main

Bill Gates on Windows Past, Present, and Future

Steven Parker   on 14 October 2005 - 08:00 · 48 comments & 4861 views

Advertisement (Why?)
It's hard to believe that twenty years ago, Microsoft Windows was the underdog of the industry, now shipped on 95% of PC's worldwide PC Magazine poses the question, Whats beyond Vista? to Bill Gates.
MM: Obviously now you're working on Vista. But what is your vision for the future? What would you like to see over the next 10 years, the next 20 years?

BG: In the future, things are going to be far more user-centric where a user will have a computer at work, a computer at home, a phone, and other devices. So instead of starting with your state being on that computer, you really want your state – your documents, your contacts, your schedule -- all to be available to you on every device. And if you personalize something and say you like this, it shows up on all those other devices.
View: The Full Article - There is also a nice round-up of Twenty years of Windows here.


What's Included: (new/updated entries are marked like this):

Windows 2K SP4 - Updated Components
Internet Explorer 6 SP1
DirectX 9.0c
.NET Framework 1.1 (+SP1)
- KB886903: Security Update for .NET Framework 1.1 SP1
Microsoft Installer 3.1 v2
MDAC 2.8 SP1
Windows Script 5.6 (v5.6.0.8825)
Windows Media Player v9
Windows Journal Viewer 1.5 (only in Full)
MSN Messenger 7.0.0816 (only in Full)
Windows Messenger 5.1.0700 (only in Full)


Windows 2K SP4 - Critical Updates
KB891861: SP4 Rollup 1 v2
KB823353: Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 1
KB828026: Update for Windows Media Player URL script command behavior
KB833989: Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 SP1
KB842773: Update for BITS 2.0 and WinHTTP 5.1 for Windows 2000
KB870669: Disable ADODB.Stream object from Internet Explorer
KB873374: Microsoft GDI+ Detection Tool
KB883935: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB885492: Security Update for Windows Media Player 9 Series
KB887797: Cumulative update for Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 1
KB890046: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB893756: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB896358: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB896422: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB896423: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB897715: Security Update for Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 1
KB899587: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB899591: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB901214: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB890830: Malicious Software Removal Tool v1.9
KB896688: Cumulative Update for Internet Explorer 6 SP1
KB899589: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB900725: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB901017: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB902400: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB904706: Security Update for DirectX 9 on Windows 2000
KB905414: Security Update for Windows 2000
KB905495: Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 SP1 for Windows 2000 SP4
KB905749: Security Update for Windows 2000


Windows 2K SP4 - Recommended updates
Root Certificates Update
KB818043: L2TP/IPsec NAT-T update for Windows XP and Windows 2000
KB820888: Fix for Crash When Mounting NTFS Volumes
KB822831: Windows 2000 Patch - Driver Installation Program Does Not Install Device Drivers
KB891122: Update for DRM-enabled Media Players
KB892313: Updates for Windows Media Player 9 & 10
KB895181: Fix for MPEG4 videos in Windows Media Player 9 or 10
KB898458: Security Update for the Step-by-Step Interactive Training Application



Add-ons
DirectX Control Panel
TweakUI 1.33
ieSpellcheck (only in Full)
Startup Control Panel 2.8 (only in Full)
Startup Monitor 1.02 (only in Full)
New XP Style Wallpapers (only in Full)
New Wallpapers (only in Full)
Delete Old 9x Wallpapers Otion (only in Full)
Macromedia Shockwave Player (only in Full)
WinUptime Tool (only in Full)
Windows Movie Maker 1.2 (only in Full)
Sun Java 1.5.0_05 (only in Full)
Macromedia Flash Player 8 for Internet Explorer (only in Full)
Macromedia Flash Player 8 for Mozilla, Firefox, Opera and Netscape (only in Full)
Google Toolbar 3.0.126.3 (only in Full)


And of course a lot of registry tweaks which improve speed, appearance, functionality and security!

File Size & MD5 Hashes

English Full File Size: 211 MB (221628874 bytes)
English Full MD5 Hash: AFDEDF4F4CC5653CD98392E270ABD684
English Lite File Size: 158 MB (166581434 bytes)
English Lite MD5 Hash: AB49142528CEAF59F8A69CAD6D92BFEB
English Update File Size: 32.9 MB (34553506 bytes)
English Update MD5 Hash: 3E1795A8D9932AA3EE6BD14E96CBB748

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 48 additional comments
(10 replies) #1 capeche on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:05
Brilliant article, but, as much of a visionary as Gates has proved himself time and again to be, his idea about storing data "in the clouds" sounds a bit overly hopeful.
#1.1 Neobond on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:20
lol, you got that right
#1.2 daelight on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:28
There will be a computer in every home - it will be a computer that works and never crashes - that'd be an Apple Mac then? Hahaaaa.. luv it

#1.3 Dipso on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:37
Do you realy think so? Data is getting more and more desentralized every day. I have a lot of syncronizing going on with all of my computers at home already, and with my mp3' player and pda even more so. And at school we have terminal systems that allow us to access the same desktop and files from any terminal at campus or from a home computer via the internet (VPN).

I think what they see in the future is that you will have something like an ISP or maby even the ISP, provide personal server spaces for your files and software, as network speeds increase both wired and wireless, this gets more and more plausible. Just think about the possibilites. No longer is software licensess restricted to a single computer or system, the licence is for having it installed on your personal space. This also means that you can go to your friends place, and log on to your own space, and have your own desktop and software available there to.

You could think of it, kinda like steam, only that the files and data are stored and accessed on the steam server, instead of being downloaded and executed localy. (Steam allows you to access the account from several computers, but only one at a time)

I had a bunch of friends who lived at the student housing in the city a year back or so, and they all had 100mbit connections, so when we had a party or something, if one of them wanted to play a song or show of a cool webpage or whatnot, he just used remote desktop to do it. Also because of the speed of the connections they usaly used their home computers through the terminals at school to. Thats also a small way that we see the emergence of this new "era"

Its when you put all of thiese technologies (VPN, Terminal Computing, RDC, Portable Computing etc. etc) together and think what implications this and future technology will have, you come to the same conclution as you find in the article.

Undoubtedly this is a bit off into the future yet, but its pretty clear that this is a very possible/plausible way of the future.

I for one would love to have access to all my data all the time.

Last edited by 44005 on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:45
#1.4 capeche on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:55
I'm sure you're right, mate. I was just poking fun at Gates's choice of words. Perhaps one day we'll all be accustomed to having our data stored "in the cloud".
#1.5 Jugalator on 14 Oct 2005 - 09:44
QUOTE
I think what they see in the future is that you will have something like an ISP or maby even the ISP, provide personal server spaces for your files and software

My ISP already does this
Not a whole lot of space, but for the price and being part of the deal it's pretty good.

I'm sure I could get more universal space seamlessly integrated with Windows via e.g. WebDAV or something if I just looked around for it.

I can't *run* the apps from there (I need to download them first), but this is still stuff where the technology is here already, even a few years ago when talk about subscription based online services started. I'm not sure if there are such services online now, but it just seem to be a matter of finding a working business model, and not a tech obstacle.

I doubt they'll gladly let you run your own apps on their servers anytime soon though due to the security issues. They'd at the very least need to be coded so they don't expect read/write access to various places on the server anyway.

Last edited by 21023 on 14 Oct 2005 - 09:52
#1.6 Dipso on 14 Oct 2005 - 14:03
Yea.. its needs to be part of the architecture ofcourse. But its realy what is happening in the buissiness world, with desentralized computing. (Ironicly its in a way more sentralized, because the whole buissiness connects to a sentral server)

My dad accesses the same desctop, and software when he is at home one his laptop as when hes sitting in either his office in our hometown of tronheim, norway or when he is at their office in the capital oslo, norway. And all the software is executed on the mainframe, atleast afaik.

The only real "problem" would be that content providers would have even more controll over your software, and piracy would be realy hard to accomplish, that wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for the fact that a lot of software has moronic licencing schemes (Adobe photoshop for instance, should have a home licence that was like 50$ to get users hooked on the software, then let the corporate users pay the full price, cause honestly, how many home users do you think have payed for photoshop?
#1.7 sloppycode on 14 Oct 2005 - 19:59
I dream that one day I will have a computer in my toilet, so I can browse the web whilst taking a dump
#1.8 brianshapiro on 14 Oct 2005 - 23:29
I think a lot of people (not companies) don't like the idea of needing to connect to some network in order to access your programs or files. Which is why I think the Network Computer was unsuccesful. However, if there was a system which was a combination of local and network storage and the degree of both customizable people might buy it
#1.9 PCyr on 15 Oct 2005 - 00:01
QUOTE
There will be a computer in every home - it will be a computer that works and never crashes - that'd be an Apple Mac then? Hahaaaa.. luv it


troll much?
#1.10 Mando on 17 Oct 2005 - 16:57
right on PCyr

#2 Computer Guru on 14 Oct 2005 - 08:37
I have faith in Bill
(2 replies) #3 Jugalator on 14 Oct 2005 - 09:39
QUOTE
In the future, things are going to be far more user-centric where a user will have a computer at work, a computer at home, a phone, and other devices.

Just FYI, Bill Gates has always said this the past 10 years or so as an answer to this question.
It's getting a bit worn out, especially as TODAY, users have a computer at work, at home, a (possibly smart) phone, and other devices (e.g. PDA's).
QUOTE
So instead of starting with your state being on that computer, you really want your state – your documents, your contacts, your schedule -- all to be available to you on every device.

Yes, data synchronization isn't an unheard of feature and both Windows XP and PDA's support this feature to synchronize (wait for it...) documents, contacts, and your calendar with schedules and meetings. With e.g. Bluetooth that will happen before you get to sit down and start working on your workplace. We also... today... have web services if you prefer to store this information elsewhere at a universally accessible location assuming you have Internet access, wireless or not.

Last edited by 21023 on 14 Oct 2005 - 09:53
#3.1 Smigit on 14 Oct 2005 - 11:19
Yes but its not very seamless atm. To get things to sync you need to connect them up or have it 2m from your desktop and hit a button, use software to access remote files ect ect. I think bills aiming for a system where it all happens realtime without the user even having to ever think about "syncing" their data like they do today
#3.2 Dipso on 14 Oct 2005 - 14:06
yes, exactly, as i stated in my longish post above, what bill envisions is a system where data is consistent and syncronous over an array of devices, that is possible with for instance a model as the one i have described above.
#4 ubergeek on 14 Oct 2005 - 09:40
He's my God . Geekwise
#5 Alan Zeino on 14 Oct 2005 - 10:11
The first paragraph is a little wierd grammar-wise.
#6 TRC on 14 Oct 2005 - 10:26
I clicked the next link at the bottom of the page, thinking the interview with Bill Gates was continued on the next page. I was somewhat baffled when I came to the part where he said he preferred the style of Mac OS. Then I discovered they were actually interviewing some guy from Xerox.
#7 Neobond on 14 Oct 2005 - 11:44
comments cleaned
#8 Vortech on 14 Oct 2005 - 11:51
This guy is awesome. I can't wait for this to happen.
(1 reply) #9 Joshie on 14 Oct 2005 - 12:34
I always feel left out when these CEOs start talking about their visions. I don't have a PDA. I don't have a work computer. I have my computers at home, and I like to geek around with them, and that's pretty much it. I'm not some suit-and-tie businessman who benefits from that sort of future, and it feels like my sort of userbase is left ignored by progress.
#9.1 Dipso on 14 Oct 2005 - 14:09
I wasnt even, until i got my hands on my dads old pda, i started using it to keep track of classes and school related stuff. Now i have a life thats a lot more organized (i dont have to call my buddies and ask when and where the next class is)

With a messy mind like mine, a geeky approach was just what the doctor ordered
#10 capeche on 14 Oct 2005 - 12:44
I'm waiting for the day when we don't need all those separate pieces of equipment because we've all been turned into cybermen!

#11 Ivand on 14 Oct 2005 - 13:04
Keep on dreaming bill..
(3 replies) #12 gaurav on 14 Oct 2005 - 13:44
tell bill gates to come to india, reduce the extremely insane price of win xp here, and someone please introduce real broadband here, hell all of us are rotting on dial ups. and broadband ISPs only 'rip' us off, believe it, see there plans:
http://broadband.sify.com/showplan.php?id=18
http://delhi.mtnl.net.in/commercial/broadband_tariff.htm
#12.1 roadwarrior on 14 Oct 2005 - 13:59
QUOTE
tell bill gates to come to india, reduce the extremely insane price of win xp here

I thought that India was one of the places where Microsoft was selling Starter Edition, but I may be wrong.
#12.2 BigGiantHead on 14 Oct 2005 - 21:18
Microsoft does sell the starter edition in India, but it is restricted to only one language-Hindi.As much as it may help the rural user to get acquainted with computers, I prefer English. The limited functionality is also a con. So the starter edition is a complete bust.

And gaurav is right about the damn broadband services. Here we are stuck in dial-up hell. The plans offered by ISP's are completely ridiculous. 'Rip off' is a big understatement.
#12.3 gaurav on 15 Oct 2005 - 09:05
QUOTE
I thought that India was one of the places where Microsoft was selling Starter Edition, but I may be wrong.


Well, everyone knows that starter edition sucks. had they priced win xp pro little lower, there would be no need for SE. an advanced, or even a regular user needs more than what SE provides.
SE is only for beginners who know nothing about computing, to help them grab the 'concept' of computing. and after the beginners become regular, they'll need more than SE.
(2 replies) #13 Galley on 14 Oct 2005 - 16:11
QUOTE
BG: I agree, Windows Me was a steaming pile of dog poo.


He finally admits it!
#13.1 TRC on 14 Oct 2005 - 23:02
That wasn't in the article.
#13.2 Havin_it on 15 Oct 2005 - 11:36
Yeah, but he was thinking it
#14 Shadrack on 14 Oct 2005 - 17:14
I already have all my data synchronized between my 3 home computers (one of them being a Mac), my Laptop work computer, my PDA, and my Ipod. The only thing is keeping all this stuff synchronized takes a little overhead that I wish wasn't there.

When Microsoft put out SyncToy, my life got a little easier.
#15 stifler6478 on 14 Oct 2005 - 17:19
I got to see Bill Gates on Wednesday. He came to the UW Madison campus to give a talk to select Computer Science Students. It was very good. I have a writup in my latest blog entry at My MSN Space.

If it intersts you, the blog also talks about how I got to play PGR3 on Xbox 360 .

-Spenser
(1 reply) #16 Morphie on 14 Oct 2005 - 17:38
OS X Server does user-centric computing perfectly. Way to be behind the times M$. Always so far behind.
#16.1 MaxMonster on 14 Oct 2005 - 21:49
shouldn't a comment like this be deleted? It seems others on the flip side get the axe.
(1 reply) #17 sloppycode on 14 Oct 2005 - 19:57
nice one bill, you really the leading technological evangelist of our time. You don't just speak a load of **** and dream about rubbish that only travelling salesmen would find useful
#17.1 MaxMonster on 14 Oct 2005 - 21:51
This comment is useful in what way? I believe it violates Neowins policy.
#18 Javizun on 14 Oct 2005 - 22:27
i dont know why people hate bill gates
sounds to me like people are sheep in following on another mans hate
if bill did something to you personally then i understand but i really want to know why
he recieves so much hate? he got visions-the money to make them happen,we all have visions and dreams.
he did what alot of you did not come up with and regardless he owns the computer market.people are talking about apple will do this and that yeah right while apple is nice
i dont think a company will loose a market share of 95% overnight to a company that is just now up with the times-a photo ipod was how long in the making? and is not even a complete video ipod. everything apple is doing been done for over 3-4 years so innovation my ass.

i hope microsoft contiunes to excel-computer science rules
(3 replies) #19 TRC on 14 Oct 2005 - 22:58
QUOTE
i dont know why people hate bill gates


Because they think it's the popular thing to do. Have to jump on that bandwagon you know, trying to fit in.
#19.1 EduardValencia on 14 Oct 2005 - 23:22
lol
#19.2 Airlink on 15 Oct 2005 - 00:53
:jumps on the bandwaggon:
:trips:
:falls under the wheels:
:is run over by the bandwagon:




:meep:
i'm ok
#19.3 Mando on 17 Oct 2005 - 16:59
easy one that
1) jealous of his money

2) jealous of his success

#20 [AK] on 15 Oct 2005 - 01:31
Lol I'm just roffling at the trolling Apple fanboys here. ROFL Go eat a Banana for change

Some of the people on here who have posted comments about his dreams and visions being utter crap are probably using windows themselves........which may I add..is an operating sytem which is a stepping stone into the direction he is going. So if his ideas are crap I suggest those people stop using Windows now.

Those that have come out with stuff like "oh I can already synch my data with my pda and bla bla" - I don't think you guys understand where he is coming from. Of course data synchronisation is available but incredibly tedious at that. You need drivers then you need software and then you need to go around clicking buttons, dragging or dropping files etc etc. Try to think of having your data by you all the time as simply turning on your pda and accessing a personal zone if you like, all devices exchange data in much more realtime on a universal protocol. Wouldn't it be nice to open up a word document say.....or an image, edit it, then access the same resource on any device without having to copy it over or save to the originating device for example having that file updated on all devices as soon as you click save. Or think of playing your mp3 on your pc.............you then move to your pda, tablet pc or whatever and the mp3 is playing on there too....kinda strange I know but I think that's the kinda **** he's after.

Oh well time will tell.........
#21 deron dantzler on 15 Oct 2005 - 04:56
I like what he says about being able to access your documents and everything no matter where you are, at home, at the office, etc. Good thing I'm already doing that with my .Mac iDisk.
#22 superrcat on 15 Oct 2005 - 23:43
So he thinks everyone will have a .mac account? People are already doing this today...
#23 toadeater on 16 Oct 2005 - 08:32
Bill Gates is living in lalaland. He hasn't known what's going on in the industry in years. He's repeatedly missed the boat on everything. Things like the graphics revolution, the internet, the multimedia revolution, the search engine and blogging revolution, COMPUTER SECURITY, online and personal broadcasting (podcasting, etc), P2P, and quite a few other things.

Microsoft isn't a leader, it's a predatorial integrator of existing technology others have pioneered through hard work and an honest desire to make a GOOD product. Hence the well-known comparison of Microsoft to The Borg. That is a legitimate business model I suppose, but try to give credit where it's due. Crediting Bill Gates with advances in the computer industry, or believing he is some sort of visionary is like crediting Al Gore for being the Father of the Internet.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)