Microsoft and IBM have settled outstanding legal claims stemming from the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft in the mid-1990s.
The agreement, announced Friday, will result in a $775 million payment to IBM and a $75 million credit toward Microsoft software. In the course of the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust suit against the software giant, the government claimed that IBM suffered from Microsoft's discriminatory pricing and overcharging practices, according to a Microsoft statement released Friday.
The settlement resolves those antitrust claims, as well as others related to IBM's OS/2 operating system and SmartSuite desktop application suite. "IBM is pleased that we have amicably resolved these longstanding issues," Ed Lineen, senior vice president and general counsel for IBM, said in the statement.
The pact does not cover claims for alleged harm to IBM's server hardware or server software business.
News source: C|Net News.com
The agreement, announced Friday, will result in a $775 million payment to IBM and a $75 million credit toward Microsoft software. In the course of the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust suit against the software giant, the government claimed that IBM suffered from Microsoft's discriminatory pricing and overcharging practices, according to a Microsoft statement released Friday.
The settlement resolves those antitrust claims, as well as others related to IBM's OS/2 operating system and SmartSuite desktop application suite. "IBM is pleased that we have amicably resolved these longstanding issues," Ed Lineen, senior vice president and general counsel for IBM, said in the statement.
The pact does not cover claims for alleged harm to IBM's server hardware or server software business.
I touched on the subject with Jed Rose, a featured community leader at Microsoft, who agreed to comment or find someone to comment on this subject. I asked him what he felt about Macintosh becoming mainstream for x86 and his initial response was that theres already quite a bit of discussion going on behind the scenes in Mac section of Microsoft. I hope to have official comment on Microsoft's perception of this soon.
Whatever the outcome, one thing is sure. Apple are working on OS X codenamed Leopard and it's scheduled to release around the same time as Longhorn. We may find ourselves looking at a real choice for our hardware around that time, this is of course assuming that it will be a boxed version that x86 users can buy off the shelf, without needing to meet the strict hardware requirements that Apple have always had in the past.
2006 just became a lot more interesting.

The problems with OS/2 was:
- Boring IBM marketing
- Marketing only to business
- Steep hardware requirments. At the time, Windows 3.0 could run on 2-4 MB of RAM, but OS/2 2.1 needed around 12 MB. RAM was expensive back then.
By the time IBM realized that they had a potentially great platform, it was too late. MS had won the desktop OS war. IBM tried a consumer push with OS/2 3.0 a.k.a Warp. Too late. Anyone remember the "OS/2 Warp Fiesta Bowl?"
I recently had a chance to play with Lotus SmartSuite. I was shocked at how nice it actually was. All the apps were intuitive especially Freelance Graphics. 1-2-3 was nice also. The biggest surprise was the word processor - Word Pro. It was big, but it seemed more like a desktop publisher than a text editor.
Competition would have been a great thing in the productivity suite market but it never happened. I'm not blaming MS 100% because the IBM marketing machine didn't do their part either.
I have this sweet jacket that folds up into a football with the OS/2 Fiesta logo on it..haha.
Anyway. We used OS/2 warp 4.0, and I really liked it..but it quickly became outdated. Even IBM wasn't using it on their employees computers..so that wasn't gonna last long. But it was fun while it did.
Last edited by 115639 on 01 Jul 2005 - 16:46
hmmmmm.....wonder how it feels to have the shoe on the other foot...
Lucky for Microsoft that their money pile is big. lol
edit: Hmm, a Slashdotter said it should be about a month of revenue for Microsoft, and that they have a $40+ billion cash reserve. Anyone have any current figures of Microsoft's economy?
Last edited by 21023 on 01 Jul 2005 - 20:52
yeah thats true ....
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/apr05/04-28fy05Q3earnings.mspx
Last edited by 2096 on 01 Jul 2005 - 22:48
About freeking time. This thing has draged on for more than a decade now. I wonder how much it cost the two sides in legal fees, court costs, bribery, pay-offs, and wasted oportunity?
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.