main

Don't Blame Vista - Monad Not Bundled with Final

shawncruiksh   on 06 August 2005 - 15:04 · 85 comments & 6223 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Earlier this week, Neowin reported (article) the first wave of malicious viruses may surface sooner than expected for Microsoft's latest version of Windows Vista - specifically targeting their new command shell, codenamed "Monad". Now, Microsoft is reporting the targeted command shell will not be included in Windows Vista when the OS finally ships late 2006.

"Monad will not be included in the final version of Windows Vista and there is no relation between Monad and Windows Vista Beta 1," stated Stephen Toulouse, a representative for Microsoft's Security Response Center. "Monad is being considered for the Windows Operating System platform for the next three to five years. So these potential viruses do not affect Windows Vista or any other version of Windows if 'Monad' has not been installed on the system."

While it is now clear that the new command line shell won't ship as part of Vista, it is still unclear how the technology will be delivered. Microsoft representatives have said Monad would first ship as a feature of Exchange 12, the next release of Microsoft's e-mail server, due in the second half of 2006.

News source: ZDNet


Agent 3.0 Release Notes

Forte is pleased to provide Agent 3.0, a major release with many powerful, new features.
There is so much to tell you that we've provided just a hint here of what you can do with
Agent 3.0. Get more details by clicking the feature description.


Multiple News Servers and Multiple Connections to News Servers: Agent 3.0 allows
you to use as many news servers as you like to retrieve message headers and bodies and
to post messages. For each server you can use as many connections as that server allows.
Task Management: Agent 3.0 has a new Task Manager, allowing you to view and
control all your online tasks.
Folder and Message Organization: Agent 3.0 features Desks, a powerful way to
organize your folders, allowing you to create multiple subscription lists. Newsgroups and
email folders now share properties, and can share messages.
The Newsgroup Directory: Agent 3.0 provides a powerful way to view and search all
newsgroups available on all your news servers. Use the Newsgroup Directory to view
newsgroups by any combination of news servers and according to your search criteria. Use
the Directory to assign newsgroups to desks.
Menu and Toolbar Changes: Agent 3.0 has redesigned its menus to enable you to
use Agent's features effectively. You'll recognize commands from Agent 2.0, but we have
added many new commands and combined others to make Agent even easier to use.
Sending and Receiving Messages: Agent has created special folders to handle the
messages you send and retrieve. The Outbox is now a folder, and we've added special
folders for storing draft messages and sent messages. And, of course, Agent provides an
Inbox for receiving email.
Bookmarks: We have added a new feature that lets you move quickly to messages,
folders and desks that you use often.
Help Tips: When performing common operations you'll see pop-up tips that will help
you use Agent effectively.
Other Features Added / Problems Fixed from Agent 2.0: We added a number of other
features and fixed several problems reported with Agent 2.0.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 85 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 edgrale on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:05
Didn't they say like months ago that Monad would not be included with Vista?! What's all this fuzz about?
#1.1 ThunderRiver on 06 Aug 2005 - 18:44
Yep. and I find it funny that the public media thinks the only reason Microsoft drops Monad is only due to the virus writer. Not so...
(1 reply) #2 beanwaur on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:13
...they dropped this too!?
#2.1 el22 on 06 Aug 2005 - 18:52
No. They never dropped this from Vista because it was never intended as a Longhorn feature... and there was an article on Neowin saying this same thing months ago.
(2 replies) #3 roadwarrior on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:14
Is anyone keeping a list of the features that have been "dropped" from Vista so far? It seems like there has been at least one a month for the last year. It seems like Microsoft is announcing features to keep people interested, and then they decide a few months later to drop the feature.
#3.1 aleks on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:58
People will upgrade to Vista even though the only thing they'll add is the new translucent visual style

Look at how many people bought the pointless Windows Me!!
#3.2 brianshapiro on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:08
well you can right now download a working version of Monad; its not like its vaporware. its just a matter of whether they'll include it in the ship version of Vista
#4 Dayon on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:27
I was actually looking forward to Monad....
(8 replies) #5 Jason on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:28
Nothing has been dropped from Vista, WinFS will is still being developed and will be available for Vista as soon as its finished and as far as Monad is going I don't think they ever said it would be an integral part of Vista.

Why quote ZDnet?, you should quote the proper source which is

http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/default.aspx
#5.1 roadwarrior on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:36
The point remains that those were features that Microsoft had at one time said would be part of Longhorn/Vista when it was released. They now claim that those things WON'T be in Vista when it is released, therefore those features have been "dropped" from the release. It doesn't matter if the feature will be added back in later, it still won't be there on release day.
#5.2 Jason on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:47
Like it matters if its there on release day or not, being dropped would imply that they have scrapped development on them which is not true.
#5.3 Jugalator on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:34
"being dropped would imply that they have scrapped development on them which is not true"

It depends on if you're talking about being dropped from the release or not.. :-p

Usually people are talking about the Windows Vista release (for example the guy you replied to), not Windows Vista in 4 years or so.

Then we could just as well be talking about what's ready in time for Windows Blackcomb instead.

I think you can safely assume that if people are talking about dropped features from Vista, they're talking about the OS release, not what's going to happen at some future a few years later. :-p

Last edited by 21023 on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:43
#5.4 theyarecomingforyou on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:54
I'd rather features were dropped and included in a Service Pack or released separately rather than them having bugs and being a security risk.
#5.5 todd` on 06 Aug 2005 - 17:02
I know this is going to come off sounding like a troll, but what's the difference? It's inevitable that there will be at least one patch for it after it released, no matter when it is released and it's not like they're going to label something unfinished as final. That's the way software development works. You release it to a wider audience and they find more bugs.
#5.6 SquareSoft0 on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:02
Monad was never intended to be released with the first release of Vista. (Your argument is moot, roadwarrior.)
#5.7 aristotle-dude on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:08
"Monad was never intended to be released with the first release of Vista. (Your argument is moot, roadwarrior.)"

Do you work at MSFT? If not, why should we believe you?

There was the assumption that Monad would be included with Longhorn. Now apparently it is not being included so I don't see how you are proving anyone wrong. I suppose you were one of the enthusiastic "fans" who flamed Paul Thurrott eh? Well this is Neowin after all and the moto is "where unprofessional journalism looks better".
#5.8 SquareSoft0 on 07 Aug 2005 - 00:01
Alright, my wording was off, I meant to say that they NEVER mentioned this being included in Vista. I've been in the beta since near the beginning and nowhere in the documentation does it say it would be included in the final release of Longhorn / Vista.
(2 replies) #6 bastawhiz on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:33
I don't blame them. If someone was writing viruses for something that I was still in the process of developing, I wouldn't release it on time either.

Seriously. Put yourself in Microsoft's position. By releasing Monad with Vista, they are jeapordizing millions of computers on its release. It should be made an optional feature or even installed on demand rather than on first boot.
#6.1 bluarash on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:57
What I do not understand is why this is an increased risk. If security was handled properly, a misbehaving script should not be able to get root access (Vista uses reduced account settings) and therefore there is little danger. The script would not have the proper permission to do anything adverse to the system.

I, however, do not have a problem with them pulling it until it is not a security issue. Through the number of articles that I have read it appears that Microsoft never had any intentions of putting MSH into a consumer version of Windows and instead were more interested in the server market for remote administration.
#6.2 scyphe on 08 Aug 2005 - 12:10
It's not like this decision was taken a few days ago. The newspost is reporting something that was reported months ago. So this whole post and comment-thread are sort of moot. It makes it look like MS dropped Monad from Vista because of the proof-of-concept-"virus" that was written about a couple of days ago.. Which has got nothing to do with the whole deal...
(2 replies) #7 DKAngel on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:38
yay to stupid virus writers and script kiddies that love to tarnish what we use today :/
stupid fags
#7.1 Jugalator on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:33
Hm. That's not why it's delayed though; it's because it won't be done for Vista's release.
#7.2 nacs on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:48
Yes I can't believe we don't live in a perfect utopia free of people who exploit ****ty code.
(2 replies) #8 azz0r_wugg on 06 Aug 2005 - 15:54
Good article on it here.

QUOTE
What's going on with Longhorn anyway?

First, WinFS was dropped. Then, it came out that Longhorn wasn't going to be based on .Net Framework after all.

And now, Microsoft tells us that Monad, Microsoft's super-duper combination shell and script language, isn't going to make it into Longhorn either.

But Monad, I thought, had promise.

Monad was going to be far more than just, as some have called it, the next generation CLI (command line interface) for Windows.

It was going to be a scripting language that tried to one-up Python, Ruby, PHP, Perl and all the other advanced script languages that make quick and dirty programming so darn useful for system administrators and power-users.

It was going to put the long-in-the-tooth VBS (Visual Basic Scripting) in the trashcan where it belonged.

It was, for as far as I'm concerned, the most potentially useful part of Longhorn.


Its a shame indeed.
#8.1 jimbo11883 on 06 Aug 2005 - 22:01
"Then, it came out that Longhorn wasn't going to be based on .Net Framework after all."

Oh lord, if the OS was going to be based on the .NET framework, imagine the slowness... C/C++/ASM forever MS! (VB6 for me lol)
#8.2 I am Not PCyr on 07 Aug 2005 - 05:54
i'd rather have it integrated, i was pissed when i heard that !

imagine the bandwidth used to serve the runtime at WU
if all 600 million people that ms says comes to wu,
installs the .net framework. i know i must have re downloaded around 1/200 times.

oh and save the comments for the genuises over ati & nvidia
who both have announced they are discontinuing their driver installs
for .net based garbage one moron who works for ati said
the cp will be gone by the end of the year ! brilliant

Now THAT is news !
Either nobody knows or cares ?
But the polls are in for example 60% people use ati cp
and 12% use that "Will & Grace" .net CCC

What ya gonna do when they take away your "normal" proggies
and shove this .net bs down you throat ?
#9 Explicative on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:02
MS needs to learn that taking security seriously means implementing new and better security measures, not removing any aspect of the OS that poses a security risk. Creating a "3-5 year" delay on one of the main reasons to upgrade is ridiculous.
#10 jivemastert on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:12
people who write viruses should be shot. its a gross abuse of talent and skill (in some cases) and it gets you no where. they will find out who did it... afterall, isnt that what the virus creators want? don't they want to be known as the person who took down a huge amount of computers? it is retarded. if you want to be known, go play a sport or something.

seriously, it's crap like this that ruins computing for people and it's just out right wrong.
#11 Jugalator on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:30
Yeah, like I said earlier... Funny how quickly news editors forget what MS has already said.

It's a bit sad though; I was looking at Monad as one of the major improvements in Windows Vista. Hopefully it'll be downloadable shortly after its release though.
#12 Ferret on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:37
I'm beta testing it at the moment - So I hope MS keep it patched up....
(3 replies) #13 gertin on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:47
Isn't this "virus" basically the same thing as just a malicious batch script? I was reading about this over at Slashdot and it doesn't seem like this is a real virus. It's a script that has to be executed manually by the end user.
And one more thing, it doesn't even spread itself.
#13.1 nacs on 06 Aug 2005 - 16:50
That hasn't prevented mass exploitation before though.

Take vbs files for example. Those things are *still* a plague on Windows boxes, ever servers and that was supposed to be 'manually executed' scripting.
#13.2 BigCheese on 06 Aug 2005 - 17:21
Viruses don't spread themselves, they rely on people to transfer them to other computers. Worms spread themselves.
#13.3 Jon on 06 Aug 2005 - 17:34
Viruses by definition self replicate through one host. Worms however replicate from host to host. Rabbits, replicate from host to host but only exist on one at a time, ie: they 'hop'.

There you go, amusing fact of the day. The AV world is full of animals, octopuses, rabbits, goats.. they are all there It's like a bloody zoo
(1 reply) #14 soldier1st on 06 Aug 2005 - 17:05
vista will be impressive when it finaly ships,the lagging when viewing folders will be eliminated i bet as beta 1 screws up alot when viewing folders but then again it is beta quality.
#14.1 CaKeY on 08 Aug 2005 - 06:20
What the hell does that have to do with anything??
#15 GwaRGuITaR on 06 Aug 2005 - 17:24
wow, they just can't win...
if they bundle it people will squak about it being unsecure bloat
if they pull it people will squak about them dropping "yet another feature"

the average user won't be using monad; no need to include it. free download later? sure.
but no need for a home user to have it.
(3 replies) #16 Daugirdas on 06 Aug 2005 - 18:45
Can't wait for WINXP SP3... Oh sorry, WinVISTA
#16.1 Ghostdraconi on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:40
Put as many Smileys as you want, still won't make your "joke" funny
#16.2 nacs on 06 Aug 2005 - 21:02
I thought it was pretty funny. And true.
#16.3 PCyr on 08 Aug 2005 - 01:12
Troll!
#17 Melfster on 06 Aug 2005 - 19:05
This story is pretty retarded. It is just someone trying to make publicity. I have using Monad for year. And pretty much is one better .NET apps I have seen. It is probable one of the best shells out there in any environment and it is very powerful.
#18 versiondub on 06 Aug 2005 - 19:31
Every time they announce a cut feature, I can't help but think this is just going to be a merger between windows XP and object toolbar - I really see no difference between the two operating systems save a few GUI advancements. Windows XP was probably the best attempt at a good OS by microsoft - I think Vista will be a burnout.
(13 replies) #19 aristotle-dude on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:12
Features dropped so far from release version:
WinFS (incidentally also dropped from Windows NT 4.x in the past.

Features scaled severely:
-Indigo
-Avalon
-various interface features

It look like it will be a nice paid upgrade for XP but the requirements are really high.

My prediction, expect resistance from deploying in the enterprise.
#19.1 Smigit on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:27
one feature has been dropped so now its a "minor" update. WinFS wasnt Longhorn, it's a full OS that can stand on it's own two feet without ONE feature. WinFS (and Monad) were both features that would be more useful to developers and coders than anyone else, the general home user probably wont miss or notice their absense, all they want is the advanced search features of WinFS which are still there anyway.

As for the others, its in alpha, you havent seen it so its pure speculation. Anyway as above, its not a one feature OS.

As for your prediction, well enterprises are always reluctant to upgrade due to cost, so I can agree with that but that wont be based on features but budgeting.
#19.2 Jason on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:48
Aristotle I bet you happily pay for Apple's minor yearly updates.
#19.3 jagedEdge on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:57
Jason, each "minor" update to OS X brings more features than Microsoft's "major" updates. I'd rather pay $129 per year for lots of features instead of $199-$299 every three years for no features.
#19.4 aristotle-dude on 06 Aug 2005 - 20:59
Jason, I've explained how versioning works in several threads already. The major version number usually denotes binary or component backwards compatibility, not the amount of changes. As long as the API changes do not break backwards compatibility, you can use the same major version and update the minor version.

Most OS and systems developers understand and use this methodology for versioning of their products.

This is off topic but there was an 18 month gap between Tiger and Panther which IIIRC, was longer than the time between Windows 2000 Pro and XP Pro and I could not get Panther in Canada locally until two months after that.

Don't get all hissy with me because MSFT cannot ship Vista/Longhorn on time.


I bought Panther and Tiger which works out to about the same as one copy of Windows XP Pro. I got Tiger cheaper than regular price in a bundle with iLife and iWorks which I bought online from apple.com.

How did you enjoy paying for Windows 98, 98SE, Millennium Edition, Windows 2000 Pro and/or XP?
#19.5 Jason on 06 Aug 2005 - 21:25
I personally bought 95 then dumped that as soon as NT4 came out which I then upgraded to 2000 from and finally bought XP.

Never bought any 9x versions other than 95 but that was dumped quick when NT4 came out.

I think a 5 year gap from XP to Vista is acceptable, XP is a good OS and 5 years is good value for money.
#19.6 Cubiz on 07 Aug 2005 - 01:44
QUOTE

I think a 5 year gap from XP to Vista is acceptable, XP is a good OS and 5 years is good value for money.


I beg to differ. 5 years between major OS releases is unacceptable if you want to keep up with modern technology. Service packs don't count, since they're just a few updates and only add minor features if any at all. XP was a good OS when it was first released, but compare it to what's on the market today and XP becomes the grandmother of the OS market.

Personally I'm looking forward to Vista; if it's any good, it will be Jaugar + Panther + Tiger + Leopard + more – if not, it's not worth purchasing IMO.
#19.7 imtoomuch on 07 Aug 2005 - 12:15
Why are Apple trolls so worried about Vista?
#19.8 gizmostripe on 07 Aug 2005 - 13:55
I agree, its not like it bothers them...And Avalon & Indigo havent been scaled back at all. Theyre both at beta 1 and on target, the only thing avalon lacks is colour blending (add, xor etc.) and thats been suggested a lot, and I expect that to appear in Beta 2.

.NET is also going to be included in the OS - No more framework downloads for Vista users.
#19.9 jagedEdge on 07 Aug 2005 - 19:01
QUOTE
Why are Apple trolls so worried about Vista?

We "trolls" can't understand while you all are so excited over something that's starting to equal Jaguar (maybe Panther).
#19.10 mugwhump on 07 Aug 2005 - 19:18
The little Mac fans are sad because people aren't "oooh-ing" and "aah-ing" over Tiger anymore, and want to come pee in the pool. They're not getting attention, so they feel left out and want to create some noise about Apple, whenever and wherever they can.

They are like the geek version of jehovahs witnesses.
#19.11 aristotle-dude on 07 Aug 2005 - 20:14
mugwhump, why don't you go play your little games while the grownups (IT professionals) discuss future windows technology ok? Run along now.
#19.12 mugwhump on 07 Aug 2005 - 23:25
When will you understand that no one cares about the resume of a fat, obnoxious, lifeless mac fanboy with delusions of grandeur? It doesn't give you any more clout. If anything, it's more pathetic that you think your fairly-recent job in IT will impress others.

It doesn't. Now go fondle your eMac. Caress your powerbook. Whatever. Hell, go get started in culinary arts school. Who cares...just shut up, before you are proven wrong and made a fool of yet again. Your "IT professional" job hasn't helped keep you from being blatantly and undisputedly WRONG about 90% of everything you've trolled about.

And I don't have any computer games installed, thanks. Waddle off, eat a twinkie, and fire up Warcraft 3, you slug.
#19.13 Cubiz on 08 Aug 2005 - 07:00
I wasn't trolling - and when will you Windows trolls realise that us Mac users don't give a **** if you don't like us. mugwhump, that was one of the most immature posts I've seen on Neowin in a while - for gods sake, grow up.
#20 excalpius on 07 Aug 2005 - 00:43
MONAD was never part of Vista. The morons at ZDNet got it wrong in both their article and most especially in their title for the article, which was inaccurate, misleading FUD.

So now, ZDNet publishes an article where Microsoft denies the rumor that ZDNet itselg mistakely published. All the while, ZDNet gets traffic and hits, which was of course their cynical intention all along.

This is how the TABLOIDS work people. It is pathetic to see online tech sites turning into RAGS in pursuit of the almighty advertising dollar...sigh.
#21 raid517 on 07 Aug 2005 - 01:31
Erm so what will be in Longhorn/Vista then - appart from a slightly polished XP theme? Do they just intend to add DRM and then be done with it? It doesn't seem like there is much to interest most users - or any good reason to upgrade.

GJ
#22 Rascally on 07 Aug 2005 - 03:28
You know, now that I think about it.... would you want good old aunt Hilda or grandma using MSH?

You: "Okay, now grandma...drop down to a shell and execute that script."

Grandma: "You want me to murder WHAT??!?! *click*"

(3 replies) #23 toadeater on 07 Aug 2005 - 04:17
I'm glad they dropped it. They should drop more features, like Internet Explorer, Outlook, WMP, Messenger, and their DRM schemes. The only thing that sounds good is the new 3D-accelerated GUI, and the phase out of the registry.
#23.1 eilegz on 07 Aug 2005 - 20:33
yeah make windows more lite and modular
#23.2 virtorio on 07 Aug 2005 - 22:57
Drop Internet Explorer? Great idea, then you'll just be able to go download Mozilla/Opera and you'll be set, oh wait, you won't be able to as you won't have a web browser.

But you are technically right, it should be removable (although if you take out the rendering engine technology then huge amounts of applications that use it will no longer work, but hey, as long as it's modular it must be good, as deleting the icon from your desktop and simply not using it is quite a hassle).
#23.3 CaKeY on 08 Aug 2005 - 06:23
And if you had a halfway decent shell you could download and install a browser without needing one. wget
(4 replies) #24 I am Not PCyr on 07 Aug 2005 - 06:23
I wanna see more specialized versions released.
taylored with features for the different types of users.

Windows Vista "Apple Troll Edition"
MS steals everything they can from apple for this one..
Oh damn they are all ready doing that arn't they ?

Windows Vista "Microsoft Fanboy Edition"
See above "Apple Troll Edition"

Windows Vista "Linux Troll Edition"
In order to do anything you you will have
to open a console and log in as "SU"
and spend 8 hrs a day hunting down fixes
to make common hardware work.*that runs fine on windows !

Windows Vista "7331 OMG 1!! Edition"
Only comes with Counter-Strike Source / Steam.

Windows Vista "Basement Dwellers Deluxe Edition"
Theme will look like neowin's site and have Firefox pre-installed (IE removed)
Custom Edtion made just for the infamous PCyr's & SVT's in the world

Windows Vista "Instant Messenger Edition"
It will have nothing more than the core os components and messenger,
this will be for the kids that like chatting about useless garbage all day/night.
BRB Im going AFK to use the bathroom... Like OMG 1!! that would so cool

Windows Vista "Grandma Edition"
Comes with Internet Explorer and NORTON antivirus.
And the only sites you can go to would be like POGO / Cashbreak.

Last edited by 120661 on 07 Aug 2005 - 06:35
#24.1 PCyr on 08 Aug 2005 - 01:17
QUOTE
Windows Vista "Basement Dwellers Deluxe Edition"
Theme will look like neowin's site and have Firefox pre-installed (IE removed)
Custom Edtion made just for the infamous PCyr's & SVT's in the world

FYI: I was out partying last night, and am going away for a few days. Grow up, and try forming an argument instead of insults.

I suspect you're Colonal_Angus with your typical trolling while making a self-righteous attempt at making yourself look like an anti-troll.
#24.2 I am Not PCyr on 08 Aug 2005 - 01:53
Ok if you can put down the Zima for a minute
you would see i wasn't beeing serious, err well maybe not ?

Anyway Relax man.. i think these guys 'round here been
giving ya a hard time too much and its makin ya wound up.

Oh and i wasnt trying to form insults and i have no intention
on forming arguments either, what i did say is what i meant.

I'll say it again cause i think ya missed the point,
I wanna see diff versions of vista come out..

Oh and where can i buy that book "pwning windows noobs for dummies" ?
And can i get it autographed ?
#24.3 PCyr on 08 Aug 2005 - 16:40
QUOTE
Ok if you can put down the Zima for a minute
you would see i wasn't beeing serious, err well maybe not ?

Anyway Relax man.. i think these guys 'round here been
giving ya a hard time too much and its makin ya wound up.

Oh and i wasnt trying to form insults and i have no intention
on forming arguments either, what i did say is what i meant.

I'll say it again cause i think ya missed the point,
I wanna see diff versions of vista come out..


Well it did come of like an insult. If that's not what you meant then OK.

QUOTE
Oh and where can i buy that book "pwning windows noobs for dummies" ?
And can i get it autographed ?

In all fairness, Ravensworth made the picture, I just link to it
#24.4 I am Not PCyr on 08 Aug 2005 - 21:36

Your right my comment was prob a bit personal when
i was using your name(and SVT) Sorry about that.
I don't have anything against anyone here or anywhere
..was just tryin to be funny, i guess i won't quit my day job. LOL

I like the spirited discussions around here, it makes for an interesting read
#25 electic102 on 07 Aug 2005 - 06:29
Why don't they do us all a favor and jus trash Vista. Don't release it. For the first time every, I am seriously thinking about switching now.
#26 joker999 on 07 Aug 2005 - 07:02
Low end pc should have "Vista lite"

high end pc normal "Vista"?

#27 .:Neo.X.WinFreak:. on 07 Aug 2005 - 10:57
jawn... didn't I say it?
well, if there's the possibility to put vista on a mac machine next year when vista comes out... I'm seriously thinking about buying a Mac and get vista as 2nd OS on it... that would be incredible fun

-fm
#dusn't want to switch -> wants to have both
(4 replies) #28 terryb on 07 Aug 2005 - 11:05
ms is really bad...

wish more games would come out for osx or linux so i could escape this hell
#28.1 eilegz on 07 Aug 2005 - 20:15
agree tire of windows overpriced, insecure, bloated, less customizable, annoying updates, wga, activation.

anyways too bad that linux and osx dont have games otherwise i ditched m$ windows long time ago
#28.2 virtorio on 07 Aug 2005 - 23:08
QUOTE
anyways too bad that ..... osx dont have games otherwise i ditched m$ windows long time ago

There are plenty of games available on the Mac:
http://www.macgamefiles.com/
http://www.macsoftgames.com/
http://www.apple.com/games/
#28.3 CaKeY on 08 Aug 2005 - 06:29
Some really nice ones for Linux too:

http://icculus.org/
http://www.tuxgames.com/
http://www.linux-gamers.net
http://liflg.org/?catid=1