The unit price of AMD Turion 64 X2-based notebooks is about US$150 less than an Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom)-based notebook, according to product portfolios that notebook vendors have offered. AMD still has an edge in pricing to compete in the 64-bit dual-core notebook market, sources at notebook vendors indicated, adding that the sufficient performance of the Turion 64 X2 CPU has also caught the attention of buyers.

Hewlett Packard (HP) offers its Pavilion dv6000z, which features the AMD Turion 64 X2 mobile processor (1.80GHz/512KB), at a price tag of US$898. The suggested price is US$156 cheaper than an HP Pavilion dv600t, which is based on the Intel Core 2 Duo mobile CPU (1.83GHz, 667MHz FSB, 2MB cache).

View: The full story
News source: DigiTimes



There are 11 additional comments
Advertisement
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by RAID 0 on 05 Sep 2006 - 16:03
That's one way for AMD to keep sales up. If you can't beat them on speed, beat them on price...
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by Omega Prime on 05 Sep 2006 - 17:31
Turions are nice CPUs. My laptop is just a single-core ML-34 (1.8GHz, 1MB cache) and runs just about as good as my PC's Pentium D 920.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by Yogurth on 05 Sep 2006 - 17:42
Turions are fast but they aren't as power efficient as Intel's Core Processors, which is IMO the most important thing for notebooks. Battery life rules notebook world.
Quote this comment #3.1 Posted by bsquirle on 05 Sep 2006 - 19:15
True, but not on all fronts.
For example:
I'm looking for a new notebook, but it just has to be powerfull (not top of the line, just powerfull) and portable. I have to be able to take it with me, but I know I'll always be able to plug it in somewhere. Max battery need for that laptop would be like 1.5 hour? So I'll go AMD if they're cheaper.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by bsquirle on 05 Sep 2006 - 19:14
Sorry - deleted
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by Wrezal on 05 Sep 2006 - 19:44
atm Intel's mobile processors are the best performance wise and give much more battery life... in fact i was going to consider an AMD lappy but it was expensive compared to the Core Duo Sony lappy which had FAR better specs

So i guess AMD lost this round! They do better in the gaming desktop market
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by GAM on 05 Sep 2006 - 19:49
My next notebook will be a Turion dual core 64-bit machine. It is a real nice CPU for a notebook.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #7 Posted by guylaroche on 05 Sep 2006 - 20:09
My friend bought a dual-core 64bit AMD laptop. He LOVES it. I'm not at all surprised they're so popular.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #8 Posted by BigBoy on 05 Sep 2006 - 20:26
I'm sorry, but - Turion 64 x2 and Intel Core Duo 2 is not an apples to apples comparison. Not in performance and should definitely not be in price either. AMD ha sstill quite a bit of catch up to do to catch up to Core Duo 2.

Turion should be compared to Intel Core Duo (not Duo 2).

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/08/22/amd...s_have_arrived/

Interestingly enough I just bought a Core Duo laptop this past weekend for $550 AR...
Quote this comment #8.1 Posted by strekship on 05 Sep 2006 - 23:58
I can't remember- are the core duos 64bit or just the core 2's?
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #9 Posted by Proteus8898 on 06 Sep 2006 - 03:25
A newer, faster, and more efficient technology costs more than and older, slower, and less efficient one. Is this really newsworthy?
[1]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


Scroll to the Top
....
My Preferences
....
Communicating with server
Loading
Please Wait...
....
Loading
 X 
....