main

New Twist in Europe's Microsoft Anti-trust Case

MonkeyClaw   on 07 September 2006 - 13:24 · 9 comments & 5072 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The European Commission official due to take charge of the antitrust case against Microsoft next month has been offered a job by a Brussels-based consultancy that lists Microsoft among its clients.

Henri Piffaut, deputy head of the unit handling the long-running antitrust case, has asked for leave from his civil servant position in the Commission on personal grounds, said the Commission's competition spokesman Jonathan Todd. "The situation is fluid. The Commission hasn't responded to the request yet and for the time being he remains an employee here," he said.

Piffaut is due to take over the top job in the unit next month from Cecilio Madero Villarejo, who has led it for the past seven years. He joined the unit as deputy head earlier this year. Despite the hiccup over replacing Villarejo, the antitrust case against Microsoft is unlikely to be affected by Piffaut's request to leave, Todd said. "I can't see this causing any delays," he said.

If Piffaut is denied leave, he would have to give up his career at the Commission. He could also be prevented from working on cases he was linked to while serving as an antitrust official at the Commisison, the European Union's executive body.

Piffaut has been asked to join LECG, an international firm of consultants, to head up a team of economists working on merger cases in the Brussels office. Microsoft's spokesman in Brussels, Tom Brookes, said he had heard about Piffaut's possible job change but declined to comment further.

Four years ago Microsoft hired Detlef Eckert, a senior Commission official in the information society department, whose job included overseeing the antitrust investigation being conducted by his colleagues in the competition department. Eckert was not bound by the tough conflict of interest rules that apply to antitrust officials.

News source: Macworld UK

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
#1 Tom W on 07 Sep 2006 - 13:28
Typical dodgy Microsoft....
#2 Croquant on 07 Sep 2006 - 14:09
Can't beat em? Buy them.
(2 replies) #3 fobban on 07 Sep 2006 - 14:42
EU should pay Microsoft for wasting their time. And while they're at it they should sue Apple for forcing people to use iTunes with their iPods.
#3.1 theyarecomingforyou on 07 Sep 2006 - 16:47
So you're against the EU investigating Microsoft but fine for Apple to be in their place? That flies in the face of common sense and demonstrates a pro-Microsoft, anti-Apple stance. The simple fact of the matter is that BOTH companies should be investigated and all anti-competitive behaviour punished. You can't just sit at the side picking companies you don't like, whilst sticking your head in the sand regarding anything about Microsoft - you should actually use logic to form the basis of your opinion.
#3.2 Hell-In-A-Handbasket on 08 Sep 2006 - 10:17
do a google search for " iTunes Alternative " and see how much we are forced to use iTunes with our iPods,,,, check next time please, and im not a Apple fanboy, iv only used the OS 1 time for 5 minutes.
#4 lbmouse on 07 Sep 2006 - 14:53
Just had visions of the US DOJ vs. MS anti-trust case. We should've learned by now, consumers never win. It doesn't matter what continent they live on.
(1 reply) #5 FloatingFatMan on 07 Sep 2006 - 15:18
Uh.. The guy's not been offered a job by Microsoft, he's been offered a job by a consultancy firm who just happen to have done work for Microsoft.

And if he takes it, he won't be allowed to handle the anti-trust case against Microsoft, so where's the problem?
#5.1 markjensen on 07 Sep 2006 - 15:25
Microsoft has a history of manipulating others, such as BayStar into doing the money work in an effort to distance themselves from the goings-on.
#6 paxa on 08 Sep 2006 - 00:35
as Croquant said...if you can't beat them, buy them.
the news doesn't surprise me the least, it looks like a typicall microsoft stategy

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)