main

AMD schedules December for 65nm Athlon debut?

Steven Parker   on 03 October 2006 - 12:23 · 14 comments & 4173 views

Advertisement (Why?)
What has AMD got coming up during the last three months of the year? A host of 65nm and 90nm Athlons, apparently, according to roadmap slides posted on the internet last week which would seem to confirm earlier reports.

November is a key month in the quarter. Then, AMD will introduce the Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5600+ and 6000+, all all 90nm dual-core parts based on the company's 'Windsor' chip design, according to allegedly leaked information posted by German-language site Planet3DNow.

The three Socket AM2 CPUs will be clocked at 2.8GHz, 2.8GHz and 3GHz respectively, with 1MB, 2MB and 2MB of L2 cache, and TDPs of 89W, 89W and 125W.

A month later, AMD will ship the 65nm 'Brisbane'-based Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 4400+, 4800+ and 5000+, clocked at 2.1GHz, 2.3Ghz, 2.5GHz and 2.6GHz, respectively. They're all TDP-rated at 65W and contain 1MB of L2 cache.

View: Full Article @ Channel Register

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
#1 Chanser on 03 Oct 2006 - 12:40
If true, I hope it's a hard launch.

Don't think it will beat Core 2 Duo, probably match it. I don't think this is K8L architecture or is it?
#2 QwertyManiac on 03 Oct 2006 - 13:21
Well, when are thier Quadro competions coming in ?
#3 Lasker on 03 Oct 2006 - 13:22
core duo 2 it much better than these future chips, intel is the powerhouse babe

Last edited by Lasker on 03 Oct 2006 - 13:48
(4 replies) #4 TheGriffin on 03 Oct 2006 - 13:26
Oh now AMD is doing the old Intel game, increase the Cache and Ghz and you're good to go!
#4.1 Eredain on 03 Oct 2006 - 14:42
And that had been proven to be a bad way to operate unless you have a strong position in corporates, and AMD doesn't have that.

AMD is now behind, even being i litle intel-fanboy myself, i don't wish AMD fall back in the race because is thanks to AMD that we have the core 2 duo now.
#4.2 RealFduch on 03 Oct 2006 - 17:53
Don't forget they still have to deal with trobles with Intel pushing their EMT64 bull.
#4.3 cooldude7273 on 03 Oct 2006 - 22:10
Quote - RealFduch said @ #4.2
Don't forget they still have to deal with trobles with Intel pushing their EMT64 bull.


Which part of EM64T is bull exactly? Let me guess, they copied it from AMD, thus it is bull? Then AMD64 must surely be bull too, right? Because AMD has never copied anything from Intel! Especially not things like SSE, SSE2, and SSE3!
#4.4 MrCobra on 04 Oct 2006 - 06:39
Quote - RealFduch said @ #4.2
Don't forget they still have to deal with trobles with Intel pushing their EMT64 bull.

Intel licenses tech from AMD and AMD licenses tech from Intel. Big whoop-tee-doo. They've been doing that for the better part of 20 years.
#5 sgr55 on 03 Oct 2006 - 14:42
bare in mind that AMD will get a higher performance gain per Mhz than intel would have with their old chips since AMD's design is more efficient than Netburst was.

(1 reply) #6 denzilla on 03 Oct 2006 - 21:35
If GHz didn't matter, then why do people OC?
#6.1 cooldude7273 on 03 Oct 2006 - 22:12
Either you're trying to be smart or you are stupid. Speed will increase your performance, but this should not be the sole consideration when considering an increase in performance. (think cache). Somehow, I think you knew that.
#7 freeeekyyy on 03 Oct 2006 - 23:22
And how long did intel already have this for?
#8 RAID 0 on 03 Oct 2006 - 23:28
With Hyper Transport 3 coming out next year, this "might" keep pace with the Core2's.
#9 Osprey on 04 Oct 2006 - 02:25
125W for the 6000+? Is that right?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)