main

Microsoft's Fathi: Vista Security Is Becoming Reality

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 07 September 2006 - 15:07 · 15 comments & 5621 views

Advertisement (Why?)
After taking on the responsibility of leading Microsoft's efforts to secure its much-awaited Vista operating system, Ben Fathi, corporate vice president of the Redmond, Wash., company's Security Technology Unit, is in town at the Security Standard Conference to evangelize to the firm's progress in those efforts. While critics continue to say that Microsoft's next-generation operating system will likely carry as many vulnerabilities as its predecessors and some of the software giant's partners in the security applications markets have called the firm out for some of the new features present in preview versions of Vista, Fathi maintains that the company's Trustworthy Computing initiative is moving forward, and that the new OS will be the most secure Windows product the company has ever produced.

eWEEK Senior Writer Matt Hines sat down with Fathi at the conference on September 6th to get his perspective on where things stand with Vista at present, and in preparation for its launch in November 2006.

View: Vista Security Q&A
News source: eWeek

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 15 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 PureLegend on 07 Sep 2006 - 15:28
This sounds promising. Hopefully we are coming to the end of the patch-mania era.
#1.1 markjensen on 07 Sep 2006 - 15:30
Patches aren't bad. I get them all the time for my Linux box.

What matters is the turnaround time from identification to patch release, and making sure that all users apply them (which never seems to happen).
(1 reply) #2 oootle on 07 Sep 2006 - 16:03
Launch in November 2006?

thought it was january
#2.1 AltecXP on 07 Sep 2006 - 16:07
Quote - oootle said @ #2
Launch in November 2006?

thought it was january


Public launch is janualry, OEM companies get it in November.
(4 replies) #3 Timmah on 07 Sep 2006 - 16:58
How do you pronounce Fathi?
#3.1 bush on 07 Sep 2006 - 18:19
probably [fahtii]
#3.2 idoia on 07 Sep 2006 - 20:51
Quote - bush said @ #3.1
probably [fahtii]


like fatty

#3.3 Computer Guru on 07 Sep 2006 - 23:27
It's hard to explain in English because that "h" isn't an "h" as you know it.

It's an Arabic letter, and it doesn't exist in the English alphabet.

You can hear that letter being pronounced: http://www.arabic2000.com/arabic/audio/letters/let6.ra

It's then pronounced just like it's spelled: fat-hi where h is that letter.... the rest are pronounced as-is.

Hope this helps!!
#3.4 Croquant on 08 Sep 2006 - 03:32
Quote - Computer Guru said @ #3.3
It's hard to explain in English because that "h" isn't an "h" as you know it.

It's an Arabic letter, and it doesn't exist in the English alphabet.

You can hear that letter being pronounced: http://www.arabic2000.com/arabic/audio/letters/let6.ra

It's then pronounced just like it's spelled: fat-hi where h is that letter.... the rest are pronounced as-is.

Hope this helps!!

:head explodes:
#4 Daniel on 07 Sep 2006 - 17:16
tim: maybe its a silent "h"?

j/k i have no idea
(2 replies) #5 EduardValencia on 07 Sep 2006 - 20:21
hmmm this could be the beginning of a new era,where MS won't worry much about security and stability anymore,and begin implmenting new features more quicker
#5.1 Contraban on 08 Sep 2006 - 00:31
Never.
#5.2 MrCobra on 08 Sep 2006 - 01:36
They'll still release Windows versions just like always. Next one is supposed to be around 2010 to 2011 time frame yet they claimed that it would never be 5+ years between releases again.
#6 Jugalator on 08 Sep 2006 - 06:41
"and that the new OS will be the most secure Windows product the company has ever produced."

Well, it would be quite a disaster otherwise, no? :p

The only thing one should expect from Microsoft with no surprises is that their new versions will get successively better in the security area. You'll have your surprises if they'd fail to do so.
#7 dangel on 08 Sep 2006 - 11:34
Interesting that the biggest debate here is how to pronounce someone's name..

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)