main

New Weapon in Fight Against Smog

malebolgia   on 25 July 2005 - 14:41 · 28 comments & 1391 views

Advertisement (Why?)
From catalytic converters to alternative fuels, the fight against big-city smog has for years been fought inside combustion engines and exhaust pipes.

Now, scientists are taking the fight to the streets by developing "smart" building materials designed to clean the air with a little help from the elements. Using technology already available for self-cleaning windows and bathroom tiles, scientists hope to paint up cities with materials that dissolve and wash away pollutants when exposed to sun and rain.

"Among other things, we want to construct concrete walls that break down vehicle exhausts in road tunnels," said Karin Pettersson, a spokeswoman for Swedish construction giant Skanska. "It is also possible to make pavings that clean the air in cities." The Stockholm-based company is part of a $1.7 million Swedish-Finnish project to develop catalytic cement and concrete products coated with titanium dioxide, a compound often used in white paint and toothpaste that can become highly reactive when exposed to ultraviolet light.

News source: CNN


Note: This is a Beta release . Therefore, do not install these builds on machines you depend on. If you have a previous version of Avalon, Indigo, or .NET Framework 2.0 installed you must read this (http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/vs2005/uninstall/) before download.

Indigo is the codename for Microsoft’s unified programming model for building connected systems. It extends the .NET Framework 2.0 with additional APIs for building secure, reliable, transacted Web services that interoperate with non-Microsoft platforms and integrate with existing investments. By combining the functionality of existing Microsoft distributed application technologies (ASMX, .NET Remoting, .NET Enterprise Services, Web Services Enhancements, and System.Messaging), Indigo delivers a single development framework that improves developer productivity and reduces organizations’ time to market.

Avalon is the code name for Microsoft's unified presentation subsystem for Windows. It consists of a display engine and a managed-code framework. Avalon unifies how Windows creates, displays, and manipulates documents, media, and user interface. This enables developers and designers to create visually-stunning, differentiated user experiences that improve customer connection. When delivered, Avalon will become Microsoft's strategic user interface (UI) technology.

This Beta1 "RC" release supports Visual Studio 2005 Beta2 and the .NET Framework 2.0 beta 2. There is also an updated WinFX SDK, including documentation, samples and tools available for this release.

IMPORTANT: Installing the Avalon and Indigo Beta1 "RC"(ISO)
The download bootstrapper of Microsoft® Pre-Release Software Code Named “Avalon” and “Indigo” Beta1 RC is currently unavailable in preparation for the final Beta 1 release that will be available to the general public shortly. Therefore, in the interim, you can download the ISO image of the RC bits.

Accessing the ISO File
An ISO-9660 image file is an exact representation of a CD, including the content and the logical format. The most common use of an image file is to write it to a blank CD-R resulting in an identical copy of the original CD including file name and volume label information. ISO Images can also be extracted directly to a file location by many CD-R utilities. For more information about image files, please visit the MSDN FAQ.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 28 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 ShadowPHP on 25 Jul 2005 - 14:56
QUOTE
products coated with titanium dioxide, a compound often used in white paint and toothpaste that can become highly reactive when exposed to ultraviolet light.

WOW, I want some UV Lightbulbs, lol
#1.1 unbalance on 25 Jul 2005 - 20:41
"lalala... brushing teeth.... mmm good toothpaste...." *turns on UV light* "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARG! MY MOUTH!"

another cenario

Say you wanted to make ur room glow that wonderful blue colour like white clothes do when exposed to UV light. Go out to paint store, buy some White Paint, paint the room, install a UV light.... *turns on* ... hmm i wonder wat would happen?
#2 Netrack on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:09
this could help our enviroment alot
(9 replies) #3 Co_Co on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:26
this could help, but when huge polluting countries like the US ignore and disregard the Koyoto protocol it makes me think whether they will care if their building are helpful to the enviroment or not
#3.1 xSuRgEx on 25 Jul 2005 - 16:01
i agree.

when all the big citys in the us are covered in a thick black smog. like the one that covered london in the old days. they will be thinking to them selves. " i wish we took more notice of that koyoto protocool". Bigger and more full guzling isnt allways better.

but it would be nice to have buldings etc that help clean up the air.
#3.2 KCKitsune on 25 Jul 2005 - 18:11
you know xSuRgEx, that China is the second largest producer of Green house gas (Link) and it does not have to abide by the Protocol because it is a "Developing Nation". The Kyoto Protocol is a joke. It targets rich countries and tries to make them poor. The best way to reduce pollution is by making it worth while economically. That is the reason that fuel cell cars are not out on the roads. They are just too expensive right now.
#3.3 kitchenutensils on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:04
the US can agree to koyoto, and have little effect on its economy which is currently (comparitively) very secure in comparison to China. If China were to abide, then its industry would be in ruins, due to the fact that it is upcoming and therefore in need of a bit of freedom. Once china is in an economic situation that is as secure as the US, of course they would sign up. the simple fact is that G.B. doesnt give a damn about the environment provided it does not effect his business in the short term.
#3.4 Erich on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:11
*deleted*

Sorry, double post some how :-/

Last edited by 44827 on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:17
#3.5 Erich on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:13
What's your point? Alot more people starve in China than people in the USA. USA is a richer nation, they can afford to clean themselves up. That doesn't make China completely off the hook, but don't be using, "they're not doing it so we're not going to" as your reason. Canada who is a little bit poorer per capita (it's like 3,000 USD or something, but I should double check that) Is pushing alot of energy conservation and pollution reduction in conjunction with the kyoto accord so why can't the US?

And if I can see the push in everyday life, then obviously it's working to some degree.

EDIT: And the comment about making richer nations poorer is bullocks. IMO, the quality of life is improving, we have a richer style of living because of it. How so you ask? With a $5 investment here or there for energy efficient lightbulbs, or a couple grand to get better insulation in your roof, you will have saved more than your investment inside half a year. Yes that's right, your investment will pay you back in half a year with heat and electricity savings (and for people who need air conditioning instead of heating, better insulation will keep your house cool with a smaller A/C unit). Atleast for us this is all true, we can now use our money for more luxury items like sound systems and big screen tvs. Your argument is bogus. It makes our air cleaner and we are going to be rewarded with less health problems and a longer life.

Last edited by 44827 on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:25
#3.6 KCKitsune on 25 Jul 2005 - 19:57
If it doesn't affect a country's economical development, then why is nations like China and India exempt from the protocol?
#3.7 Shining Arcanine on 25 Jul 2005 - 22:07
The US already does a heck of alot more than many other countries in lowering its emissions. However, the Kyoto Treaty was designed to put a huge burden on developed nations that would ruin their economies while the economies of "developing nations" such as China would be unscathed and allowed to pollute the air however the heck they want.

Lowering our emissions through unfair, damaging regulations while other countries' emissions go largely unchecked is not the answer to our problem. That is our problem. If we are to one day have preindustrial air quality, all nations, developing or not must work together to lower emissions in a calm, orderly manner that won't pull the rug out from under them, or a select group of them, in the process.
#3.8 danlu on 26 Jul 2005 - 09:19
The environment is going to hell and some argue that it is too costly to try doing anything about it

When I think about it, maybe it would be best if we stop caring about the environment completely. There's a lot of money to be saved right there and besides, the human race could use a good extinction.
#3.9 ziadoz on 26 Jul 2005 - 10:46
The only solution to the problems is for all countries to stop being selfish and start investing in more green technologies. There are so many methods of producing energy that arent damaging to our environments. Solar panels could power houses, Wind farms could power cities and in France I heard they developed a vehicle running on compressed air capable of 60mph. Its the governments and stubborn people who are afraid of change/loss of power/loss of money that are going to be responsible for crippling our environment. Personally I think cleaner technologies are more important than attempts to reduce emissions, but most countries would rather research these right up until there are no fossil fuels left.
#4 nic on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:27
Sounds like a good plan to me.
#5 Colin-uk on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:42
the only way i can see thi having any use, is if it is used on a large scale, which it probably wont due to funding or something like that...
#6 EduardValencia on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:49
wow,this is great,keep it up people!
#7 mattking on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:54
good news if it works!
(1 reply) #8 ripgut on 25 Jul 2005 - 15:56
hmmm, a science article on the main page news.... great to hear btw
#8.1 rbet on 25 Jul 2005 - 16:28
yeah... ripgut the science whore is right
#9 MaddogMDD on 25 Jul 2005 - 16:39
heh cool i work for Skanska (US division)
#10 Shibby on 25 Jul 2005 - 16:50
this would be great and is well worth the money instead i think it needs more money, may get so much more out of this.

i notice when just going on the outskirts of london or going to the midlands the air quality there is just horrible, i live in the south of the uk and you really do notice the lovely air. since i'm just down the motorway from the sea which is about a 5 min drive. and right next to the country side
(1 reply) #11 Ryster092 on 25 Jul 2005 - 18:43
While these new building materials sound excellent for the environment... why is neowin reporting it?
#11.1 vetmalebolgia on 25 Jul 2005 - 21:21
QUOTE
why is neowin reporting it?
I thought it was interesting
#12 Valkyre on 25 Jul 2005 - 21:41
Yes, with this we will finally clear all smog and breathe normally again!

Of course, 50 years from now they'll discover it causes a disease known as YSOPACAOYD (You Stopped One Problem And Caused Another One You Dumbasses), which will kill off the entire human race.
#13 Shining Arcanine on 25 Jul 2005 - 22:17
I'm not a chemistry expert (yet), but wouldn't the chemical reactions compromise the structural integrity of the buildings if they are made out of stuff designed to react with the air? Just a thought.

Personally, I think the best way to solve this problem is to cut it off at the source. We need to work towards the rapid development of replacements (such as fuel cell technology) for CO2, SO2, etc. emitting equipment. An excellent example would be hydrogen powered cars. With them, the problem go from having hundreds of millions of individual inefficient emission centers but a handful of semi-efficient emission centers and that number will decline as we move towards cleaner power (e.g. nuclear fission). Nightly hydrogen production would be an excellent use of the energy that would be otherwise wasted due to low demand on the electrical power grid at night (as you can't exactly turn off a fission reactor).
(1 reply) #14 Enigma-Penguin on 26 Jul 2005 - 00:16
who keeps coming up with the ideas...
#14.1 TheSarge on 26 Jul 2005 - 04:50
People that are smarter than you, that's who.
#15 Computer Guru on 26 Jul 2005 - 15:33
america alone disregards the environment. CFCs and Koyoto protocol anyone?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)