Vista will be the last version of Windows that exists in its current, monolithic form, according to Gartner.
The research firm predicts Microsoft will be forced to migrate Windows to a modular architecture tied together through hardware-supported virtualization. "The current, integrated architecture of Microsoft Windows is unsustainable - for enterprises and for Microsoft," wrote Gartner analysts Brian Gammage, Michael Silver and David Mitchell Smith.
The problem is that the operating system's increasing complexity is making it ever more difficult for enterprises to implement migrations, and impossible for Microsoft to release regular updates. This, in turn, stands in the way of Microsoft's efforts to push companies to subscription licensing.
The answer, according to Gartner, is virtualization, which is built into newer chips from Intel and AMD, and has become mainstream for x86 servers through the efforts of VMware. "Once Windows includes virtualization at its core, we expect OS development to change direction from integration to modularization," the analysts wrote.
Virtualization is best known as a way of running multiple server instances on a single hardware platform, but it can also be used to run individual operating system functions or applications. The technique isolates the various components from one another, making them easier to manage. Gartner believes Microsoft will use virtualization to divide the Windows client into a "service partition", controlling system functions such as management and security, and one or more application partitions. Such a path is already being followed in the x86 server world, Gartner said.
"The combination of the service partition and the ability to deliver horizontal functions in software appliances provides the key for unbundling the Windows OS," the analysts wrote. Such an architecture would allow Microsoft to make major development changes to Windows without worrying about disrupting dependencies across the entire operating system. This, in turn, would mean the company could release regular updates, and would make backward compatibility easier.
Next-generation Windows-based partitions "could run in parallel to partitions running kernels with the Vista/NT code base," wrote Gammage, Silver and Smith. They said Microsoft doesn't agree with this vision, saying it's identified problems with integrating data across partitions and creating a consistent user experience. "However, we regard these concerns as only partially founded, and anticipate a key role for virtualization in the required unbundling of the Windows OS," the analysts said.
Gartner expects a significant update to Vista in late 2008 or 2009 that will add virtualization (in the form of a component called a hypervisor) and a service partition. The hypervisor will allow more frequent updates, and will make the Software Assurance subscription scheme effectively mandatory for Windows from around 2010, Gartner said. To date, Microsoft's main effort to simplify Windows development, in 2004, was to rebuild Windows into a stack of more than 50 layers, Gartner said.
"Upper layers could have dependencies on lower layers, but lower layers could not be dependent on upper ones," the analysts wrote. "This would allow it to lockdown lower layers when complete and worry less about compatibility changes as it worked up the stack." But this redesign is not enough to ease Microsoft's ongoing development and delivery problems, or the deployment difficulties of enterprises, Gartner said.
News source: Macworld UK
The research firm predicts Microsoft will be forced to migrate Windows to a modular architecture tied together through hardware-supported virtualization. "The current, integrated architecture of Microsoft Windows is unsustainable - for enterprises and for Microsoft," wrote Gartner analysts Brian Gammage, Michael Silver and David Mitchell Smith.
The problem is that the operating system's increasing complexity is making it ever more difficult for enterprises to implement migrations, and impossible for Microsoft to release regular updates. This, in turn, stands in the way of Microsoft's efforts to push companies to subscription licensing.
The answer, according to Gartner, is virtualization, which is built into newer chips from Intel and AMD, and has become mainstream for x86 servers through the efforts of VMware. "Once Windows includes virtualization at its core, we expect OS development to change direction from integration to modularization," the analysts wrote.
Virtualization is best known as a way of running multiple server instances on a single hardware platform, but it can also be used to run individual operating system functions or applications. The technique isolates the various components from one another, making them easier to manage. Gartner believes Microsoft will use virtualization to divide the Windows client into a "service partition", controlling system functions such as management and security, and one or more application partitions. Such a path is already being followed in the x86 server world, Gartner said.
"The combination of the service partition and the ability to deliver horizontal functions in software appliances provides the key for unbundling the Windows OS," the analysts wrote. Such an architecture would allow Microsoft to make major development changes to Windows without worrying about disrupting dependencies across the entire operating system. This, in turn, would mean the company could release regular updates, and would make backward compatibility easier.
Next-generation Windows-based partitions "could run in parallel to partitions running kernels with the Vista/NT code base," wrote Gammage, Silver and Smith. They said Microsoft doesn't agree with this vision, saying it's identified problems with integrating data across partitions and creating a consistent user experience. "However, we regard these concerns as only partially founded, and anticipate a key role for virtualization in the required unbundling of the Windows OS," the analysts said.
Gartner expects a significant update to Vista in late 2008 or 2009 that will add virtualization (in the form of a component called a hypervisor) and a service partition. The hypervisor will allow more frequent updates, and will make the Software Assurance subscription scheme effectively mandatory for Windows from around 2010, Gartner said. To date, Microsoft's main effort to simplify Windows development, in 2004, was to rebuild Windows into a stack of more than 50 layers, Gartner said.
"Upper layers could have dependencies on lower layers, but lower layers could not be dependent on upper ones," the analysts wrote. "This would allow it to lockdown lower layers when complete and worry less about compatibility changes as it worked up the stack." But this redesign is not enough to ease Microsoft's ongoing development and delivery problems, or the deployment difficulties of enterprises, Gartner said.

Nice prediction.
The most recent time I heard MS talking about virtualization was the danger of security attacks from them if done via hardware virtualization.
It's really cool that Microsoft is finally getting along with the future of how software and hardware will be made. It's so much more sensible to build programs to fit like a puzzle piece. It reminds me of how Google is tying their different programs into a collective suite.
I wonder if it was said at TechEd, in case it was "recent"? Just wondering if one could dig up something reported on this.
They said Windows XP was completely new. They also said Vista was completely new.
come on. fool, you still believe them.
They said Windows XP was completely new. They also said Vista was completely new.
come on. fool, you still believe them.
Completely new? Can you link MS to saying that? I can't remember them saying XP or Vista will be completely new rewrite of the code like OS9 to OSX.
Why?
A Modular OS only requires small teams for each module and as we all should know that throwing more people at a problem doesn't solve it and just makes development time longer. So if a small team who knows what they are doing works on a specific part of the OS (the module) they could get it completed and fully working in much less time and with less bugs. Then all one needs at the end is to put the modules together and have a few teams link them together and iron out the final bugs. After release if a certain module has a bug, then the small team merely fixes it and issues and update, and you would be able to update without restarting (just restart the module not the OS). This is a lot like the Linux OS model and i would be very glad if microsoft took it.
Ofcourse for this to work Microsoft will have to remove is monolithic middle management problem also. Since from what i've heard from microsoft employees, is that quite often developer code is rejected by the middle management for no reason whatsoever, meaning the employee has to resumbit the code again and lose valuble time and effort.
Make the OS Modular and remove those middle management issues, then Microsoft could be on its way to making a fast efficent, feature-rich OS in a fraction of the time it took Vista.
This means that they will charge for addons?
This means that they will charge for addons?
I doubt it will make any difference in what you buy or install, or are required to install really. What it'll change is the way the system accesses that.
lol!
ms has spent all this time redoing vista so that it will be *easier* for them to release regular updates.. has he not heard of this thing called R2?
isn't microsoft developing the next os core under the name of "Singularity"?
I thought singularity would be even more bundled than how nt operates. all system layers and managers were supposed to be together in a single lower-level core; and this would decrease the "bureaucracy" thus increase the speed? Or do i need another "x for dummies" book?
isn't microsoft developing the next os core under the name of "Singularity"?
I thought singularity would be even more bundled than how nt operates. all system layers and managers were supposed to be together in a single lower-level core; and this would decrease the "bureaucracy" thus increase the speed? Or do i need another "x for dummies" book?
Singularity was just a research project, not meant to become an actual product.
anyway, its interesting. but i dont know why people treat Gartner as gospel anyway
anyway, its interesting. but i dont know why people treat Gartner as gospel anyway
they are the consultants.
Of corse, it is going to become more and more about working through abstract object layers with common functionality expectations. Then you can focus on what is behind the interface and improve on it. The gang of four stated this YEARS ago and it has been common practice in the software industry since. The problem is they keep wanting to update the interface. Whenever you update the interface, software written targeting that interface is going to have problems.
who even listens to gartner anymore?
they either come out with "EXPERTS: Really Obvious Point" or something just plainly ill-informed, just like the "Vista has a 30% chance of making its Jan 07 release date" crap that came out AFTER the most recent MS roadmap shift.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.