main
Report a problem

Study Shows Microsoft, Linux Neck-And-Neck

malebolgia   on 04 April 2005 - 22:48 · 24 comments & 6349 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Most U.S. businesses say there is very little difference between the cost of maintaining a Windows versus a Linux-based corporate computing environment, according to a new Yankee Group study released on Monday. The main cost difference, said Yankee Group analyst Laura DiDio, is determined by the amount of time it takes to develop applications or ensure the security of servers, the networked computers that store data, crunch numbers and serve up Web pages.

"What we found is that costs are not really dependent on the underlying functionality in the core operating system," DiDio said. In the independent study, 88 percent of respondents said that the quality, performance and reliability of Windows was equal to or better than Linux. Linux, which can be copied and modified freely, unlike proprietary software such as Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system, has been locked in competition for the last several years against Microsoft's Windows Server software for a share of the corporate market. In most cases, both Linux and Windows are growing at the expense of Sun Microsystems Inc.'s Unix-based servers, which were instrumental in the growth of the Internet during the 1990s.

News source: Reuters

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 24 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#1.1 Joshie on 16 May 2008 - 16:04
(Fally said @ #8.1)
LOL, yeah you have to pay smart people to run them...


That's a big problem with Linux aficionados. It strikes me that anyone who brags about their own intelligence ultimately tends to come up short...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)