main

Google Release Free Website Service

Mr magoo   on 23 February 2006 - 11:14 · 83 comments & 26697 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Google have launched Google Page Creator, a free website creation tool.

Perhaps best described as Geocities for the 21st century, Page Creator takes the Google AJAX magic and applies it to website design. The process is simple, albeit, at this time, a little buggy.

In a fashion remarkably similar to Powerpoint, users can pick from a number of themes (or change them on the go) and text layouts. It makes use of a rather clever What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) editor, so users don't have to face the prospect of editing HTML (but the option exists). Best of all, in true ground breaking fashion, Google lets you have 100MB of space for free, and it doesn't even put ads on your homepage.

It's all very easy; of course, that's the idea. Google have identified an area of the web which has garnered little interest in the last few years. "Free" providers traditionally have provided a lack lustre offering designed to try and persuade people to go up to pay-for options. No longer. Google Pages sees the company delve into a natural but new field, and will no doubt be popular.

Screenshot: >> Click here <<
View: Signup




Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 83 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 fuel925 on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:16
Hurrah for google again! But I will still reserve judgement until I see what kind of ads are going to plague my website.

EDIT: Just published a quick page, and there are NO ads at this time.
#1.1 vetMr magoo on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:21
You read the articles at neowin then?!
#1.2 fuel925 on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:35
lol oops, guess I just read the bare minimum :p
#1.3 sphbecker on 24 Feb 2006 - 22:24
You have to wonder why Google would do something like this with no ad review. Perhaps they plan on adding ads later. I could see someone calling this anti-competitive pricing.
#2 divertom15 on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:18
nice
(4 replies) #3 SamNeeds on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:32
What ever next! Google Muffins?
#3.1 Mad_Griffith on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:17
looooool
#3.2 Nidonocu on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:15
Google Muffins, you get 1000 muffins to eat on the grounds you'll never eat them all.
#3.3 Toastyone on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:50
no no googletoast
#3.4 harleydog on 24 Feb 2006 - 00:07
Yes, but only the tops of the muffins.
#4 chris100 on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:33
Pretty Cool
#5 chicken-royal on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:40
pretty cool, having a play around with it now
(5 replies) #6 Marsden on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:52
Nice rip off of MS Office Live... been there, done that...
#6.1 Chicane-UK on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:55
lol.. because as we all know, Google rip Microsoft off on a frequent basis!
#6.2 some214 on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:24
Ahhhm,

you're forgetting desktop search, sidebar, start.com/live.com(google personalize), gadgets(called modules)...

I'd say they equally rip each other off, but google is considered one of the most innovative compaines.
#6.3 Octol on 23 Feb 2006 - 16:39
"Nice rip off of MS Office Live"

Reminds me of a friend of mine who has a bakery. Bakes pies, cakes, cookies, bread. Then some SOB has the temerity to open another bakery down the road and bake those exact same things!

How dare he bake those things when my friend was already doing it!
#6.4 Avangelon on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:29
I like Octol's comment, it's hard to "rip off" a common idea, practice, or method of doing something.
#6.5 Sn4k36 on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:50
hmmm... I through google started the office live part.. Since they are working with openoffice to bring a live version. That's what was posted sometime ago.
#7 Phil_B on 23 Feb 2006 - 11:55
im interested to know how they can make money out of this? I guess this is one step forward into producing 'software' products online and their end aim is to sell a suite.

//EDIT - I see now, you need to have a gmail account so there aim is in effect so increase numbers across their 'passport' system (most of which is ad serving).
(2 replies) #8 godsfshrmn on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:05
Only 100mb? Geez
#8.1 Jugalator on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:21
Compared to Office Live's 30 MB, it's a lot.

And it's quite uncommon to have free + ad-free web hosting from established companies offering over 100 MB.
#8.2 Krankerz on 25 Feb 2006 - 00:47
Compared to my iWeb account (1 GB), it's a little.
(3 replies) #9 lawtai on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:10
Doesn't look like anything special.
#9.1 Jugalator on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:26
Web hosting services generally don't look that sexy.
#9.2 dolimite35 on 23 Feb 2006 - 19:16
i think there is something wrong with describing anything computers with the word 'sexy' :p
#9.3 Krankerz on 25 Feb 2006 - 00:48
Apparantly you've never owned a Mac!
#10 HoochieMamma on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:20
Sweet.
(3 replies) #11 Aaron on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:21
I tinkered a bit with it and I guess it is better than nothing. But, these are static pages right? Not like a blog?
#11.1 Jugalator on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:23
If you want Google's blog service, you're hereby redirected to Blogger.
#11.2 Aaron on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:50
I know it just seems, well, kinda pointless. Who will use this? Maybe I am just not seeing the market for this.
#11.3 Nidonocu on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:16
Anyone who currently has to put up with the suck of Geocities and other free *BUY OUR STUFF* hosts.
#12 Pimpster on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:23
no credit for me finding the news bit eh
(3 replies) #13 cork1958 on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:41
This is just Google getting into stuff even further over their head, so the rest of their stuff can even get worse than it is. There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that makes Google stick out any better than ANY other service that you may need. Unlike most other people here, Google does not blow my hair back whatsoever, whether it's simple searches or gmail (which sucks) or Google toolbars (which suck even more), etc..........................


I'm almost beginning to believe there are more Google fanboys than there are Firefox ones. Of course that is probably due to the fact that Firefox has become the target of security issues and such, and maybe people are FINALLY realizing Firefox isn't all that great either. Which is exactly what I think about Google also!!
#13.1 Colin Holywell on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:17
Move along troll...
#13.2 nookadum on 23 Feb 2006 - 16:45
Well, by your terms, all the other alternatives aren't that great either. So what's your point?

People like Google's products. If you don't like that fact, then ignore them. Don't be a fool by being a troll.
#13.3 ambiance on 25 Feb 2006 - 20:35
Shouldn't you be hiding under a bridge?
(4 replies) #14 XerXis on 23 Feb 2006 - 12:50
they should put more time in making radical improvements to their search engine. the competition is coming up fast. core business google, stick to your core business and do it good

edit 1: tried using the service, opera not supported as browser, come on, what part of javascript or css does opera not support that is needed, this is bs

edit 2: created a page, passed it trough the validator (http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ffreedownloads.googlepages.com%2Fhome) net even standard html. and that from a company that is always boosting about it's standard compliance and it's help to the open source community. shame on you google

Last edited by XerXis on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:00
#14.1 Mike Frett on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:08
I agree, they need to focus on the search engine. While they are sticking their noses in all this other jazz, the competition is nippin' at their ass.

OT, Man I wish I could win the lotto, even 1mil will do. I need funds. lol.
#14.2 Zentox on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:27
You people always have something to bitch about. If you don't like it don't use it.
#14.3 NeoTech on 24 Feb 2006 - 02:41
I agree. I feel that Google is branching out farther than it can handle at the moment. But, with the release of this their stocks went up so I'm certainly not going to say it wasn't a bad venture.

As for valid html.... no comment on that.
#14.4 Havin_it on 24 Feb 2006 - 13:23
You're using a visual, WYSIWYG design tool and expect it to generate standard-compliant code? I don't think even Dreamweaver can do this (without running cleanup tools and hand-coding, I mean). But give it time, maybe this will be rectified.

Sucks about Opera, though; if they go putting all their eggs in one basket like this (in the same way all their desktop apps only work on Windows), then all they're doing is paying lip-service to the principles of open standards.

I like to think the hiring last month of Guido van Rossum (creator of the Python language) is because they know this, and are hoping to improve portability of these technologies. We'll see...
#15 Kushan on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:04
I've been waiting for google doing web hosting for a while.

Wonder if it has instant google crawling too
#16 Bamsebjørn on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:06
Gotta love Google.
#17 majortom1981 on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:15
ITs aawesome for free web hosting. No adds and 100mb . Why alll the complaining? lol

Just use it to host your pictures and stuff.

I created an account the live sites do not have ads.
#18 xxdesmus on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:18
just what we need...another half-assed google product. woohoo
#19 forster on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:30
Im very impressed by this, nice one G
#20 neufuse on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:32
great... free space... all we need is more porn companies running to this to make fake pages that plague the internet with random words like "intenet fun run time neowin smilie cookie" going on for 3 pages to screw up the indexers in google then plastering it with porn links on the page
#21 infinitex on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:45
I wonder if they're going to somehow integrate this with Blogger
#22 MrStoo on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:55
Google does it again hehe.
#23 Allan® on 23 Feb 2006 - 13:57
~yawn~ one of the few things that Google has done that hasn't impressed me. It could be because I can't publish the page or that it won't allow me to change colours, columns etc. Will try again later or at work.
(2 replies) #24 darkpuma on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:02
Waaay to basic for me, even geocities gave more advanced options. The filestorage is nice though, and I certainly cant complain about no ads.... I wouldn't even have bothered making an account, but... I already have a gmail account, so all i need to do is sign in! pretty cool!
#24.1 MNS on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:16
there's no such thing as "way too basic" in these types of applications.

it's like if there was a truly WYSIWYG programming app (don't throw rocks at me if there is, i don't dwell in programming), you can't complain it's too "basic". it's supposed to be basic to make it easy for people not knowledgeable enough to use it.

if it's too basic for you, you shouldn't be using it. write your code in a text editor like you should.
#24.2 darkpuma on 23 Feb 2006 - 20:56
Oh, i think you misunderstood me... I code in php and stuff, and have a very 'in depth' knowledge of all of this stuff, so for me, its way to basic. But as far as wysiwyg editors go, sure, its awesome.
(3 replies) #25 vetSMeK on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:14
Its free and ad free, what is there to complain about?

I remember the days before i paid for webhosting, 5mb of rather unreliable ad filled space was all i could find.

100mb is good if you want to make your own little page for what ever reason. good on you google
#25.1 darkyi on 23 Feb 2006 - 14:29
I agree. It's nice for the newbies.
#25.2 Shining Arcanine on 23 Feb 2006 - 16:31
PHP and MySQL are missing.
#25.3 NeoTech on 24 Feb 2006 - 02:46
Anyone that needs php or mysql should seriously consider buying hosting. That includes myself, but I haven't convinced my dad to let me buy paid hosting yet.

I mean, html is more than enough for the average user which is probably the majority of people that are going to be using this.
#26 thefunky_monkey on 23 Feb 2006 - 15:32
is the site down for everyone?
(2 replies) #27 chinmay on 23 Feb 2006 - 16:10
It isn't down for me .. but I can't register anymore. They have reached the limit for today . This is what I get :-

Thank you for your interest in Google Page Creator! Google Page Creator has experienced extremely strong demand, and, as a result, we have temporarily limited the number of new signups as we increase capacity. In the meantime, please submit your email address and we will notify you as soon as we are ready to add new accounts. Thank you for your patience.
#27.1 Subaru on 23 Feb 2006 - 16:25
Same here
#27.2 Sn4k36 on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:54
yeah i got the samething also.
(1 reply) #28 Vomer on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:01
Someone got a link to a live example site?
#29 ranasrule on 23 Feb 2006 - 17:34
lovin it
(2 replies) #30 Sterling Christensen on 23 Feb 2006 - 18:09
But how could this possibly be profitable? The only way I can think of is by requiring a gmail account, which could mean more ad-impressions for gmail.

Maybe pages already hosted with them means more pages they don't have to cache?

I still don't see how it could be profitable... Can somebody help me out here?
#30.1 jwjw1 on 23 Feb 2006 - 18:32
please submit your email address and we will notify you as soon as we are ready to add new accounts.

thats how....with spam advertistments and selling your email address.....slick move LOL
#30.2 NeoTech on 24 Feb 2006 - 02:51
You do realize that you have sign in with a gmail address, right? So that means that they don't need a notify form to get it in the first place.

And, what service in their right mind will sell your email to someone so that in return they can get bombarded by spam? That would practically kill their servers.

"Hmm, I think I'll submit all these emails so that it can clog up the server and cause it to crash!"
#31 mallow on 23 Feb 2006 - 18:12
http://mallow.googlepages.com

Nothing really there, was just testing the WYSIWYG interface, which is pretty nice!

As long as they allow hotlinking images, this could be a really nice place to host pictures because it's fast
#32 Dirtie on 23 Feb 2006 - 21:34
Are we allowed to hotlink files and images? If so, count me in
#33 Angel Blue01 on 24 Feb 2006 - 00:36
Its no good without FTP transfer of existing pages -can't move to them!
#34 idoia on 24 Feb 2006 - 01:12
Thank you for your interest in Google Page Creator!

Google Page Creator has experienced extremely strong demand, and, as a result, we have temporarily limited the number of new signups as we increase capacity. We will notify you as soon as we are ready to add new accounts. Thank you for your patience.

#35 joker999 on 24 Feb 2006 - 02:39
i saw there have a html code -- cool!
#36 tiwaris on 24 Feb 2006 - 05:34
Offers temporary closed. I was late to the party.
#37 haydn82 on 24 Feb 2006 - 17:01
Looks pretty good....... very buggy tho!
(1 reply) #38 KSean on 24 Feb 2006 - 20:24
Once they allow FTP, I'll use it
#38.1 ambiance on 25 Feb 2006 - 20:39
Ditto! Kudos Google! I love this new free (somewhat) world they are pushing, maybe OTHER companies should take notes.
(1 reply) #39 neo_joel on 24 Feb 2006 - 22:27
All i have to say is whats next for google ?
#39.1 soothsayer on 25 Feb 2006 - 16:58
A little microchip that can be surgically implanted in your brain that will download it's contents and synchronize to your computer? Then search, archive, and retrieve your thoughts, memories and feelings. Next you can publish the content of your brain on the internet, make blog posts by merely thinking the words and see adsense matches for whatever you are thinking about at the moment.
(1 reply) #40 Magallanes on 26 Feb 2006 - 13:20
I say geocities and the crowd say "it's stink!".
I say lycos and the people say "no way!".
I say google and the fanboys say "Hallelujah brothers and sisters! we are saved!".

You cannot trust some opinnions in internet, specially when we talk about google, anti-ms or linux cause they are too biased to be near of the reality. For instance Picasa was acclaimed like a "MUST HAVE" but the facts is the program is useless and there are a lot more programs better and free.

Now, you can have a not-for-free webpage for the price of a beer. The advantage is you put the rules, you can put ads or not, you can put the name that you want or the content you want. So the question is why to invest time in a page where you are (in some ways) limited?. May be if you are a kid or you want to put a anonymous webpage.. To be free is good but it's not a holy grail.
#40.1 caledai on 27 Feb 2006 - 14:59
I have used Geocities - and now the Google. Geocities still stinks, and yes google is limited.

Apart from the advanced features you expect from purchased hosts - for a WYSISYG editor - with some basic html coding support - its more than enough for the people they are targeting it at. AKA the Teen/Blog Market.

Not the advanced coders present on neowin.

As for Picasa - As a tech - and using it personally - the program ISN'T useless.
lots more programs better and free? Whats the point of point out 'free' as picassa is 'free'.
And for end users that do not have a clue about what they are doing - again its a great program.
Sure I have a couple of bugs with it - particulary the labeling area - but apart from that it runs well.

Speaking of talking about limited pages - thats just what is needed - my brother wants to have a website where they can upload photos, and announcements - what more is needed?

Surely not php, linked to a mysql database for a group of people who do not know how to use anything more the a wysiwyg.

While personally - and yes i did create a site - like it the limitations - such as the lack of a single consistent navigational area - across the site - not replicated on each page as it is, mean its useful for a small subset of web pages - Hmm, look at mySpace.

You cant trust opinions on the net - sure - thats because the bias works both ways.
Take this from someone who has used, and is using the products.
#41 Colin-uk on 28 Feb 2006 - 11:15
my guess is they'll offer google ads to people signing up and offering them a cut of the revenue

they may even let you intergrate your blogger blog at some point... sounds pretty cool though

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)