main

Bill Gates: Windows Vista is not the end of the line

Brad Wardell   on 08 January 2007 - 23:21 · 36 comments & 20809 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Yesterday we had the rare opportunity to talk with Microsoft Co-Founder Bill Gates about the future of Windows, 64-bit computing, and more.

As we have previously reported, Gartner Group and others have reported that they believe Windows Vista will be the last major edition of Microsoft Windows and that future versions would mostly be about virtualization and extensions. When asked about that and Bill Gates was adamant that another major version of Microsoft Windows would be delivered within 2 to 4 years.

Mr. Gates also talked about his future with Microsoft including his continuing involvement, though at a lesser level, after 2008.

View: Bill Gates: Windows Vista not the end of the line
View: WinCustomize.com Coverage of CES
View: Neowin.net CES Blog

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 36 additional comments
#1 vetSlimy on 08 Jan 2007 - 23:24
Great news but it was obvious, in a way
(1 reply) #2 Ricky S. on 08 Jan 2007 - 23:32
Sooo by his 2-4 Year time frame we're looking at 6-8 Years....
#2.1 +Brandon Live on 09 Jan 2007 - 04:10
Nope, I'm pretty sure we're not
(3 replies) #3 Nose Nuggets on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:02
was there ever any doubt in your mind?

B. Gates: "so yeah, after i leave in 08 yall are screwed. im legally forbidding this company to produce operating systems. chow suckas!"


#3.1 sahwnllewellyn on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:20
#3.2 Nose Nuggets on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:27
Quote - (sahwnllewellyn said @ #3.1)


im waiting for the

"but M$ has never produced anything a rational human being would consider an operating system."

#3.3 C_Guy on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:22
Steve Jobs strikes again! Aparently 90%+ of computer users are not rational human beings.
(6 replies) #4 Frozen Vista on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:34
I never understood why people thought that Vista would be the "end of the line" anyway tbh
#4.1 ThaCrip on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:51
as far as im conserned, you might as well say that XP was good enough as it offered the stuff people need and was stable... vista is the first windows version to the public that never really offers anything major over the current windows version, which is WindowsXP.... and unless they come up with something major which i doubt since there aint much else u can do with current pc's then i doubt there worth upgrading to.... although im sure in a while everyone will be pretty much forced to update to Windows Vista... but this is the first time i dont really care about the "next version of windows".... since xp does everything i want it to do and it does it well and XP is really stable.
#4.2 +Shadowdruid on 09 Jan 2007 - 10:10
Quote - (ThaCrip said @ #4.1)
as far as im conserned, you might as well say that XP was good enough as it offered the stuff people need and was stable... vista is the first windows version to the public that never really offers anything major over the current windows version, which is WindowsXP.... and unless they come up with something major which i doubt since there aint much else u can do with current pc's then i doubt there worth upgrading to.... although im sure in a while everyone will be pretty much forced to update to Windows Vista... but this is the first time i dont really care about the "next version of windows".... since xp does everything i want it to do and it does it well and XP is really stable.


Nothing major? Are you like smoking crack or something? Windows Vista is intended to be a technology-based release, to provide a solid base to include advanced technologies, many of which will be related to how the system functions, and hence not readily visible to the user.

The security, the developer technologies, the business technologies, the core technology. Theres a hell of a lot of major upgrades in vista from xp. So please stop the vista is just xp with a skin. Theres a lot more than the average joe will realize. But if you dig in, you will find them.

Vista is a big milestone on the road to Vienna, and many of the technologies you will find in vista will be upgraded and be made better for Vienna.

If you don't want to upgrade to Vista don't. Nobody is forcing you to and nobody will be forced to until 2010 [when xp's support finishes and activation/wga for it is disabled]
#4.3 Xavien on 09 Jan 2007 - 11:55
If you are into PC gaming, you will be forced to switch a lot earlier than 2010.
#4.4 C_Guy on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:23
Wait! In a free and open market (which we're in), no one is actually forced to do or buy anything.
#4.5 lodgepole on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:25
Quote -
many of which will be related to how the system functions, and hence not readily visible to the user.

But often this is all that matters, especially for home users.
For business users, there are many arguments for the upgrade, managibility and security are the first that come to mind. Even with these arguments, I don't see businesses clamoring to install Vista right away. Wait 'til service packs are out and more extensive driver support IMO.
#4.6 +Odom on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:49
You forgot the most important one for big corporations, compatibility.
Not everyone buys Microsoft software for everything. All the other software, especially in-house developed, needs to be able to run on it as well. Businesses with 50 people and not having much requirements wouldn't have a problem upgrading the software. But what about businesses with 50.000 and more?
#5 Alphanumeric on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:46
I'm glad to hear it's not the end of the line.
(2 replies) #6 IntelliMoo on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:46
MS Math: Within 2 to 4 years = 2 + 4 = after 6 years, minimum.
#6.1 ThaCrip on 09 Jan 2007 - 00:58
me personally i dont really see a need for a new "major" OS anytime within 5 years MINIMUM anyways... i think 2 years would be rather pointless and un-nessesary ... cause like i said before XP is already "good enough" for pretty much everyone.

all vista really is if u ask me is a more bloated version of windows XP with a slightly different interface and they want to charge u hundreds of dollars for it... ill use common sence and avoid Windows Vista for a while.... but when is all said and done eventually Vista will become the standard so we will basically be forced to upgrade eventually .
#6.2 XerXis on 09 Jan 2007 - 09:21
Quote - (ThaCrip said @ #6.1)
me personally i dont really see a need for a new "major" OS anytime within 5 years MINIMUM anyways... i think 2 years would be rather pointless and un-nessesary ... cause like i said before XP is already "good enough" for pretty much everyone.

all vista really is if u ask me is a more bloated version of windows XP with a slightly different interface and they want to charge u hundreds of dollars for it... ill use common sence and avoid Windows Vista for a while.... but when is all said and done eventually Vista will become the standard so we will basically be forced to upgrade eventually .


yeah yeah yeah, you said it before, we heard you! now cut the crap please
(8 replies) #7 Grunt on 09 Jan 2007 - 01:00
chances are, MS will release a new windows, but within the next 2 years alot of people will be moving over to linux as its beginning to offer just as much usability as windows these days. (if not built in features, work arounds) and linux is moving on very quickly. And i'd have to say; much faster than windows.

so i could be the last version of windows, unless they move to open source (or close to)

NB: this has come from an avid windows user. i've only tried Ubuntu on vmware and just couldn't take the time to work with it. I'm all for windows going on forever. But I see linux taking over in 8 years-ish
#7.1 MioTheGreat on 09 Jan 2007 - 01:02
And This will finally be the year of the linux desktop? Come on. For how long have we heard this?
#7.2 Nose Nuggets on 09 Jan 2007 - 01:29
Quote - (Grunt said @ #7)
chances are, MS will release a new windows, but within the next 2 years alot of people will be moving over to linux as its beginning to offer just as much usability as windows these days. (if not built in features, work arounds) and linux is moving on very quickly. And i'd have to say; much faster than windows.

so i could be the last version of windows, unless they move to open source (or close to)

NB: this has come from an avid windows user. i've only tried Ubuntu on vmware and just couldn't take the time to work with it. I'm all for windows going on forever. But I see linux taking over in 8 years-ish



linux? dont believe the hype. the fact that a Terminal app even appears in the prgrams list is enough to scare away the average user
#7.3 ArtOf_War on 09 Jan 2007 - 02:59
Yeah.... right...
#7.4 Matt Zander on 09 Jan 2007 - 04:05
Quote - (Grunt said @ #7)
chances are, MS will release a new windows, but within the next 2 years alot of people will be moving over to linux as its beginning to offer just as much usability as windows these days. (if not built in features, work arounds) and linux is moving on very quickly. And i'd have to say; much faster than windows.

so i could be the last version of windows, unless they move to open source (or close to)

NB: this has come from an avid windows user. i've only tried Ubuntu on vmware and just couldn't take the time to work with it. I'm all for windows going on forever. But I see linux taking over in 8 years-ish



I'd say if Linux is still being developed in 8-10 years then, sure, I think it'll become the main OS people use. I hope that's the case cos open source is good.
#7.5 Neomac v6 on 09 Jan 2007 - 05:20
OS X has a better chance than Linux. It's powerful, secure AND user-friendly, with bundled killer apps. The average Joe doesn't have to worry about configurations and workarounds.
#7.6 bobbba on 09 Jan 2007 - 08:28
Some rock solid thinking here then...

You've tried ubuntu on vmware so that makes you qualified to predict that linux will take over the desktop market

and how will OS X ever significantly increase market share while it is tied to Apple hardware. Even without that the business world has to great an investment in windows and windows based apps to change.
#7.7 C_Guy on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:24
Linux? Ha ha ha, yeah ok. Care to put some money on that?
#7.8 Dakkaroth on 09 Jan 2007 - 19:12
Quote - (bobbba said @ #7.6)
and how will OS X ever significantly increase market share while it is tied to Apple hardware.


Thank you for saying this much at least. I don't understand how anyone in their right mind would expect me to spend $1000-2000+ for half-assed performance and to use OSX. It just isn't gonna happen. I've seen all the Mac prices and yuck! My computer was purchased for such a fraction of the price (custom built too) 3 years ago, and it still runs faster than anything I can buy from Apple NOW for the same price. Ridiculous.
(2 replies) #8 ramesees on 09 Jan 2007 - 01:16
I dont see Vienna coming out within 2 years, I mean isnt that supposed to be what Vista should have been?

I know they can build on the Vista core etc... but 2 years seems awfully short, you'd only have time for 1 maybe 2 service packs for Vista in that time, and to concentrate all resources into a major OS release seems it would take a lot longer.

4 years I can understand for Vienna, we'll see it maybe released by the end of the decade.

All of this is of course speculation and conjecture, and my own personal thoughts.
#8.1 +Brandon Live on 09 Jan 2007 - 04:23
For the most part, the people working on the next version of Windows aren't working on Vista SPs.
#8.2 ramesees on 09 Jan 2007 - 11:17
Ahhh, that clears up matters

Thanks Brandon
(4 replies) #9 PieAnn on 09 Jan 2007 - 02:05
if it wasn't for the high price, people wouldn't whine about MS.
what do you expect? it's business.
it will keep on coming.
#9.1 Matt Zander on 09 Jan 2007 - 04:07
Quote - (PieAnn said @ #9)
if it wasn't for the high price, people wouldn't whine about MS.
what do you expect? it's business.
it will keep on coming.


They're going to price themselves out of the market pretty soon, though.
#9.2 bobbba on 09 Jan 2007 - 08:30
Quote - (Matt Zander said @ #1.1)
They're going to price themselves out of the market pretty soon, though.


Not while there's little or no choice in the market.
#9.3 +Shadowdruid on 09 Jan 2007 - 10:17
yeh 200usd for an os which will last you at least 3 years and you will use every single time you turn on your computer, is soooo expensive. Such a huge ripoff from ms....

Stop looking at ultimates price and going OMG VISTA IS SOO EXPENSIVE! First list every single feature in ultimate that you will use and then say that you need ultimate. Most people, like you, will not need it and hence can survive with Home Premium/Home Basic/Business.

#9.4 C_Guy on 09 Jan 2007 - 17:29
Yeah, it's sad that people just assume they need Ultiamte when most of them probably won't use all the features. Ultiamte is "so" expenseive because Microsoft put so much more into it. But they realized its nto fair to charge customers for features they're not going to use so they came out with different editions.

No matter what they do, some people will just never be happy with Microsoft and that's just plain ignorance.
#10 mujjuman on 10 Jan 2007 - 10:20
screw Vista. i use Win95.

just kidding, but Win95 was still a good OS.

i still use WinXP and will prob do so until i find a great reason to use Vista.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)