main
Report a problem

Apple to switch to Intel chips!

Brad Wardell   on 04 June 2005 - 03:20 · 296 comments & 36470 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Computer plans to announce Monday that it's scrapping its partnership with IBM and switching its computers to Intel's microprocessors. Apple has been using PowerPC chips to power their Macintosh line of computers since 1994. But according to CNET, Apple is scheduled to announce this Monday at their Worldwide Developer's Conference their intention to make the switch.

Those who remember the migration from the 68k series chips back in the early 90s may recall that it took some doing. To run at optimal speeds, software has to be recompiled to the native chipset. Migrating to a totally different platform such as PowerPC to Intel will be a significant upheaval.

When Apple announced their move to IBM's next-generation PowerPC chipsets (now in the G5) some pundits have long made the argument that Apple can't ship enough computers to remain competitive on both price and performance with computers powered by Intel-compatible CPUs. Simply put, economies of scale were working against Apple in the long-run.

According to a CNET source, what may have spurred the change was just that -- IBM's concerns about making a low-volume chip that competes with x86's in performance in the same price-range. The question is, can the Mac survive a transition from the PowerPC to Intel-based CPUs with the corresponding software compatibility/optimization issues?

News source: News.com

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 296 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#1.1 Chad on 04 Jun 2005 - 19:36
Where did anyone say anything about 'tinkering' with their bios? OpenFirmware is a better bios
#1.2 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 00:15
The point is that we aren't talking about configuring it for personal use. Why you insist that is the main difference, I don't know. The OpenFirmware bios is a much more stable, much more advanced bios than anything on x86. The amount of tech behind it is unmatched.
#1.3 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 20:52
So you two haver never downloaded an unstable alpha/beta bios release? Hehe, apparently not.
(1 reply) #2 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#2.1 Chad on 04 Jun 2005 - 19:38
The rumor of Marklar is that it boots on an x86 chipset. That doesn't mean it can run on any x86 computer. It's all about the bios. You don't have the bios, you don't run OS X

(1 reply) #3 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#3.1 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 00:12
No. If Apple does switch to an Intel processor (which I highly doubt will happen), it WILL NOT be an x86. It would cost Apple and it's developers way too much time and money to re-do all of their apps/OS X to the new platform.
(2 replies) #4 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#4.1 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 00:21
Just stop ok? The bios isn't 'dead', and pc manufacturers aren't moving away from it. The bios is THE issue here. It's against the OS X eula to run it on anything but their bios.
#4.2 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 20:57
If you knew anything about Apple, you'd know the answer to that
(1 reply) #5 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#5.1 Chad on 05 Jun 2005 - 21:07
By who? The Inquirer? Please. They just picked up the same story as everyone else and added their own twist for publicity

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)