main

ASUS GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB review

Julio Franco   on 05 April 2007 - 19:43 · 8 comments & 6988 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The GeForce 8 series is set to expand on April 17th as Nvidia is set to release three mid-range DirectX 10 graphics cards. While these new affordable graphics cards are going to be very attractive, it is still hard to ignore the value currently offered by the 320MB version of the GeForce 8800 GTS, which can be had for just $300. At least on paper, we can already tell this new offering is a good value as it features everything found on the original 8800 GTS with just half the memory, and a 33% lower price tag.

The GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB has captured and quickly dominated the $300+ videocard market as there is nothing else within this price range that can compete or even come close to it. This new GeForce 8-series alternative was released a little over a month ago now and availability has been excellent from the beginning, with countless options available. Today we have managed to get our hands on the ASUS EN8800GTS, which is priced at around $310 and comes with a few added bonuses.

View: ASUS GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB review @ TechSpot

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 8 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Magallanes on 05 Apr 2007 - 21:04
It's insane the price, it's way more cheap to buy a xbox360 or a wii and cost half of a whole ps3.

#1.1 kyro on 05 Apr 2007 - 23:54
exactly.. You said it.
(1 reply) #2 TRC on 05 Apr 2007 - 21:06
A 320MB video card?
#2.1 Imnotrichey on 05 Apr 2007 - 22:29
theres a 640 mb version as well
#3 +Raa on 06 Apr 2007 - 03:12
I want the 8800 Ultra already
This temp 7300GS just doesn't cut it, and I havent had it 24 hours! lol
(2 replies) #4 ANova on 06 Apr 2007 - 06:44
This card isn't worth it, the 320 MB is a large bottleneck and will hurt peformance significantly in games like Crysis or any other with high quality textures and/or while running at high resolutions/AA.
#4.1 Flatty on 06 Apr 2007 - 08:31
Quote - (ANova said @ #4)
This card isn't worth it, the 320 MB is a large bottleneck and will hurt peformance significantly in games like Crysis or any other with high quality textures and/or while running at high resolutions/AA.

Clearly those that plan on playing intense first person shooters at high resolutions, will be much better off spending the extra $100. However, those limited to a resolution of 1600x1200 or less are probably better off saving their money and getting the cheaper 320MB 8800 GTS. . That means: if you do NOT plan to buy a 1600x1200+ monitor, getting +320MB of ram would be quite useless. It depends on what you're playing on, more than what game you're playing.
#4.2 ANova on 06 Apr 2007 - 20:56
Quote -
320 MB is a large bottleneck and will hurt peformance significantly in games like Crysis or any other with high quality textures


What resolution/AA you play at is part of it, what game you play later will be bigger.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)