main

Mac OS X Tiger to Ship on April 29

dbfriends   on 12 April 2005 - 13:40 · 98 comments & 16657 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple has announced the date when it's new version of OS X - Tiger, v10.4 - will go on sale. Friday, April 29, at 6pm is the magic time - $129 or £89, the price. As Neowin has previously reported, among the new features will be an updated Mail client and iCal app. Apple also says it will include the new version 7 of Quicktime, and native 64-bit application support. Preorders are now being accepted.

Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO, said: "Mac OS X Tiger is the most innovative and secure desktop operating system ever created. Tiger's groundbreaking new features like Spotlight and Dashboard will change the way people use their computers, and drive our competitors nuts trying to copy them."

Spotlight is Apple's new search system, which it touts as being a "new, lightning-fast way for users to find virtually anything stored on their Mac". Dashboard, meanwhile, allows users to put widgets on their desktop for anything from the weather to tracking flights. Also new, an updated iChat, Automator - which can make repetitive tasks easier - and RSS reader support in the Safari browser.

In other news, the BBC reports that a group of US newspapers, along with the AP news agency, are to back bloggers being sued by Apple for leaking details of the new features. A court had ruled they should be forced to reveal the sources of the information - Dave Tomlin, assistant general counsel for AP, said the case had potential implications journalists of all kinds. "For us, this case is about whether the First Amendment protects journalists from being turned into informants for the government, the courts or anybody else who wants to use them that way," Mr Tomlin said.

View: Apple announcement | Apple Store | Tiger info
View: Neowin discussion


PS: Your dedicated Neowin writer got 10/10 on both - although the US one was a close call :)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 98 additional comments
(10 replies) #1 thefunkymunky on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:42
Errrm. Why is Neowin showing a Panther box in the article?
#1.1 dbfriends on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:47
Mainly 'cos we ain't got a Tiger pic yet
#1.2 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:50


There ya go!
#1.3 dbfriends on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:05
*cough* wrong picture? What wrong picture? Thanks muchly, updated
#1.4 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:14
No problem. The pic was on the OS X Tech Specs page.
#1.5 Mr. Dee on 12 Apr 2005 - 18:19
#1.6 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 18:54
If by "Tax" you mean that you had to pay for that version, then the one you labeled "PR Rescue" shouldn't have it. OS X 10.1 was a free upgrade for 10.0 users.
#1.7 Mr. Dee on 12 Apr 2005 - 19:53
I remember in September of 2001, some users had to pay a $20 tax for it.
#1.8 dp123 on 12 Apr 2005 - 20:30
Mr. Dee, 10.0 cost $100... 10.1 cost $129. So if you owned 10.0, you made up the difference $29. No tax.
#1.9 Mr. Dee on 12 Apr 2005 - 22:14
I hope Microsoft comes up with a nice box art for Longhorn.
#1.10 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 11:45
yes it could be a meaty blue screen of death box.
(1 reply) #2 fubarshibby on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:45
Damn, I won't be able to upgrade for free... That cut-off date is April 12

EDIT: Woohoo! With my educational discount, I can get it for only $69! Hells yes!
#2.1 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:53
As always. The cutoff date is the day that they announce the release date.
(1 reply) #3 joker999 on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:52
woooooot!!!! i can wait to buy mac mini
#3.1 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 11:47
Good for you mate, I just switched to Mac, got an iMac G5, u won't regret it.
#4 Chrisnet on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:52
Just ordered my copy... $90cdn (with eduational discount)... not bad
#5 yayo on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:53
w00t - the time has come.
(7 replies) #6 i like chips on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:53
spotlight and dashboard are hardly worth-while upgrades and the price tag.
#6.1 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:55
I suggest you take a few minutes to browse the Apple web site (click the "Tiger info" link in the article) if you think that Spotlight and Dashboard are the only new things in Tiger.
#6.2 fubarshibby on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:57
You have no idea what you're talking about if you think that Spotlight isn't a worthwhile upgrade, and in any case, there's a heck of a lot more updated than that.
#6.3 Cavboy on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:02
I'm not an OS X user! But isn't Spotlight like the free desktop search software from google and microsoft? And Dashboard like Samurize?
#6.4 i like chips on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:04
yeah but that's what steve's touting! i'm using a tiger build right now and i really don't think it's worth the price! hell i'm sure lotta people disagree but i just can't see it!
#6.5 Phillip on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:26
i like chips, You are running Tiger, not using it. Spotlight is much more powerful that Google's desktop search, Dashboard is gonna get even better with more widgets. Haven't you noticed other things like new Mail, new iChat, new iCal, new sync technology, new Safari with RSS support, whole new Automator app for visual scripting, new QT, voice over, parent controls, oh I could go one till I am blue in the face.
#6.6 Jstphish on 13 Apr 2005 - 03:51
... Core Image and Video which are huge additions.
#6.7 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 11:50
...over 200 features, no matter how small or large.
(3 replies) #7 zerolimit on 12 Apr 2005 - 13:56
I am a pc user is there any video that shows what the new os has. I am thinking about making the switch. (Dont start with the flames grow up)
#7.1 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:02
You can view the most recent videos from MacWorld San Francisco and last year's WWDC conference on the Apple site. Both show off some of the features. You can also look at the Tiger info link at the end of the article.
#7.3 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 11:52
go onto the Apple homepage and go to "switch". then check out peoples switching stories, they might encourage you and help you make the right decision.
(7 replies) #8 TheSarge on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:03
Just what IS in this "new" OS, anyways?
What, did they integrate left-clicking into the operating system?
#8.1 AlexSpark on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:10
left clicking? haha i see a flame gone wrong
#8.2 Phillip on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:28
Why don't you try something 'new'? Its called 'reading'.
#8.3 Koyder on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:36
Yes, reading is strongly encouraged.

http://www.apple.com/macosx/newfeatures/ne...ewfeatures.html

Last edited by 20672 on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:46
#8.4 orichimaru on 12 Apr 2005 - 19:07
OS X Does support alternate mouse buttons, Apple mice just dont have any extra buttons
#8.5 Zenith on 13 Apr 2005 - 04:48
yes it does. i am using a kensington 5 click mouse right now. Mac OS X was designed so that if people wished to use multi-click mice, they could, but the OS shouldn't have to rely on a right click.
#8.6 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 11:54
">>Apple mice<< just dont have any extra buttons"
Apple mice, not wotever other mouse you choose to use.
#8.7 chimera963 on 13 Apr 2005 - 12:11
Everyone PLEASE stop going on about Long Horn we can worry (yes, worry, muhauhauuha) about long horn when it is going to be released. (a bloody long time)
(23 replies) #9 NimrodUK on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:25
Its sound like they copied a lot of features from Longhorn, eg the Dashboard and Searching Features.....
#9.1 AlexSpark on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:29
did you ever think it may be the other way around ?
#9.2 Cubiz on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:33
Why do you think Longhorn is taking so long? Microsoft obviously need alot of time to catch up with Apple

From WWDC2004: "Redmond, start your photocopiers"
#9.3 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:36
How exactly do you propose that Apple could copy features from an OS that won't even be released for another year or so (it isn't even at Beta 1 stage yet!)?
#9.4 brianshapiro on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:50
Because Microsoft announced these features long (very long) before Apple did...

And what Microsoft is working on is a lot more complex than what is being released in Tiger. Otherwise Microsoft could have released Longhorn years ago? Did you notice how it only took them a month or so to create a desktop search tool? If they just wanted to do what Tiger does it could have been released already. (This should shed light on why Longhorn is taking so long.)

Its obvious to anyone that Apple decided to include most of these features to try to one-up Longhorn and appear as if they were delivering what Longhorn did before it was released, since Longhorn would take so long. "Redmond, start your copiers" is just Apple BS, and anyone whether a Mac or PC fan, who knows anything, realizes this.

(By the way Longhorn will be released into beta in about a month I think)
#9.5 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:00
Apple keeps things under wraps a lot longer than Microsoft does. Apple has likely been working on some of these things for years before announcing the features last year at WWDC (remember that Spotlight grew out of the search engine in iTunes, which has been around for quite some time). Microsoft tends to announce all kinds of things, but then take forever delivering them. I was around back when the first betas were circulating for Chicago, which became Windows 95. There were things that Microsoft promised for Windows 95 which they didn't fully deliver until Windows 98 was released!
#9.6 joseph- on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:12
I really don't know why people have to come into threads like this to mention Microsoft products...but then again...I don't see why Jobs must get in his cheap jabs either. In the end, money talks and the bottom line matters...or installed base and market share.

Tiger seems to be to OS X what XP was to 2000, whereas Longhorn will be to XP what OS X was to OS 9. An incremental upgrade is nothing to get all hot and bothered over. I'm sure Tiger will be an outstanding OS...but OS X *already was* an outstanding OS. As is XP. Both serve their purposes nicely. But I don't think that Tiger will appear as some sort of revolutionary evolution in OS X to the -casual user-. Changes in OS X, as it evolves, are more subtle than the changes between Windows releases. But no less profound. However, for Jobs to make cute little comments about "their competitors" copying them, when it seems as though Apple didn't announce any of their additions to OS X until after "their competitors" had announced something similiar planned for their next-generation OS. Seems a tad shady to me.

I'd have far more respect for Apple if Jobs could just learn to keep his mouth shut, at least about things not pertaining to the iPod, because that's the only market in which they have ever clearly dominated. Consumers that matter speak with their wallet, not on fanboy websites, and the truth speaks for itself.

#9.7 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:26
QUOTE
Tiger seems to be to OS X what XP was to 2000, whereas Longhorn will be to XP what OS X was to OS 9.


Where do people keep coming up with this BS that Longhorn is going to be this massive shift in code base from XP? It is still based on the NT kernel (the Windows Server 2003 kernel to be precise). XP was to Windows 98 or ME what OS X was to OS 9 (a complete shift in the code base of the OS).
#9.8 joseph- on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:39
I meant that figuratively. Microsoft is putting a lot more effort and resources into Longhorn since XP than it put into 98 from 95 or 2000 to XP. Yes, they may share the same codebase and the same kernel source, but as anyone can see that's used linux, there is more to an OS than just the kernel. Are all linux distros identical? No. And continuing on with your rationale, by *your* definition, unless there is a massive shift in code base in OS X, then Tiger is merely nothing more than OS X, Service Pack 4. Right?

I don't recall mentioning anything about the codebase at all in my initial post. Quit assuming thats what I meant and being so defensive.
#9.9 brianshapiro on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:42
roadwarrior, because Longhorn will be using a new API (WinFX from Win32), even though still based on the NT kernel. Windows XP was just Windows 2000 with more features (people notice theming as the one that stands out the most) and speedups and bug fixes. Graphics wise Longhorn will do something similar to what OS X achieved for MacOS.

I'm not trying to be an MS fanboy, I stand by what I said. If Microsoft just wanted to release something like OS X Tiger they could have done so already. Not just because its easy to create something like Spotlight compared to WinFS, but because Avalon, the graphics system is already working and just being tested and will be released for XP. If matching Tiger was Microsoft's goal they could have had it done by now. There's a lot more in Longhorn than people realize, and just as Microsoft is having to catch up with Apple now, I will bet Apple will have to catch up with Microsoft by then.

(ps Longhorn beta soon)
#9.10 SVT on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:45
QUOTE
Longhorn will be to XP what OS X was to OS 9

And the winner of most ignorant comment of the day is... joseph-!!!

Longhorn = Windows NT 6.0
#9.11 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:52
QUOTE
I don't recall mentioning anything about the codebase at all in my initial post. Quit assuming thats what I meant and being so defensive.


You said, and I quote:
QUOTE
Longhorn will be to XP what OS X was to OS 9


Which does imply a complete code base shift.
#9.12 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:55
QUOTE
and just as Microsoft is having to catch up with Apple now, I will bet Apple will have to catch up with Microsoft by then.


If Apple sticks to their current release cycle, it's possible that they will have 10.5 out around the same time as Longhorn is released.
#9.13 markjensen on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:35
QUOTE
And continuing on with your rationale, by *your* definition, unless there is a massive shift in code base in OS X, then Tiger is merely nothing more than OS X, Service Pack 4. Right?

Well, Apple seems to be calling this 10.4, so I guess that is exactly right, then.
#9.14 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:58
No, that wouldn't be right at all. 10.3.1, 10.3.2, etc, are Apple's version of "Service Packs" (i.e., updates that fix bugs but don't add significant features).

The difference between 10.3 and 10.4 is exactly analogous to the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP (NT versions 5.0 and 5.1, respectively).
#9.15 joseph- on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:47
Read my second post. I was speaking *figuratively* about the changes between XP and Longhorn. Merely because that would be a logical progression. OS 9 was a dead horse, and was dead in the water. To go where Apple wanted to go with their OS, they *had* to essentially abandon that code base. It made sense and allowed them to come out with the stellar OS X and platform that they have today. However, with Microsoft, that doesn't make sense. XP is a (relatively) stable platform. They just need to refine it. Little work was done from 2000 to XP. Far more work is going into Longhorn, even though it is just a progression from XP. Perhaps I should have been clearer with my initial analogy, but I was speaking more on the effort put into each OS in respect to their respective companies. Little effort between Win95-98, little effort between Win2k-XP. Lot of effort between OS 9 to OS X, lot of effort between XP to Longhorn. I'm not, nor ever was, speaking in pure relation to the codebase. I'm talking about the overall package in terms of a completed, working, functional product.

Sorry if that seemed "ignorant"...forgot that I have to be as specific as possible to avoid childish insults on this site. Won't happen again.
#9.16 jerry on 12 Apr 2005 - 19:04
QUOTE
Perhaps I should have been clearer with my initial analogy, but I was speaking more on the effort put into each OS in respect to their respective companies.

And that analogy makes ZERO sense to the user. Nobody cares how much effort was put into something, all they want is better performance & features.

For the first time, I agree with SVT (post number 1.10)
#9.17 joseph- on 12 Apr 2005 - 20:12
And the user is more concerned with the *CODEBASE* of the OS they are using? What effort do you think I was referring to, if not performance and features? Longhorn will have more -features- than XP. OS X had more features and better performance than OS 9 did.

QUOTE
I'm talking about the overall package in terms of a completed, working, functional product.


Which is of concern to the user. What part of that doesn't make sense? I'm sorry you don't quite comprehend what is meant by effort, but I fail to see how I'm the only ignorant one in this thread.
#9.18 E.Lo on 12 Apr 2005 - 20:47
QUOTE
brianshapiro on 12 Apr 2005 - 09:50
Because Microsoft announced these features long (very long) before Apple did...


Umm, Apple applied for the Spotlight patent back in Jan of 2000. Long before Longhorn was even announced.
#9.19 brianshapiro on 12 Apr 2005 - 23:31
First of all the contention that it was 'years before Longhorn was announced' is wrong because you can find articles on Longhorn that early. Its also not as if Microsoft hadn't worked on an object file system before (Cairo) and the patent is just for a system integrated indexed search.

Apple also said before they were trying to figure out how to do this search and realized they had the technology in iTunes, where they adapted it from, just in time for Tiger development.

My contention is mainly that Apple put all of these features in the OS X Tiger release in response to Longhorn buzz, --- they weren't going to put them in anyway regardless of what Microsoft did. The idea of a search system like that had been around for years, they could have implemented it sooner. I think they did it in Tiger as a response. I'm not saying Apple was 'copying'. And regardless, saying Microsoft will be copying Tiger with Longhorn (which Jobs suggested) is a BS statement.
#9.20 dp123 on 12 Apr 2005 - 23:39
Brian, and there was talk about database file systems back in the OpenDoc and Copland days....

The fact is, despite MS's claims, they never got Cairo to work. They began talking about Blackcomb in 2000 (they claimed then they had all the pieces in Cairo...), then mysteriously Blackcomb slips in 2003 to 2006 and Longhorn was supposed to be an interim release, then Longhorn becomes the major release and was due in late 2004/early 2005, now it's due at the very end of 2006 withOUT WinFS... Can you really claim MS HAS something to copy??? I don't think you can. Let's just wait and see if they hit their BETA1 release date.
#9.21 brianshapiro on 12 Apr 2005 - 23:50
No like I was saying I don't really think anyone is necessarily copying anyone .

I made two claims, one that I think Spotlight in the Tiger release was a response to Longhorn buzz, and that WinFS promises more than just what Spotlight is delivering. Even though WinFS will not be shipped with Longhorn, its been revealed that Microsoft will include a desktop search ala Spotlight in Longhorn to make up for it.

And I think Microsoft means it when they say WinFS will be released. People have had access to Longhorn and reports have been all of the 'pillars' except WinFS were virtually done in basic development, and that WinFS has progressed a lot. So I don't know what deadlines they'll meet, but I believe that everything will come out like Microsoft has said.
#9.22 Chad on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:51
STOP TALKING ABOUT LONGHORN. THIS THREAD IS SPECIFIC TO TIGER. IF YOU WANT TO COMPARE MS TO APPLE, START A FREAKIN THREAD!!!
#9.23 joseph- on 14 Apr 2005 - 01:04
Tell that to Jobs then, fanboys.
#10 Cubiz on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:32
Wow - I don't even have a Mac (yet) and I'm excited!
#11 Mongrel on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:36
I'll admit, those are some damn good-looking widgets... wish Konfabulator had themes that nice
(3 replies) #12 rajputwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:40
yeah developer connection and getting it for free
#12.1 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:01
Same here. I wonder what date they will begin letting us download it?
#12.2 rajputwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:21
i figure they would just send it to us like those panther builds
#12.3 roadwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:28
I wasn't in ADC back then. How did they handle it? I know for sure that some developers must have been able to download it early, since that was the first version that got passed around the warez groups
#13 rajputwarrior on 12 Apr 2005 - 14:43
oh yeah, i wish they would change their theme, ugly
#14 digitalslacker on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:03
woohooo!!!!!
anyone know if best buy will sell it?
i got about 60 bucks of gift certs to use up


#15 cswadner on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:04
woot i excited
#16 hotdog963al on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:18
I'm probably going to order tonight!!
#17 neostyle on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:26
this is insanely great !!!
the most important software produkt this year and the years to come .
just ordered my copy of tiger . after getting my mini and new ipod ,and enjoying panther ,i'm only waiting for the new g5 to make the complete switch .

yeah ...
(2 replies) #18 mr_scruff on 12 Apr 2005 - 15:41
does anyone know when windows will get quicktime 7 then? the video codec with it is meant to be amazing.
#18.1 betasp on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:22
QUOTE
does anyone know when windows will get quicktime 7 then? the video codec with it is meant to be amazing.


I suspect playback will be around NAB of this year. I suspect Apple will not allow encoding on the PC platform. I don't think they allowed for all of the Mp4 encoding options on the PC that they did on the Mac.
#18.2 dp123 on 12 Apr 2005 - 18:25
QUOTE
I suspect playback will be around NAB of this year.


NAB is next week. The Win version will not be released prior to the Mac version.

QUOTE
I suspect Apple will not allow encoding on the PC platform.


Why? QT for Mac and QT for the PC have almost always been almost 100% feature compatible. The PC version will have the same options.

QUOTE
I don't think they allowed for all of the Mp4 encoding options on the PC that they did on the Mac.


Wrong. QT (Free) and QT Pro have different encoding options. There are no significant feature differences between QT 6 for the PC and Mac. This isn't WMP.

I would expect the PC version to become available simultaneously to a general release of Tiger... Maybe a little later... (It's unclear if you will be able to upgrade to QT7 without a Tiger upgrade... If so, simultaneously.) Or... possibly... with a new iTunes update. (Notice the absence of a new iTunes version from Tiger and iLife info... iTunes will be upgraded shortly after the release of QT7, I expect.)

Last edited by 9953 on 12 Apr 2005 - 18:32
(2 replies) #19 Mr. Dee on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:47
I think this is disrespectful, its on the Tiger Upgrade Process page at the bottom.
Compare the great cats: Tiger vs. Panther vs. Jaguar
Running Mac OS X v10.3 Panther or Mac OS X v10.2 Jaguar? Don’t have a "cow" — see how Tiger will take your Mac to the next level.


http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/

#19.1 dp123 on 12 Apr 2005 - 16:56
oh, boo hoo.
#19.2 tylershaw on 12 Apr 2005 - 21:11
Actually, that's pretty funny. Maybe not too appropriate, but I don't think MS is in too bad of a financial situation where they should be worried. It's all good.
#20 weenur on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:08
Yay!
(1 reply) #21 icecaveman on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:38
LoL anyone who has been watching Microsoft's channel9, from the Microsoft research groups the last years, omfg how Apple has been active with THEIR OWN PHOTOCOPIERS. Damn those hypocrites! Pathetic.
#21.1 joseph- on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:56
This has been a rather civil thread, up until now. Lets not muck it up with childish inflamatory posts, please? Be a sport.
#22 Vandil on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:49
Tiger's going to be awesome.

Well, actually 10.4.1 will be awesome. (heh)

Anyway, if you pre-order yours from Amazon.com, you can get a $35 mail-in rebate, thus making Tiger a $94 expense.