main

Microsoft's "Origami" Ultra-Mobile PC Launched

Tom Warren   on 09 March 2006 - 08:48 · 57 comments & 10669 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft has finally unveiled "Origami" as the Ultra-Mobile PC.
 
We exclusively predicted that Microsoft would reveal a device last month with Intel and that it would be called Ultra Mobile PC.
 
The official launch partners for the UMPC seem to be Intel, ASUS, Founder and Samsung. ASUS, Founder and Samsung have launched devices which promise the following:
 
  • Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005 OS
  • Approximately 7” diagonal display (or smaller)
  • Minimum 800 x 480 resolution
  • Approximately 2 pounds
  • Integrated touch panel
  • WiFi- and Bluetooth-enabled
Interestingly these devices don't sport a camera which is a big shame. Channel9 have a great video (as usual) with Otto Berkes (General Manger of UMPC Platform) of Microsoft.
 
Microsoft are working with hardware vendors and software developers to push this technology in the right direction within the next couple of years. Microsoft claims UMPC devices will have a battery life of two and a half hours or more, and feature 30-60 GB hard drive for storage, with Intel Celeron M, Intel Pentium M or VIA C7-M processors. Microsoft also anticipates pricing in the US$599-$999 price-range.
 
View: Origami Project
View: Microsoft UMPC Homepage

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 57 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 CronicHazel on 09 Mar 2006 - 08:57
hm... will this be a failure or revolutionary? D:

...a cross between a pda and a tablet.... interesting.... =x
#1.1 markjensen on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:51
Well, I am guessing that the market for this is those tablet users that want a smaller device.

Because there sure isn't much of in interest among PDA users for a bigger device.
#1.2 LispyGlitter2 on 09 Mar 2006 - 21:34
I think it's pretty much just the evolution of things. Portable Media Centers weren't the hit that MS thought, so they came up with this, just like the failure of the Mira project lead to the evolution of tablet PC's. I'd buy this.
(1 reply) #2 Solarix on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:01
i have a feeling this will be the next jaguar64
#2.1 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 10:07
Sounds like flamebait to me.
(3 replies) #3 sundayx on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:15
i would very like to see an apple comeback for this.
#3.1 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 10:08
if apple comes up with something like it then apple will have invented it right? so lame.
#3.2 agge on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:16
that was your own words, right? so lame.
#3.3 pharrett on 09 Mar 2006 - 18:35
Actually, Apple had their own PDA several years ago, called the Newton. It was on store shelves three years before the first Palm Pilot hit.
(1 reply) #4 IsLNdbOi on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:15
Didn't Sony release something like this awhile ago?
#4.1 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 10:23
Most people call it reading - See here

"In truth, this category has existed for some time but not with any real focus by Microsoft or Intel."
#5 IsLNdbOi on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:18
(1 reply) #6 Clive on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:22
If microsoft wanted to win they should have made only one version and made that a real microsoft pitch such as the Xbox with a cool invigorating name. I dont think this will work.
#6.1 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 10:25
Multiple versions for multiple looks. Nothing wrong with that + if muliple companies make it you'll see price wars which is good for the consumer. Better than just one companies in complete control over a popular project line - like some corporate pigs we all know.
(1 reply) #7 Boiling Ice on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:42
it's running XP!!!!
I thought they will release it with Mobile vista!!!
#7.1 creamhackered on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:46
Later editions (think Christmas this year) will be running Vista obviously....
#8 Deathray on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:47
Intel site

If you check the "Watch the video of possible usages" they show completely new models, which in my opinion are amazing... The site isn't updated, although it is March 9th... so I guess we'll find out later on, but their prototypes/working models look a lot better than Samsung and Asus.
#9 blade707 on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:53
iv been looking forward to this.
(2 replies) #10 Jugalator on 09 Mar 2006 - 09:57
Whoops, they still use the design here... :/
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/umpc/default.mspx

I guess it's final that it'll look like poo then.

I for one have a hard time imagining who'd use this that doesn't fit in a pocket and is less powerful than a laptop. Well maybe there are some special uses, but I think they'll miss the major market. And isn't this why tablet PC's failed before?
#10.1 mprobins on 09 Mar 2006 - 10:41
You're trying to squeeze this device in an existing category.

This sort of thing will be awesome for things that laptops would be very good at, but are generally too bulky for. Things that cell phones and PDAs are just too damn small for. I mean seriously, right now there is a plethora of tiny devices with small screens and big devices with huge screens, with nothing in the middle.

Imagine the kind of things a PC could do if you could mount one on your car's dash. Combine it with GPS and real nav software, traffic information, your calendaring software, a blue-tooth cell phone and headset.

Hell, I want one of these things just for vacations. Load up a couple of movies, music, some simple games, and my plane flight will be bearable. During my vacation I can then use it to store photos from my digital camera and actually be able to show them to people on a decent sized screen. I can have actual readable maps on the thing.

Can I do these things with a PDA? Mostly, but the experience sucks. Can I do this with a laptop? Mostly, but it is bulky and I have to use when a flat surface is available.
#10.2 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 11:04
Very good points mprobins.

I'd like one for on the go during my normal weekday. In meetings and in the coffee shop. I really like the idea of taking it on vacation with me too. No more lugging arounf the laptop! Wihoo!
#11 windows95isg8 on 09 Mar 2006 - 11:07
Not my sort of thing, I have just orded a Samsung i300, it has all I could ever need and more.

My Phone
#12 Andy13 on 09 Mar 2006 - 11:13
About time! *rolls eyes* I don't know what the big deal is, honestly. :-P But then again, I'm deaf.
(4 replies) #13 diabulos on 09 Mar 2006 - 11:28
Is this a joke?

I am sorry, but it shows MS has no taste whatsoever. I mean, the only bit of taste they have is in Vista, and there is so much osX in that, well, that's another story.

This looks horrid, why can apple produce slim, elegant small devices and no other PC industry can come up with something of the same level? I mean, why is it that almost every device they come out with looks like it was done by a brick designer?

MS missed the boat here, an ugly device, with no strong brand in an already saturated market (Pocket PC, Pocket PC for mobile phones, Mobile Windows, Tablet PC...) It could have been great, a well designed device, appealing to the eye and with a well thought out integration running windows media center (for later integration, via Bluetooth and infrared into controlling other devices, even analogue ones). It could have been the item all students would want, sell a Bluetooth keyboard and hey, USB storage devices, speakers, it could take over the student market in many instances, but then, so could the Tablet PC.....

Bad design, badly thought out, a pity
#13.1 reidtheweed01 on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:07
When you are talking about apple, i hope you arnt talkign about that stupid mac that they, where the screen and the rest of it the computer are in one, if you think that is orginal then you are a complete idiot. Its a ****ing laptop with the screen turned around on a stand, how could you not realize it, they didnt come up with anything new.
#13.2 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:21
Diabulos - Nice trolling. First of all looks are in the eye of the beholder friend. Secondly, you are missing the whole point of the device...its not a PDA/PocketPC or a Phone or Laptop.

Speaking of an ugly design since you've expressed your idea of what one is: just look at the latest and greatest "innovation" from apple - that ugly brick speaker! LOL! Yes, they are truly reinvented the home stereo! ROFL!
#13.3 Aaron on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:52
Well, my understanding of these devices is that MS is creating the software to drive them not the hardware to run them. So if you have issue with looks I suggest you gripe to those vendors.
#13.4 diabulos on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:15
I only used apple as an example in relation to the Ipod and the nano, which I think are great designs and prove my point that you can do small with great form factor, great usability and battery life. I did not extend to their other offerings (and I do think that boom box i ugly as hell).

My questioning of what exactly it is has some logic. With such a myriad of formats out there, I think MS keeps fragmenting their brand, too many offerings, none of them exceptional, overall brand image; weak (same with the several versions of vista)

Why does everyone here thinks that if anyone talks about 'looks' they are either brainless or Apple lovers (I know I did mention Apple, still) form is as important in devices of this kind as performance, the device has to fit into a lifestyle, now more than ever. Look at the successful MP3 players, they tend to be generally the ones that have a good form(look)/features ratio.

To the point about MS making only the software, they have a look (vista and its glass, etc, XP and Luna) that should be able to translate into hardware (their keyboard and mice seem to have a cohesive and quite elegant look) why not here?

I still stand by my judgement that the form factor is just another pebble in the already fragmented offering, it will compete with the PPC and the Tablet form and maybe touch on the windows mobile for phones area, overall, what is it? why that and not a tablet? or just a smaller tablet. The format running CE was tried before (with full keyboard a la clam shell form) and quietly disappear, why would it work now?

So there you are, I may be a 'complete idiot' to some (although how the imac got into the conversation baffles me) but I still say; interesting idea, bad design, weak branding in an already over-fragmented market space
#14 HawkMan on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:02
This device is targetted m,ore at business men and lawyers who needs something more than a PDA, but don't want or need to carrey a huge clumsy to use full fledged laptop, this one will fit easily in any business friecase or such.

it's also perfect to use for work situation where it's beneficiel to have easy access to information on a device you can carry with you, where a PDA would be too small to use efficiently. This is such as Nurses and doctors on hopsital who can carry this and easily add information to patient journals and check up on them while doing the rounds.
(2 replies) #15 reidtheweed01 on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:04
What the hell is with you people about looks. You all complain about how wow looks ugly like everything else microsoft makes, but if it was another company you wouldnt say a thing. Then im sure you people are going to start complaining about how you are ****ed because it cant play any hardcore games you are addicted to. It is not a psp, or ipod killer in anyway, it just happens to have the those abilities to do what they do, and better just like any PC, which is what it is.
#15.1 marlow714 on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:23
The only people complaining about it's looks are apple trolls. They think if apple created it, it must be the best, perfect and the first. As we all know that hasn't been the case for apple for the past 20 years!
#15.2 ichi on 10 Mar 2006 - 00:15
MS is not designing it, there's no need to get rabid about people complaints.
#16 Raven Ryan on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:11
In my opinion this product is simple and nice. It's time to change your mindset on Microsoft. Not completely a Microsoft product. If you have noticed, it is branded with the Samsung's name on it.
#17 Galley on 09 Mar 2006 - 12:59
Give me a 400MHz Palm OS 5-based PDA with an 8" screen with at least VGA resolution, 128MB RAM, Dual SD slots, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.0 in a clamshell design with a full keyboard, and bring it in for $500-600. I want something that weighs less than a pound that I can carry with me at work. I don't need Office, Windows Media Player and all that other Microsoft bundled crap.
(1 reply) #18 lbuysers2 on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:05
The Asus device does sport a camera.

IPB Image

Last edited by lbuysers2 on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:20
#18.1 brianshapiro on 09 Mar 2006 - 16:00
i think if there were some modifications to the design this would make a nice form factor for using video chat , which would fill the role of video phones
(1 reply) #19 Inertia on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:42
where can we buy these ? are they going to be avialable in the UK ? if so where and when ?
#20 mr_da3m0n on 09 Mar 2006 - 13:50
Actually, I'll buy one. Would serve me. Alot. I already have a Powerbook, but my job requires me to has some kind of Windows powered mobile option. Virtual PC doesn't cut it at all.

So this sounds like the thing i'd want, it's small enough to be carried *with* my laptop.
#21 Timmah on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:14
I'm personally not overly impressed with what I've seen so far, but I doubt I'd ever have bought one anyway.

When you've got a rucksack and a laptop you've already got a true ultra-mobile PC!
(3 replies) #22 raid517 on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:28
Not for me. Not small enough yet.

Give me something that can do everything my iPod, my Archos AV4100, my PDA, my Cell phone and my PSP can do in a package that is small enough to hold in one hand, then we might be in business. I'd really love to be able to throw all these different gadgets away.

I simply don't see this appealing to the mobile media generation.

It just seems like a trimmed down tablet PC with less features.

GJ

Last edited by raid517 on 09 Mar 2006 - 15:32
#22.1 mr_da3m0n on 09 Mar 2006 - 16:34
raid517 meet the OQO.
OQO, meet raid517.

Now get a room.

http://www.oqo.com/
#22.2 raid517 on 10 Mar 2006 - 11:30
This isn't part of the UMPC platform.

GJ
#22.3 mr_da3m0n on 10 Mar 2006 - 14:59
.... no, and?

Oh wait, you actually want something that is *SPECIFICALLY* UMPC? Uh.. yeah, sure. You do that.
(4 replies) #23 dhan on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:41
Its too big.
Its too thick.
Its too short on battery life.
Its too wide at bezel.
:p
and so on...
The industrial design on this sucks.
#23.1 metalguy90 on 09 Mar 2006 - 14:55
must everyone complain about everything.
first.... this is a real cool idea... almost Star Trek like.... ever notice that everything seems to be like 'Star Trek'.
second..... I dont see you designing mobile PCs....
third.... ever see a first generation iPod? ... pretty heavy and ugly.... i have a 4G iPod which is still quite heavy compared to todays standards....

give things time..... usually the first attempt isnt the best....
#23.2 raid517 on 09 Mar 2006 - 15:37
Well it will take a new generation of chipsets from Intel before that happens - as, as far as I understand it the UMPC is an extablished Intel form factor at the moment.

Size and portability are important - and even in Star Trek the devices they use are considerably smaller.

It definately does have a very 'first generation' look about it - like something you will look back on in ten years time and smirk about how old fashioned it looks.

Cut the size in half and make it do more stuff, then you will be rocking.

GJ
#23.3 brianshapiro on 09 Mar 2006 - 16:02
raid517

they plan to cut the size in future generations

but frankly, i dont want something smaller, i just want a small, cheap, high battery life, tablet. i also dont want to be running full windows programs on a very tiny screen. which is why i also dont complain about the relatively low resolution, because i dont want things looking tiny (if the OS can scale things like in Vista thats fine).
#23.4 raid517 on 10 Mar 2006 - 11:33
It's still too big. Half that size would still give you a decent sized screen. Half the size and I might be a buyer.

GJ
#24 Croquant on 09 Mar 2006 - 15:58
If it had a fold-out keyboard, I might be interested.
#25 plastikaa on 09 Mar 2006 - 16:40
check out:

http://www.intel.com/design/mobile/platform/umpc.htm

What about the picture in the top right?

"Microsoft also anticipates pricing in the US$599-$999 price-range." and "Approximately 2 pounds"
- at last! a product which is cheaper in the UK! lol!

Last edited by plastikaa on 09 Mar 2006 - 19:19
#26 plastikaa on 09 Mar 2006 - 19:14
I want it to do everything that our currently technology cant do too! -

Make it the size and weight of a stamp with a holographic projection, and controlled using thought processes, then Ill buy one, until then though this sucks .... bla blah fill in standard moan. Then Ill buy one!

People... be realistic! What do you expect, this is 2006. Yeah I know we can do a lot of stuff, but in 1996 complaining saying you wanted a 4ghz processor and 64 bit in a normal computer would get you no where! So wait until 2016 until we get even cooler stuff and stop trying to live in a time frame that hasnt happened yet.
#27 Ely on 09 Mar 2006 - 20:26
Seems like a very nice device; I will defenately get one of these.
(1 reply) #28 reidtheweed01 on 09 Mar 2006 - 21:11
Quit saying its too big, because you are just looking stupid. I remember a few months ago when for the first time laptops outsold desktops, and that shows that laptops are not too big. So why the hell is this too big, it can do everything, and more then what a normal laptop can do, and its 1/4 the size, maybe less.
#28.1 raid517 on 10 Mar 2006 - 11:36
It can't do everything laptops can do. It can do maybe half a dozen or so specific things. Which is why laptops are and will remain a lot more popular.

GJ
#29 lylesback2 on 09 Mar 2006 - 21:23
a little pricey.. but i want one

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)