main

Ten Year old becomes Microsoft Engineer

JoshS   on 16 July 2005 - 08:22 · 132 comments & 14802 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Arfa Karim Randhawa meets Bill and is given a tour of Redmond.

Arfa Karim Randhawa, aged 10, has become the youngest person to be certified as a Microsoft engineer. Randhawa passed her Microsoft Certified Professional examinations last year. She met Bill Gates this week and was taken on a tour of Microsoft's Redmond campus.

The 10 year-old, from Faisalabad in Pakistan, asked Gates why children were not allowed to work for Microsoft and was told that they should concentrate on their school studies.

But he explained that Microsoft has an intern programme which would be available to her once she reached high school level. Randhawa also asked why there are so few women in the company, suggesting that Microsoft should have an equal number of men and women.

Gates replied that it is sometimes difficult to get women interested in technology.

News source: vnunet.com


Thanks to Radish™ for his Back Page News Submission

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 132 additional comments
#1 AnarKhy on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:25
bah!
(3 replies) #2 Sp3ctranova on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:27
I never knew the human brain was developed enough at age 10 for something like this....
#2.1 joekr on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:33
Chicks are getting pregnant at the age of 10 these days
#2.2 deadmonkey on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:38
I assume you mean 9 not 19.
#2.3 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 01:47
You'd be surprised at what some can do on day 1.
#3 Cubiz on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:32
#4 stezo2k on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:36
sounds good for her... looks like she'll have a good career when she leaves school
(1 reply) #5 elliot on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:37
Congrats to her parents, obviously they wanted this much more than she did.

If she had a normal childhood, I doubt she would have even heard of programming at that age...
#5.1 SquareSoft0 on 16 Jul 2005 - 09:09
I have a bad feeling that you're right.
#6 umerh on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:38
I have seen this girl (i saw her at PDC05 Pakistan Developers Conference) and i couldnt even believe that she could be a C# Wizard


This pic is with Clemens Vasters (RD) with Arfa
#7 Techno_Funky on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:43
way to go girl
#8 Storm on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:52
how do you take it?
i want to..
(11 replies) #9 Ruffneckting on 16 Jul 2005 - 08:55
QUOTE
Gates replied that it is sometimes difficult to get women interested in technology.


Unless it's (put girls favorite colour here)

j/k

Fair play to her, someone send her an invite to join neowin.
#9.1 DeepThought on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:18
That's no excuse. Like the little girl said, Microsoft should employ equal numbers of men and women, otherwise they're sexist. They should either keep firing male workers until the number is the same as female employees, or they should hire women to match numbers of men, regardless of interest or proficiency in the technology field.

Likewise for firefighters. Strength ratios are sexist.
#9.2 Spinally on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:38
Wow, that was the single most retarded piece of feminist bull**** I've seen in years (even if you are a man), I agree that sex doesn't matter, but I DON'T agree that they should equalize the number of men and women in employees just because it's the good thing to do (it's not good, btw). If a man and a woman come apply for a job, and I think the man is more knowledgeable (after taking tests, ofcourse) I will most certainly hire the man, even if my workforce is already 95% men. Why? Because I want my company to run as good as possible, and that's only possible when you make good choices about your employees, not based on sex, but based on ability.

(vice versa too, if 95% of my workforce is women and the woman applying is better than the man, I'll hire the woman anyday)

Sexist my ass.
#9.3 elliot on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:53
It's called sarcasm, genius.
#9.4 DeepThought on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:00
Heh, sorry, my post's sarcasm might have been a little subtle. Speech inflections don't translate very well to a written medium.

I agree with what you said wholeheartedly... it's nonsensical to demand that a certain number of employees meet an arbitrary characteristic like race or gender; all that should matter in the WORKPLACE is the ability to do the WORK. The same statement can apply to affirmative action in colleges. And yet, despite the intentional absurdity of my post, it wasn't all that dissimilar to the kinds of radical gender-feminism statements made seriously.

THAT'S scary.
#9.5 nic on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:40
Don't worry DeepThought, your post was ooozzing with sarcasm when I read it.
#9.6 Wolfsglen on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:33
rofl i got the sarcasm too...but i must admit, i laughed as much at the response that didnt get it as i did the original sarcasm
#9.7 ev0| on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:39
the more women in the company the more distraction for men and the more drama and talking behind peoples backs. Now that is a fact.
#9.8 enzop on 16 Jul 2005 - 20:09
DeepThought, that has to be the dumbest thing ive ever heard when it comes to equal rights, how the hell is sacking men so that the number equals the amount of women working there fair?!?!! silly girl :p or boy :p
#9.9 Sticktron on 16 Jul 2005 - 23:26
wow.. someone didn't read the follow-ups, now did they?
#9.10 eAi on 18 Jul 2005 - 09:21
How did they manage that? They have to scroll down to find the "R" button anyway...
#9.11 NeoReader on 18 Jul 2005 - 18:19
He took to long thinking of such a good responce that by the time he finally submitted the rest of us already knew it was sarcasm and where already reading 4 to 5 posts below
(1 reply) #10 eckoman2k1 on 16 Jul 2005 - 09:01
Wow :| She's 10 years old and is already has the knowledge that I'm going to university for in the fall, that's amazing!
#10.1 weenur on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:00
MCAD is not the same as an engineering degree... not even remotely close.
#11 Avi on 16 Jul 2005 - 09:48
lmfao.
#12 tiwaris on 16 Jul 2005 - 09:59
Good for her.
(2 replies) #13 ishtar on 16 Jul 2005 - 10:05
I'm curious how many american kids do that and never get recognised for their ability its always some foreigner who seems to always be smarter than us . Thats probably all they have to do over there , theres nothing else except a bunch of crumbling buildings.
#13.1 galoosh33 on 16 Jul 2005 - 10:23
I totally agree. I bet there are quite a few very talented kids in the USA and Europe, yet they don't get to meet Bill Gates!

Lucky girl though, I'm sure she will do well
#13.2 AethylFilth on 18 Jul 2005 - 14:46
And I'm curious as to how someone can live in 2005 Earth and still have a mindset like that. OH wait.. not curious at all.
(2 replies) #14 mbg on 16 Jul 2005 - 10:06
Since when did someone become an engineer by writing a multiple choice test?
#14.1 nic on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:33
I really agree with you here. The title "Engineer" is so thrown around these days.

I mean, congratz to the girl. I'm sure she will do great things when she becomes a real engineer, but passing a technician exam is hardly grounds to be called an "Engineer." I was at the Hilton hotel the other day for a weddings reception, and the sink in the bathroom was out with the note "Sink is out, Hilton Engineering."
#14.2 Treefrog on 17 Jul 2005 - 21:15
MS are known to use the term "Engineer" in a very misleading way, as an MSCE is most certainly NOT an engineer. There have been true engineering organizations that have tried to correct the situation, but I don't think they've had much luck .

BTW, the story is incorrect in that she did not recieve any certification with the word "engineer" in it. She passed the MCAD cert.
(5 replies) #15 xSuRgEx on 16 Jul 2005 - 10:54
mcse isnt a hard thing to get, they are underrated anyway. all PcWorld in the UK computer tech's are mcse, i think that says it all.
#15.1 Jason on 16 Jul 2005 - 12:03
If that is the case then each MCSE employee at PC World would be able to design and implement an Active Directory network spanning the world from the ground up.


I am impressed they can even boot a PC up
#15.2 daveoc64 on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:02
You have got to be joking. PC World staff don't have a clue.
#15.3 weenur on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:02
She got a MCAD, which is a developer certification.
#15.4 Garry on 17 Jul 2005 - 01:12
I used to work at PC World. Trust me, PC World employ very very few MCSEs and certainly do not train their staff to anywhere near MCSE level. In fact, one of the technicians I worked with had never worked with PCs before at all... He was a TV repairman prior to getting the PC World job.
#15.5 NeoReader on 18 Jul 2005 - 18:25
QUOTE
I am impressed they can even boot a PC up.


QUOTE
You have got to be joking. PC World staff don't have a clue.


That's why he was impressed.
#16 feelgood13 on 16 Jul 2005 - 11:06
she needs to hire a lawyer asap to get that name changed
#17 Narlzac85 on 16 Jul 2005 - 11:58
most kids with talent like this are never recognized in the US because we suffer through the agony of public education which really holds some kids back during the best learning years. I didn't even have a challenge until freshmen year of college (mostly because I played games and goofed around all day). Damn you public school!!
(2 replies) #18 hotdog963al on 16 Jul 2005 - 12:15
Hahaha Shows how good you have to be to be Microsoft Certified eh?
It's kind of insulting to the current Employees I would Imagine. "YOU ARE JUST AS GOOD AS A TEN YEAR OLD GIRL!"
#18.1 Jason on 16 Jul 2005 - 12:17
Just because someone has a c# exam passed dosn't mean they have equal knowledge as someone else with the exam passed.

#18.2 weenur on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:06
Exactly right, Jason. Being able to pass the exam doesn't equate to actual experience in the field. I doubt that she'd have the skills to gather requirements for an actual enterprise project. But, who knows? She may just be a genious.

@hotdog963al, take the SQL Server exam and tell me how easy it was.

I wonder if Arfa took the SQL exam. I'd be very impressed if she did and passed it. One of the finest DB developers I know said it was hard(he did pass, though).
(2 replies) #19 chimera963 on 16 Jul 2005 - 12:18
lol 10 years old and in microsoft now, pretty weird.
just coz shes gna b in microsoft at 10 years of ages doesnt mean shes insanely smart, it could also mean microsoft are insanely desperate :p
#19.1 phiberoptik on 16 Jul 2005 - 12:58
She's not "in microsoft" and she's not going to "b in microsoft".

She just happened to pass some multiple choice tests and get a piece of paper saying she's certified. I doubt she would be able to execute any of the real world used knowledge if put into a corporate IT situation. They don't teach you how to deal with corporate BS either on the MCSE.
#19.2 eAi on 18 Jul 2005 - 09:24
chimera963: You're typing with a keyboard here, not a mobile phone. Please fill in the missing characters in your words so we can actually read it...
#20 Liaqat_ali on 16 Jul 2005 - 13:05
wow...that made me proud
#21 ahodes1 on 16 Jul 2005 - 13:18
No, not at all. The source article is incorrect. She did not become an MCSE, but rather an MCAD (Microsoft Certified Application Developer). Also, she was 9 when she got the certification and 10 when she got to go to America to see Bill Gates. The article that has its facts correct can be found here
(2 replies) #22 iascoot on 16 Jul 2005 - 13:58
**** man, go out and play
i dont believe people should be pushed that early in life
#22.1 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 01:59
I think people focus too much on playing and not enough on learning. It would be nice if the school curriculum was made much more extensive and condensed so that grades 1 through 12 become grades 1 through 8, with college after that.

In the current system, everyone who wants to learn and do something with themselves has to suffer being treated like an idiot for 12 long years (not because they are stupid but because the teachers refuse to teach at a decent rate) when they could learn everything they need to learn before going to college in 6 years and then go to college so they'll be able to do something with themselves sooner in life. Just my 2 cents.
#22.2 NeoReader on 18 Jul 2005 - 18:35
Well that's what you can expect when you have 20something teachers. "it's like the blind leading the blind". They just got out of high school and they are teaching to high schoolers?

I think the teachers should be people who have gone through at least some 10 years of some kind of teacher requirement classes and so forth, that way they have all this knowledge that they can pass on and some kind or small child psycology courses should be a requirement for any teacher. I mean come on beside from parents these teachers are the ones reasing our kids.

my .02
(6 replies) #23 Colonel_Angus on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:07
In the country I live in (United States), it is illegal to call yourself an enginer without a govenment license.

Pakistan must have lower standards.
#23.1 roadwarrior on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:27
I live in the US as well, and you are full of it. You can call yourself an engineer if you have an engineering degree or a certification such as MCSE or CCNE (the E in them means engineer).
#23.2 Colonel_Angus on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:44
QUOTE
Registration as a professional engineer through a state board of registration is the only legal basis for public practice of engineering.

http://www.imagineeringezine.com/e-zine/whatpe.html
QUOTE
Under the Texas Engineering Practice Act, only duly licensed persons may legally perform, or offer to perform engineering services for the public.

http://www.tbpe.state.tx.us/lic.htm
All 50 states require PE certification. It looks like roadwarrior just got PWNED!
#23.3 wildk on 16 Jul 2005 - 23:35
Unfortunatly not, you see, having read through your links, it quickly became clear that the PE qualification only applies to mainly building services (Stuctural engineer, Electrician, etc). however there are a boat load of exemptions in there where people can call themsleves engineers and not be in breach of this licencing.
#23.4 Nand on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:59
just for my information MCSE means Microsoft Computer Science Engineer ?
#23.5 Treefrog on 17 Jul 2005 - 21:22
MCSE=Microsoft Certified Sytems Engineer

Note, this is NOT what the girl passed, she passed the MCAD (Microsoft Certified Applications Developer)

I agree totally that MS is trying to water down the meaning of the term Engineer. Just one more thing I don't like about them.
#23.6 AethylFilth on 18 Jul 2005 - 15:18
23.3.
The P.Eng qualification applies to MANY branches of engineering, note a few "non-building" services:
Biological Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Software Engineer
Water Engineer
Environmental Engineer

many others as well.

I'm currently working and on overview for 48 months to receive my P.Eng after doing my undergrad in Engineering Systems and Computing.
While people still do call themselves engineers without being a certified, professional engineer, the bottom line is that they do not have the qualifications to work under that title, or call their work "Engineering" in the professional sense, as microsoft portrays it. (However, the word engineering is common, and can be used to describe something as little as "cobbling together" )

Would you let someone who is a certified public speaker, call themselves a Lawyer? A person who works a cash register an Accountant? Someone with first aid, a Medical Doctor?
I hope you get the point.
Engineers work incredibly hard, and face rigorous and strict guidelines set out by provincial/national/international engineering councils. When someone who is not restricted buy these regulations, and haven't put in the same amount of work wants to use the same distinction for themselves and their work, it discredits the sanctity of Engineering.
Thank you
(1 reply) #24 icecaveman on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:40
Way to bring suicide bombers into the redmond campus

J/K
#24.1 TheSarge on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:54
Not Funny!
(12 replies) #25 mannan on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:50
Proud to be a Pakistani .....


i am pakistani and only 15 years old,, you can see pic in my avatar ,,,and i've done (RHCT,MCSE,CCNP,LPC)


Pakistani are very talented ............
#25.1 elliot on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:56
The rest of the world just has better standards when it comes to giving your child a childhood.
#25.2 mx3 on 16 Jul 2005 - 17:10
Apparently they're not very talented when it comes to writing news comments at Neowin, though.
#25.3 enzop on 16 Jul 2005 - 20:03
Every race is talented, not just urs

and they are quite dangerous as we saw in london
#25.4 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:10
elliot, what would those be? I live in the US and I think that girl has had a better childhood than most Americans.
#25.5 DeepThought on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:19
Interestingly, any culture that places extreme pressure on young children is misinterpreted as creating baby geniuses, while in reality societal competition has a lot more to do with the kids' IQs than the kids themselves. Japan, for instance, has some of the most educated children in the world (and, typically, at younger ages) *not* because of nationality or genetics, but because of the INSANE levels of competition from basically day one (due in part to the historical system of honor). America, on the other hand, has a more lenient idea of how children should learn. For better or for worse, children in America face very little pressure in education, and (in the eyes of the rest of the world) "real" work only starts at high-school levels. While Japanese children struggle to get good grades in "middle-school" levels, American children write book reports and make baking-soda volcanoes. As suggested earlier in this thread, one can surmise that the girl's parents had this in mind for her long before she could even understand basic technological functions.

The moral of the story is that when you're in a competitive society, knowing more at a young age isn't as special as knowing that much in a very lax culture. All humans of all races, creeds, and nationalities have the *ability* to gain whatever certification this girl did, but only those who have a real reason to reach proverbially higher ever do. Typically, it's out of need, not want.
#25.6 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:39
The Japanese are actually very intelligent. Their average IQ is a 105, 5 points higher than ours. The Chinese are very intelligent too.

Anyway, I think the focus should not be on appling pressure to students but more so on giving students the oppitunity to learn as quickly as they'd like to rather than force them to learn at the absurdly slow pace our school system forces them to learn at. If anyone is wondering what I mean when I refer to our school system, I'll clarify it now. I'm referring to the private schools. I don't want to even begin with the public schools.
#25.7 DeepThought on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:59
QUOTE
The Japanese are actually very intelligent.

What I was trying to say was that the reason FOR the intelligence is because of the pressure TO be intelligent. It's not like Japanese children understand mathematics as soon as they're born; the Japanese education system is designed to educate children better, quicker. This ensures proficiency with rudimentary IQ-test skills as well as historical dates, math formulas, etcetera.

And regarding the second part... aren't private schools *designed* to be more complex and flexible for more 'interested' students than the public schools are? In any case, you're correct in the fact that US public schools are incredible failures when it comes to things like "educating" or "teaching".
#25.8 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 03:16
QUOTE
What I was trying to say was that the reason FOR the intelligence is because of the pressure TO be intelligent.


The reason for their intelligence is more genetics than anything else but no matter how intelligent they are, their intelligence is useless without an education. Japan's education system provides that necessary education and the competition simply enhances it. However Japan's education system doesn't make the Japanese intelligent, unless you consider intelligence to be what a person is saying or doing rather than what a person is thinking. On such a scale, Albert Einstein would be considered an idiot in grammar school even through he was more intelligent than any of his classmates.

The better private schools are years ahead of the public schools but from my own experience, it isn't enough.
#25.9 ishtar on 17 Jul 2005 - 10:27
Yea my boy is very talented too ,to get into the gifted program he had to make a 128 on the iq test odd though if you were a minority you only needed to make a 114 , now hes at college UF aerospace engneering .
#25.10 DeepThought on 17 Jul 2005 - 17:19
...wait. Arcanine, you think that Japanese people are BORN with a higher degree/capacity of/for intelligence because of their genetics? So, if you were to raise a newborn Japanese child in America and send him/her to an education system as flawed as, say, America's, the child would preform better than American or British or Russian students? That's just ignorant.
#25.11 AethylFilth on 18 Jul 2005 - 15:27
I can't believe the extent of the racist comments on here. The moderators will delete messages and post warning levels, but this??

QUOTE
The rest of the world just has better standards when it comes to giving your child a childhood.


Standards compared to what? Who are you to say who's childhood is better? If anything I'd say Africa is having a harder time than pakistan.

QUOTE
#25.2 Reply by mx3 on 16 Jul 2005 - 22:10 Quote this comment
Apparently they're not very talented when it comes to writing news comments at Neowin, though.


The boy is 15! First, ease up! Second, he has great certifications for his age, lives in pakistan, and can type in ALMOST perfect english, yet you need to chastise him because you can't just read between the minute mistakes? Grow up.


QUOTE
#25.3 Reply by enzop on 17 Jul 2005 - 01:03 Quote this comment
Every race is talented, not just urs

and they are quite dangerous as we saw in london


First off, the terrorists in london weren't from pakistan, that has been proven.

Second of all, even if they were, that's a ridiculously racist statement. Get the hell off the internet.



#25.12 NeoReader on 18 Jul 2005 - 18:45
I totally agree with your post AethylFilth.
#26 Ifoow on 16 Jul 2005 - 14:59
wow interesting article......NOT!!!!!!!
(4 replies) #27 Englishkid on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:24
i agree i bet she has no friends that are her own age never played sports had fun she's just been sat infront of the computer programming
#27.1 MegaManXcalibur on 16 Jul 2005 - 20:49
To many people computer programming is fun and sports aren't. Generly if a kid gets this good at computer programming at such a young age they have fun doing it.
#27.2 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jul 2005 - 02:18
What have sports ever contributed that was useful to society? A nation of spectators?

I don't know about everyone else but I know that I would have loved to have known as much as she does about computer programming when I was her age.
#27.3 RenaissanceMan on 18 Jul 2005 - 09:12
QUOTE
What have sports ever contributed that was useful to society?


Ideally, they give children an healthy appreciation for physical fitness and a working understanding of competition. It doesn't always work out that way, though.

I do agree that knowledge and creativity are just as important (and probably moreso), though.
#27.4 AethylFilth on 18 Jul 2005 - 15:29
How do you know? I've had friends who were GENIUS programmers by 13, started working for IBM at 17. They had tons of friends, played on travelling hockey teams, etc. their whole life.
You people are mind blowing.
#28 dolimite35 on 16 Jul 2005 - 15:53
No big surprise, there are a lot of smart kids out in the world, heck 10 years olds in highschool or in college. There was one in my college taking physics, he never took notes just listened. I wouldnt say they have "no childhood" because we dont really know. Good luck to her.
#29 hotrod on 16 Jul 2005 - 16:02