main

Windows Vista Beta 2: Largest software download in history

Tekmaven   on 10 June 2006 - 12:20 · 84 comments & 52633 views

Advertisement (Why?)
In an instant message chat, Microsoft has told the Windows Featured Communities that the demand for Windows Vista Beta 2 has been overwhelming. It is, in fact, the largest downloaded software in history. Currently, they are serving product keys out ten times faster then the downloads can be served. In fact, they are pumping out bits as fast as they can - any faster and there would be a measurable impact on the internet. In fact, I quote a Microsoft representive:

"So, we are literally saying that if we increased our bandwidth any further there's a possibilty of taking down the Internet - people might have problems with World Cup viewing, etc"

People who have recieved Vista Beta 2 product keys, but are unable to download, may need to wait a few days, up to one week. Microsoft encoruages users who want to try out Windows Vista Beta 2 to order the DVD. When they recieve the DVD in 1-4 weeks, install it, and activate it, they will be automattically guaranteed an RC1 upgrade.

News source: Bink.nu

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 84 additional comments
#1 Cpugeni Ω on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:26
lol jeezuz, isane bandwidth required folks
#2 Ely on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:29
that's truly amazing and scary at the same time lol.
#3 gxsaurav on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:32
wow, never knew that.....seems like unlike the claim of linux or Mac community, people are indeed eager for Vista
(2 replies) #4 LeeŽ on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:33
Would be interesting to know the exact figures of bandwidth it's using.
#4.1 toadeater on 10 Jun 2006 - 20:13
Yes.
#4.2 Arkle on 11 Jun 2006 - 23:18
Quite.
(4 replies) #5 adamlivesley on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:41
erm i dont think microsoft would of said we might take down the internet?! How will that affect anything? Its microsoft's bandwidth, not the BBC's! The internet wont stop, the world wont stop just because Microsoft used abit too much bandwidth! The internet would be impossible to take down, enless every server, every network cable, and every phone line just stopped.... which microsoft cant do
#5.1 Smigit on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:50
It isnt so much their servers but ISP's ect that I suspect would be the issue. The claim does sound exagerated but who knows, at 4Gigs a pop this isnt a small file.

I also wana know how much bandwith they have used.
#5.2 Maxious on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:53
Well if every windows power user in the world was downloading it from their local Akamai server (Microsoft/CNN/Apple have magical mirrors that appear to be hosted in the US but are really quite close in terms of internet nodes), alot of local internet links would become saturated. So while *some* of the internet would work *sometimes*, other bits would be dead or painfully slow.

Case in point: One of the US -> Australia links was broken a week and a half ago. There were some backups but almost instantly the other links were saturated leading to speeds that ranged over about 8 hours from 2-30kb/s. I say 30kb/s, because that was after ISPs had time to reprioritise some of their connections. http://whirlpool.net.au/article.cfm/1636?show=replies
#5.3 Luppy on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:59
How do you think the file gets to it's destination, it hops to each isp until it gets to where it needs to go, and it does this by going through cables.

What he is saying is that if they increase their bandwidth, the isps may not be able to handle the extra load.

And that already Vista Beta 2 is taking up a huge % of the current internet traffic happening.

Last edited by Luppy on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:42
#5.4 Express on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:11
Part of the reason might be the fact that ISP bandwidths are already oversubscribed several times over.
(4 replies) #6 mjj1998 on 10 Jun 2006 - 12:42
Considering the amount of people who have needed to re-download the ISO file numerous times due to corruption issues, then this isn't really that surprising! Just do a search for "Install issue 80070241" on the MS Vista newsgroups and you'll see what I'm talking about...
#6.1 ahhell on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:09
The corrupted downloads are probably caused by the oversaturation of the "Internet".

Just get it from the Newsgroups. Don't need to worry about corrupted downloads.
#6.2 Tammm on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:22
This is true, however they can measure how many correct downloads there are due to the serial generation before downloads. At least, in theory.
#6.3 Spitfire_x86 on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:27
MS should use torrents
#6.4 advancedboy on 13 Jun 2006 - 02:19
Quote - Spitfire_x86 said @ #6.3
MS should use torrents


Torrents wouldn't give them the record
(1 reply) #7 Jugalator on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:21
Hehe, bringing down the Internet sounds a bit tough

Are you sure this isn't a PR stunt by Microsoft with a handful of exaggeration put in to impress and convince?

I mean, I've hardly noticed any disruptions on my Internet superhighway.

But maybe that's because MS hasn't increased their capacity yet, as they say? :p
#7.1 Enrickey on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:35
If you've read any of the other replies to this news post, you would realise that it is fully possible.
(2 replies) #8 Angel Blue01 on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:36
Winzip used to claim it was the most downloaded program ever. Now its probably itunes or something like it.

How many times is Vista beta 2 beign downloaded, and by how many people?
#8.1 Cierro on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:47
Largest software download, meaning how many GB were passed thru servers to clients.

Not how many times it was downloaded.

Approx. 3 GB x How many times downloaded = prolly huge amount of net traffic.
#8.2 Smigit on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:19
Itunes wouldnt be close IMHO. I wouldnt know what number one was but the various versions of ICQ would rate up there with it being consuistantly in download.coms top 10 list for getting on 10 years now. From download.com alone thats had well over 110,000,000 downloads.

That said that sites not perhaps the most accurate measure but I think for general practice its an ok comparison.

edit: this is all in relation to a dload count, not what the article is about I'm aware.
#9 Unwonted on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:40
Thank goodness for newsgroups.
#10 Mackist Fire on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:53
Maybe they should use torrent instead of direct download.
#11 Oddstar on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:55
http://bittorrent.com/ is running a torrent for it if still unable to d/l
#12 *John* on 10 Jun 2006 - 13:57
Since when was a Microsoft press release trustworthy?
#13 mgleason007 on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:03
Claims mean nothing without actual numbers.
#14 madnuke on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:09
All your internet belong to Microsoft.
#15 -Underoath- on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:12
my internet kept cutting out yesterday while i was playing cs 1.6... thank god i got the beta2 as soooooon as it came out.
#16 GameMaster90 on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:23
What are the requirements for getting Vista Beta on DVD?
(1 reply) #17 Saadu on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:34
Q for those who installed Beta 2: Are there new wallpapers? or sounds?
Also is it possible to run vista beta side by side on windows XP?
#17.1 King Mustard on 10 Jun 2006 - 16:17
Yes, no and yes.
(2 replies) #18 Xtreme $niper on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:37
Wow.. That is quite interesting. Hopefully the Internet survives. :p

"Are there new wallpapers? or sounds?
Also is it possible to run vista beta side by side on windows XP? "

Yes, very nice wallpapers. Yes, some new sounds though not many. Login sound still the same for now.
And yes, it is possible to run Vista side-by-side with XP. All you have to do is either install it on a different hard drive, or a separate partition. Vista installer takes care of the boot loader.
#18.1 Saadu on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:17
Thanks for replying,
Also is it possible to then uninstall vista beta and reversing the boot.ini to load xp? I only want to try it if i dont have to reinstall XP in case i dont like it or its not stable to run all my software.
#18.2 PCyr on 11 Jun 2006 - 05:13
Actually Xavien, when I installed Vista, I could only boot to safe mode in XP
#19 xxdesmus on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:40
that's incredible, makes a lot of sense though too
(4 replies) #20 texarkana on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:41
I dl`it from mininova in a few hours..!!

wy is MS not using BT...also..??

#20.1 powowcow on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:01
Because Bittorrent is the baddie in the neighbourhood, didn't you know? lol
#20.2 toadeater on 10 Jun 2006 - 20:20
Interesting. MS doesn't mention all the downloads Vista is getting on Bittorrent. Maybe they're illegal, but they haven't brought down anyone's internet.

If you've got a legit beta key, you might as well download the ISO via Bittorrent, then you won't have to wait, or ruin someone's World Cup viewing.

But I'd take this whole press release with a grain of salt. Largest download in history? Maybe Vista being so bloated has something to do with skewing those statistics, if they're going by the MB and not number of downloads.
#20.3 Julius Caro on 10 Jun 2006 - 21:32
I agree using bittorrent would be more efficient, but it uses bandwidth too!!
#20.4 Mr Mialo on 11 Jun 2006 - 02:45
You mean why isn't MS using Avalanche.

http://research.microsoft.com/~pablo/avalanche.aspx

I am surprised. They could have said biggest download in history, and look at how great we are at the same time.
(2 replies) #21 foxconn287 on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:57
By using BitTorrent, Microsoft would be associating itself with piracy which would not look good for shareholders, investors, future deals, etc.

Before you say BitTorrent isn't piracy, which is technically true, the recording industry in USA has made that "association" so no matter what the legal status, I do not think it will have a positive impact on its reputation for Microsoft.

Flame away.
#21.1 Julius Caro on 11 Jun 2006 - 00:00
Blizzard used bittorrent to distribute WoW. There's nothing wrong with it, and I think nobody denies its potential, not even the evil **AAs.
#21.2 Blackice on 12 Jun 2006 - 02:08
oh, I don't think so: shareholders rarely object to to the most cost-effective route. That said, they usually object to most sensible route, so its more a question of how the balance lies with Microsoft's crowd.

Besides, there's nothing against creating a small, purpose-built client, and hiding the fact that it is using bittorrent. You'll still get uploads from everyone else who is:
1) downloading
2) finished, but left the computer on overnight and isn't there to turn it off

Their extra input would distirbute the load more effectively (the load on ISPs)
#22 RobertH on 10 Jun 2006 - 14:57
Quote -
When they recieve the DVD in 1-4 weeks, install it, and activate it, they will be automattically guaranteed an RC1 upgrade.


Ok so does that mean they will send them RC1 on DVD later, or they will get the upgrade 'via the net' some how. Maybe the RC1 will upgrade Beta2 somehow .... hmm.... cos from that it seems that they are saying "dont worry about a new build your ok".
#23 Colin-uk on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:02
I wonder how much bandwidth they've used so far :whistle:
(1 reply) #24 Xavien on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:10
ofcourse you have to be careful, because in the Vista Boot Loader, you cannot enter safe mode for Windows XP, only for vista.

So you'd have to go into safe mode from windows xp itself (via the msconfig BOOT.INI tab)

Already installed Vista here, on a seperate partition to windows XP and activated
#24.1 Gobelet on 11 Jun 2006 - 16:23
Quote - Xavien said @ #18.1
ofcourse you have to be careful, because in the Vista Boot Loader, you cannot enter safe mode for Windows XP, only for vista.

So you'd have to go into safe mode from windows xp itself (via the msconfig BOOT.INI tab)

Already installed Vista here, on a seperate partition to windows XP and activated

Yes you can actually, after selecting Earlier version of Windows and pressing enter, mash your F8 key until it pops up.
#25 nw_raptor on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:21
<evil> Bring it on, take down the Internet </evil>
#26 jedimasterk on 10 Jun 2006 - 15:21
Remember people this is not even close to what the final will be like. Some of the features in this beta will be stripped from the final RTM. So don't get to used to it. And this edition which is the Ultimate Edition will more than likely be priced way more than you think.
http://www.windowsitpro.com/windowspaulthu...rott_50539.html
#27 MaX Velocity on 10 Jun 2006 - 16:44
(1 reply) #28 Beastage on 10 Jun 2006 - 17:05
Yea I called Bill Gates and told him to use bit torrent.. he replied with "uh?"
MS, this is what BT is for - UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH

I like Vista... its much better than XP was in beta , its very diffrent to use at first almost like when switching from win98 to winXP and then when I booted to XP again it felt really old.

#28.1 mko on 11 Jun 2006 - 03:34
Quote - Beastage said @ #1
Yea I called Bill Gates and told him to use bit torrent.. he replied with "uh?"
MS, this is what BT is for - UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH

I like Vista... its much better than XP was in beta , its very diffrent to use at first almost like when switching from win98 to winXP and then when I booted to XP again it felt really old.


Unlimited Bandwidth? Clearly you have no idea how the internet works.

Instead of congesting nodes near Microsoft's end, BT will cause massive upstream traffic near the user end, which in turn stresses the ISP's upstream, since a lot of ISPs still have smaller upstream links than downstream. Microsoft on the other hand have more upstream bandiwdth than all the users of many ISPs combined would.

This is why in BT you never max your downstream traffic since its limited on how fast others can send it you, and in most cases their uplink is smaller than your downstream. On the other hand I got Vista through Australia's akamai mirror and happily downloaded it at 600Kb/sec.
(1 reply) #29 Umbrello on 10 Jun 2006 - 17:14
So how many people actually downloaded Windows Vista Beta 2? I doubt it was the largest software download in history. It's only been one day.
#29.1 nquinnathome1 on 10 Jun 2006 - 17:39
It may not be the most downloaded file, certainly isn't the largest you can download, but at 3/4GB in size and with a fairly large amount of downloaders it may well be largest in terms of total bandwidth use across the Internet.
#30 DigitalDude on 10 Jun 2006 - 17:22
I thought the largest was ICQ, at least according to downloads.com.
#31 CompMad3243 on 10 Jun 2006 - 17:55
Well download Vista quick before the Internet does get slow.
#32 shadowchaos on 10 Jun 2006 - 18:04
hey guys my name is microsoft and so many people are downloading our os that we may just KILL THE INTERNET.


Interesting though, guess more people are excited for vista than I thought.
#33 caesar on 10 Jun 2006 - 18:53
I tend to belive some people have been falsely told that this is the latest XXX movie one could have.
(1 reply) #34 McG on 10 Jun 2006 - 20:11
When are they planning on releasing the new Windows sounds? I'm really anxious to hear the Windows Startup Sound for this OS. They recorded it almost a half a year ago...
#34.1 Beastage on 10 Jun 2006 - 21:40
I guess for the RC's, vista needs alot of priority work before they will finish with the sounds/icons
(1 reply) #35 naap51stang on 10 Jun 2006 - 20:40
It's probably more that people are indeed eager for a FREE copy of vista, even if it is beta...

#35.1 daftperception on 10 Jun 2006 - 21:55
Quote - naap51stang said @ #3.1
It's probably more that people are indeed eager for a FREE copy of vista, even if it is beta...
Man MSoft bashers can never give them any credit seriously if you don't like them stop buying there software and get linux they need the competition anyways.
(1 reply) #36 Luppy on 10 Jun 2006 - 21:33
toadeater making it commonly avaliabe via bittorrent would only make the issue worse.

As it would cause more people getting vista simultanously, causing more traffic, causing more load on the isps, causing a crash.
#36.1 toadeater on 11 Jun 2006 - 21:20
Quote - Luppy said @ #20.4
toadeater making it commonly avaliabe via bittorrent would only make the issue worse.

As it would cause more people getting vista simultanously, causing more traffic, causing more load on the isps, causing a crash.


But it IS available over Bittorrent already, unofficially. There's no need to speculate, because we have a real world example.

Right now there are about 2500 people downloading Vista simultaneously as I type this (which is a couple of days since the release), and 1000 people sharing it. How many downloads did MS's servers handle?
#37 water.hammer on 10 Jun 2006 - 23:06
First of all MS has the bandwidth and the won't hurt ISPs because most do caching (at least here as I don't know how these things operate in the US) so if one person downloads the file, the ISP servers won't have to re-download the file when another client wants it.
And no, this isn't the biggest software download in histroy. Bigger things happen when Redhat releases fedora dvd and when Novell releases suse DVDs on ftp servers.
(1 reply) #38 Ivand on 10 Jun 2006 - 23:12
4Gb * 1000000 = 4000000Gb = 3906.25Tb = 3.81 Pb

In a few days. that's a lot of bandwidth, also, i think more people than that can be downloading the Beta
#38.1 MaceX on 11 Jun 2006 - 00:48
And to think. That would still only fill up 3.5% of Data's brain.
(1 reply) #39 Osprey on 11 Jun 2006 - 00:45
Microsoft should be glad that Beta 2 leaked to bittorrent networks two weeks ago or else they'd be experiencing an even greater resource demand right now. I downloaded it that way and, when Microsoft released it to the public a few days ago, I merely had to register for a key since I had the ISO already.
#39.1 roadwarrior on 11 Jun 2006 - 23:43
Same here, except that I got mine from newsgroups.
(3 replies) #40 a1kashur on 11 Jun 2006 - 02:05
I'm sure all Microsoft bashers are the first ones to download anything that microsoft releases. Aholes.
#40.1 water.hammer on 11 Jun 2006 - 07:02
umm.. No. Please don't generalize.
#40.2 toadeater on 11 Jun 2006 - 21:30
What is a Microsoft basher? Someone who doesn't fawn over every MS press release like it was the word of God?

MS claims Vista is the biggest software download in history, and we're supposed to go "Ooh, aah!" What does that say about the quality of Vista? Absolutely nothing.

The claim that it is may not even be true, I'd like to see some verifiable stats showing how many copies of the beta were downloaded. I've already seen the p2p results, and they've only been in the thousands. Maybe 50,000 people total on Bittorrent and Emule.

That traffic pales in comparison to the amount of DVDRs being traded on the internet on a daily basis. Then MS goes on to say Vista is so huge it can take down the entire internet. Is that a bug or a feature?

Maybe instead of a 4GB bloated mess, MS should have made Vista 1GB so they don't have to destroy the internet in order to conduct a public beta test.
#40.3 roadwarrior on 11 Jun 2006 - 23:48
Toadeater is right. Many terabytes get posted on a daily basis to newsgroups, which actually has a minimal effect on the internet. I highly doubt Microsoft's claim about taking down the internet if they increased their server's bandwidth.
#41 PharosBR on 11 Jun 2006 - 04:38
Quote -
It is, in fact, the largest downloaded software in history. Currently, they are serving product keys out ten times faster then the downloads can be served. In fact, they are pumping out bits as fast as they can - any faster and there would be a measurable impact on the internet. In fact, I quote a Microsoft representive:


Can't say enough "In fact", eh?


#42 PCyr on 11 Jun 2006 - 05:17
lol, how would you know? Everything is "quads" in Trek, they don't use bytes because they don't want to be made fools of in the real 24th century. "Hah! Something as big as Data's brain could only hold a few yottabytes? My kids NQ4 player holds 10 times that much!"
#43 MaceX on 11 Jun 2006 - 06:13
Quote -
Data was built with an ultimate storage capacity of 800 quadrillion bits (approximately 88 petabytes).
#44 Smigit on 11 Jun 2006 - 13:13
You know, if they took down the internet with Vista they wouldnt have to patch it that much since it would stop the trafficing of most malware.

haha. Got my copy. Will install it when I get a 2nd HD.
#45 Ivand on 11 Jun 2006 - 15:17
i got another reason too, akamai serves and caches MS' traffic but also does google's, yahoo's, cbs and apple so if akamai auments MS pipes then the others clienst will have smallers one, and the intarweb dies

Last edited by Ivand on 11 Jun 2006 - 15:50
(1 reply) #46 PureLegend on 11 Jun 2006 - 16:35
Quote - MaceX said @ #40.1
Quote -
Data was built with an ultimate storage capacity of 800 quadrillion bits (approximately 88 petabytes).


So...that's the absolute maximum any storage device can hold?
#46.1 Hooya on 11 Jun 2006 - 18:42
Quote - PureLegend said @ #42.1
Quote - MaceX said @ #40.1
Quote -
Data was built with an ultimate storage capacity of 800 quadrillion bits (approximately 88 petabytes).


So...that's the absolute maximum any storage device can hold?


He's talking about Data, the android from Star Trek: The Next Generation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek/Data
#47 Proneax on 11 Jun 2006 - 19:22
I'm not understanding how this would kill the internet?

Ok so MS saturates on thier end, not a big deal if I want to go read neowin.
Maybe me and 1000 of my neighbors are all downloading it, saturating our links. SO WHAT?
You're telling me my ISP doesn't have the traffic shaping/ throttling ability that my 1 neighbor who isnt downloading it is going to have trouble downloading his email?

And if this is being cached by akamai at my ISP, then it's even less of a problem.

And with bittorrent - so what you've got everyone maxing thier upload bandwidth, well isn't that why your isp cap's your upload bandwidth, so you don't kill their connection for your neighbor?

I can see how they might say we're going to saturate a certain amount of network links, but that should be able to be managed by the isp no?

someone straighten me out

Last edited by Proneax on 11 Jun 2006 - 19:28
(1 reply) #48 powowcow on 12 Jun 2006 - 01:30
Aren't some games that can be downloaded on FilePlanet via the Direct2Drive service bigger than Vista? Splinter Cell Chaos Theory is almost 4gb. There must be newer games that are bigger.
#48.1 Mathachew on 12 Jun 2006 - 01:46
There's a difference between a free download and a download that you pay for, which is probably the distinction between the two.
#49 Ficman on 12 Jun 2006 - 19:08