main

Nvidia Preps More GeForce 7 Graphics Chips

malebolgia   on 05 July 2005 - 21:51 · 22 comments & 1843 views

Advertisement (Why?)
NVIDIA Corp. may be preparing a new GeForce 7-series graphics processors in addition to already launched GeForce 7800 GTX product, as the firm’s unofficial drivers already list a chip code-named G72, which may turn out to be a more affordable GeForce 7 family member.

NVIDIA’s ForceWare 80.40 drivers, which were recently leaked on the Internet and are available at 3DChipset web-site, list G72 and NV48 graphics processing units, which were not yet released, among all the graphics chips the driver is capable of support. The driver also supports yet unreleased, but already somewhat known – GeForce 6600 LE, nForce4 C51 IGP, G70GL and Quadro FX 4500 – products.

News source: X-bit labs


Microsoft neither denied nor confirmed Shimpi's findings - instead deciding to play a wildcard. "Xbox 360 will have the hardware, software and services to enable breakthrough gaming and entertainment experiences that will blow consumers away." Which means we'll find out when the platform launches, later this year.

Finally, last week saw another Nintendo Revolution poster creep onto the internet. This time containing the words "Something is going ON" which is oddly suggestive. Those who remember the fake VirtualBoy-esque "headset" can once again get excited, as this new poster suggests that the Revolution will sense movement, via the headset.

Unfortunately the headset is extremely unlikely, however a movement sensor could still be implemented.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 22 additional comments
#1 Ambivalancer on 05 Jul 2005 - 21:57
This may sound a bit presumptious but...I think I would rather buy something like a 6600 over one of these 'affordable' ones will probably be more expensive, and it will only have slightly more funcionality. However, if it has a lot more pipelines or higher clock speeds then I suppose that it's quite good news, but it may be a bit of a silly move if they aren't much better than a 6600gt/6800.
(1 reply) #2 Octol on 05 Jul 2005 - 23:07
Although it's going to be tough on the pocketbook, I think I'm just going to have to bite the bullet and get a 7800 GTX for a system upgrade that I'm planning. However, I also think that I'll wait for the new product round of price gouging to end first.
#2.1 MrCobra on 06 Jul 2005 - 13:25
I agree and I wish I had waited but it is a bad ass card.
#3 ANova on 06 Jul 2005 - 00:33
This is the 7800 GT clocked at 335 MHz/1.1 GHz mem and will be priced at $500.
(1 reply) #4 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#4.1 TheSarge on 06 Jul 2005 - 01:23
Ah, never mind.
(5 replies) #5 RobertH on 06 Jul 2005 - 01:26
AGP versions would be nice.
#5.1 Treefrog on 06 Jul 2005 - 02:28
AGP is not going to hold up to this next generation of GPU's (maybe not this exact chipset, but the time is coming really fast). If you are planning to spend the money for the added performance, you're going to have to budget in for a PCI-E mobo that will actually allow you to use the added power. AGP just simply will not handle the bandwidth, and any cards built with an AGP bridge will be limited to what the AGP pipe can carry.
#5.2 riscy on 06 Jul 2005 - 03:35
That is cr*p, AGP 8X's bandwidth isn't fully loaded by the current generation of GFX cards. Where do you get your information from? Check out http://www.viperlair.com/articles/editorials/pcie/index.shtml
#5.3 ANova on 06 Jul 2005 - 06:37
The 7800 GTX doesn't use anywhere near the available bandwidth that the AGP port is capable of. Apparently nvidia has decided not to officially support agp, but that doesn't mean a third party IHV won't. There is also a very good chance that ATI's R520 will be available in agp.
#5.4 Treefrog on 06 Jul 2005 - 15:30
Read what I said. I did not say that AGP was a big bottleneck at this time (though I can't find any charts to give hard and fast numbers for that either way, most reviews that I've read have hinted at this) but that it will be soon, though another point to consider is that even A64 3000+ CPUs (and faster) are becoming a bottleneck. The CPU simply can't feed the data to the GPU fast enough. So even if you had the newest card in AGP form, it's not going to perform (to any noticable degree) any differently than the generation of cards before it. Even the 6800's are CPU bound in certain circumstances. Paying that much for a new generation of card does not pay off unless you're willing to have other components of the system matched for optimum performance (this has been true for many years now).

Simple solution, if you have an AGP equipped mobo, unless you live on the bleeding edge you probably don't have much more than a 3400+ CPU and should stick with the 6800's (which kick mucho butt anyways). If you DO live on the bleeding edge, you either already have, or are going to be getting a PCI-e mobo soon anyway, well, just because it's the new thing, so the issue is moot.

Regardless, I'm sure one (or more) of the card manufactures will come out with an AGP part, just because there will be people that will fork over for them. If I had the money to spend on upgrading my GPU to that level, spending a bit more to upgrade my mobo and CPU would be trivial. On the other hand, if I wanted to get more mileage out of my AGP rig, I'd just get the fastest CPU I could afford for my mobo along with a 6800 GT or Ultra and be very happy knowing that I'm maxing out and my next upgrade would be to new tech.

ATI is something I won't consider, because I simply don't like them. Every single one I've tried has simply not worked in the system I had at the time (I've tried 3 times, each one a bust.. 3 strikes you're out).
#5.5 ANova on 07 Jul 2005 - 00:21
And I've had nvidia cards not work in some systems. **** happens.
(3 replies) #6 TheSarge on 06 Jul 2005 - 01:29
ATI's next (delayed) processor better be something really great or the Good Ship ATi & Crew is going to be in peril.
#6.1 dhitb on 06 Jul 2005 - 01:47
They might have to rely on *gasp* leafblowers and game-dependant "optimizations"
#6.2 jerry on 06 Jul 2005 - 03:47
QUOTE
They might have to rely on *gasp* leafblowers and game-dependant "optimizations"

While you are at it, tell us when Longhorn will come out. Your crystal ball must be put to good use ..
#6.3 dhitb on 07 Jul 2005 - 03:27
No sooner than August 2006. The crystal ball has spoken.
(1 reply) #7 Zkal on 06 Jul 2005 - 04:30
Actually NV48 is released. Some who have recently purchased 6800-type of card have found out that their device id. is NV48 instead of NV40/42. There was a thread of this somewhere, propably Guru3D or something like that..
Supposedly only change in NV48 is that is manufactured in smaller processes, same used for 7800GTX
#7.1 Treefrog on 06 Jul 2005 - 15:33
Ooooh, so does this mean the new part will run cooler? That is the only problem with the 6800's, they're awesome, but they're power hogs .
#8 nvizible on 06 Jul 2005 - 05:37
"is capable of support"?

Surely you mean "is capable of supporting"?

English, my dear fellow, English!

(One could also say "of which it can support" or other such permutations.)
#9 Adequate on 06 Jul 2005 - 06:32
Conspiracy against the truth...
#10 kravex on 06 Jul 2005 - 08:11
With the price and supported platforms (AGP and PCI-e) of the 6600GT I think the 7000 series can wait...

(1 reply) #11 AsciiSmoke on 06 Jul 2005 - 08:44
What they need to do is make something as powerfull as a 256mb 6600gt but for around £50. And to be for the mass market there still has to be an AGP version.

Now that's what I call mid-range power-to-the-people.

Guess, I'll keep dreaming.
#11.1 Treefrog on 06 Jul 2005 - 15:35
A 256MB 6600GT for $50.. let me share your dream, please . I'd buy that in a heartbeat. How about a 256MB 6800GT for $100 while we're at it .

Closest thing I can find is a 6200 with the NV44A core for $68, though that is still a very nice card, and runs cool. It only has a 64bit memory interface instead of 128bit, that's it's weak spot .



Last edited by 58940 on 06 Jul 2005 - 15:45

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)