main

Intel to Roll out new Itanium Chips

malebolgia   on 14 July 2005 - 15:04 · 18 comments & 2593 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Intel is expected to announce next week what may be the last batch of single-core Itanium processors, CNET News.com has learned.

According to a source familiar with Intel's plans, the chipmaking giant will introduce on Monday two Itanium 2 processors from its 64-bit Madison lineup. The chips will run at speeds of 1.66GHz, with computer memory cache sizes of 9MB and 6MB, respectively, and are expected to be snatched up by mainframe computer makers such as Hitachi, Fujitsu and Silicon Graphics Inc.

Prices for the new Itanium processors were not made available at press time. Intel currently sells similar processors for as much as $4,227 in large quantities with a 400MHz front-side bus that speeds data to and from the chip. The new versions are expected to ship with a front-side bus that can reach 667MHz.

News source: C|Net News.com


Minimum System Requirements
  • 233 MHz Intel Pentium class or better processor
  • At least 128 MB of RAM
  • Windows 2000 or XP

Recommended System Configuration

For viewing 640x480 standard definition (SD) H.264 video:
  • 1.8 GHz Intel Pentium 4 or faster processor
  • At least 256 MB of RAM
  • 64 MB or greater video card
  • Windows 2000 or XP


New features in QuickTime 7 Player for Windows:
  • H.264 video playback. Watch movies created with this state-of-the-art, standards-based codec, which delivers exceptional-quality video.
  • Surround sound. With QuickTime 7, your PC, and surround speakers, you can enjoy the full effect of your surround sound game or movie.
  • New and improved playback controls. Easily change settings including jog shuttle, playback speed, bass, treble, and balance.
  • Zero-configuration streaming. QuickTime automatically determines your optimal Internet connection speed and reconnects dropped connections.
  • Live resize. Playback continues smoothly as you change the size of the QuickTime Player window

New features in QuickTime 7 Pro for Windows:
  • Create H.264 video. Create incredible-looking video for any use, from 3G for mobile devices to HD.
  • Create surround audio. Create a rich multimedia experience by adding multichannel audio to your movie.
  • Floating controls. Easily access functions like pause, play, fast-forward, and rewind while watching full-screen movies.
  • Background exporting. Export your movie in the background and continue with your next playback or editing task.
  • Improved movie authoring. The all-new Movie Properties facilitates simple and efficient movie authoring.
  • Automate with VB Script. Automate your QuickTime workflow with native VB Script support in QuickTime 7. Developers can also use VB Script to access the new QuickTime Active X control for creating custom multimedia applications.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
(5 replies) #1 Darknm on 14 Jul 2005 - 15:09
thats damn expencive for a processor.. but i guess for that "6 - 9" MB of cache i guess its worht it.
#1.1 Hurmoth on 14 Jul 2005 - 15:09
$4000+ is not worth it for just a processor
#1.2 Darknm on 14 Jul 2005 - 15:13
oh my god.. i just read the title "single core" my god you'd think insted of packing all that cache in the thing they would put in another core..
#1.3 sphbecker on 14 Jul 2005 - 15:59
You guys do not seem to understand what this processors is used for.
#1.4 AethylFilth on 14 Jul 2005 - 20:48
unbelievable
#1.5 TheSarge on 14 Jul 2005 - 23:01
Geez, read the freeking article. These chips aren't really new, they're just the last revision of the single-core Itanium.
Which means that Intel is planing to roll out multi-core (or dual-core) CPUs for servers sometime soon.
Which means that a lot of you missed the point.
As far as the expected price goes, they're charging what they thing the market will pay. Don't blame them if you think it's too much.
#2 RanCorX2 on 14 Jul 2005 - 15:33
computer stuff is such a ripoff nowadays...
(2 replies) #3 child998 on 14 Jul 2005 - 16:11
I dont get why CPU's are geting lower speeds. Yes i know they are 64bit and thay have more memery in the cache, but still there only runing at 1.8ghz. And I hate intel, if you want a good CPU, go for AMD. with intel your paying for the name. DIE intel DIE. I will go to the doctors for my madness.
#3.1 Zxian on 14 Jul 2005 - 16:31
Why don't people understand that higher clockspeed doesn't always mean higher performance?!?!?!

Take a look at the Pentium-M processors (yes they're Intel, and they blow anything AMD-mobile out of the water). They run at speeds from 1.4-2.1 GHz (give or take) and compare with P4's at 2.0-3.4GHz and the corresponding AMD chips.

When you're running a server that's communicating with several hundred computers, crunching power isn't as important as memory.
#3.2 Zerbs on 14 Jul 2005 - 18:40
as Zxian points out, you can't compare clockspeed of different processor lines. Even Intel itself when going from say 486 to the first Pentium had slower clock speeds, but a Pentium 60 Mhz could beat a 486 100 Mhz.

For price, Intel and AMD are very close now, they see-saw back and forth on who is lower. Itanium may have much lower clockspeed than an Opteron, but it is a different chip for a different kind of computer.
(2 replies) #4 StuRReaL on 14 Jul 2005 - 16:12
guys these aren't chips for "normal people" to buy. These are mainframe CPU's big big big chips for doing very very very heavy duty processing, the likes of which we won't need for another 5 years or so
#4.1 Snafu on 14 Jul 2005 - 17:55
Right, These processors are meant for areas where alot of processing power is required like weather forcasting.
#4.2 sphbecker on 14 Jul 2005 - 18:22
Or Instant Messaging
#5 xxpor on 14 Jul 2005 - 19:01
I want that itanium with the 1.1 billion transistors and 24mb of L2.
#6 Kst on 14 Jul 2005 - 19:05
c'mon AMD fanboys, right hand over heart......I pledge alegance to the flag of Intel...lmao
#7 bsharp on 15 Jul 2005 - 03:32
The computers that Itanium are made for are big money stuff like deconstructing the human genome!

Last edited by 115639 on 15 Jul 2005 - 03:40
#8 tiwaris on 15 Jul 2005 - 05:20
It is well worth $4K price tag. Itaniums are perhaps the most advanced processors today. Only reason that these are not very successful is lack of suitable compilers (even intel's own compiler is incapable of harnessing the power it can deliver).
#9 bsharp on 17 Jul 2005 - 01:12
check out some of the spec marks on them
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/
Super fast!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)