main

Microsoft schmoozes open source president

malebolgia   on 03 June 2005 - 15:04 · 9 comments & 1785 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft has made one of its most direct overtures to the open-source software community to date, in the form of an invitation to Michael Tiemann, president of the Open Source Initiative (OSI), to begin a "productive conversation." Tiemann, who is also vice president for open-source affairs at Linux distributor Red Hat, said Microsoft had contacted him as president of OSI in order to open up a top-level dialogue, according to a report in industry journal eWeek.

He said the OSI would take the offer at face value, according to the report. Tiemann has exchanged emails with the company but has not yet met anyone. Tiemann would be most likely to meet with Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, who has been involved in attempting to ease relations with the open source world. Red Hat could not immediately confirm the report. The move represents part of Microsoft's latest effort in dealing with the growing popularity of open-source or "free" software, which makes source code available to anyone and isn't controlled by any single company.

News source: InfoWorld


"Opera is honored to receive PC World's World Class 2005 Award, as we strive to lead the browser industry in innovation and excellence," says Jon von Tetzchner, CEO, Opera Software. "We are largely known for our innovative features, but Opera 8 also excels in its security offerings. We not only extend users as much functionality as possible but also a considerable degree of protection while online."

Opera 8 was released on April 19, 2005, and is hailed by reviewers as "fast", "flashy" and "still number one in browser innovation". Known as a viable alternative to the market giant Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Opera's market share is growing. Current download figures for the newest version of the browser totaled four million in the first four weeks of its release.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 lbmouse on 03 Jun 2005 - 15:12
Maybe someone at MS read this article. The OSS community is one of the most powerful organizations around.
#1.1 EduardValencia on 03 Jun 2005 - 15:32
very far behind microsoft,way to go
#1.2 Colonel_Angus on 03 Jun 2005 - 23:29
QUOTE
very far behind microsoft,way to go


That's a very ingnorant comment, considering many of MS's best employees contribute to open source projects, both professionally under MS and in their free time away from work.
#2 markjensen on 03 Jun 2005 - 15:44
This article on the same item has a bit more content. A particular interesting quote is
QUOTE
Asked why he thinks Microsoft wants to meet with him and what he thinks they are interested in discussing, Tiemann said he still thinks the Microsoft Shared Source program represents an "attempt to quell an internal civil war" at Microsoft.


Interesting, indeed.
#3 raid517 on 03 Jun 2005 - 16:39
Mmm... odd don't you think... You can almost imagine a telephone call to Michael Tiemann from Microsoft, where Tiemann initiates the converstaion by simply asking 'hi how can we help?'

Now that on it's own will undoubtedly be a moment to be savoured.

GJ

Last edited by 13486 on 03 Jun 2005 - 19:26
#4 barneyt on 03 Jun 2005 - 19:33
Maybe MS is finally saying publicly that sees Open Source as something other than "a mild irritant". I'm sure that Firefox's rise has opened up some eyes in Redmond........

Hope that Open Source folks take their time digesting this matter...

Barney
(1 reply) #5 anog on 03 Jun 2005 - 21:12
QUOTE
open-source or "free" software, which makes source code available to anyone and isn't controlled by any single company.


Isn't this plain wrong? Just because you can see the source, it doesn't mean the company/individual who wrote it doesn't control it!...
#5.1 markjensen on 03 Jun 2005 - 22:07
True, the code writer owns the copyright, but he/she also gets to choose how to license it. Various Open Source licenses (BSD, GPL, etc.) allow free redistribution of the code.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the writer and copyright holder determining the condiditons of distribution.

There are other systems, like Microsoft's "Shared Source" which allows you to look at the code, but not do anything with it.
#6 krono6 on 03 Jun 2005 - 21:34
When I read the title, I thought that there was some MS sex scandal....

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)