main

Sober worm cracked

configure   on 13 December 2005 - 13:12 · 18 comments & 3580 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Finnish security firm F-Secure has cracked a code used by the Sober worm, potentially allowing the company to block the worm from receiving updates.

Sober has mutated constantly since October 2003, when the first variant was picked up, with more than 20 other variants making the rounds. Last month the latest version, called Sober.Y by F-Secure (or CME-681 using US-CERT's CME naming system), was responsible for the biggest outbreak of the year, and still accounts for about 40 percent of all infections detected by F-Secure.

One of the features that has made Sober so dangerous is its ability to download new variants, instantly infecting large numbers of machines, say security experts. The current variant is expected to re-activate itself on 5 January, according to iDefense.

The downloading pattern stumped anti-virus researchers for a time because the URL used was created by a secret algorithm. "Sober has been using an algorithm to create pseudorandom URLs which will change based on date. These URLs point to free hosting servers typically operating in Germany or in Austria," said Mikko Hypponen, F-Secure's manager of anti-virus research.

View: Read more at TechWorld
News source: TechWorld




Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
#1 Steven on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:23
Chalk one up for the White Hats.
#2 cork1958 on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:28
The person or persons that wrote this code were hard core, huh?

Yeah, one for the good guys!!
(5 replies) #3 mswarts on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:37
OOOOOOLD News...!

Edit: This news was posted on Slashdot Friday December 09, @03:43AM. I've been noticing recently that reading Neowin is like reading yesterday's news on Slashdot, but this is ridiculous. Neowin can, should, and needs to do better than this.

Last edited by mswarts on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:55
#3.1 markjensen on 13 Dec 2005 - 14:57
Neowin Rules


Unacceptable Forum or News comments.
While some members feel that post count is important, there are some posts we that feel do not contribute to the community in any way what-so-ever. Observe, because these are examples of unacceptable posts. If you wish to direct a fellow member to something that has already been posted, please do so in a courteous manner.

# 'old news' or anything similar.
# 'first post' or anything similar.
# '(insert product or brand) sucks' or anything similar
# 'I posted this in BPN x days ago!!!' or anything similar
#3.2 Croquant on 13 Dec 2005 - 16:05
"or anything similar"
Don't you think that's a bit too broad of a definition?
#3.3 markjensen on 13 Dec 2005 - 18:15
"or anything similar"
Don't you think that's a bit too broad of a definition?
< br />
Well, that covers comments like "OOOOOOLD News...!", doesn't it? Plus derivatives like, "AAAAANCIENT News...!", and "This news is SOOOOO old!".

I think you can get the point.
#3.4 Sub on 13 Dec 2005 - 19:57
I hate the old news comment, however this original poster is correct =(
#3.5 mswarts on 13 Dec 2005 - 23:18
I'm aware of those rules. But if I was a newcomer to Neowin, I wouldn't come back. It's only because I've read Neowin news for a long while, and I like it, that I continue to visit. I expect better, because I've seen better. Bear with me, and just consider the number of recent Neowin headlines that are a day, two days, or in this case 4 days late to air. You know the other tech news sites, so I'll not list them. Form now on, I'll keep such comments to myself.
#4 stevonw on 13 Dec 2005 - 13:42
w00t
#5 CDog on 13 Dec 2005 - 14:31
Great Now if only people would stop opening dodgy email attachments in the first place...
#6 dkldkldkl on 13 Dec 2005 - 14:35
This is really sad that somebody just keeps updating his virus from his basement. Can't he get a life?
#7 madnuke on 13 Dec 2005 - 15:54
Thank god for that, I remember what the last wave did.....
#8 shizat63 on 13 Dec 2005 - 16:49
Based on the algorithm they should have figured out the next server that jackass was planning on using, then followed it back.
#9 tiger2k on 13 Dec 2005 - 17:08
Well i must say that was pretty smart to have it update itself from different servers each time, and make it so no one can find out how it figured out the server. Although if s/he was really smart s/he would of known they were hot in his/er trail and change the algorithm on one of those updates.
#10 Colin-uk on 13 Dec 2005 - 18:00
Nice of them
#11 STanger on 13 Dec 2005 - 18:22
it's about time that Sober gets punch drunk HAHAHAHA :no:

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)