main

Microsoft Prepares For October Windows Vista RTM

atsaunier   on 13 September 2006 - 10:17 · 14 comments & 7209 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Since Microsoft Released Windows Vista™ Release Candidate 1 (RC1) on September 1, 2006, Microsoft has “Forked” the development cycle and began work on the Release To Manufacturing (RTM) builds, which Technical Beta Testers and the Technology Adoption Program Members (TAP) will continue to receive throughout the development cycle. Once Microsoft finalizes Windows Vista™ later this quarter it will then be shipping the code to manufactures for production, also known as “Release To Manufacturing” or “RTM”. Microsoft is currently targeting to release the product to manufactures in October 2006, the exact date is unknown and is ultimately determined by the product quality.

Upon the final release of Windows Vista™ Microsoft will be delivering five (5) different editions, two (2) Business Editions which is currently targeted for release in November 2006 to Volume License Customers and three (3) Home Editions which is currently targeted for general availability in “Early” 2007, Some sites are saying January 30. 2007 although the exact delivery date of Windows Vista™ will be determined by product quality.

View: Windows Vista Product Lineup
News source: Winxperts.net

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Zhivago on 13 Sep 2006 - 15:34
Will there be RC2 or not?
#1.1 M118LR on 13 Sep 2006 - 22:46
No
(2 replies) #2 Julius Caro on 13 Sep 2006 - 16:08
they need it to be finished in november?

I'm starting to fear.

Not that RC1 Is bad, but they can't definitely polish it up in a month
#2.1 M118LR on 13 Sep 2006 - 22:45
By the end of October.
#2.2 skinnyJM on 14 Sep 2006 - 00:31
Wouldn't "Once Microsoft finalizes Windows Vista™ later this quarter..." mean the end of September???
(2 replies) #3 Cornflake Addict on 13 Sep 2006 - 16:50
Oh here we go again, Microsoft not listening to their BETA Technical Testers and IT Professionals. Vista is not ready fro RTM it needs to move to RC2 before RTM, there are problems with upgrading, taking too long and at times failling to upgrade from XP Home and Pro. From my personal experience, and my professional opinion, Vista should move to RC2 and not rush into RTM.

Microsoft needs to listen to their IT Professionals and BETA testers and not rush into releasing RTM too soon. My proffesional opinion would be to stick with a Jan 2007 release not November.
#3.1 Chicane-UK on 13 Sep 2006 - 17:08
I guess it goes to show that the community which they evangelise so much essentially means jack schitt when put against the shareholders. They are the only people they want to keep happy at the end of the day..
#3.2 Cornflake Addict on 13 Sep 2006 - 17:14
Quote - Chicane-UK said @ #3.1
I guess it goes to show that the community which they evangelise so much essentially means jack schitt when put against the shareholders. They are the only people they want to keep happy at the end of the day..


Well put... and agree... Share Holders come first... tuff sh** to the end-users.
#4 Chicane-UK on 13 Sep 2006 - 17:07
I just can't see how it'll be finished and in a COMPLETE state by this date. Absolutely no way.
(2 replies) #5 theh0g on 13 Sep 2006 - 18:28
Again, money and deadline is more important than quality. I gave up on Windows on my home desktop more than a year ago, but I still have to use it full time at work. I've decided to give RC1 a shot:
- install destroyed my Linux partition completely (you have to CREATE a partition, just selecting unallocated space is not enough. Really retarded)
- minimum is Geforce5?! I have a Gf4 Ti4200 for now and no one can convince me I can't use it, even without Aero, it's REALLY slow. No drivers, of course, while MS's own driver is crap, as usual.
- whole system, on AMD1700xp/512RAM is slow as hell. I play WoW with all details on in 1280x1024 for God's sake and now some crappy OS requires more?!
- there is a lot of mess, Windows Explorer (as usual) rapes me with its "My Pictures" etc. folders I don't want, finding a disk is confusing at first
- again, Microsoft didn't learn a THING in the past, extensions for known filetypes are still hidden! And they wonder why users click on worms they get in Outlook
- what's new? Everything is rearranged, there is a new theme....beside from very few new applications and improvements, there is basically nothing new, not worth my $200 (or even more!

When I get a new machine, I'll give it another shot (with RTM and some patches). 1700xp with fastest Geforce4 should be enough for basic OS and also Aero (compiz runs perfectly on my machine). Until better version comes out, that's all from me

p.s. my opinion only
#5.1 ShiZZa on 13 Sep 2006 - 18:44
Quote - theh0g said @ #5

- minimum is Geforce5?! I have a Gf4 Ti4200 for now and no one can convince me I can't use it, even without Aero, it's REALLY slow. No drivers, of course, while MS's own driver is crap, as usual.


Blame NVidia not MS for the drivers. Nvidia only plans to make Vista drivers back to the 5xxx Cards. But its not there falut eather. At somepoint your old card will lose support. So Nivida is taking that step with Vista to start droping legacy support. ATI is thinking about only making drivers for the X Series cards.
#5.2 theh0g on 13 Sep 2006 - 18:49
Quote - ShiZZa said @ #5.1
Quote - theh0g said @ #5

- minimum is Geforce5?! I have a Gf4 Ti4200 for now and no one can convince me I can't use it, even without Aero, it's REALLY slow. No drivers, of course, while MS's own driver is crap, as usual.


Blame NVidia not MS for the drivers. Nvidia only plans to make Vista drivers back to the 5xxx Cards. But its not there falut eather. At somepoint your old card will lose support. So Nivida is taking that step with Vista to start droping legacy support. ATI is thinking about only making drivers for the X Series cards.


Of course, Microsoft made huge propaganda how all PCs will have to be upgraded. Sure Nvidia and Ati will take advantage of this and try to sell new cards. It's still retarded.
(1 reply) #6 eilegz on 14 Sep 2006 - 04:01
so i just hope that vista dont become like windows 2000 (very good stable OS but veru bad compatibility), also no corporate version of ultimate thats bad, but no enterprise need it anyways.
#6.1 M118LR on 14 Sep 2006 - 05:46
Enterprise is the corporate version of Vista and only available to Corporations. There won't be any more VL Keys with Vista.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)