main

Shuttle Discovery Launches Successfully

stncttr908   on 26 July 2005 - 16:14 · 35 comments & 2525 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The Space Shuttle Discovery successfully launched this morning, marking the first launch since the Columbia disaster nearly 2 1/2 years ago which claimed the lives of its entire crew and set in motion mass overhauls of the shuttle's heat shields which failed upon re-entry due to damage sustained during takeoff. Since that time, nearly 50 major safety improvements had been made.

Liftoff was at 10:39 EST in Cape Canaveral, Florida. This return to orbit for Discovery had been delayed weeks due to problems and bad weather, compounded by the uneasiness of returning the shuttle to flight after such a long hiatus. The ascent was monitored by two chase planes and 100 cameras for signs of any damage which could jeopardize the ship's re-entry into the atmosphere at the end of its mission. The launch was witnessed by the families of both the Discovery and Columbia crews.

Discovery's mission is to deliver to the half-finished International Space Station nearly three years of supplies put on back order since the last shuttle visit in late 2002. The entire quest is expected to last 12 days.

View: NASA TV
View: Mission STS-114 Highlights
News source: Yahoo! News


The updated Mac mini comes with 512MB of RAM and built in wireless. Here are the new options:

  • 1.25GHz G4, 512MB RAM, 40GB HD, Combo Drive, $499
  • 1.42GHz G4, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, Combo Drive, Airport Extreme and Bluetooth, $599
  • 1.42GHz G4, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, Super Drive, Airport Extreme and Bluetooth, $699

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 35 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Surr3al on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:22
Good thing neowin covered this, because it's not like every other news agency already has.

Ehem, I'm sorry. I mean, yay! Maybe one day we'll make it to Mars and then realize it's a giant red rock!

Oops, I did it again, I mean umm, glad we got the shuttle off. Good luck to the crew on their re-entry. :o
#1.1 Netrack on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:35
i hope they send you to mars then
#1.2 Surr3al on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:53
Eh? Is that supposed to be an insult?

I would hope to go to Mars, however that probably won't happen.
#1.3 Ravensworth on 26 Jul 2005 - 19:41
Why would you hope to go to Mars?. In your original post you made it sound like it was a stupid waste of time to go to a "giant red rock".
#1.4 krono6 on 27 Jul 2005 - 17:14
Yes, but you can't argue with the fact that the best giant rocks are indeed red!
(1 reply) #2 rbet on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:24
Good luck to the crew and NASA.
#2.1 Ficman on 26 Jul 2005 - 18:03
Agreed... Let's get them back now... God's Speed...
(1 reply) #3 cub-x on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:26
Yay!!! finally we get around finishing the spacestation!

and statistically looking at it, airplanes from the same company don't crash twice.
(That would mean the shuttle would be the safest transport through the air right now )
#3.1 ev0| on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:38
Statistically looking at it, there have been around 100 shuttle flights and so you could say the chance of a disaster is around 2 percent since 2 flights ended in disaster..
(1 reply) #4 wtmcgee on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:27
Just got back from the shuttle launch ... more people than I've EVER seen at a launch. Everyone seemed extra nervous beforehand and extra giddy once it seemed to get up into space without a hitch.

#4.1 Bwizzel-B on 26 Jul 2005 - 18:32
Should have been there for the first launch. Now, *that* was a friggin' mob.


(2 replies) #5 ripgut on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:32
great to hear, Nothing will stop mankind's exploration
#5.1 TheSarge on 26 Jul 2005 - 22:24
Unless we wipe ourselves out, of course.
#5.2 Ravensworth on 27 Jul 2005 - 06:32
End of the World (warning: mature language)

(1 reply) #6 ev0| on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:37
this is not tech news ! isnt' this science news ?
#6.1 Ravensworth on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:51
Yes but show me where it says that Neowin is strictly a tech news site.
#7 petrolxl on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:51
Hooray! Aliens here we come.
#8 dolimite35 on 26 Jul 2005 - 16:59
i cant believe they were even thinking of launching even if the fuel-gauge glitch happens again, doing a one time deal to launch anyways. I dont think that is right to the people who go up in space.
(1 reply) #9 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#9.1 MrMercenary on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:02
Good luck to the crew

Last edited by 15584 on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:07
#10 perochan on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:12
really sux that they planned for years and everything just gone in a few seconds.
#11 Jugalator on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:16
Well, I sure hope everything is just fine.

From spaceflightnow.com:

1512 GMT (11:12 a.m. EDT)

T+plus 33 minutes. A few seconds after solid rocket booster separation, a large chunk of something broke free from the external fuel tank. The onboard video camera mounted on the tank showed the object flying away from the vehicle without striking Discovery.

1522 GMT (11:22 a.m. EDT)

An image from the external tank video shows the chunk of debris breaking away from the tank just after the solid boosters separated. See the image here: http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts1...50726debris.jpg

1605 GMT (12:05 p.m. EDT)

Mission management team chairmain Wayne Hale says he doesn't know any details about the debris coming off the tank noted just after booster separation. He said the film experts will be studying all launch footage frame by frame, as was plan doing into this first post-Columbia launch.

edit: this news is now carried in swedish mainstream news... hmm :-/

Last edited by 21023 on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:59
(1 reply) #12 AethylFilth on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:33
columbia wouldn't have crashed if they used Linux + firewall kekeke
#12.1 mr_demilord on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:39
#13 Galley on 26 Jul 2005 - 17:47
HDNet broadcast it live in Hi-Def.
#14 bucko on 26 Jul 2005 - 18:33
I still think they should of not launched until they figured out the problem with that sensor.
#15 Octol on 26 Jul 2005 - 19:07
Good thing the launch got off! The Space Station crew was getting ready to ask for a refund on that supply order!
#16 warwagon on 26 Jul 2005 - 21:09
columbia launched successfully too, it was the coming back down that turned them into a done turkey
(1 reply) #17 Jedimark on 26 Jul 2005 - 21:11
Watched the launch, it was quite spectacular.

14,800mph at one point... I want one!!
#17.1 dolimite35 on 26 Jul 2005 - 21:32
Man, to go that fast. But thats going up, i want to go that fast going horizontal
#18 RazorSA on 26 Jul 2005 - 21:47
Okay, So I missed the launch live on TV.

Can anyone send me a link to the launch on the internet, or NASA TV ???
(4 replies) #19 TheSarge on 26 Jul 2005 - 22:32
Don't start jumping up and down just yet, folks.
The real test will come when they bring that thing back down and try a re-entry.
#19.1 knightryderrwn on 27 Jul 2005 - 00:00
Yeah....and here's a thought....

Suppose they find a hole in Discovery's wing that prohibits a safe reentry...so, they move the crew onto the space station, and rush Atlantis to launch, Atlantis gets into orbit, only to discover.....a hole in their wing, too!!

So, now, instead of 2 people living on the station, you've got 11! (the original 2, plus Discovery's 7, plus the 2 from Atlantis, which would only launch with a commander and pilot in order to accomodate the Discovery crew). Guess the Russians would be sending a lot of their Soyuz capsules up to bring our people back! (Not to mention that we'd lose two Shuttles, and, more than likely, the space station).

Sheesh.

Bob
#19.2 Darknm on 27 Jul 2005 - 00:37
i think i'll be one of the first to see it since it dose have to fly over texas
#19.3 PCyr on 27 Jul 2005 - 05:53
@knightry they have tools on board to patch a moderately sized hole.
#19.4 knightryderrwn on 27 Jul 2005 - 14:46
Yeah, PCyr, but would they help against a hole the size of the one that destroyed Columbia? That's the kind of damage I'm talkin' about, and everything I've read says that even those tools wouldn't have saved the Columbia.

Besides the fact, those tools (patches, goop, etc.) haven't been tested under actual reentry conditions...would you want your life (and the lives of 6 of your friends) dependent on untested tools and techniques?? I'm not so sure I would.

Bob

Well, well, this is interesting....


NASA grounds future shuttle flights
Foam insulation flew off fuel tank but did not hit Discovery

At least...we hope not

Last edited by 507 on 27 Jul 2005 - 23:08

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)