main

AMD may advance dual-core Opteron processor launch

malebolgia on 01 April 2005 - 15:24 · 24 comments & 2337 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which originally was scheduled to launch its dual-core Opteron processor in the third quarter of this year, may advance the launch to the middle of the second quarter, according to sources at Taiwan server makers. In the second quarter, the sources believe that AMD will launch its dual-core Opteron 200 and 800 series processors, with the respective codenames Italy and Egypt, for servers that incorporate two or more processors.

News source: DigiTimes


"Computer users can stop phishers by not responding to an e-mail or pop-up that asks for personal information," said Lydia Parnes of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Just delete it."

"Phishing is more than a dirty trick played on unsuspecting consumers - it's a serious identity theft problem," said Grant. "In little over a year it's become one of the top scams reported to our National Fraud Information Center and Internet Fraud Watch program."

"The Internet has revolutionized the way we communicate, transact business and educate ourselves," said Aaron Kornblum, Internet Safety Enforcement attorney at Microsoft. "We must work together to stop these con artists from misusing the Internet as a tool for fraud. Microsoft provides consumers with the information and technology that will help protect all of us from this pervasive and destructive threat, and has filed legal action today against some of these individuals."

Kornblum announced that Microsoft is filing 117 lawsuits against alleged phishers as part of its commitment to protecting consumers against phishing and other cybercrime. The company is filing the lawsuits today in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle against John Doe defendants.

Through today's sweep of John Doe lawsuits, Microsoft's legal team hopes to establish connections between phishing scams worldwide and uncover the largest-volume operators.

Internet users should follow these simple steps to avoid phishing scams:

Be suspicious if someone contacts you unexpectedly and asks for your personal information. It's hard to tell whether something is legitimate by looking at an e-mail or a Web site, or talking to someone on the phone. But if you're contacted out of the blue and asked for your personal information, it's a warning sign that something is "phishy." Most legitimate companies and agencies don't operate that way.
Don't click on a link in an e-mail message that asks for your personal information. It may take you to a phony Web site that looks just like the Web site of the real company or government agency. Following the instructions, you enter your personal information on the Web site - and into the hands of identity thieves. To check whether the message is really from the company or agency, call it directly or go to the company's Web site. If you don't have the telephone number, get it from the phone book, the Internet or directory assistance. Use a search engine to find the official Web site.
If someone contacts you and says you've been a victim of fraud, verify the person's identity before you provide any personal information. Legitimate credit card issuers and other companies may contact you if there is an unusual pattern indicating that someone else might be using one of your accounts. But usually they only ask if you made particular transactions; they don't request your account number or other personal information. Law enforcement agencies might also contact you if you've been the victim of fraud. To be on the safe side, ask for the person's name, the name of the agency or company, the telephone number, and the address. Then get the main number (see tip above) and call to find out if the person is legitimate.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 24 additional comments
#1 EnIgMa-PenGuIn on 01 Apr 2005 - 15:45
It sounds a bit odd to move the ramp forward that much, but considering how much they might loose out on if they dont, its worth it. :/
(2 replies) #2 ev0| on 01 Apr 2005 - 15:46
i'm not complaining. thanks to amd, my 2 year old dual oppie can now become a quad system with full vector (SSE, SSE2, SSE3) support, just with a BIOS update and dropping 2 new procs in.
#2.1 Jizzler on 01 Apr 2005 - 15:58
Ditto for me.
#2.2 bucko on 01 Apr 2005 - 16:02
(8 replies) #3 DjmUK on 01 Apr 2005 - 16:45
It's only a few weeks ahead - but still, AMD are competing with Intel to bring the first ones to the public.

Anyways, I'm interested in seeing the price table between Single Core & Dual Core (to see if it's worth it at this time).
#3.1 SVT on 01 Apr 2005 - 17:20
QUOTE
AMD are competing with Intel to bring the first ones to the public.

IBM's been selling dual core CPUs for over a year.
#3.2 bucko on 01 Apr 2005 - 17:39
You want a medal? Oh no wait, sorry your cabinet is to full of them.
#3.3 Help on 01 Apr 2005 - 19:28
QUOTE
AMD are competing with Intel to bring the first ones to the public.

I assume that you mean desktop processors? If so, Intel is going to be the first one to sell them, they're gonna be called Pentium D.
#3.4 DjmUK on 01 Apr 2005 - 20:44
I see, I didn't know about the Pentium D (ah, D = Dual Core?). But yes, desktop/server processors is what I was referring to.

P.S.
SVT - I couldn't care less about IBM, as you quoted from my post, I was referring to AMD & Intel only.
#3.5 Help on 01 Apr 2005 - 23:15
Pentium D
Official: D = 'Different'
What I think should be: D = 'Desktop'
Why? you ask?
Pentium D/Celeron D
pentium M/Celeron M
#3.6 bucko on 02 Apr 2005 - 01:16
lmao `help
#3.7 Cephas on 02 Apr 2005 - 02:29
It can't be Pentium Desktop because lugger laptops will use them.
#3.8 Quick Reply on 02 Apr 2005 - 07:30
Pentium D = Pentium Desktop or
Pentium D = Pentium Desktop Replacement then
#4 ev0| on 01 Apr 2005 - 20:36
Intel might be first with dual core, but they STILL dont' have integrated memory controllers, something AMD has had for 2 years now.
(5 replies) #5 hardgiant on 01 Apr 2005 - 21:47
AMD is starting to lose me with there decisions, the Pentium D won't cost that much more and will be out first. It will be hard to recommend a single core Athlon 64 when dual core Pentium D's are selling next to them.

I guess AMD feels that servers need dual core more then home users and they may be right but how long will the wait be til dual core Athlon 64's show up?

To bad AMD wasn't a bigger company and could get both out together.

#5.1 TwoTailedFox on 01 Apr 2005 - 22:47
Except Intel's 'Dual Core' CPU's arn't really Dual Core... they just two CPU's on one die.

AMD are the only one of the two whose new processors are really Dual Core.
#5.2 Help on 01 Apr 2005 - 23:19
QUOTE
Except Intel's 'Dual Core' CPU's arn't really Dual Core... they just two CPU's on one die.

AMD are the only one of the two whose new processors are really Dual Core.


True, but technicially, wouldn't the performance for intel's 2 CPUs on a die that's connected together perform better?
no shared....L2 cache
no shared....I/O controller/bus
#5.3 bucko on 02 Apr 2005 - 01:18
thats a theory, were talking real world performance here.
#5.4 theyarecomingforyou on 02 Apr 2005 - 04:27
Pentium D's perform slower because they can't be addressed by current applications properly - they perform slower than Pentium 4 single cores.
#5.5 neufuse on 02 Apr 2005 - 06:12
QUOTE
Pentium D's perform slower because they can't be addressed by current applications properly - they perform slower than Pentium 4 single cores.


all dual cores will act like that, the app needs to be writen multi threaded to take advantage of it.
(1 reply) #6 Angelhood on 02 Apr 2005 - 03:09

How does the price and performance compare to just having dual processors?
#6.1 carl0ski on 02 Apr 2005 - 06:30
QUOTE
How does the price and performance compare to just having dual processors?


apparently the single socket, less Mobo circuitry is required for dual core

lower cost.

Two cores on one CPU package = only one Heatsink required,
One package (pin array and ceramic )


Theoretically after consumers pay the research and development costs on the Dual Core CPU's . 1 Dual core CPU will be cheaper to produce than 2 single core cpu's
(1 reply) #7 ALUOp on 02 Apr 2005 - 10:08
Dual core?
Sun is coming up with 8-core, 32-thread chips for servers.
Pentium D really means D for desktops.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19423
#7.1 Soleen on 04 Apr 2005 - 04:28
Thats amazing!!! :-)
Sun has always been an inovative company.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)