main

Mandriva's Limited Edition 2005 brings the ultimate to Linux

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 13 April 2005 - 18:37 · 39 comments & 6883 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Mandriva (pronounced "Man-dree-vah"!), the company formerly known as Mandrakesoft, today released Limited Edition 2005, a special new version of its operating system that blends the most up to date popular open source applications, including Firefox 1.0.2, with specific customisations resulting in advanced multimedia, internet and development capabilities. These features include out-of-the-box Webcontent RSS reading and software sound mixing (so multiple applicationscan play sound at once). Limited Edition 2005 is the only Linux systemto allow the trouble-free coexistence of 32-bit and 64-bitapplications.

It also offers enhanced hardware support for removable devices, including the ability to boot from USB keys. Sold exclusively online by Mandriva, this new release is available right now as a download to Mandriva Clubmembers who benefit from privileged as well as discounted access to the company's products. Other customers can purchase the Limited Edition's DVD set on Mandriva Store.

View: Mandriva Limited Edition 2005


"People have always turned to Mandriva Linux for the latest and
hottest in Linux. Limited Edition 2005 is a strong embodiment of that
desire, while maintaining excellent stability. Some open source
enthusiasts don't want to wait 10 months to take advantage of Linux's
breathtaking pace of innovation. Those enthusiasts will find great
value in LE 2005," commented François Bancilhon, Mandriva CEO.

Summary of important applications:

- Linux kernel 2.6.11.6
- KDE 3.3.2 (with some backports from version 3.4, including kpdf)
- GNOME 2.8.3
- Firefox 1.0.2
- GCC 3.4.3
- The GIMP 2.2
- Cdrecord 2.01.01a21 (with DVD+R dual-layer support)
- OpenOffice.org 1.1.4
- MySQL 4.1.11


* Power user's dream *

Linux power users will welcome the advanced Web experience, enhanced
hardware compatibility and expanded development options brought by
Limited Edition 2005, along with significant performance
gains. Firefox 1.0.2 offers the most advanced Web browsing experience,
with multi-tabbed navigation, pop-up blocking, increased speed, and
unmatched security. Limited Edition also offers the RSS reader
Akregator. RSS is a format used to simplify the aggregation and
syndication of Web content. RSS feeds contain news and updates from
websites and blogs, providing personalized access to information.

Limited Edition 2005 is built to optimize and increase performance. It
has been developed with x86-64 technology in mind, which allows for
the use of more powerful applications. Support for dual-core
technology adds to potential performance, allowing the use of advanced
new processors. Developers and power users running demanding
multimedia configurations will appreciate the additional power those
features provide. Some special optimizations enhance the overall speed
delivered by the system. For instance, KDE 3.3 is 10% faster, thanks
to special tuning by Mandriva.

Addressing both the x86 and x86-64 architectures, Limited Edition 2005
is the only Linux system to allow the seamless installation and
running of 32-bit applications on 64-bit platforms. This will allow
users to benefit from all the power and performance of 64-bit
technology while continuing to use vital 32-bit
applications. Developers will welcome the ability to develop 32-bit
and 64-bit versions of the same application on the same machine,
without the need to use chroot. Finally, Limited Edition allows you to
copy the contents of the DVD to the hard disk during installation,
removing the need to use the DVD for subsequent software installation,
and so saving even more time.

Limited Edition 2005 provides better support for removable devices
such as digital cameras, CD-ROM drives and USB keys through immediate
detection of devices as they are plugged in, and by allowing you to
boot the installation from a USB key.

Also available is DKMS which allows kernel modules to be
dynamically built for each kernel on your system in a simplified and
organized fashion.

A special feature that will certainly appeal to gamers and enthusiasts
is that the new release from Mandriva has support for the Xbox
console, empowering users to bridge the divide between gaming and
other computer activities. Additional hardware enhancements include
full support for Adaptec Host RAID controllers (RAID, SCSI, SATA) and
extended recognition for the most recent flat screen monitors,
including widescreen resolutions.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 39 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 nic on 13 Apr 2005 - 18:39
i don't like the new name.
#1.1 Hurmoth on 13 Apr 2005 - 18:50
The name is horrible
#1.2 advancedboy on 14 Apr 2005 - 02:46
amen.
(3 replies) #2 ripgut on 13 Apr 2005 - 18:48
Who cares about the name, god. It's about what can it do for you not how its labeled.
Since im a newbie to linux i can honestly say i have found the OS that is perfect for me, I dont game as much lately (maybe cause im just getting older, who knows) and Ubuntu does everything i did in windows. But bottom line is that Funtionality > name
#2.1 Hurmoth on 13 Apr 2005 - 18:55
I agree that functionality is way more important then a name, but the name is still important. The first thing you hear about a distro is its name, not what functionality it has. If the name isn't appealing, most people aren't going to us it, at least in my opinion. Functionality is 75% important and 25% name is important to me.
#2.2 Skyfrog on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:10
It's still a lot better than Ubuntu "The Hoary Hedgehog".
#2.3 Jugalator on 14 Apr 2005 - 08:29
Hehe, Ubuntu always seem to go for the most ugly animal description they can find...

Earlier it was the "Warty Warthog".
#3 kyro on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:15
whats next? redhat going to rename ratheads?
(1 reply) #4 Saadu on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:24
I thought Mandrake was free...? When did it become pay only?>
#4.1 bryonhowley on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:55
Quit some time ago. You can still download there basic version free. But toe good stuff costs. Or just wait it will be on Bit Torrent soon.
(7 replies) #5 BaLdMoNkEy on 13 Apr 2005 - 19:39
lol, quite a move on microsoft if i may say so...

Here "Mandriva" are having just released a fully functional and user friendly, strangely windows like 64-bit linux alternative and suddenly decide to charge muchos money for it while microsoft, blissfully unaware, continues to slowly develop their version of xp 64 bit to be released in the "first half of 2005".

Mandriva could make A LOT of money out of this if they get it right
#5.1 bidz on 13 Apr 2005 - 20:17
Uhm, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition is already finished and released by Microsoft. It's not in development any more.
#5.2 Foo Fighter on 13 Apr 2005 - 21:21
QUOTE
a fully functional and user friendly


That's a matter of opinion. I haven't used a Linux distro yet that offered a "user friendly" interface. And frankly neither Gnome nor KDE measure up to OSX or XP in terms of well designed graphical environments. Aside from Redhat's well designed BlueCurve theme, all Linux distros use the same ugly interface with tacky open-source Fooods icons which have been done to death. The worst mistake open-source devs ever made was trying to copy Apple's "Aqua" look and feel. It just doesn't look right at all on Linux, not without an advanced underlying composition engine to drive it.

The problem is that Linux GUis are being developed by amateurs, not professional designers or usability experts (all of whom get PAID for their services). XP may look "Fisher Price" to l33t haXorz but it is very well engineered and easy to understand for novice and business users. And OSX is just plain elegant! No open-source project has even BEGUN to touch Apple's desktop, and probably never will. My personal belief is that both GUIs (KDE and Gnome) should be scrapped. Apple had the right approach; design proprietary software layered over open-source underpinnings. Build a professional commercial desktop and license it out. Until then Linux GUIs are purely amateurware.
#5.3 Knight' on 13 Apr 2005 - 21:50
Bleh, your opinion is noted, but don't try pass it off as fact. Why don't you just look at the Linux section in the forum, and you'll find a thread there with loads of pictures of KDE/Gnome/Other WM's, and let those speak for them selves.
#5.4 Nichotin on 13 Apr 2005 - 21:52
Foo Fighter: What about getting paid to develop open code? I think that model will work pretty well as soon as Linux becomes more widespread. By the way, people are free to develop proprietary interfaces for a GNU/Linux system, it is just that most people will shy away from it. There are more reasons than price to go open source, not neccassarily important to the average person, but some day people will realize the importance. Not that it is an excuse for having a bad interface, but as far as I see, at least KDE has gotten _very far_. I think it is very useable.
#5.5 warwagon on 13 Apr 2005 - 22:08
Right on Foo Fighter
#5.6 ichi on 13 Apr 2005 - 22:31
QUOTE

The problem is that Linux GUis are being developed by amateurs, not professional designers or usability experts


With "amateurs" like Rasterman who needs professionals.
#5.7 BaLdMoNkEy on 13 Apr 2005 - 23:18
hmm, i am almost 100% sure i posted a reply correcting my errors and stuff... o well.

(I swear i really do remember visiting the XP site very recently and them kindly informing me that XP 64-Bit is not out yet, but maybe im just crap )

I was thinking less from a gui point of view and more from the fact that they seem to be including a more user friendly software base (like Firefox for example and perhaps the apparently increased device support)

The gui may not quite be up to scratch, but they are beginning to catch on to some of the elements that, IMO, make an OS useable to more than just the experts - useability straight out of the box.

More to the point, if windows XP was so perfectly designed, microsoft would not have begun the ridiculously long process of recoding half of its OS from the ground up (+ perhaps ripping off apple just a tiny bit) for several years.

Admittedly windows XP is like nothing microsoft have ever produced before in terms of non-crashability and useability and it was clear that when it was released (or maybe when 2000 was released?) they had risen to a new level of OS development. Having said that however, ALL of its features are found on other operating systems too, its just a case of better implementing the way in which users... umm... use them.

I admit I am no linux expert but from my amateur viewpoint, this distro looks very inviting for me to try out compared to all of the others i have heard about. On top of all of that, it is half the price of windows XP. If all an OS needs is a universal installation system and a slight touch up to the gui so that people actually understand what is going on i would say its not far off flawless.

But then again you don't exactly see me frantically punching my credit card details into their website as quickly as I possibly can and you wont any time soon.
#6 mannan on 13 Apr 2005 - 20:46
Fedora is still better
1) larger community
2) Stronger Base
3) Cutting Edge
4) Stability
5) Security
and after all its 100% Free
(6 replies) #7 k3rny on 13 Apr 2005 - 21:53
QUOTE
That's a matter of opinion. I haven't used a Linux distro yet that offered a "user friendly" interface. And frankly neither Gnome nor KDE measure up to OSX or XP in terms of well designed graphical environments. Aside from Redhat's well designed BlueCurve theme, all Linux distros use the same ugly interface with tacky open-source Fooods icons which have been done to death. The worst mistake open-source devs ever made was trying to copy Apple's "Aqua" look and feel. It just doesn't look right at all on Linux, not without an advanced underlying composition engine to drive it.

The problem is that Linux GUis are being developed by amateurs, not professional designers or usability experts (all of whom get PAID for their services). XP may look "Fisher Price" to l33t haXorz but it is very well engineered and easy to understand for novice and business users. And OSX is just plain elegant! No open-source project has even BEGUN to touch Apple's desktop, and probably never will. My personal belief is that both GUIs (KDE and Gnome) should be scrapped. Apple had the right approach; design proprietary software layered over open-source underpinnings. Build a professional commercial desktop and license it out. Until then Linux GUIs are purely amateurware.


I have to agree with you that OS X's aqua user interface is very good: clean and offers a good consistency.
In what refers to win XP's UI, I must say you are blind, It's the worst UI ever built, I really mean it.
Linux: presonally I prefer gnome and xfce over kde for being more clean, and I assure you they are far better than win XP's one, It's not even comparable. But they are still behind os x's UI imho.
And in what concerns the underlying technology, windows's is prehistorical if compared.

Edit: This was meant being a reply
#7.1 Foo Fighter on 13 Apr 2005 - 22:13
QUOTE
And in what concerns the underlying technology, windows's is prehistorical if compared.


Not Longhorn. OSX's Quartz engine and Longhorn's Avalon make Gnome and KDE look like Windows 3.1, which isn't far from reality. Neither desktop environment is innovative or original; just borrowed concepts from Windows and MacOS.
#7.2 ichi on 13 Apr 2005 - 22:35
Have you seen any WM besides KDE and Gnome?

Longhorn hasn't been released yet by the way, you can't compare it to current linux desktops.
Check projects like luminocity or e17 to see the kind of stuff Longhorn will face.
#7.3 Foo Fighter on 14 Apr 2005 - 02:15
QUOTE
Longhorn hasn't been released yet by the way, you can't compare it to current linux desktops.


Correct, but Avalon is available now for developers.
#7.4 Jugalator on 14 Apr 2005 - 08:32
QUOTE
Not Longhorn. OSX's Quartz engine and Longhorn's Avalon make Gnome and KDE look like Windows 3.1, which isn't far from reality. Neither desktop environment is innovative or original; just borrowed concepts from Windows and MacOS.

Err, there's more to "technology" than visuals.
Especially if you explicitly talk about UNDERLYING technology.

Also, Avalon can make something look and work like crap and it can make something look and work well. It doesn't automatically make something good; that depends entirely on the designers, not the technology. And no one of us have seen how it'll look in Longhorn, besides in an ugly alpha-stage, so how can you say anything about what it'll look and work like... Maybe it'll get the same horrible transformation as Watercolor -> Luna went through. We don't know, but I hope MS has hired better designers this time around, or Windows users will once again have to put up with an ugly default UI.
#7.5 ichi on 14 Apr 2005 - 09:53
QUOTE
Correct, but Avalon is available now for developers.


Same with Luminocity and E17 with the EFL.
#7.6 k3rny on 14 Apr 2005 - 15:25
QUOTE
Not Longhorn. OSX's Quartz engine and Longhorn's Avalon make Gnome and KDE look like Windows 3.1


First of all, Longhorn hasn't even been released and by the time it gets shiped, It will already be passed.
If you wan't more info on what I'm talking about, search for stuff like:
luminocity
enlightenment
Looking Glass
X.org
xcompmgr & transset
etc etc etc ...
#8 josrh on 13 Apr 2005 - 21:54
slowest website ever
(1 reply) #9 ir0nw0lf on 13 Apr 2005 - 22:45
QUOTE
support for the Xbox console


Eh? Anyone elaborate on this?
#9.1 ichi on 13 Apr 2005 - 23:04
Maybe it runs on Xbox consoles?
No idea, but anyway I don't think it has anything to do with playing Xbox games on the PC
#10 Bwizzel-B on 13 Apr 2005 - 23:31
M$FT ought to sell an app to allow you to play any Xbox game on the PC. I mean, if Xbox 2 doesn't support xbox 1 games, it's the perfect place to retire it to.
(2 replies) #11 mannan on 13 Apr 2005 - 23:45
QUOTE
OSX's Quartz engine and Longhorn's Avalon make Gnome and KDE look like Windows 3.1


I think you haven't seen "project looking glass" when its final version comes it will revolutionize the GUI of desktop
#11.1 Jugalator on 14 Apr 2005 - 08:39
Hmm, well I for one don't want to have a desktop look like this.

I can't see any signs of a revolution either.

Yet another 3D desktop enivornment, yes, but unfortunately, we're still working with 2D devices (mouse & monitor), usually making working in 3D involve additional steps in order to get the same thing done compared to if you worked in a 2D UI.
#11.2 ichi on 14 Apr 2005 - 09:56
I've always thought of looking glass as a tech demo, rather than an actual desktop implementation.
#12 soldier1st on 14 Apr 2005 - 03:48
the new name is crap,mandrakesoft was the best name they had.
#13 TheSarge on 14 Apr 2005 - 06:40
I don't like the new name. Sounds like they pluked it out of a bad Bollywood movie.
(3 replies) #14 cpu on 14 Apr 2005 - 07:29
QUOTE
advanced multimedia, internet and development capabilities


EU have to sue them. Multimedia player is included
#14.1 Jugalator on 14 Apr 2005 - 08:26
No, because Mandriva isn't in the same market position as Microsoft.
#14.2 markjensen on 14 Apr 2005 - 10:21
QUOTE
EU have to sue them. Multimedia player is included

Actually, several are included! And worse thing is... You can pick any, all or none!

Oh, wait... I guess that is the ultimate in freedom of choice. What are they going to be sued for???
#14.3 Treefrog on 14 Apr 2005 - 14:12
QUOTE
EU have to sue them. Multimedia player is included


What!! You mean they are in a position to restrict your rights and choices by integrating a media player into the core OS files in an attempt to create a monopoly on media services... oh wait.. nope, wrong company, these guy actually give you choices of multiple players from many developers. Care to try again?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)