Yahoo Inc. launched there music downloads services yesterday. As a part of the lauch all U.S. subscribers are offered a week's free subscription to the service that claims to have more than one million tracks encoded at 192Kbs available to download and play. Customers can choose either to buy an annual subscription at $59.88 or a monthly subscription at $6.99. However, if you do not keep up the payments, the music you have downloaded becomes unplayable.
The service will allow customers to buy tracks and burn them to CD outright. Yahoo's price per track is 79c compared with Napster's 99c. Alternatively, music can be transferred to a 'Play for Sure' compatible portable device based around the Microsoft Windows DRM 10 software. However, these music players are mostly from Creative and iRiver and form a minority of the market even in the US.
This service is only available to Windows XP clients, and with Windows Media Player 9.0.
News source: PC Pro
The service will allow customers to buy tracks and burn them to CD outright. Yahoo's price per track is 79c compared with Napster's 99c. Alternatively, music can be transferred to a 'Play for Sure' compatible portable device based around the Microsoft Windows DRM 10 software. However, these music players are mostly from Creative and iRiver and form a minority of the market even in the US.
This service is only available to Windows XP clients, and with Windows Media Player 9.0.
What's new in this build:
- UltraVNC File Transfers support
- UltraVNC Repeater support
- Can deploy RealVNC v4.1.1 and TightVNC v1.3.6 servers

(The above could also be a she)
What I said above just proves how wrong you are and that having many companies makes prices cheaper on both downloads and subscription plans compared to your iTunes service. Also keep in mind I'm a mac guy but I'm not going to sit here and think that there isn't a real market for this and that maybe something can be better than iTunes. Hey maybe if other services take marketshare from Apple than maybe just maybe they might support other players beside the ipod or heaven forbid maybe charge 79 cents a song instead of 99 cents a song.
Also don't complain about Microsoft crap DRM because last time I checked Apple DRM could do the same as Microsofts DRM which isn't much as far as the users control of music.
I never said anything about the DRM, did I? Why accuse me of complaining about it?
Yahoo isn't the first to go with a lower price, Wal-Mart's store charges 88 cents per song. What's really funny is that they have started selling iPods now, which won't work with their store! I wouldn't want to be working in the electronics department there trying to explain to clueless customers why the iPod they bought won't work with Wal-Mart's music store.
This is exactly why people continue to download using p2p apps. If they charged 50c a track and made them mp3 with a choice of what bitrate you wanted with NO DRM, then I'm sure it'd kick off.
Now in my case I've used Napster To Go, Rhapsody To Go and Yahoo Music To Go and right now they seem to be the same for me so price is the winning factor. Now with all that said I'm more into Columbia House where I can get full quality CDs without DRM for about 5 bucks including S&H and my plan doesn't send stuff out every month.
Right now I've got Buy One Get 4 Free which is good for me. Also I get bonus points for everything I buy so if my highest priced selection costs me 18.98 I get 38 bonus points just for that order and 75 gets me a free CD if I pay my almost 3 bucks shipping and tax cost. Right now I have over 1,000 bonus points. I also love to buy the newer DVDs so I can buy them for 20 bucks at Columbia House and get 4 free CDS which is a great deal for me because I end up buying the DVDs either way. Even best buy and those stores aren't more than 4 bucks cheaper for the DVD but try getting those stores to give you four free CDs for about 7 dollars more than their DVD itself. Hey I also get 40 bonus points for that DVD as well.
Oh well, it won't be long until they are just giving the music away...and then we'd be right back to what we had with the original napster.
Now I like it because with a supported player like my iRiver H320 I can pay 60 bucks a year and transfer tons and tons of songs to my H320 without having to pay per song. Now again if I cancel my subscription or it runs out those files on both my computer and H320 player won't play anymore. I view this like HBO in that I'm paying a monthly price to get access to what is on HBO knowing I won't watch everything but I also know that if I cancel HBO I won't get to watch HBO content either.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.