main

Google Infringes on Nude Photo Site: Court Papers

malebolgia   on 23 February 2006 - 04:46 · 10 comments & 1846 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Google Inc.'s image search service violates the copyrights of adult magazine and Web publisher Perfect 10 Inc. by displaying thumbnail-sized photographs, a federal judge has ruled. However, Google is likely not responsible for displaying the underlying images from Perfect 10's Web site, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California said in a ruling last week that was made public on Tuesday.

The order could effectively bar Google from featuring thumbnail pictures -- small versions of photos that are linked to a bigger version of the same picture -- but not limit Google from linking to actual photos which exist on other Web sites. The judge accepted that people who click on full-size images from Perfect 10 are not viewing images that Google has stored or served up on its computers but links to other sites.

News source: Reuters




Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 fro0ty on 23 Feb 2006 - 15:33
errrm isnt this what robots.txt is for?
#1.1 NeoTech on 25 Feb 2006 - 16:37
Yep, but if they used that then they couldn't sue Google for money.
(1 reply) #2 Ivand on 23 Feb 2006 - 15:33
so they think people actually wank at google images?
#2.1 Phil Gates on 23 Feb 2006 - 15:42
i will vouch for that!!
#3 cybershark on 23 Feb 2006 - 15:49
Shame on you Perfect 10 for failing to setup your site correctly. If it's a subscription service you should have used have a robots.txt file and have username & password access only.

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't there a case similar to this late last year. Where some web site had illegally posted some porn mag's pictures. And Google indexed the site and they sued Google about it.

And shame on you District Court Judge A. Howard Matz for believing their BS and congrats for demonstrating your technological stupidity.
#4 cryptic on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:09
Why would they make a move that essentially removes them from the search results. Not the way to generate traffic if you ask me. What the hell his t he harm in posting thumbnails?
(1 reply) #5 D.V on 24 Feb 2006 - 01:06
the judge obviously does not know what he's talking about but its not really his fault. he is a judge, not a web programmer.
#5.1 tiwaris on 24 Feb 2006 - 05:35
Yeah, I too think so, how do these judges decide on the technical tidbits?
#6 aleck79 on 24 Feb 2006 - 10:22
wtf happened to fair use. They are little tiny images about 1% of the real size.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)