main

Song sites face legal crackdown

Steven Parker   on 12 December 2005 - 10:39 · 80 comments & 3807 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks DCrad for this submission. The music industry is to extend its copyright war by taking legal action against websites offering unlicensed song scores and lyrics. The Music Publishers' Association (MPA), which represents US sheet music companies, will launch its first campaign against such sites in 2006.
 
MPA president Lauren Keiser said he wanted site owners to be jailed. He said unlicensed guitar tabs and song scores were widely available on the internet but were "completely illegal". Mr Keiser said he did not just want to shut websites and impose fines, saying if authorities can "throw in some jail time I think we'll be a little more effective".
 
The move comes after several years of bitter legal battles against unauthorised services allowing users to download recordings for free. Publishing companies have taken action against websites in the past, but this will be the first co-ordinated legal campaign by the MPA.

The MPA would target "very big sites that people would think are legitimate and very, very popular", Mr Keiser said.
 
View: The full article @ BBC News

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 80 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 GHL on 12 Dec 2005 - 10:57
that is honestly absolute [removed] .

Last edited by #1.1 GHL on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:20
sorry, i thought it'd be censored, otherwise i'd not have said it.
guess I didnt need innapropriate language anyway.
#2 Alex_is_Axel on 12 Dec 2005 - 10:57
this is really getting rediculous
#3 domgrimm on 12 Dec 2005 - 10:59
There are thousands of those websites around. The MPA will shut them all down? I can't see it happening
#4 werejag on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:07
lol cracking down sure helped the mpaa and riaa . go ahead make it worst for yourself Music Publishers' Association (MPA).

bring down one and you create more.

#5 blachole on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:08
This has to be the next dumbest thing they are doing...absolutly rediculous.
(2 replies) #6 Corona on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:09
how on earth sharing lyrics are illegal ? this is the most stupid thing I ever heard
#6.1 blachole on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:13
Ya, I have been sitting here for the past 10 mins trying to figure this out.
#6.2 theyarecomingforyou on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:50
I agree, it is completely ridiculous. If it was books then I could understand it, but lyrics don't mean anything without knowing the song. This is going too far and I think they're going to have a serious problem trying to shut them down. Sheet music sales died in the 30's when people could but could go out and buy recordings, rather than having to learn it themselves - trying to bring it back is a seriously lost cause.
#7 Quick Reply on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:14
Absolutely ludicrous. These sites don't claim that the poetry is of their own, they are properly sourced. The Lyrics are designed to be sung in a Song by the artist anyway, these Lyrics arn't even available to be purchased, fair use applies here. Soon it will be illegal to even sing such a song to yourself.
#8 Carlson-online on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:23
its proper stupid!

how many avid younger guitarists use these tabs to help develop the skill in the instrument! a bloody lot, ive spoken to all my guitar playing friends (myself included)n they all thnk that they are going way to far. soons its gona be illegal to say the bands name outloud!

stupid censors.....
#9 mitt on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:32
I don't understand how can guitar tabs and song scores be copyrighted. This is getting really cruel, and especially the part where the MPA president said he wanted site owners to be jailed. Are people going to be labeled criminals for an "unauthorized" song lyric ?
(2 replies) #10 tOta on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:33
Stupid and stupid
Next thing will be that you cant sing a song unless you bought a cd or through music store.
#10.1 mitt on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:37
No tOta, that will probably be illegal too: You'll have to buy a license first to be alowed to duplicate a song with your mouth :crazy:
#10.2 Quick Reply on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:55
Hopefully we must buy a license to listen to the song before we even know if we like it or not, so that way we wouldn't have to be exposed to Music that is so heavily controlled.
#11 CDog on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:54
This is getting silly, honestly now...
(1 reply) #12 hardgiant on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:57
Singing in the shower is illegal and the RIAA will bust your ass. :p
#12.1 s0nic69 on 12 Dec 2005 - 18:55
lmao, i was thinking that as i was reading it.
#13 hardgiant on 12 Dec 2005 - 11:58
nm
#14 caveman017 on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:00
i think some companies are way too greedy
#15 denzilla on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:03
Pretty soon memorizing a song and playing it back in your head will be an intellectual property violation. Pathetic....


On a side not, I really enjoy reading posts now since the profanity filter is off. Definitely makes for a more interesting read
#16 m-head on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:06
Do they mean the sites like Lyrics.com or sites that actually have the notes and stuff?

Either way its ****ing stupid.
#17 Lt-DavidW on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:09
It would make it so much easier for them if they just stopped producing music altogether, that way they never have to suffer the fate of us actually hearing their published songs.
(1 reply) #18 VICTORT on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:18
Judas Priest - Breaking the law:

There I was completely wasting, out of work and down
all inside it's so frustrating as I drift from town to town
feel as though nobody cares if I live or die
so I might as well begin to put some action in my life

Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law

So much for the golden future, I can't even start
I've had every promise broken, there's anger in my heart
you don't know what it's like, you don't have a clue
if you did you'd find yourselves doing the same thing too

Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law
Breaking the law, breaking the law
#18.1 tomx313 on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:36
I TOTALLY AGREE!!!!
#19 supernova_00 on 12 Dec 2005 - 12:22
What the F**K. Now they are going way to far. People really need to get together now and boycott cd's
#20 ph3412t3h13 on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:15
what in the crap...........
#21 The Grasshopper on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:19
in the future you won't be able to mention a song name on the interweb!
#22 xorian on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:27
I hope they get pirated to hell
#23 StuRReaL on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:34
WTF? this takes the piss, next they'll be copyrighting certain words in a certain order!!! (oh damn i've probably given them another way of making money). Copyrighting lyrics is fine but stopping people distributing them thats crazy what do they think is going to happen? someones going to take the lyrics and sing them and then play the music themselves? idiots!!!! I think these MD's of these companies should stop shoving that illegal white powder up there noses.
(1 reply) #24 Gooey on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:44
I'm not going against the grain here, I do disagree with this, but I think some people have gotten a little too excited here. Song lyrics and and musical representation are copyrightable and are the property of the record company / artist, in the asme way that the text in a book and a film's script is under copyright. To deny this is burrying your head in the sand and is naive. Companies have the right to protect their property just like you and I do, sharing song lyrics without permission is in violation of the copyright.

It would seem that the sheet music companies are losing out on this as they have paid to publish the music legally and people are just using the web sites to get it for free. Just because this is the web it doesn't mean it's not subject to the law. I know that I have gotten tabs from the web and not purchased the books I would say that most of them are probably 'fair use' as they are people's interpretations of the music. Frankly I don't see them being able to do much in the UK about this.
#24.1 zORYn on 12 Dec 2005 - 23:54
they're probably mentioning tab (music tabs, not sheets) sites also, to which people contribute. They're wrong (the tabs) 99% of the times, so i'd like to see how they would claim them "copyrighted" when they're not even right..
#25 alsheron on 12 Dec 2005 - 13:53
Please dont hurt allofmp3!

I love eet!
#26 Rfire on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:13
Most excellent. I am glad that proactive steps are FINALLY being taken to protect intellectual property.
#27 bsnappy on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:18
Am i not right in thinking that most of the guitar tab sites don't actually give you the official tab?
The ones i use, people submit their take on it. And they credit the band as the people who wrote/performed the song originally.
If they actually go ahead and start prosecuting people then they are screwing themselves in the long run. How many bands would be around today if they couldn't get tabs/lyrics off the net when first starting. I know my band wouldn't.
#28 cryptic on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:37
Ideas like this are why I no longer purhcase CD's except on the rarest ocassion. If the RIAA had just taken to the online music sales model sooner instead of all this litigation and copy protection they would have been able to make money. ( I realize the RIAA is not doing this particualr thing) Not to mention Tabs and sheet music are not really the same. Its like saying that humming a tune is the same as singing it. Sure it sounds the same but its not really all there.
Mr Keiser said he did not just want to shut websites and impose fines, saying if authorities can "throw in some jail time I think we'll be a little more effective".
Lets lop off their heads while were at it. Give me a break. I like music but I have enough in my collection to keep me sustained without buying new stuff. The music industry has become very user-unfriendly
#29 brianshapiro on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:44
I patented this idea. I'm going to sue the MPA.
(1 reply) #30 Dr.Jones on 12 Dec 2005 - 14:53
Learning to play the song on guitar doesn't rip off the artist from any money. I can see why it's illegal, but still, how is it hurting them? What is the artists point of view on this?
#30.1 Pdj79 on 12 Dec 2005 - 15:20
They don't have a point of view on this. They just sit back and wait to find out how much they'll collect. What's retarded about this is the prospect of how this will be handled. If injunctions are filed and sites are shut down, what will replace it? A site where you have to pay $.99 to download tabs and/or lyrics? This might work for orchestral pieces where you get the whole score (actually it does happen on several sites...of course it costs $4 per piece, but when it comes down to it, that's the same as you would pay to buy it from a music shop), but what about tabs someone's created because the band never officially released tabs of the music? Or what about albums where the liner notes don't contain lyrics? Where are you to find out the words to those songs or the chords? I hate big business...nothing but greed and corruption.
#31 dj_alex_m on 12 Dec 2005 - 15:14
Wow MPA, way to go an alienate the consumer even more!

Lets start with guitar tabs - things that let guitarists learn songs, while also letting gutarists learn valuable skills. Is this the MPA's attempt to rid the world of guitarists, or have the MPA just gone made with power?

Song lyrics - you gotta be kidding me right? Oh no! People can sing along to songs now and know the correct words! I'm sorry, but this doesn't affect your income, but rather suppliments it.

I'm sorry, but the MPA has just lost it. It's grown so big it's about to implode on itself - and that's just going to be one big mess! The only people this is going to hurt is the artists and record companies themselves. When will they wake up and realise they are stabing themselves with the dagger.
#32 Andy13 on 12 Dec 2005 - 15:56
MPA is going too far. Our freedoms are being violated more and more.

Big Brother is watching you...
#33 rubicant78 on 12 Dec 2005 - 16:02
Why don't they just get it over with and ban eyes and ears. That is what it is coming to..
#34 cswadner on 12 Dec 2005 - 17:27
Come on now... do they not realize that these sites help to make music more popular. People pick up guitar tabs, and play the song in their free time, allowing others to hear the song, and then they want to go and get it. Same with lyrics... wtf!
#35 evilpig on 12 Dec 2005 - 17:49
Damn, so lame

#36 ceminess on 12 Dec 2005 - 18:58
I can understand guitar tabs, cause some bands sell their guitar, drums, & bass tabs in books, but lyrics that is just going too far
#37 s0nic69 on 12 Dec 2005 - 19:01
i understand how the lyrics could be copywritten, im sure that artists do it so that nobody steals their work, but come on, lyrics? nobody is clamming them as their own, lyrics always have the artist name and artist song on them, its just something to look up when u dont understand a word, or want to follow along better! man, im so angry at this, i wanna just kick someone from the MPA, its so dumb that its not even funny..... just my thought...
#38 iascoot on 12 Dec 2005 - 19:28
Guess ill smack my head against a wall a few times to knock out all the lyrics over the years so i can't sing them and get sued by the mpa.
#39 halloween_david on 12 Dec 2005 - 19:38
OMG these people are stupid. Saying it's illegal to look up guitar tabs and lyrics??????? Yeah people copyright the lyrics they write, but how is looking up some lyrics illegal???? Most bands have the lyrics to their songs right there on their site.

Hell, even The Cure had a section with lyrics AND guitar tabs for the longest time on their site.

They're having trouble getting people for sharing mp3's so now they're taking a different approach it seems like. This is ridiculous
#40 Lexcyn on 12 Dec 2005 - 19:51
I don't really understand how this is illegal. I mean really, it's not as though another band will steal all of their music and pretend to be them, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever.

I think I'm going to make a website that has lyrics and guitar tabs and see what they do. I'll fight them to the bitter end, because you know what? There is no law against that. NONE.
#41 raid517 on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:04
Well so much for cover bands playing other artists songs. Now due to the RIAA you can't even look at the words of a song, or at the musical score of a particularly neat guitar rift without first paying them in blood.

This is what happens when you allow corporations to run your country.

GJ
#42 thorazine on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:15
Of course lyrics and song scores are protected by copyright law, think of it as source code, its same illegal to distribute copies of Windows XP as it will distributing the source code. The companies own the copyright for the performances and the authors own it for the scores and lyrics.
It only shows how stupid is copyright law.
It makes you wonder, if you buy a CD and it doesnt come with the lyrics doesnt exist in the inlay card, the copyright law is protecting an inexistent product (the lyrics that some human person wrote after listening to the song).
#43 Kreuger on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:18
In the latest news, it's now illegal to breathe without paying for it.
#44 wulfshayde on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:31
This is a joke right..? right??

Well, heres to the death of cover artists, and garage bands, and oh... well the music industry.
#45 12Iceman on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:32
Uggh, these people just need to crawl into a hole and die already. Before we know it people will be arrested for singing along to the songs they hear on the radio. There is a limit to how far copyrights should be taken, and they crossed this line a long time ago.
(1 reply) #46 xpgeek on 12 Dec 2005 - 20:57
I just fail to see the reasoning of WHY. Are people not buying enough song lyrics, are they losing money on song lyrics.

This is stupid, and will just force the creation of huge lyrics sites in Sweden or the like.
#46.1 balupton on 13 Dec 2005 - 10:11
The country won't matter.

American artists are protected by american laws.

So if i screw over one of these american laws over an american artist in Sweden, America can still fuck me in the ass.

Sweden's laws apply to Swedish Artists only, etc etc etc
(1 reply) #47 ambiance on 12 Dec 2005 - 21:39
JIHAD ON THE RIAA!!! INFIDELs!!! WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?!?!?
#47.1 Jstphish on 12 Dec 2005 - 22:32
Owners of the intellectual property that is in question.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think they are necessarily correct and they could definitely go about it in a better manner.
#48 xMorpheousx416 on 12 Dec 2005 - 22:43
Time to look up your local congress people and start emailing the hell outta them. Send more letters then they could possibly open, and prevent this legislation from being passed....bitching about it on boards will not get you what you want to see.

Songs I can see, lyrics and teaching others to play guitar and other instruments? Please...even artists such as Joe Satriani support these sites.
#49 DJ Specs on 12 Dec 2005 - 22:48
This is total CROCK! I want to know when some people in actual power are going to put a stop to all this crap. What we need is a Supreme Court Judge to say this is all crap and the record industry is using the court system as a cash grab.

*By the way, don't quote my post, it's copyright, and if you do, I'll sue you.. hopefully you will go to jail so that I can make an example out of you and nobody else will quote my post!

#50 bucko on 13 Dec 2005 - 00:08
Hey everyone put up lyrics on there sites, you will all get jailed, *crazy*
(2 replies) #51 Spike101M69 on 13 Dec 2005 - 01:02
Someday
You gotta find another way
You gotta right your mind and live by what you say

Today
Is just another day
Let’s set your sights and try to find our way

I say fuck authority
Silent majority
Raised by the system
Now it’s time to rise against them
We’re sick of your treason
Sick of your lies
Fuck no, we won’t listen
We’re gonna open your eyes

Frustration
Domination
Feel the rage of a new generation
We’re living
We’re dying
We’re never gonna stop
Stop trying

You know
You’ve got a right to take control
You gotta take offense against the status quoue
No way
We’re gonna stand for it today
Fight for your rights
It’s time we had our say!

I say fuck authority
Silent majority
Raised by the system
Now it’s time to rage against them
We’re sick of your treason
Sick of your lies
Fuck no, we won’t listen
We’re gonna open your eyes!

Frustration
Domination
Feel the rage of a new generation
We’re living
We’re dying
We’re sick and tired of your endless lying
Destroy
Enjoy
Your fucking world is our brand new toy
Dominate
Eliminate
Your gonna feel the wrath
Wrath of hate

Fuck authority
Silent majority
Raised by the system
Now it’s time to rise against them
We’re sick of your treason
Sick of your lies
Fuck no, we won’t listen
We’re gonna open your eyes

Frustration
Domination
Feel the rage of a new generation
We’re living
We’re dying
We’re never gonna stop
Stop trying(x4)

Pennywise - Fuck Authority
#51.1 balupton on 13 Dec 2005 - 10:08
Well u just made yourself the first person on their 'To-Sue' list
#51.2 Spike101M69 on 13 Dec 2005 - 14:17
whoa, just realized it didn't censor any of that. but then on second thought, music is art, so i'm not going to fix it. mods, if you want to censorship art, then go ahead, but i can't.
#52 Shadrack on 13 Dec 2005 - 01:45
heh..i guess the swear filter isn't working quite right

The MPAA is doing some really stupid sh*t right now.
(1 reply) #53 Sota on 13 Dec 2005 - 03:33
What did you expect from a guy named Lauren?
#53.1 balupton on 13 Dec 2005 - 10:06
you champion
#54 vacantmind on 13 Dec 2005 - 07:40
wow it's so cool to censor words like fuck and shit...

i think im going to stop coming here.. ive had it with the childish censorship.
#55 balupton on 13 Dec 2005 - 10:04
I want to know why MPA hasnt sued manufacturers of Tape Recorders, or even any Recording devices.

There big bad bullys :'(

Find me at the next concert where im singing along to incorrect lyrics, and sue me coz i know some of em.

Lyrics is the best way to find out what a song is, hmm whats the song that goes "fuck the mpa", alrite lyric search that, arr its called "The Truth" by "The People".

(Not real song name, if it is, well what a fluke)
#56 domgrimm on 13 Dec 2005 - 10:21
I just don't get it. I mean, you can hear the lyrics when you listen to the song. At least, most of the time. It's different to someone putting a book online, the lyrics don't make the music
#57 wildk on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:50
This bit from the article made me laugh

"The Xerox machine was the big usurper of our potential income," he said. "But now the internet is taking more of a bite out of sheet music and printed music sales so we're taking a more proactive stance."

Where is the suit against Xerox for harming their "potential" income

and this other pearl

"Unauthorised use of lyrics and tablature deprives the songwriter of the ability to make a living, and is no different than stealing," he said.

"Music publishers and songwriters will consider all tools under the law to stop this illegal behaviour."

What???? so if you find the lyrics to a song or the tabs (which someone has pointed out are not necessarily correct just similar) you are depriving the artist or songwriter of income. I don't think, so would this then mean that if you listened to a song long enough to learn the lyrics or wrote down lyrics you would be threatened because you have deprived the songwriter of income.
#58 kravex on 13 Dec 2005 - 14:33
I was doing my shopping the other day in the local supermarket and there was a charge on the bill for listening to the music that was playing in the store!

Well not really...yet.
#59 DJ Specs on 14 Dec 2005 - 19:53
What about CD's that include lyrics? Yaaaaaaaaaaa... exactly..

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)