, who led the Firefox effort, didn't do it to spite Microsoft.

*Disclaimer: For those who don't know how to lock it down properly.
** which for some reason has come back to my brain - Probably an old forum post
#8.5 threedaysdwn on 30 Mar 2005 - 21:22
QUOTE
WMP is a decent media player, but even if I want to use something else I'm stuck with it on my system when I could use the space for something else. And the Palladium plan** doesn't really need to be said.


The space that WMP takes up (and has always taken up since Windows 3.1) is negligible. The "wmplayer.exe" app is only the interface to the Windows Media platform, much as IE is only one shell for a similar platform. Countless developers employ Windows Media (and IE) functionality into their code. It's much easier to tell Windows that you want to play a sound (and telling it which file), than to write your own code to decode the file and send PCM data directly to the soundcard.

As for Palladium, it's kind of stupid to hate them for something they haven't done. The Palladium design was dropped or put on hold, for the most part. And there was also a significant degree of misunderstanding. Despite some obvious gripes with the Palladium proposal that many of us had, there were significant benefits to it. And I do hope those get employed soon.
#8.6 Jonax on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:06
It isn't that I hated the thought of Palladium, more that I feared the consequences of it. And a lot of the rumours about it were pretty much scaremongering

Anyway, I did believe for the most part that it was extinct - Just that after hearing of it again on another forum made me have that annoying thought in the back of my head *swats it*
#8.7 M2Ys4U on 31 Mar 2005 - 00:04
it's not exticnt, it's just been renamed to trick people (or so I've head)

'trusted computing' is the latest version IIRC
#8.8 Jugalator on 31 Mar 2005 - 01:30
Yes, or NGSCB.

Here's an example where Microsoft makes it clear that "Palladium" was a code name for NGSCB.
(3 replies) #9 HellBender on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:17
I'm very, very impressed... And actually quite thankful to Microsoft for doing this. Forcing the kid to pay $500,000 would pretty much ruin his life and leave him in debt forever. While many of you might pipe up with "HE DESERVES IT!" think about it for a second. He just coded that for fun with no malacious intent, and even if he did mean for it to destroy so many computers, its a single mistake and definitely doesn't deserve his life ruined. If anything, he improved the security on countless machines so that something worse didn't come along.

Community service hours will teach him a lesson. He'll be just as sorry doing community service hours as he would've been paying the $500,000. The difference is... You aren't ruining his life (and his family's life) in this process.

Although, I would've preferred a little more community service time. 1,000+ hours seems a lot more reasonable.
#9.1 Sub on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:28
Lets look at the facts. If Microsoft would get a judgement against this kid for $500,000, he will claim bankrupcy and it will all go away. Instead Microsoft is forcing this kid to work in a ****ty enviornment, most likly picking up trash for the next 6 months to a year. I'd rather have the $500,000 fine.
#9.2 Cephas on 30 Mar 2005 - 19:38
Community service isn't that bad. I had to maintain the computers in a children's community centre and it was a pretty good experience. Also, the fine would still screw the guy over, because he'd have a really bad credit rating afterwards.
#9.3 HellBender on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:52
Yeah, community service is boring more than anything. I had to do 40 hours of community service for something I did... I did all of my hours at the offices of EMQ (they're a program to care for battered children). I got my own office and everything. I had to do a bunch of data entry... The people there were super nice and really appreciated it. After I finished my 40 hours, I still went back and did about 100 more hours over the last couple of years, just to help them out (and so that I would have volunteer work on my graduate application).
#10 EduardValencia on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:10
well i think the MF can't pay the damn DEBT
#11 imtoomuch on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:36
It's good MS did this because they would have never seen $500,00 from this kid. The punishment should have been a lot harsher than 200 hours of community service and this little ****er should serve prison time.
#12 Solarix on 30 Mar 2005 - 20:53
ud thinkg the punishment would be harsher after what he did, fun intent or not
(3 replies) #13 ThunderRiver on 30 Mar 2005 - 21:07
My machine got infected by MSBlaster once, and I was actually quite impressed Though I resort to format and reinstallation, I think the punishment of community service is very good.

In fact, I would not even be surprised if Microsoft decides to hire that kid in the future. It is not the first time MS hires a hacker or virus writer to improve its system security anyway.
#13.1 Alien_II on 30 Mar 2005 - 21:17
Wow.. no wonder windows spreads that fast... a friend of mine once told me windows is like a virus.... now i know why -- thank you for pointing this out to me!!!
</sarcasm>
#13.2 hellosky on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:22
This fatass stole the original MSBlaster code and tagged it with his name! This kid is NOT a hacker! He's a n00b!
#13.3 mx3 on 31 Mar 2005 - 06:46


^ god, he IS a fatass n00b
(2 replies) #14 slimy on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:01
i would do 225 community hours for 500,000
#14.1 epple on 30 Mar 2005 - 23:09
He won't get $500K after he has done his community service.
#14.2 stanneh on 31 Mar 2005 - 14:20
im trying to work out what someone in this condition could do for the comunity as a service other than sweat?
(1 reply) #15 Ruciz on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:22
wish I could make $1900 an hour. If he made double a decent wage (~$29 an hour) it would take very close to 6 solid years at 8 hours a day to repay the $500 000. I guess justice was served
#15.1 Skyfrog on 31 Mar 2005 - 04:30
GAHHH! What is so hard to understand about this? There is NO FINE anymore! It's was dropped, it does not exist. He is doing the community service to pay for his wrong doing, not to pay a fine. He's is not getting paid anything.
#16 funnyperson1 on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:39
It's simple, MS is milking this for PR rather than ruining some kids life and looking like douchebags for an amount of money that really is miniscule to them. MS isn't a kind giant, they are still the money-grubbing corporation, they simple ceased a great oppurtunity for positive publicity....and apparently its working on some of you.
#17 TheSarge on 30 Mar 2005 - 22:50
Anyone wanna bet that M$ will be hiring Mr. Virus Writer?
I do.
#18 Codegen on 31 Mar 2005 - 00:33
Don't mean to make any flamebait here. But it's kinda weird for a company to do this that sued a guy called Mike Rowe for calling his company called Mike Rowe Soft.

Ah well, I'd rather do 225 hours of C.S. then pay a 500 grand fine.
#19 stanneh on 31 Mar 2005 - 03:02
msblast took a lot of peaples computers down how come m$ get the final say?
#20 russ0943 on 31 Mar 2005 - 04:07
good 4 ms
#21 Spitfire_x86 on 31 Mar 2005 - 05:24
The kid probably cound't pay $500,000 anyway, so M$ suggested for alternative punishment.
(1 reply) #22 Valkyre on 31 Mar 2005 - 07:13
Don't be so stupid. Microsoft didn't do it out of the goodness of their heart, they did it because that kid would never have been able to pay it off. They realized this and made it look like they were giving the kid a break.
#22.1 stanneh on 31 Mar 2005 - 14:11
Right on if Micro$oft thaught for 1 second there was a possiblity they could get that money from him they would be allthough i still dont see why M$ should be allowed to do this and not every single user who was infected by msblast why is it only M$ who deserve justice?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)