main
Report a problem

802.11n Standard Makes Progress in London Meeting

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 22 January 2007 - 16:03 · 1 comment & 1325 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The long-anticipated 1.10 version of the IEEE 802.11n draft standard was approved unanimously in an IEEE task group meeting held in London in mid-January. According to Atheros CTO Bill McFarland, who attended the meeting, all of the 3,000-plus technical comments to the 11n draft 1.0 were resolved, and that in turn resulted in the successful agreement to draft 1.10. According to McFarland's written statement, provided to eWEEK, this is a significant step forward in achieving the next stage of the approval process to an accepted 802.11n draft standard.

Last fall, the Wi-Fi Alliance announced that it would publish an interim standard in March so that companies could begin work on 11n products, while giving customers some reason to believe that those products would continue to work when the standard became finalized. "Now, the organization will begin a 15-day (short) letter ballot to determine whether a 2.0 version based on the 1.10 draft should be created and submitted for technical review," McFarland said in his prepared message. "It appears that the IEEE TGn (Task Group n) will deliver a near-to-final draft in advance of the upcoming Wi-Fi Alliance certification and thus impact the testbed." McFarland said in his comments. "This will further validate the WFA certification of draft 802.11n products and should assist consumer adoption of the new Wi-Fi technology."

View: The full story
News source: eWeek

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 1 additional comments
#1 Z3r0 on 23 Jan 2007 - 08:14
can I say, rofl, let's JUST DECIDE WHEN ITS FINISHED AND THEN FINISH IT!

In the old days they called it a deadline.

It seems silly to have all these revisions in such a short period of time, since they are not even finalised that means manufacturers don't have to support the draft standards when the final products come out.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)