main
Report a problem

FCC Says No to Satellite Radio Merger

Slimy   on 18 January 2007 - 22:09 · 12 comments & 7410 views

Advertisement (Why?)
If you’ve been following the news over the last few months, you’ve probably noticed a few articles analyzing, speculating or simply spreading rumours regarding a merger between Sirius and XM Radio. Leave all the non-facts behind and focus on the present. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin publically announced that the FCC has decided not to approve a merger between these two satellite radio rivals.

The obstacle comes not from 2007, but nearly decade ago, in 1997. When the FCC initially licensed the two companies, there was language in the licensing barring one from acquiring control of the other. Sirius CEO Mel Karmazin must be heartbroken; he has often publically announced how dearly he would love a merger. In November 2006, Karmazin seriously believed that a merger would financially benefit both companies.

Even if the FCC changed their mind regarding the merger between Sirius and XM Radio, it would still have to pass antitrust scrutiny by the Department of Justice. But don’t despair. This may be a good thing; we all know how terrible a lack of competition can be for consumers.

News source: Ars Technica

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 adversedeviant on 18 Jan 2007 - 22:16
"In November 2006, Karmazin seriously believed that a merger would financially benefit both companies."

yes by monopolizing the satellite radio market.
#1.1 vetneufuse on 18 Jan 2007 - 22:39
Quote - (adversedeviant said @ #1)
"In November 2006, Karmazin seriously believed that a merger would financially benefit both companies."

yes by monopolizing the satellite radio market.


that's exactly what I was going to say until I saw you comment... all that would happen is the cost would sky rocket...
#2 TRC on 18 Jan 2007 - 22:20
Good, this should never be allowed to happen.
#3 xpablo on 18 Jan 2007 - 22:22
Well this is sort of good news, I have XM, I had Sirius for a couple of weeks and got rid of it, because the sound quality was pretty poor compared to XM, My XM sub expires in the spring I'm still trying to decide if I will renew it or not, If XM would play a more variety of music from more artists I'd sign up for another year at least.

But if they merged with FCC aproval and Antitrust, then whats to stop DirecTv & Dish from merging , the FCC also denied their merger few years ago.

(1 reply) #4 naap51stang on 18 Jan 2007 - 22:50
The main reason I went to XM (or any sat radio) was the local market plays the SAME COMMERCIALS over and over
along with the same songs over and over. At least with a sat radio, music wise, I have NO commercials, plus, I can
put my favorite artists in the memory and have it let me know if they are on somewhere.
The no commercials aspect of sat radio was my main draw.
A side benefit is when I travel to visit my parents, a 3 hour drive, I can listen to the evening news, weather etc...
#4.1 Imnotrichey on 18 Jan 2007 - 23:12
how do you get songs in the systems memory? is this in a car or computer?
#5 C_Guy on 18 Jan 2007 - 23:00
I wish I could get Yahoo! LaunchCast via. Satellite radio.
(1 reply) #6 Imnotrichey on 18 Jan 2007 - 23:11
I still dont get how they say XM radio is commercial free. I've had it for about 2 months now, and I hear commercials all the fricking time.

I was actually hoping for a merger since I like XM, but Sirius has all those football (do they have nba as well?) channels while im stuck with baseball play by play
#6.1 FrozenSpoon on 19 Jan 2007 - 01:16
All of XM's music channels are commercial free (read: not clearchannel's ones). I'm not sure where you read it was 100% commercial free. XM sure didn't say that.
#7 Steven on 18 Jan 2007 - 23:34
This news report is now out of date:

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/MOMENTUM/497926/

Everyone Slowwwwwww Down.
#8 MrCobra on 19 Jan 2007 - 00:48
No satalite radio memrger and yet they let AT&T recombine. Stupid.
#9 RangerLG on 19 Jan 2007 - 20:47
I have not heard XM executives saying anything about merging. It is the CEO of Sirius that keeps saying he thinks it would benefit both groups to merge. The only benefit would be to him. His company would double in subscribers instantly. Plus current subs would probably need to buy new radios since both companies use different technologies. I am an XM subscriber and I personally see no benefit to me for merging. I would like to hear NFL and NBA games, but I do enjoy the music channels (non Clear Channel ones).

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)