A site boasting to offer irreverent Apple news boasted some frankly irrelevant news yesterday. An opinion piece titled "
Will Vista Be the Last Operating System Microsoft Produces?" suggested that after Vista, that's it in the OS game for Microsoft. We urge you to read it.
The article argues that if they do put out another OS, it won't be until 2015. How, I hear you cry, could this be so? Quite simple, according to Apple Matters (we'd pun the name, but hey, you can over do it). First, Vista is just too big! Secondly, that web based Google OS is coming. Thirdly, that Microsoft have lost some employees to Google.
Leaving asides the 63,000+ people still working at Microsoft, the article is seriously flawed on a number of counts. A new OS every eight years?! Drive letters are an antiquated 'idea'? A web based Google OS? There's too much code in Vista?! Come on. A drastic re-write is what Microsoft claims to have done with Vista, and is one of the reasons why it has taken so long to deliver. The Google OS rumour has hopped from blog to blog with little attributable information to verify such a claim. One might claim with more credibility that Microsoft had done a far better job at building a 'web OS' with Live.com. Further, if reports are to be believed, Microsoft will soon be launching online storage too, well before the GDrive is launched. As Mr Cringley is so found of writing, we probably will see serious virutalisation of Windows on Mac in the near future - yet the scale is important.
Apple is very deft at getting journalists (and bloggers) to write very favourable articles about the company. However, this skill masks excellently the company's size in comparison to the competition. Apple's share of the PC market in 2005 was just 2.5%. That's correct. Whilst it might be coasting at 50+% in portable media player markets, if not a lot more, in the PC market, it is slim. Steve Jobs, mac god, has engineered a recovery in the company's financial fortunes but has seen a decline in the market share (4.6% in 1996, 2.2% 2005). We think you can probably do the maths here - hint - Linux isn't taking up more than a few percent. That's right - Windows has between 80 and 90% of the PC market.
Here is the reality. Vista development is plodding along. It's not going to be the re-birth of Christ, but it is going to be an improvement on Windows XP. It is exciting, and whilst it's very popular to say otherwise, it does come with new features. We're mid year, and Microsoft does not have any major product announcements at the moment. This is why it's gone a bit quiet; not because something has gone seriously wrong and they're hushing it up. Microsoft have a long list of items they've, well, dropped from Vista, and it doesn't seem plausible that they would simply waste that development. Expect a service pack with a number of features (WinFS, for example) after Vista has been launched.
Perhaps it is unfair to single out this article for attention, for it is but one in a series of articles doing a dis-service to bloggers online. A previous example is the 60% of Vista getting a re-write story which bounced around the web in March. We'll admit - true to name, we at Neowin are about as un-professional as it gets. However, we're not in the business of what can best be described as 'trashy think pieces', designed for the single aim of courting 'controversy' - and traffic. Writers might think that the short term gain from getting syndicated around the web is worth it - but we think not. We're here for our users, and think that running mis-leading articles is at best unhelpful, and at worst, down right mischievous. If online publications, bloggers included, want to be taken seriously as 'news' outlets, they need to be serious about their news.
As this affects you, dear reader, we'd like to hear your thoughts - so leave us a comment.
View: Apple Matters Article
The article argues that if they do put out another OS, it won't be until 2015. How, I hear you cry, could this be so? Quite simple, according to Apple Matters (we'd pun the name, but hey, you can over do it). First, Vista is just too big! Secondly, that web based Google OS is coming. Thirdly, that Microsoft have lost some employees to Google.
Leaving asides the 63,000+ people still working at Microsoft, the article is seriously flawed on a number of counts. A new OS every eight years?! Drive letters are an antiquated 'idea'? A web based Google OS? There's too much code in Vista?! Come on. A drastic re-write is what Microsoft claims to have done with Vista, and is one of the reasons why it has taken so long to deliver. The Google OS rumour has hopped from blog to blog with little attributable information to verify such a claim. One might claim with more credibility that Microsoft had done a far better job at building a 'web OS' with Live.com. Further, if reports are to be believed, Microsoft will soon be launching online storage too, well before the GDrive is launched. As Mr Cringley is so found of writing, we probably will see serious virutalisation of Windows on Mac in the near future - yet the scale is important.
Apple is very deft at getting journalists (and bloggers) to write very favourable articles about the company. However, this skill masks excellently the company's size in comparison to the competition. Apple's share of the PC market in 2005 was just 2.5%. That's correct. Whilst it might be coasting at 50+% in portable media player markets, if not a lot more, in the PC market, it is slim. Steve Jobs, mac god, has engineered a recovery in the company's financial fortunes but has seen a decline in the market share (4.6% in 1996, 2.2% 2005). We think you can probably do the maths here - hint - Linux isn't taking up more than a few percent. That's right - Windows has between 80 and 90% of the PC market.
Here is the reality. Vista development is plodding along. It's not going to be the re-birth of Christ, but it is going to be an improvement on Windows XP. It is exciting, and whilst it's very popular to say otherwise, it does come with new features. We're mid year, and Microsoft does not have any major product announcements at the moment. This is why it's gone a bit quiet; not because something has gone seriously wrong and they're hushing it up. Microsoft have a long list of items they've, well, dropped from Vista, and it doesn't seem plausible that they would simply waste that development. Expect a service pack with a number of features (WinFS, for example) after Vista has been launched.
Perhaps it is unfair to single out this article for attention, for it is but one in a series of articles doing a dis-service to bloggers online. A previous example is the 60% of Vista getting a re-write story which bounced around the web in March. We'll admit - true to name, we at Neowin are about as un-professional as it gets. However, we're not in the business of what can best be described as 'trashy think pieces', designed for the single aim of courting 'controversy' - and traffic. Writers might think that the short term gain from getting syndicated around the web is worth it - but we think not. We're here for our users, and think that running mis-leading articles is at best unhelpful, and at worst, down right mischievous. If online publications, bloggers included, want to be taken seriously as 'news' outlets, they need to be serious about their news.
As this affects you, dear reader, we'd like to hear your thoughts - so leave us a comment.
View: Apple Matters Article
What is it with you people that have to complain because a staff member voiced his opinion about something? Does that make Neowin worthless to you or something? I just don't understand it.
Its the fact that you're mixing (what should be) unbiased news with biased articles on the same page.
I am not saying don't post them, it can be fun and interesting to read someones opinion on a topic, but in the current structure it seems like you are trying to make it appear as news, just give more general awareness to users, put "Editorial:" in front of the title or something.
If a lot of people are voicing their opinion against your editorials isn't that a sign that they aren't being implemented correctly? Or is our opinions to you worthless?
Uh, hello... BIG red dot that says E D I T O R I A L.
That, and along with Paul Thurrott's latest Vista article, about sums up my views on Vista. It's not looking as good as many people think to be honest. There don't seem to be any innovations (a lot of the stuff seem to stem off OS X's features, the sidebar seems to be a project that was scratched before dashboard came to life, but then because of it, resurfaced again. Right down to adding the search box in every window (which doesn't look as innovative as spotlight), I know I could go on. It all just looks like fancy effects that deteriorate user experience (glass, how useful...), infact glass makes that 3d Alt-Tab view totally useless in my opinion, etc. I know of some nice features like viewing contents of a file and folders in the icons of the explorer view, and the extensive options in explorer for file browsing, but yet again the new features dont seem to outweigh the negative aspects.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.