Carve out another notch in the loss column for Taiwanese-based DigiTimes, which on Friday reported that Apple's next-generation Leopard operating system would be delayed till October. Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg later spoke to Apple regarding the matter and was told the report is incorrect. "Just spoke with Apple who confirmed the reports are wrong and Leopard is still scheduled to ship in this spring as they previously announced. The rumor mill is wrong again," the analyst wrote on his blog site. DigiTimes had said that Apple would push Leopard's release out till October in order to bolster dual boot support for rival Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Vista operating system.
News source: Apple Insider
















Sorry for the mistake guys, gotta be more careful with DigiTimes next time!
Late May - Early June is still do-able I think.
Since June would be considered, late spring, I'm placing my bets on late April or the early part of May.
I'm still thinking it's shipping June 12. It's a tuesday and it's WWDC, so why not !
I have absolutely no idea what you just said. "Apple bashers" wouldn't say that, as it's not being delayed. Hence the whole "this rumor is not true", thing.
And, "now I recognize my Neowin." - What?
Apple bashers DID bash Apple because of this. Look in the previous news which says that Leopard is going to be postponed because of Vista, it's hilarious. It was obvious that the rumor was not true, but some took it literally.
Apple bashers DID bash Apple because of this. Look in the previous news which says that Leopard is going to be postponed because of Vista, it's hilarious. It was obvious that the rumor was not true, but some took it literally.
Actually there was more people saying they didn't believe the story than people bashing Apple. I was one who made a small joke about it, but made it pretty clear it was a joke and that I didn't believe the story.
And Neowin has posted more than a few stories that ended up not being true or only had a small part of it right. Other sites reported this story also. Don't make it sound like Neowin was the only one to post it becayse they wasn't. Honestly it's not Neowin, it's the person who makes the actual post. Sometimes people aren't sure if a story is true or not, but will post it anyway to see peoples reactions and most of the time the poster makes it clear it's just rumor.
Try again
Maybe Neowin should add a new section called Rumor for things they are not sure, but then again, it'd be quite empty, as most of their news is accurate.
What I hate is that there's way too many rumors and hype considering Apple and nobody knows what's true or not, especially if you don't follow their stories often. It's bad for both sides : Apple fans make hype out of it, and Apple bashers ridiculize them.
I didn't say fastest, just fast. I think a leopard is still pretty fast. From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard
I didn't say fastest, just fast. I think a leopard is still pretty fast. From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard
I didnt say the fastest as well, just fast too. I'm saying that most people often associate the cheetah as the "fast cat"
There's absolutely no sane reason why Apple would delay Leopard.
My guesses:
Mid April: Final Cut Studio 6 (possibly announced, demoed at NAB and released at a later date)
Late April or early May: Mac OS X Leopard along with iLife and iWork updates, possibly new consumer hardware updates
June: iPhone
June: WWDC - discussions on Leopard, Leopard Server and iPhone, new Pro hardware updates
j/k
j/k
Keep the trolling out.
j/k
Just like Vista is then over XP.
j/k
There are just as many downsides to Apply as there is MS.
a) I don't work for Apple
b) I don't know anyone who works at Apple HQ in Cupertino
c) I don't know anyone who works at Apple HQ in Cupertino who would tell me
Mac OS 10.5 .... the 10th of 5... the 10th of May.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.