main
Report a problem

AOL: Cross-Platform Netscape 9 to be Developed In-House

Slimy   on 05 February 2007 - 23:27 · 23 comments & 4900 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The official Netscape Blog has announced that Netscape 9 is under development, and just like the current version, it will presumably be based on Mozilla Firefox. According to the announcement, Netscape 9 will be a standalone browser and will have extension integration with the Netscape.com website (Digg clone). Unlike version 8, Netscape 9 will be available simultaneously for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X in the “next month or two”. The Netscape 9 announcement includes a small screenshot (the menu bar indicates that it's based on Firefox 2) and states that the browser will borrow Firefox implementations such as Live Bookmarks, Netscape Friends' Activity Sidebar and the Netscape Sitemail Notifier.

Netscape once again employs its own programming staff (development of Netscape Browser 8 was outsourced to Mercurial Communications) and the company is also considering resuming support for features like Netscape Mail and Netscape Composer. New information about Netscape 9 will be released every Tuesday; the first such update was the announcement that the browser will be cross-platform, coupled with a screenshot of a stylish new FTP view. Will AOL's steps be enough to halt Netscape’s continuous browser market share decline (from its original 80% in the mid-Nineties)?

Link: Forum Discussion (Thanks MchWalte)
View: Teaser
News source: mozillaZine

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 23 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 hagjohn on 05 Feb 2007 - 23:51
Seems kind of dumb, If you ask me. They should just use firefox and be done with it.
#1.1 ThaCrip on 06 Feb 2007 - 06:45
i tottally agree ... netscape "used" to be good back in the day of version 4.7 (i think) ... now it's just to bloated ... so theres basically NO reason to use it over firefox/IE/Opera.... those are pretty much your only choices when it comes to webbrowsers (well atleast "real" webbrowsers)
#1.2 kaiwai on 06 Feb 2007 - 08:36
Quote - (ThaCrip said @ #1.1)
i tottally agree ... netscape "used" to be good back in the day of version 4.7 (i think) ... now it's just to bloated ... so theres basically NO reason to use it over firefox/IE/Opera.... those are pretty much your only choices when it comes to webbrowsers (well atleast "real" webbrowsers)


Please, I remember the 4.x series; it was absolutely crap; java and javascript both used to lock up the browser, illegal operations thrown left right and centre, crappy threading, slow performance, lack of standards support - it was a friggin nightmare, and ultimately it was those 'qualities' which killed Netscape.
#2 Dr.Jones on 06 Feb 2007 - 00:41
netsca-who ?
#3 seebaran on 06 Feb 2007 - 00:58
Ah come. Let's respect our elder browsers .... you whippersnappers...
(1 reply) #4 Lasker on 06 Feb 2007 - 01:12
Netscape = crap
#4.1 drygnfyre on 06 Feb 2007 - 01:51
Netscape 8 wasn't that bad. It didn't have the greatest design, but it was certainly functional.
#5 NightmarE D on 06 Feb 2007 - 02:20
I didn't even know Netscape still existed as a browser

I thought it completely died out years ago.
#6 rm20010 on 06 Feb 2007 - 04:06
Other than the inclusion of a new tab button, conjoined back/forward navigation buttons, and possibly a combined reload/stop button, that interface and especially the menu bar is almost like Firefox's just going by that teaser.
(1 reply) #7 Windam on 06 Feb 2007 - 04:35
I have allot of respect for netscape. Back in the Win95 era alternative browsers such as this proved to be a marvel.
#7.1 danj205 on 06 Feb 2007 - 04:51
But, back in the "Win95 era", Netscape was not the alternative! It was Internet Explorer (at least by that stage) and number of others.
#8 thenay on 06 Feb 2007 - 04:43
I can't see them becoming number 1 again, or number 2, maybe 3 but tied with others.
(3 replies) #9 MrCobra on 06 Feb 2007 - 05:45
Not that I've used NS in years but if AOL programmers are doing it, I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. They need to quit bundling all that ad-ware sh*t with stuff they write. They [AOL] should just die out already.
#9.1 ThaCrip on 06 Feb 2007 - 06:48
your 100percent right as far as im conserned.... anything AOL related is just BAD... and the funny thing is based on there commericials... the average joe will probably think there good ... it's a damn shame.

AOL back in the day (1995-1997area, give or take) used to be atleast decent even if it was a little bloated... nowadays it's just flat out AWFULL.... it (as u know) installs SOOO much stuff without "asking" you what you want to install.

and also (as im sure you know)... dialup users can get like local type dialup for 10 dollars a month with ANY bs installed on there pc's and generally offers better speeds with more reliable connections.... i used to use onehop.com for my dialup internet ... now they are actually good and dont screw with you... even when i canceled they canceled immediately when i asked and did not screw with me at all... only reason i cancelled with them was cause i got dsl for only 5 dollars more than i was paying for dialup (15 dollars vs 10 dollars) and i get litterally 8 times the speed (dialup = about 5KB/s , vs my current DSL of 40KB/s)

Last edited by ThaCrip on 06 Feb 2007 - 06:53
#9.2 +MchWalte on 06 Feb 2007 - 08:25
Quote - (MrCobra said @ #9)
Not that I've used NS in years but if AOL programmers are doing it, I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. They need to quit bundling all that ad-ware sh*t with stuff they write. They [AOL] should just die out already.


They give the user options now if they want to install the AOL Toolbar, AOL Desktop Search - to name a few. Even if extras to get installed, they are always uninstallable and not life threatening.
#9.3 kaiwai on 06 Feb 2007 - 09:18
Quote - (MchWalte said @ #9.2)
Quote - (MrCobra said @ #9)
Not that I've used NS in years but if AOL programmers are doing it, I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. They need to quit bundling all that ad-ware sh*t with stuff they write. They [AOL] should just die out already.


They give the user options now if they want to install the AOL Toolbar, AOL Desktop Search - to name a few. Even if extras to get installed, they are always uninstallable and not life threatening.


How about this idea; don't include the damn thing in the first place.

Winamp seems to be one of the few things that haven't been butchered by the halfwitts at AOL; get rid of the ads, get rid of the bloat; give me a messenger without intrusive ads, give me browser without 100s of adware components - if you can't make a buck the good old fashioned honest way, then you should do us all a favour and closet up shop.
#10 SamNeeds on 06 Feb 2007 - 10:06
The teaser is black?!??
#11 alsheron on 06 Feb 2007 - 11:52
Why Bother?[font=Arial Black][size=5][b]
(1 reply) #12 Lemonzest on 06 Feb 2007 - 12:52
they still making NutScrape?
#12.1 +Dakkaroth on 06 Feb 2007 - 13:09
Damn, stoled my comment. Good ol' Nutscrape.
#13 Frozen Vista on 06 Feb 2007 - 15:18
I think Flock is better than this crap tbh www.flock.com ftw
#14 C_Guy on 06 Feb 2007 - 15:36
WOW, a web browser with an FTP interface, COOL!

Netscape hasn't offered the web community anything for a long time and now that they're basing it on FF, they could save the time and effort of making a browser clone and just use FF.
#15 Webgraph on 07 Feb 2007 - 04:56
What? You mean to tell me Netscape's still around? I don't even remember when was the last time I used that thing, LOL! Thank goodness for Firefox and Safari!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)