main
Report a problem

All Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD Encryption Defeated by One Key

Slimy   on 14 February 2007 - 17:27 · 31 comments & 20959 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The first breakthrough came when a hacker named “Muslix64” circumvented both HD DVD copy protection and Blu-ray copy protection, resulting in the release of pirated copies on the Internet. On Sunday, another Doom9 forum poster named “arnezami” discovered how the Processing Key could be used for decryption on both HD DVD and Blu-ray discs (Previously every HD movie needed its own unique key in order to be decrypted). Arnezami used only an Xbox 360 HD DVD player, the bundled King Kong movie and his computer to find the key. Other Doom9 forum contributors proved that both HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc movies could be decrypted using the Processing Key found from King Kong.

Arnezami unlocked the secrets to HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc encryption without the use of any hacked software or hardware: “Most of the time I spend studying the AACS papers. A good understanding of how things worked have helped me greatly in knowing what to find in the first place (and how to recognize something).” Arnezami isn’t revealing which software player he used to expose the key information for fear that the Advanced Access Content System Licensing Administrator would crackdown on the software developer. What he did want to say, however, is that he made his discovery simply by watching the data as it passed through his system.

Link: Forum Discussion (Thanks Gunnerhkjp)
News source: DailyTech

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 31 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 roadwarrior on 14 Feb 2007 - 17:34
Quote -
Arnezami used only an Xbox 360 HD DVD player, the bundled King King movie and his computer to find the key.


Shouldn't that be King Kong?
#1.1 sp4rkbr on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:10
lol!
(3 replies) #2 TruckWEB on 14 Feb 2007 - 17:43
Nothing to help the distribution of HD-DVD or BluRay movies. With masive broadband download pipe, P2P will have a filed day with that.
#2.1 bluarash on 14 Feb 2007 - 19:52
That is what the NIKE network is for. All you need is a storage device capable of holding a movie and a good pair of feet. This of course requires friends, but those seem to be easy to come by when someone has something of value to offer in a social bonding experience.

However, by the time you read this, it is very likely that the MPAA will have lobbied Congress to outlaw all removable storage options (provided that range from >= to 25gigs).

In all seriousness, it is likely that when 10mb to 100mb pipes become available you will easily be able to download HD content. So your last assertion would be correct. When the technology is available, P2P will have a field day.

I actually believe it would be better for the MPAA and RIAA if their products did not have any content protection of them. These strategies only hinder the legitimate user and encourage a black market to grow.
#2.2 ir0nw0lf on 14 Feb 2007 - 20:36
Quote - (bluarash said @ #2.1)
That is what the NIKE network is for. All you need is a storage device capable of holding a movie and a good pair of feet. This of course requires friends, but those seem to be easy to come by when someone has something of value to offer in a social bonding experience.

However, by the time you read this, it is very likely that the MPAA will have lobbied Congress to outlaw all removable storage options (provided that range from >= to 25gigs).

In all seriousness, it is likely that when 10mb to 100mb pipes become available you will easily be able to download HD content. So your last assertion would be correct. When the technology is available, P2P will have a field day.

I actually believe it would be better for the MPAA and RIAA if their products did not have any content protection of them. These strategies only hinder the legitimate user and encourage a black market to grow.

Actually, the proper term is "sneakernet." No trademark issues with that term, which has actually been used for quite a while. Wiki on sneakernet: sneakernet
#2.3 Jugalator on 14 Feb 2007 - 22:16
Quote -
With masive broadband download pipe, P2P will have a filed day with that.
For a whole lot of people out there (if you call bidirectional 10+ Mbps by fiber massive), that requirement is already satisfied.
Quote -
In all seriousness, it is likely that when 10mb to 100mb pipes become available you will easily be able to download HD content.

Already there and common in a number of countries.
#3 digitalsoft on 14 Feb 2007 - 17:51
aaaah not surprised. nothing is safe.
(5 replies) #4 Fubar on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:15
years to come up with it , days to crack gotta love it lol
#4.1 Shadrack on 14 Feb 2007 - 19:30
For real. All the research and development was just a waist of money.

I'm not saying that they should have it in an unencrypted format on the disc...i believe that something in the DMCA in the US makes punishment more severe if the user knowingly decrypts the copy protection as oppose to just violating the licensing agreement. In this case they should have just used good old CSS like in DVDs because someone is bound to break the encryption anyway.

Another point I'd like to make is other then Blu-Ray's larger size capacity over HD-DVD, the format has also boasted stronger copy protection which now can not be used as an argument for the formats superiority over HD-DVD.
#4.2 PeterTHX on 14 Feb 2007 - 23:01
the format has also boasted stronger copy protection which now can not be used as an argument for the formats superiority over HD-DVD

BD+ and ROM-MARK are not turned on yet, just AACS.

If anything, it will force the BD studios to use them now, leaving Universal and any HD DVD studios subject to piracy.
#4.3 Shadrack on 15 Feb 2007 - 00:20
Quote - (PeterTHX said @ #4.2)
the format has also boasted stronger copy protection which now can not be used as an argument for the formats superiority over HD-DVD

BD+ and ROM-MARK are not turned on yet, just AACS.

If anything, it will force the BD studios to use them now, leaving Universal and any HD DVD studios subject to piracy.


I did not know that these encryption features were not "turned on yet" as you put it. What makes you think they will be any different?
#4.4 salis on 15 Feb 2007 - 02:37
Well if they turn on ROM-Mark, no burnt disks will play because the player checks for the mark and its not present unless your using an authorized blu-ray press thing.
#4.5 Davo on 15 Feb 2007 - 23:15
Quote - (salis said @ #4.4)
Well if they turn on ROM-Mark, no burnt disks will play because the player checks for the mark and its not present unless your using an authorized blu-ray press thing.


AND that will be cracked too. It would be in the same vein as modding PS2 or X-Boxs.
#5 magik on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:24
pwnd.
(1 reply) #6 betasp on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:38
I already see that I am going to have to up my broadband connection....
#6.1 MrCobra on 14 Feb 2007 - 19:45
Already bumped mine up.
#7 Ferret on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:44
They say on release that these things will never be cracked, and proved wrong once again that it is cracked very shortly after release :p

The player that was used, will be exposed soon enough, but I have a good idea as to which one it might be !
#8 Liaqat_ali on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:54
I wonder why this made me smile.
#9 Matt500 on 14 Feb 2007 - 18:58
Good. Films will always be cracked by the professional pirates and all normal consumers get is the ever increasing loss of control over their purchases.
#10 Alphanumeric on 14 Feb 2007 - 20:16
Knew it wouldn't take long.
(1 reply) #11 CrisCr0ss on 14 Feb 2007 - 20:45
wooot!

Now if only these stupid media corporations would give us the ability to freely navigate our dvd instead of forcing us to watch the stupid warnings/previews, which is why i may never purchase a movie, ever..
#11.1 StimyJoeBlue on 15 Feb 2007 - 03:24
CrisCr0ss - Well said. Every time I'm forced to sit through 6 different MPAA warnings and get locked into mandatory previews on something I just purchased, it makes me want to rip the disk and post it across the globe. Man, the whole industry sucks for one reason or another, but that especially chaps me.
(2 replies) #12 +Dakkaroth on 14 Feb 2007 - 21:11
Thank God he cracked both, or else we'd have retards posting..

"HAHAH, HD-DVD IS BETTER. BLU-RAY SUCKS"

OR

"BLU-RAY > HD-DVD! FORMAT WINNER!!!"

You do know that I hate all you fanboy tards, right? F--kin losers.
#12.1 cardg on 14 Feb 2007 - 21:57
If he did hack only one format.. .everyone would preffer the hacked one, lol
#12.2 Glassed Silver on 15 Feb 2007 - 16:39
Quote - (cardg said @ #12.1)
If he did hack only one format.. .everyone would preffer the hacked one, lol

appart from all the noobs who make up the majority

Glassed Silver:win
#13 Croquant on 14 Feb 2007 - 21:54
Oh my, this should get the MPAA's panties in a knot.
#14 NinjaGinger on 15 Feb 2007 - 01:21
it makes me smile until I realise that the added cost of producing copy protection that is useless but expensive is passed on to buyers like me. Almost makes me want to pirate, EVERYTHING.
#15 twistedddx on 15 Feb 2007 - 06:40
uh this keys is only good for discs with this particular manufacturing key. future discs can have a different key. just all discs checked so far use this one key on both format.
So while better then the volume key that people have been using for a month, it is just as stoppable. Altho the bad software players need to have their devices keys revoked first to prevent new keys from being found in seconds.
#16 Sp3ctranova on 15 Feb 2007 - 07:13
the sweet smell of pwnage cooling on a windowsil...
#17 chaicka on 15 Feb 2007 - 15:27
what humans create, humans can break.....simple.
#18 KayAWay on 20 Mar 2008 - 06:16
While all you hackers are out there finding "processing keys" or “volume keys”, you’re destroying the very fabric of the system that creates these technologies, artwork and music for you to appreciate.

Why would a musician make a cd that cost thousands of dollars to make, to have everyone steel their work for free. Get real. Arnezami and Muslix64, your just destroying entertainment for everyone.

There is a reason for copyrighting. Violating copyright is stealing someone else’s work, and money. Anyone who contributes to this is no hero, and you are NO hero.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)