main

Pirates Offered Windows XP Pro Retail at $100 Discount

Amin N.Karimi   on 15 May 2006 - 15:58 · 51 comments & 36937 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Users running illegal copies of Windows XP are being offered discounted purchase prices

Recently in the DailyTech labs we had a test bed machine that was giving us "this copy of Windows is not genuine" messages. Last week we tried to remedy the message by following Microsoft's recommended course of action, which was to verify the copy through its website and purchase a legitimate key. When we attempted to do so, Microsoft's website indicated that the upgrade service was not available to US customers (or any customers as far as we could tell).

On a whim we tried again this evening and it appears that Microsoft has updated its website and now allows US users of pirated or counterfeit versions of Windows XP to buy legitimate keys for $149 each -- a unique key is still required for each computer that runs Windows XP. The full version of Microsoft Windows XP Professional retails for $249.99, which means if you purchase the CD and key from Microsoft, there is a net savings of $100. The OEM version of Windows XP can be purchased online from online vendors, but this discounted version requires the purchase of hardware. Microsoft waives all shipping and handling charges, but sales tax is still added onto the purchase.

News source: DailyTech

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 51 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 PureLegend on 15 May 2006 - 16:02
LOL Oh yeah, great tactic!

"XP Pro? £100? Do be serious"

Next week

"Hello, I belive this pirate of XP is good for £25 off?"
"You are correct, sir. That'll be £75"

It'll encourage people to pirate more.
#1.1 BBinder on 15 May 2006 - 17:56
i got XP PRO OEM for £100 including next day delivery never had to buy any hardware with it
#1.2 Ryster092 on 15 May 2006 - 21:13
@1.1 - The fact you were able to buy an OEM copy without hardware means you are essentially using an unlicensed/illegal copy. You should report your retailer to Microsoft for breach of OEM licensing rules.
#1.3 Max™ on 16 May 2006 - 09:42
You are missing the fact that it is $100 off, not £100. XP Pro for $149.99 = £79.85
(1 reply) #2 Luppy on 15 May 2006 - 16:13
Exactly they are awarding the pirated users, and making the legit users spend more than pirated users... I mean wtf.
#2.1 markjensen on 15 May 2006 - 21:10
Ummm... If you think about it, the pirates have always spent less than the legitimate users. Nothing has changed, except the pirates are (potentially) paying to go legit.
(2 replies) #3 *John* on 15 May 2006 - 16:14
MS can kiss my ass......

I paid £100 (OEM Version) for my Windows XP Pro SP2 disk, and I have yet to, and never will take part in ANY WGA scheme

I barely tollerate activation, but WGA is way over the line......
#3.1 foxconn287 on 15 May 2006 - 21:02
You people amaze me. I'm going to keep my comments to myself however...
#3.2 GamblerFEXonlin on 16 May 2006 - 21:50
Please your insight instead of being provocing with rolleyes.

I think the whole WGA and WPA is a sign Microsoft may feel threatened by Linux. Also since every PC is connected to internet these days makes it possible though.

I think if people had a choice, they wouldn't buy an OS with Windows Product Activation. Escpecially not if the competitor had played on it with a campaign that sais "we respect your privacy and trusts out customers." But buing anything else than Windows leaves you out in the cold in many areas like games and hardware support and video chat etc. What a mess.
(1 reply) #4 Quick Reply on 15 May 2006 - 16:15
They have been doing this in Australia for a long time now. I believe that a condition of the key is that you provide evidence of the retailer/person who sold it to you.


http://www.microsoft.com/australia/genuine/faq.aspx#32

"What are the details of the genuine Microsoft Windows offer?
To help customers who unknowingly purchased a counterfeit version of Windows XP operating system, Microsoft has created two genuine Windows offers for those who qualify.


* Complimentary offer: Microsoft will make a complimentary copy of Microsoft Windows XP available to customers that have been sold counterfeit Windows software. Customers will be required to submit a proof of purchase, their counterfeit CD, and complete a counterfeit report with details of their purchase. Only high-quality counterfeit Windows software will qualify for the complimentary offer.



* Electronic Key Offer: Microsoft will offer an alternative for customers who find out via the WGA validation process that they are not running genuine Windows software, but do not qualify for, or choose not to take the complimentary offer. These customers will be able to license a Windows Genuine Advantage Kit for Windows XP online for a price of AUD$158 (inclusive of GST) for Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition or AUD$238 (inclusive of GST) for Microsoft Windows XP Professional. The Windows Genuine Advantage Kit for Windows XP will include a new 25-character Product Key and a Windows Product Key Update tool which will enable customers to convert their counterfeit copy to genuine Windows XP software electronically. To qualify, customers will be required to submit an on-line counterfeit report."

I guess you could make the report up (I'm not sure what questions it asks), but lawfully, making up a report is no better than pirating it (even if you get a legitimate copy in return).

Last edited by Quick Reply on 15 May 2006 - 16:33
#4.1 ahhell on 15 May 2006 - 16:31
I think you are right. Although i think I read that if you have proof..you can get a replacement copy for free.
I'll see if I can find a link.
#5 cptcaveman2004 on 15 May 2006 - 17:11
Quote - *John* said @ #3
MS can kiss my ass......

I paid £100 (OEM Version) for my Windows XP Pro SP2 disk, and I have yet to, and never will take part in ANY WGA scheme

I barely tollerate activation, but WGA is way over the line......


playing devils advocate, microsoft do have the right to protect their software... whats wrong is that theyve taken this long to do it. this is why its making people angry. theyve been using it without a problem and suddenly, upto 4 years after buying a computer, they are informed its illegal. the timing is a joke. the fact its £100 cheaper is also another insult to legit users. I would love to hear microsofts official reason for this move.

I personally believe they have realised that vista aint gonna be ready anytime soon and they can suddenly increase revenue by scaring people into buying licenses.

Also, your comment about never taking part in the WGA scheme? if all big microsoft downloads now require validation, how are you gonna opt out?? it would mean downloading from unsavoury sources for no real reason!
(2 replies) #6 n30w1n on 15 May 2006 - 17:16
The only thing that stood out in this story to me was the fact that DailyTech admitted to putting a pirated copy of Windows XP on a machine and no one even blinked.

Quote -
Recently in the DailyTech labs we had a test bed machine that was giving us "this copy of Windows is not genuine" messages.

OH MY, I WONDER HOW!!11
#6.1 vetvoidunknown on 15 May 2006 - 17:19
I see no admittance there. I have witnessed first hand a number of legal XP machines that fail WGA testing.
#6.2 Treefrog on 16 May 2006 - 13:21
"DailyTech admitted to putting a pirated copy of Windows XP on a machine and no one even blinked"

A false negative most likely. It happens.
#7 jon86 on 15 May 2006 - 17:22
Quote - cptcaveman2004 said @ #3.1
Quote - *John* said @ #3
MS can kiss my ass......

I paid £100 (OEM Version) for my Windows XP Pro SP2 disk, and I have yet to, and never will take part in ANY WGA scheme

I barely tollerate activation, but WGA is way over the line......


...

Also, your comment about never taking part in the WGA scheme? if all big microsoft downloads now require validation, how are you gonna opt out?? it would mean downloading from unsavoury sources for no real reason!


Who said *John* would have to download from unsavoury sources? It's not uncommon to see websites show lists of direct links to the official MS patches (the .exe files, not the web pages explaining them). The MS website does not 'authenticate' you to download a patch... it just authenticates you see the link to the patch.
(2 replies) #8 Stephen Dew on 15 May 2006 - 17:47
Microsoft discust me!
#8.1 Shiranui on 16 May 2006 - 01:35
Not to the extent that your spelling disgusts me, I fancy.
#8.2 MrCobra on 16 May 2006 - 02:11
You're the self proclaimed spelling police now? Give the crap a rest already.
(2 replies) #9 cptcaveman2004 on 15 May 2006 - 17:51
[quote=jon86 said,#5.1][quote=cptcaveman2004 said,#3.1]

Who said *John* would have to download from unsavoury sources? It's not uncommon to see websites show lists of direct links to the official MS patches (the .exe files, not the web pages explaining them). The MS website does not 'authenticate' you to download a patch... it just authenticates you see the link to the patch.[/quote]

Fair point.. although im sure microsoft will be sealing this little loophole pretty quickly... just seems kinda odd that if you own it, you wouldn't just download direct from microsoft via wga since all you do is click continue or validate.
#9.1 ludeboy12 on 15 May 2006 - 19:19


just because you own it doesnt me you can actually validate or use WGA. Keep in mind that if you are an enthusiest and constantly change our your parts, motherboard especially, you will come to a point when M$ will no longer let you validate even over the phone and thus you will be demoted from Valued customer to Pirate who cant validate.

that right there is crap if you ask me. There really needs to be a way to deactivate a serial so that if you do change out hardware it is no longer tied to your old hardware and you can then once again activate.
#9.2 MrCobra on 15 May 2006 - 19:30
I went through that. I have 2 holographic coasters until I got wise and imaged my hard drive.
(1 reply) #10 Ironman273 on 15 May 2006 - 18:31
But at least their spell checkers work
#10.1 advancedboy on 15 May 2006 - 21:51
ouch
#11 BeeJay on 15 May 2006 - 19:36
As a former a poor community college student, I would use pirated copies of software (such as the latest version of Windows, Photoshop, etc.) so I could learn play with the latest versions of the software while saving my pennies for other expenses.

I see this discount as being targeted at the people who pirate due to their economic situation, but may not be aware of the other avenues they might be able to recieve discounted licenses (OEM, student discount, etc.)

P.S. A couple of years after college I realized it was silly to keep fighting to keep my pirated copies of software functional. I was making plenty of money and realized I the developers of the truely useful software I used on a daily basis deserved my support. :-)
#12 Jazket on 15 May 2006 - 20:07
I did exactly what he explained in the whole thread, but about 2 months ago. Maybe the service wasn't available by the time he they tried whatever they tried, but not that it wasn't there.
#13 Mike Frett on 15 May 2006 - 20:36
Actually, while you guys say that there are many that use pirated Windows because they can't pay for it, there are MANY that use it, not because they can't pay for it, but because of Activation.

Now I own a copy of XP Home but I like to switch hardware and reinstall every few months and that activation stuff is annoying, so yeah, I've though about a pirated version just for that purpose.
(4 replies) #14 Jazket on 15 May 2006 - 20:49
An activation process that takes about 5 seconds clicking buttons that say "next", and about 1.56 seconds contacting the activation server cannot be annoying as you say. That's just a very simple excuse Mike. Don't tell me anyone hates to "Activate" their legit copy of Windows. 0.o
#14.1 Mike Frett on 15 May 2006 - 23:19
Thank you Smigit
#14.2 MrCobra on 16 May 2006 - 02:16
I've had two different legal retail copies that were refused activation after 6 times. None of my hardware was changed.
#14.3 ThaCrip on 16 May 2006 - 05:44
screw activation... it's just another thing that gets in the way for those who update there computers often... one of those little annoying things.

but my main reason(s) i dont like legit copys of windows xp is 2 BIG reasons.... first of all is PRICE and second is ACTIVATION.... i dont think ANY version of windows should ever cost more than 100 dollars MAX for the high end version (windows xp pro) ... but more like around the 50-75 (probably closer to 75 dollars) dollar area is more reasonable.... but ill tell you, if i bought a windows copy for 100 dollars it damn sure better not mess with me activation wise!

so for me i dont see any reason ill let go of my "best price possible xp copy" ..lol ... ill let you guys figure out what that means
#14.4 Treefrog on 16 May 2006 - 13:28
"Don't tell me anyone hates to "Activate" their legit copy of Windows."

Don't assume it works for everybody just because it worked for you.
#15 ludeboy12 on 15 May 2006 - 20:56
well if you have a legit OEM and you've made a motherboard change then ya you'll definitly hate activation as it wont be a simple 1.56 second process of hitting "next, next, next"
#16 jimmy_jazz on 15 May 2006 - 21:12
I have 4 computers running windows XP one of which is XP pro (VLM) installed using a keygen.

ever since validation first appeared I had been meaning to replace that copy with a legal version but didn't want to re-format.

So I followed the links from the "failed validation" pages and purchased a product key for £92 (GB) which was sent by email.

I was then directed to download and run this program

Microsoft Key Update Tool

What it did was convert my VLM pro version to regular Pro without the need to re-format

The update tool scans the system folder and checks for any system files that have been tampered with, so it would be a good idea to replace any cracked dlls with the original versions before you attempt to run it.

It is unclear if you can only use this mehod of conversion using a product key purchased in this way, as I did wonder if the tool could be used with legal OEM or retail keys.
(2 replies) #17 Smigit on 15 May 2006 - 21:54
you cant keep changing out your hardware and reactivating but. If you swap to many components you have to call Micosoft up and hope they will renew your license. so no, its not always a 1secons task and in some circumstances MS may well say that no, youve changed too much and must buy a new copy.
#17.1 Jazket on 16 May 2006 - 03:25
Quote - Smigit said @ #14.1
you cant keep changing out your hardware and reactivating but. If you swap to many components you have to call Micosoft up and hope they will renew your license. so no, its not always a 1secons task and in some circumstances MS may well say that no, youve changed too much and must buy a new copy.



in other words, Mikey doesn't have a legit copy of Windows and he don't wanna admit it

I've changed my components on many different computer many times, besides that I build them every single day of my life and I never had to call Microsoft up for any of these. This is a fact, I don't know where you got that stuff from buddy.
#17.2 Treefrog on 16 May 2006 - 13:34
"I've changed my components on many different computer many times, besides that I build them every single day of my life and I never had to call Microsoft up for any of these. This is a fact, I don't know where you got that stuff from buddy."

I think there's enough of us that have experienced otherwise to say that either you've been VERY lucky or you're lying. I personally don't want to try and count the number of times I've had to call MS up on behalf of a customer to get them re-validated after a hardware change.
(1 reply) #18 SimplyPotatoes on 16 May 2006 - 01:31
i just upgraded my pirated copy! 150 is reasonable
#18.1 ThaCrip on 16 May 2006 - 05:48
150 aint reasonable if you ask me.... im thinking more in the ball park of 100 dollars "tops" is reasonable.

cause remember that also... it aint like microsoft is poor and cant afford to do something like this either
(2 replies) #19 Nand on 16 May 2006 - 01:45
Umm I got Windows Xp Pro for 99 bucks since I am a student?
It IS NOT illegal. (If you do it that way)
#19.1 macrosslover on 16 May 2006 - 04:12
Quote - Nand said @ #1.3
Umm I got Windows Xp Pro for 99 bucks since I am a student?
It IS NOT illegal. (If you do it that way)

their is a difference between an academic version and OEM. the only thing being academic is sold to students a huge discount and is the same as a normal retail version most of the time, while the oem version requires the purchase of a piece of hardware to get it. what the previous poster is just saying is the retailer shouldn't have sold the copy of windows xp without requiring the purchase of a piece of hardware as well.
#19.2 Nand on 16 May 2006 - 21:56
Sorry bout that, I mixed up two programs I got at the same time.

I actually brought Xp Pro OEM for 99 without hardware, however it was not an educational discount. It was from college (special promotion thing, not educational version) though.
#20 Jazket on 16 May 2006 - 03:18
lmao good move Microsoft lol and it looks like giving their OS cheaper is actually the best way to stop this; (or is it cuz of Vista's Release?) its not that people out there cannot afford to buy XP is that theyre lazy when it comes to spend that money on this stuff you can easily find over the internet, or how much did they spend building those badas* computers they own right now? keep updating ur pirated copies and help the industry get rid of piracy (its like the dream of World Peace.........)
#21 webeagle12 on 16 May 2006 - 04:47
I'm sorry but WTF!!

I did pay full price for my xp Pro but for pirites they offering discount.

this is BS!!! man
#22 dkylau on 16 May 2006 - 07:31
wat the hell???? does that mean they're encouraging piracy????
(1 reply) #23 Sub on 16 May 2006 - 12:18
What about the person who bought XP Pro from thier geeky neighbor who downloaded it from bitorrent? Should they have to pay twice? How did they know it wasnt legit?
#23.1 Treefrog on 16 May 2006 - 13:36
Anybody who bought a downloaded copy deserves to pay twice! It's called the stupidity tax.
#24 thugilex on 16 May 2006 - 14:29
in leb it cost me 1 $ .... so .... mmmmm micro$oft ki$$ my @$$ looool
#25 Echilon on 16 May 2006 - 18:13
I clicked the link the other day out of interest. If it was ~£20 I'd think about buying a copy, but £92... come on microsoft, you're gonna have to do better than that
#26 reichg2000 on 16 May 2006 - 18:31
no thanks, i just pay for stuff that works like osx
#27 HeLGeN-X on 23 May 2006 - 08:39
I downloaded my Windows XP, and I still feel like I'm being ripped off! If only my audio programs worked on Linux...)

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)