Microsoft will start selling a digital music and video player to compete with Apple's iPod by Christmas, sources say.
The company is also said to be planning to have a wireless feature on the new player to enable the downloading of music and videos over-the-air by users, according to one source.
Microsoft Corp has been touting the new player to record companies in the last few weeks as well as a new integrated media software application developing a system akin to Apple Computer Inc.'s iPod/iTunes integrated ecosystem.
"They're proposing an iTunes model approach, another source told Reuters. "They're now interested in controlling the whole vertical stack of technology from the device to the service to the software."
News source: SMH
The company is also said to be planning to have a wireless feature on the new player to enable the downloading of music and videos over-the-air by users, according to one source.
Microsoft Corp has been touting the new player to record companies in the last few weeks as well as a new integrated media software application developing a system akin to Apple Computer Inc.'s iPod/iTunes integrated ecosystem.
"They're proposing an iTunes model approach, another source told Reuters. "They're now interested in controlling the whole vertical stack of technology from the device to the service to the software."

Yeah, thats what caught my eye as well.
I guess it would be useful for those times when you just have to a particular song, but nowhere near a PC.
I think hes talking about the fact you have to use iTunes to update the iPod
if microsoft tried to do something like that for windows media player and thier device, there'd be uproar.
I dont see how intergration is "monopolistic", people still have a choice.
Currently have an iAudio X5L which does the job well although its fairly bulky.
Wireless sounds like a great idea but may be an indicator this wont exactly be a cheap device. We shall see. Hopefully such a feature isnt added at the crompromise of the players overall size.
Just poking fun... if you can't tell
I'd buy it if it's cheaper than the ipod but i think maybeit'ls gonna be like around the same or $20 cheaper what do guys think
With an attitude like that the iPod would never have been released, nor would gmail. Both forefront runners in their respective fields (although Gmail does share the podeum with a few others). Nothing wrong with competition. If the product bombs the consumer looses nothing, if its good its then a viable option or may lead to lower prices.
MS needed to keep Apple alive to continue providing its R&D. Where do you think all your Vista features are coming from?
Anyhoo, what's that got to do with this discussion? You seem too defensive.
I have a crappy sounding MP3 player right now (RCA Lyra). I've been looking forever to replace it. I'm sooo close to buying the Sandisk Sansa but it has the Windows Media only sticker on it. And the rechargeable I bet is not cheap.
Why can't someone come out with a decent flash-based MP3 player that works on AA or AAA batteries. I'd still be using my MiniDisc player if: a) it worked on my Mac b) didn't have to use crappy software and c) didn't have to convert every damn song I have over to their format. 60+ hours on ONE AA battery. Beat that
Because AA/AAA batteries suck for electronics.
I'll stick with my Creative Zen Vision M
iPod/iTunes ECOSYSTEM? Does that really make sense? I wasn't aware iPod and iTunes were there with marine and desert... :-/
It depends how they do it but, I can really see them playing the "features" card which usually leads to things getting technical and it all going over a consumers head. A bare bones approach to advertising seems to have worked wonders for apple. Basically reminds me of the spoof ad they did for the "microsofts ipod box".
I guess we'll just have to wait and see!
Anyway I'm very interested to see what they can do. iPods good but it can be improved apon in many many ways.
It's me!
Well i thought it would make a good smiley.
It's me!
Well i thought it would make a good smiley.
no, its just retarded.
There have always been better music players than ipod, they were just never marketed as aggressively.
The first generation iPods didn't even have a display or controls! It was pretty much just a memory stick with an on/off switch. How a device like that could manage to take off I will never understand.
And by "better" you must mean "more features". The market seems to have decided that "better" means well-designed and easy to use.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.