main

Mac Pro: Apple Completes Intel Transition in Eight Months

Fred Derf   on 08 August 2006 - 13:41 · 48 comments & 18064 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Mac Pro models using Intel Xeon "Woodcrest" processors have now replaced the PowerPC-based Power Mac G5 models. With this release, Apple has completed its transition to Intel processors. Previously released Intel-based models included two notebooks (MacBook and MacBook Pro) and two entry-level desktop products (Mac mini and iMac). Like the Power Mac G5 that it replaces, the Mac Pro uses four CPU cores to achieve maximum performance. Apple's benchmarks show a performance increase that could be as high as 110% over previous Power Mac Quad G5 models depending on how your Mac Pro is configured. The Mac Pro can be equipped with up to 16GB of RAM.

According to Philip Schiller, senior vice-president of worldwide product marketing, the Mac Pro will cost less than a comparably configured Dell PC.

The Mac Pro is now available for order in the United States.

News source: The Toronto Star

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 48 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 neiltc13 on 08 Aug 2006 - 13:49
I don't understand why Neowin's "editors" can't write an article based on Apple's own Press Releases and information on the Mac Pro website instead of simply copying and pasting another organisation's news.
#1.1 fred666 on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:11
Obviously, you didn't follow or read the link. There are not many simularities at all.
#1.2 xMorpheousx416 on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:12
You mean write an opinion based article? Why....when posting news, you post the news. If you want to post opinions, you post opinions.
#1.3 markjensen on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:32
People complain when it is "just a copy". People complain when it is changed in little ways. People complain when a wholly original editorial/opinion is posted.

People complain.
#2 xMorpheousx416 on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:14
Anyone know, cuz I have yet to investigate, how much system memory OSX Tiger, or even Leopard will use? 16GB is a ton of usable space....would be nice to know if the OS isn't limited.
#3 bobbba on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:14
Gotta love the product :->

Gotta hate the price :-<
#4 bucko on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:16
The Mac Pro is cool, I would love one but there £££, id probably setup my own Intel Xeon machine (I have a big old empty server case) and stick Xp x64 on it. I so need a decent machine for rendering my 3D and video work.
(12 replies) #5 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:25
"According to Philip Schiller, senior vice-president of worldwide product marketing, the Mac Pro will cost less than a comparably configured Dell PC."

And once again , Apple lies...

Just did a compare

Mac Pro $12,748.00

Dell Precision 690 $9,098

I tried to match everything as best as possible, I might have mistaken but I can't see where
also even if the match isn't +90% identical there is nothing to justify ~4000 usd more

I guess that as always Apple spin doctors use a comparison between 2 unrealistic setups from both makers so if challenged they can say... "but look at this model and that... we are cheaper!"

Last edited by Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:32
#5.1 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:28
what's the setup?
Many others did the compare and came up that Apple was cheaper.

Maybe you choose the 16 GB RAM. Apple always charge extra (a lot) for the ram.

Last edited by coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:37
#5.2 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:31
Quote - coolchan said @ #5.1
what's the setup?
Many others did the compare and came up that Apple was cheaper.


yes I'm trying to figure out a way to get some sort of a short summary of both systems.
#5.3 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:39
list your configurations.

I just did a quick comparison.
Apple: $4,149.00
Two 2.66GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
1GB (2 x 512MB)
250GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 512MB, Stereo 3D (2 x dual-link DVI)
1 x SuperDrive
Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse - U.S. English
Mac OS X - U.S. English

Dell: $5,109.00
Dell Precision Workstation 690 (750w - 64bit) Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5150 2.66GHz, 4MB L2,1333
Operating System Genuine Windows® XP Professional, x64 Edition with Media
2nd Processor Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5150 2.66GHz, 4MB L2,1333
Memory 1GB, DDR2 SDRAM FBD Memory, 533MHz, ECC (2 DIMMS)
Keyboard USB Entry Quietkey, No Hot Keys
Monitors No Monitor Option
Graphic Cards 512MB PCIe x16 nVidia Quadro FX 4500, Dual DVI or Dual VGA or DVI + VGA
Boot Hard Drive 250GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 8MB DataBurst Cache™
Hard Drive Configuration C1 All SATA drives, Non-RAID, 1 or 2 drive total configuration
Floppy Drive and Media Card Reader Options No Floppy Drive
Mouse Dell USB 2-Button Optical Mouse with Scroll
CD-ROM, DVD, and Read-Write Devices 16X DVD+/-RW w/ Cyberlink PowerDVD™ and Roxio Creator™ Dell Ed


Last edited by coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:48
#5.4 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:48
Dell

Dell Precision Workstation 690 (1KW - 64bit) Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5050 3.00GHz, 2 X 2MB L2, 667
Operating System Genuine Windows® XP Professional, x64 Edition with Media
2nd Processor Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5050 3.00GHz, 2 X 2MB L2, 667
Memory 16GB, DDR2 SDRAM FBD Memory, 533MHz, ECC in Riser (8 DIMMS)
Keyboard Dell USB Enhanced Multimedia Keyboard with built-in 2-port USB Hub
Monitors Dell 20 inch UltraSharp™ 2007FP Widescreen, adjustable stand, VGA/DVI
Graphic Cards 512MB PCIe x16 nVidia Quadro FX 4500, Dual DVI or Dual VGA or DVI + VGA
Boot Hard Drive 500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™
Hard Drive Configuration C3 All SATA drives, Non-RAID, 4 drive total configuration
Floppy Drive and Media Card Reader Options No Floppy Drive
Mouse Dell USB 2-Button Optical Mouse with Scroll
CD-ROM, DVD, and Read-Write Devices 48XCDRW AND 16XDVD+/-RW, w/Cyberlink PowerDVD™ and Roxio Creator™
Speakers No Speaker option
Resource CD No Resource CD
2nd Hard Drive 500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™
Hard Drive Internal Controller Option SATA/SAS Integrated Card - For Connecting Internal Hard Drives
Hardware Support Services 3 Year On-site Economy Plan
Installation Services No Onsite System Setup
Intel Hyper-Threading Hyper-Threading feature preset to ON. Can be disabled/enabled in BIOS.
3rd Hard Drive 500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™
4th Hard Drive 500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™

TOTAL:$9,141.00


Apple

Mac Pro
Part Number: Z0D8
1 x SuperDrive
Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse - U.S. English
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
Accessory kit
Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
16GB (8 x 2GB)
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
Mac OS X - U.S. English
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 512MB, Stereo 3D (2 x dual-link DVI)

Estimated Ship: 7-10 business days Remove $12,049.00 $12,049.00
Apple Cinema Display (20" flat panel)
Part Number: M9177LL/A
Estimated Ship: Within 24 hours Remove $699.00 $699.00

Cart Subtotal: $12,748.00

#5.5 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:51
I was right you did choose 16 GB RAM.
Well everyone knows that RAMs are overpriced at apple.com. But the the RAM you choose at Dell is only 533 MHz, while Apple's are 667MHz.
Look at my configurations which matches the barebone Mac Pro. Apple is cheaper.

Buy your computer at Apple, buy your RAM at some place else.

Last edited by coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:57
#5.6 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:59
Quote - coolchan said @ #5.5
I was right you did choose 16 GB RAM.
Well everyone knows that RAMs are overpriced at apple.com. But the the RAM you choose at Dell is only 533 MHz, while Apple's are 667MHz.
Look at my configurations which matches the barebone Mac Pro. Apple is cheaper.


The diffrence in ram prices is 2000usd, there's still a ~2000usd gap and I think the Dell has more features including extended guarnatee.

In anyway the statement by apple's vice president is wrong.
#5.7 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:01
Quote - Beastage said @ #5.6
Quote - coolchan said @ #5.5
I was right you did choose 16 GB RAM.
Well everyone knows that RAMs are overpriced at apple.com. But the the RAM you choose at Dell is only 533 MHz, while Apple's are 667MHz.
Look at my configurations which matches the barebone Mac Pro. Apple is cheaper.


The diffrence in ram prices is 2000usd, there's still a ~2000usd gap and I think the Dell has more features including extended guarnatee.

In anyway the statement by apple's vice president is wrong.


The Dell display is cheaper too.

Based on the barebone comparison he's right.
#5.8 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:01
Quote - coolchan said @ #5.5
I was right you did choose 16 GB RAM.
Well everyone knows that RAMs are overpriced at apple.com. But the the RAM you choose at Dell is only 533 MHz, while Apple's are 667MHz.
Look at my configurations which matches the barebone Mac Pro. Apple is cheaper.

Buy your computer at Apple, buy your RAM at some place else.


Just build everything yourself, thats cheaper than anything
#5.9 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:04
Quote - Beastage said @ #5.8

Just build everything yourself, thats cheaper than anything


Yeah. But we are not talking about a cheap gaming box here. If someone want the kind of hardware (expensive), they probably don't want to build it themselves anyway.
#5.10 Andy-Roo on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:35
I'd like to point out that the system you priced out contains older-generation Xeon processors (i.e. NOT based on the new Core architecture). That is one of the reasons for the huge price difference, considering Intel has slashed prices on all their obsolete processors.
#5.11 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:42
Quote - Andy-Roo said @ #5.10
I'd like to point out that the system you priced out contains older-generation Xeon processors (i.e. NOT based on the new Core architecture). That is one of the reasons for the huge price difference, considering Intel has slashed prices on all their obsolete processors.


yea, didn't catch that one. he should've choose Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160 3.00GHz, 4MB L2,1333.
#5.12 Beastage on 08 Aug 2006 - 16:45
Quote - Andy-Roo said @ #5.10
I'd like to point out that the system you priced out contains older-generation Xeon processors (i.e. NOT based on the new Core architecture). That is one of the reasons for the huge price difference, considering Intel has slashed prices on all their obsolete processors.



Didn't notice that, I choose what was available from the Dell's site
#6 dagamer34 on 08 Aug 2006 - 14:28
Using their configuration?
(2 replies) #7 neufuse on 08 Aug 2006 - 15:49
apple is definatly more expensive in all the configs i tried against dell...



Apple
======
Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
4GB (4 x 1GB)
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 512MB, Stereo 3D (2 x dual-link DVI)
1 x SuperDrive
AirPort Extreme card (Wi-fi)
$6,698.00

Dell
======
Dell Precision Workstation
Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5050 3.00GHz, 2 X 2MB L2, 667 T6307 [222-1821] 1
Genuine Windows® XP Professional, SP2 with Media XPP2E [420-4860] 11
2nd Processor:
Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5050 3.00GHz, 2 X 2MB L2, 667 PR300 [311-5915] 2
Memory:
4GB, DDR2 SDRAM FBD Memory, 667MHz, ECC (4 DIMMS) 4G4E6 [311-6398] 3
Graphic Cards:
512MB PCIe x16 nVidia Quadro FX 4500, Dual DVI or Dual VGA or DVI + VGA FX4500 [320-4765] 6
500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™ 500ST [341-3728] 8
500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™ 500STA [341-3732] 23
48XCDRW AND 16XDVD+/-RW, w/Cyberlink PowerDVD™ and Roxio Creator™ CDRM16 [313-4283] 16
3.5 inch 1.44MB Floppy Drive FD [341-3690] 10
No Monitor Option NMN [320-3316] 5
Dell Wireless 1450 (802.11 b/g) WLAN USB 2.0 DT Adapter DW1450 [430-1181] 19
USB Entry Quietkey, No Hot Keys U [310-7949] 4
Dell USB 2-Button Optical Mouse with Scroll LOB [310-7958] 12
3 Year Business Essential Plan PADP3YR [902-4902][970-1012][970-6580][981-8389][984-2917][984-2918] 29

only $5,871

almost $1,000 less......
#7.1 Adam Welling on 08 Aug 2006 - 16:05
Once again, you're using the older Xeon's processors which represent a serious performance and price difference. Sorry if I interrupted your well planned troll.
#7.2 Spaz on 08 Aug 2006 - 16:11
why do people keep comparing the wrong processors and then say apple lies? pay freagin attention, they don't even have the same amount of L2 cache.

--edit: adam beat me to it.
(2 replies) #8 morgan.nelson on 08 Aug 2006 - 16:21
I have now configured the DELL Precision and Apple Mac Pro in as many different ways as humanly possible via their online configuration tools.

The ONLY way that Apple's Mac Pro is cheaper is if you only have 1GB of RAM, using the paltry 2.66GHz procs, 1 Superdrive, smallest hard drive, lowest end nVidia card option and NO displays. At this point the price is $180 less than a Dell Precision similarly configured. In most cases the Mac Pro is more. In fact, configuring it as I need it for my work the DELL would be $2,083 (USD) less! See the configs below.

===============================================

Dell Precision Workstation 690 (1KW-64bit) - $6,313

Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160 3.00GHz, 4MB L2,1333
Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160 3.00GHz, 4MB L2,1333
Genuine Windows® XP Professional, x64 Edition with Media
4GB, DDR2 SDRAM FBD Memory, 533MHz, ECC, In Riser (4 DIMMS)
512MB PCIe x16 nVidia Quadro FX 4500, Dual DVI
C1 All SATA drives, Non-RAID, 1 or 2 drive total configuration
500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™
500GB SATA 3.0Gb/s,7200 RPM Hard Drive with 16MB DataBurst Cache™
SATA/SAS Integrated Card - For Connecting Internal Hard Drives
16XDVD+/-RW, w/ Cyberlink PowerDVD™ and Roxio Creator™
16XDVD+/-RW, w/ Cyberlink PowerDVD™ and Roxio Creator™
No Floppy Drive
Dell 20 inch UltraSharp™ 2007FP Widescreen, adjustable stand, VGA/DVI
Dell 20 inch UltraSharp™ 2007FP Widescreen, adjustable stand, VGA/DVI
USB Entry Quietkey, No Hot Keys
Dell USB 2-Button Mechanical Mouse with Scroll
3Yr Parts + Onsite Labor (Next Business Day)

============================================

Apple Mac Pro - $8,396.00

Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel XEON Processors
4GB RAM (4 X 1GB)
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
500GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s
2 x Superdrives
nVidia Quadro FX 4500 512MB, Stereo 3D (2 x dual-link DVI)
Apple Cinema Display (20” flat panel)
Apple Cinema Display (20” flat panel)
Apple Keyboard and Mighty Mouse
Mac OS X – U.S. English
AppleCare 3yr Service Plan

#8.1 D-M on 08 Aug 2006 - 16:37
My mortgage keeps getting bigger and bigger every year, I don't know why? Besides, with the much heat pumping outta them notebooks, hell with the eggs, I'm upgrading to steak & potatoes!
#8.2 coolchan on 08 Aug 2006 - 18:58
The Apple RAM are 667MHz, Dell 533Mhz. And Apple displays are in fact more expensive than Dell's. But the point of this news is the computer not the display.
(1 reply) #9 D.V on 08 Aug 2006 - 17:09
OKAY PEOPLE STOP DOING THIS COMPARISONS.

It has been said numerous times that in these comparisons, Apple is using the new Woodcrest chips. Dell is not (they are using the old ones).

In addition, if people purchased their RAM elsewhere, Apple would still be cheaper.



This is comparison exhibited at the WWDC. Not only is Apple using the new chips and Dell using the old, Apple is still cheaper (though this may be because they are using different graphics cards. If they were using the same, I'd imagine the price would be the close if not the same.) That shows that Apple is indeed cheaper than Dells.


I think the myth that Apple is more expensive comes from the fact that Apple does not sell "low end" products. I mean their crappiest computer the Mac Mini (well I wont lie, its kinda crappy lol) is still not too bad for the price.
And the lowest laptop, the MacBook, is by far the best deal for a laptop with those specs. Note the bold.
It's not a fair comparison to compare some crap Dell Inspiron with the MacBook even though both are each company's respective "lower range" product because the MacBook hardware is so much better.
#9.1 dangel on 09 Aug 2006 - 12:30
Quote - D.V said @ #9

It's not a fair comparison to compare some crap Dell Inspiron with the MacBook even though both are each company's respective "lower range" product because the MacBook hardware is so much better.


In what way? Surely it's much of a muchness - bad reports about both (although Dell's volumes are somewhat larger) and both use the same hardware don't they?
(3 replies) #10 drygnfyre on 08 Aug 2006 - 19:12
It only took eight months? That's pretty quick.
#10.1 mrmckeb on 09 Aug 2006 - 08:24
Sarcasm... right? I hope so.
#10.2 roadwarrior on 10 Aug 2006 - 02:14
Quote - mrmckeb said @ #10.1
Sarcasm... right? I hope so.


8 Months to transition from one hardware platform to another is not only quick, it's unprecedented. The nearly seamless way that it was done is nothing short of incredible.
#10.3 dangel on 10 Aug 2006 - 08:52
Quote - roadwarrior said @ #10.2
Quote - mrmckeb said @ #10.1
Sarcasm... right? I hope so.


8 Months to transition from one hardware platform to another is not only quick, it's unprecedented. The nearly seamless way that it was done is nothing short of incredible.


...except they've been porting OSX to x86 for longer, it's just they didn't go public until more recently.
#11 ishtar on 08 Aug 2006 - 20:01
Huh big deal.
(1 reply) #12 GAM on 08 Aug 2006 - 20:13
Doesn't matter which one is "cheaper" when both are overpriced.
#12.1 roadwarrior on 10 Aug 2006 - 02:17
Overpriced compared to what? The bargain basement POS that Joe Blow builds from the lowest priced parts available through Pricewatch? You won't find many, if any, other machines of this class for less than the default config of the Mac Pro.
#13 khaos34 on 08 Aug 2006 - 20:26
Would snatch one up right-quick if I had the money.
#14 Xellos on 08 Aug 2006 - 20:41
OK let me be the first PC user to recognize that fact that the apple is for the first time in a long time cheaper

However for you mac fans heres a little note the 5100 Xeons are woodcrest core processors the only diffrence in these systems the ram speeds ok

</Sarcasm>Notice how much pride Apple has in the intelligence of it's users by not giving the neither the model numbers or specs of the processors they use</sarcasm>
(2 replies) #15 realmccoy on 08 Aug 2006 - 22:55
All that power and you can't even play the latest computer games . Go figure
#15.1 Chadwick on 08 Aug 2006 - 23:29
someone has been living under a rock.

one word, bootcamp.
#15.2 dangel on 09 Aug 2006 - 12:30
Quote - Chadwick said @ #15.1
someone has been living under a rock.

one word, bootcamp.


Well.. two. It's "boot camp"
#16 realmccoy on 08 Aug 2006 - 22:56
Why did Apple go with the slower memory 667 and not 800?
#17 bilemke on 09 Aug 2006 - 08:36
Soo what.. Perhaps someone at Intel is ****ed at Dell so they sell chips to Apple cheaper?

#18 ANova on 09 Aug 2006 - 11:21
$5300 for 16 GB of ram, ahaha....no thanks.

Also, the Macbook can be as much as $600 more compared to other notebook pcs you can get with the same exact specs.

Quote -
Why did Apple go with the slower memory 667 and not 800?


Because it is not needed, the woodcrests and DDR2 667 both run at 333MHz.
#19 Neomac v6 on 09 Aug 2006 - 11:48
PC geeks buy on specs and price, Mac geeks buy for the user experience and unique software. If it works out that the Mac is cheaper, well that's just an added bonus.
#20 Jack31081 on 09 Aug 2006 - 13:19
I would just like to congratulate everyone on wasting all their time proving that Apple has a savvy marketing team.

Apple said you could buy A Mac Pro for less than a comparably spec'd Dell. They didn't say you could buy ANY Mac Pro (or any Mac at all) for less than a comparable Dell machine. And they are correct. They priced their base Mac Pro lower than the Dell specifically so they could make that claim. People hear it, choose Apple over Dell, go to Apple, and either buy the base machine, or more likely, upgrade it to their liking, in which case the price is comparable or a bit more than a similar Dell machine.

But in the end, Apple did its job, they got another customer. I hope you all enjoyed your little "I'm right! No, I'm right!" session.
(1 reply) #21 LTD on 09 Aug 2006 - 22:45
Hey brainiacs:

Dells don't run OS X.

Just think about that.
#21.1 mrmckeb on 10 Aug 2006 - 12:37
Good work on pointing that out LTD. The fact that Dell runs Windows makes them the obvioud winner!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)