Italy has introduced a new law requiring Internet service providers to block child pornography Web sites within six hours of being told to do so, the communications ministry said on Tuesday. The decree, which comes into force almost immediately, requires Internet providers to set up a system that blocks child pornography Web sites from being viewed soon after the providers are notified of their existence.
"The decree reinforces the fight against child pornography and the exploitation of minors through the Internet," Communications Minister Paolo Gentiloni said in a statement. Italy's penal code includes severe punishment for the distribution and publication of child pornography.
News source: CNET
"The decree reinforces the fight against child pornography and the exploitation of minors through the Internet," Communications Minister Paolo Gentiloni said in a statement. Italy's penal code includes severe punishment for the distribution and publication of child pornography.

TOR anyone? Or any other similar solution for that matter ..
b) Stops people being directed to these websites maliciously
c) The sites would go out of existence if more countries did this.
d) The "Yet another pointless 'effort'" argument is getting boring.
b) Stops people being directed to these websites maliciously
c) The sites would go out of existence if more countries did this.
d) The "Yet another pointless 'effort'" argument is getting boring.
I was mainly trying to imply that this will not do anything to stop those who really want to get access to such material. They will find their ways. It'd better to actually work against the people/criminals who produce such material, than waste time tying to actually use censorship to counter this.
b) Stops people being directed to these websites maliciously
c) The sites would go out of existence if more countries did this.
d) The "Yet another pointless 'effort'" argument is getting boring.
I was mainly trying to imply that this will not do anything to stop those who really want to get access to such material. They will find their ways. It'd better to actually work against the people/criminals who produce such material, than waste time tying to actually use censorship to counter this.
it's not about finding. it's about sharing illegal content.
the webservers and it's owners are being caught using this law.
and hopefully the ISPs + hosts get frightened and audit their client's websites.
If I ask you to reply to my posts IMMEDIATELY after I post them, can you do it?
Preventing access to child pornography web sites is a good thing but taking down the child abusing mafias or organizations is an even better thing.
This comment is not directed at you but instead is intended for everyone that argues the obvious (because you're all correct): that it's better to go after the source (the people creating this garbage) than the sites where these people find this stuff.
You have to remember that enacting this law does not mean that police departments are suddenly going to take a break and quit hunting these sick people down. What this accomplishes is a sort of narrowing of the haystack, so to speak. Instead of battling to take down a seemingly endless list of mirror sites, they can now focus on finding the sites that originate these materials and the criminals that produce and distribute them.
Italian authorities as well as authorities across many countries (even outside of Europe) have and will continue to work together to fight the criminals that operate these sites regardless of where they operate them from.
Well I'm not anyway.
So is making ISPs block chid porn a good idea? ..... YES
Should they do it? ............................................... NO
You are too close-minded.
What they call child porn =/= exploiting children.
When I was little my parents made some photos of me plaing in the bath. NUDE!!!!!!! Oh NO!!!!!!
Do you understand that my mother can be put in jail because of those laws?
The child-porn and child abuse laws are very silly. For example you can be put to jail if you have sex or play with girl who's only a week younger than you. It's just nonsense!
Why we can dump child-* laws? Because we already have other laws for that!
We already have laws for RAPE, KIDNAPPING, CAUSING HARM, filming and distributing content without approval of people involved in it. Also there are laws about pornography. We don't need any other laws.
in the uk such sites are blocked arent they??????
im sure we have a law like this YEARS ago!
What lawyers call child porn =/= exploiting children.
When I was little my parents made some photos of me plaing in the bath. NUDE!!!!!!! Oh NO!!!!!!
Do you understand that my mother can be put in jail because of those laws?
The child-porn and child abuse laws are very silly. For example you can be put to jail if you have sex or play with girl who loves you, but is a week younger than you. It's just nonsense!
Why we can dump child-* laws? Because we already have other laws for that!
We already have laws about RAPE, KIDNAPPING, CAUSING HARM, filming and distributing content without approval of people involved in it. Also there are laws about pornography. We don't need any other laws.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.