main

Sharp's PN-655U 65-inch LCD Now Available

voidunknown   on 08 June 2006 - 17:36 · 14 comments & 7859 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Weren't you just telling your boss yesterday that what you really need to increase productivity is a 1080p 65-inch LCD HDTV? We're sure you were because Sharp announced today that the PN-655U we've been drooling over is now available in the US.

Of course, they didn't mention a price but judging from the nearly-$9,000 price tag of its existing 45-inch cousin, we suggest ratting out a coworker or two to make room in the budget. Isn't it worth it? They are also showing off the consumer edition LC-65D90U that is already available for between $15 and $20k, and their new 57-inch LC-57D90U, but you've probably got better odds of convincing your boss it's a good purchase than your wife.

News source: HD Beat

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
#1 Makks on 08 Jun 2006 - 17:44
Blimey, I can't wait to see one of those in action.
(1 reply) #2 PureLegend on 08 Jun 2006 - 17:49
Who saw the 100-inch?
#2.1 vetvoidunknown on 08 Jun 2006 - 17:54
I saw an 85-inch at CES 2006. It was definately a site to see.
#3 Mathiasdm on 08 Jun 2006 - 18:03
Heh, I tried a 1080p trailer on my AMD Turion laptop. It plays, but stops playing for a short moment, every 2 seconds or so.

This stuff needs quite a bit of processing power ;-)
(1 reply) #4 vetvoidunknown on 08 Jun 2006 - 18:10
Your Turion should play 1080p fine. Try turning off power management or plugging it in to enable full laptop power. I bet it works then.
#4.1 Mathiasdm on 08 Jun 2006 - 20:33
Quote - voidunknown said @ #3.1
Your Turion should play 1080p fine. Try turning off power management or plugging it in to enable full laptop power. I bet it works then.

Oooh, thank you very much for that information :-P
I'm going to give that a try, thanks!
#5 Venir on 08 Jun 2006 - 18:44
VERY nice!!!
#6 Croquant on 08 Jun 2006 - 21:10
Excuse me while a scrape my jaw off the floor.
:scrape:
#7 strekship on 08 Jun 2006 - 23:44
To bad i only have a 17in CRT. I realy need to scrape together some money so i can get a good monitor.
#8 Tony_Yayo on 09 Jun 2006 - 07:13
where can i see the 85inch from CES 2006
#9 wicker_man on 09 Jun 2006 - 07:16
65"? Pfft. Plasmas have been doing this for years. Now 103 inches is the size
After all, when would people stop being excited by large screen LCD TVs? They don't have a really great image compared to, say, plasma...
(2 replies) #10 _dandy_ on 09 Jun 2006 - 20:27
I have an old 19" LCD panel with a native resolution of 1280x1024. How much higher is the resolution on this 65" beast? Or will it provide me with roughly the same resolution?

Expand the resolution in a linear fashion, then we can talk. In the meantime, all you're getting is bigger pixels.
#10.1 Dark_Angel on 13 Jun 2006 - 13:38
If you had really paid attention, you had noticed the mention to "1080p", which tells me that it probably has a resolution of 1920x1080.
#10.2 _dandy_ on 17 Jun 2006 - 14:09
Quote - Dark_Angel said @ #10.1
If you had really paid attention, you had noticed the mention to "1080p", which tells me that it probably has a resolution of 1920x1080.


I did pay attention, thank you very much, and this is exactly the point I was trying to convey. My old 19" LCD can do 1280x1024; going from that at 19" to 1920x1080 at 65" is *very* underwhelming. I want that to be expanded linearly. I'm currently using 3 LCD panels:

- 19" 1280x1024
- 17" 1280x1024
- 15" 1024x768

...for a total resolution of 3584x2816 across roughly 51" (doing stupid math--but still close enough to drive my point). I wanna get rid of this mess and replace it with one large display. Hence my assertion that this 65" LCD would only provide me with lower resolution than what I already have. It's not even the equivalent of 2 of my current monitors, only everything's blown up across 65".

I guess what I ultimately want is this:

http://www.digitaltigers.com/displays-commandcenter.shtml

...only, built out of a single panel. Is that any clearer?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)