main
Report a problem

Turkey to block 'insulting' Web sites

Slimy   on 07 April 2007 - 00:50 · 33 comments & 8876 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A parliamentary commission has approved a proposal allowing Turkey to block Web sites that are deemed insulting to the founder of modern Turkey. Parliament plans to vote on the proposal, which indicates the discomfort that many Turks feel about Western-style freedom of expression, though a date has not been announced. Lawmakers in the commission also debated whether the proposal should be widened to allow the Turkish Telecommunications Board to block access to any sites that question the principles of the Turkish secular system or the unity of the Turkish state – a reference to Web sites with information on Kurdish rebels in Turkey. It is illegal in Turkey to talk of breaking up the state or to insult Ataturk, the revered founder of modern Turkey whose image graces every denomination of currency and whose portrait hangs in nearly all government offices. Ataturk is held to be responsible for creating a secular republic from the crumbling, Islamic Ottoman Empire.

This decision clashes with Turkey’s implementation of widespread reforms in its bid to join the European Union. European calls for free speech have angered some nationalist Turks, who view the recommendations as interference in their internal affairs.

Link: Forum Discussion (Thanks Hum)
News source: CNN

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 33 additional comments
#1 MrCobra on 07 Apr 2007 - 01:32
OMG. A bunch of grown people acting like children and complaining over "he said, she said" bs.
(1 reply) #2 semifamous on 07 Apr 2007 - 01:47
Apparently it's a spreading trend. Governments think they can stop people from thinking or expressing ideas? And that some ideas should not be expressed?

Recent previous attempts:
http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=39282
http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=39247
#2.1 Ravensworth on 07 Apr 2007 - 01:50
Yeah, good thing they'll eventually fail. Darn that technology for crushing their backwards oppresive regimes!
#3 mattrobs on 07 Apr 2007 - 02:49
How exactly are they going to do this? No one owns the Internet.
#4 Toology on 07 Apr 2007 - 03:16
It looks like the Thais and Turks have something in common. They should really get together and perhaps build a time machine to take them back a few centuries.
(2 replies) #5 SacrificialSoldier on 07 Apr 2007 - 03:46
Just a bunch or uptight self-centered people wanting to show their "power"
#5.1 blake on 07 Apr 2007 - 04:03
oh no, Now there are coming after you too, hide!
#5.2 MrCobra on 07 Apr 2007 - 05:31
Quote - (SacrificialSoldier said @ #5)
Just a bunch or uptight self-centered people wanting to show their "power"

Halfassed ego is more like it.
#6 +Smigit on 07 Apr 2007 - 05:27
good luck youtube

But yeah its quite pathetic really. Individuals should have the say as to what offends them or not and avoid anything that does. I dont think the government needs to overprotect everyone and tell them whats offensive to them or not.

In the end of the day people should be able to take these insults on the chest and read them for what they are, the oppinions on someone that shouldnt be concerned with. I'd care less if some random on the other side of the globe was mocking my country, beliefs or hell even me. I might argue back but in the end of the day what they said doesnt hurt you if your able to look on their "insults" for the stupidity they are.
#7 Primexx on 07 Apr 2007 - 07:42
I propose that everyone keep a copy of the Tor installation package and documentation at a secure offline location so that when the Government blocks something, even Tor's website, you could just take your Tor out and install it.
#8 ricknl on 07 Apr 2007 - 07:54
I originally come from Turkey, and I think this is a well written objective article, which you don't find many these days.

The funny thing is, when Ataturk was alive there was a book written, which talked about Ataturk as a drunken man, giving serious decisions about his country while feasting. The cabinet back then wanted to forbid bringing this book to Turkey. Ironically, it was Ataturk himself who wanted the book to be translated to Turkish!

And when Ataturk was alive, it was not 'forbidden' to critisise him, so you cannot compare Turkey to Thailand. Actually Ataturk was sometimes harshly critisied by the parliament, and had his bad days too while he was trying to have the westerinsation legislations passed.

Any way... you can still critisize Ataturk in Turkey today too, you can say that you don't agree with him, or what so ever, but you may not insult him... Then again, prison is a little bit of a too harsh punnishment for this.
(1 reply) #9 backdrifter on 07 Apr 2007 - 09:23
I don't think it's forbidden to critisize him cause I mock him, and no police came after me so far... The problem is the government can not seem to adapt the new ways of communication, like how you can't block sites hosted in other countries or simply it's impossible to control the internet. (not that they should, but trying is also stupid enough)
#9.1 XerXis on 07 Apr 2007 - 17:37
ask the chinese if it is possible to block international sites , only way out for the chinese people is using proxies
(1 reply) #10 Croquant on 07 Apr 2007 - 09:47
:writes a site that insults turkey and praises chicken and beef:
#10.1 Samboini on 07 Apr 2007 - 11:44
Ideally you want a dish with both of them in at once; double delicious.
#11 ricknl on 07 Apr 2007 - 10:28
And there is more to this actually.

April is the election month for the president of Turkey. In Turkey the parliament elects the president, and the current prime minister, who has 2/3 of parliament's support wants to be the new president.

There is only one drawback.

The current prime minister is a 'soft islamist', who by nature is not really a 'sample' Ataturk supporter.

Most probably, by making such supportive laws for Ataturk, he's just trying to show the whole world, how much he actually 'loves' Ataturk.
#12 Samboini on 07 Apr 2007 - 11:44
Who cares? I know I don't. If people want information online they WILL get it, there are countless workarounds, I fail to see why governments even bother nowadays.
#13 leesmithg on 07 Apr 2007 - 12:52
I think it's about time Turkey was removed from european maps and given middle east status.


Turkey will never get full e.u. status with things like this going on.
(2 replies) #14 sy64 on 07 Apr 2007 - 13:26
ha ha ha and this lot want to join the EU???
#14.1 +mad_onion on 07 Apr 2007 - 15:35
yeah, well the citizens of turkey used to support accession to the European Union but public opinion seems to have got a lot more negative as the reality of trying to join have become apparent, they have to change a lot about their society. mabye the culture is just too different from that of the rest of Europe for it to happen. the government still wants it for the economic advantages but it could be a very long time yet.
#14.2 ricknl on 07 Apr 2007 - 23:36
How little do you know about the Eastern Europe then. Turkey may have differences compared to Western Europe, but socially very connected to Eastern Europe.

In Turkey, the reason why public became distant to EU is not because 'they have to change too many things', because they made a lot of laws already to fit in the EU, but because EU wants things from Turkey, which they didn't want when they accepted the Eastern European countries. So Turkish people see this as double standard, and they also see every request from the EU just another excuse not to accept Turkey.

Turkey has been a part of Europe's history in the last few centries, and in 1920s decided its destination and that was towards the Western World. In 1960s did its first attemp to join the EU, in 1995 signed the Customs Union agreement with the EU. Joining the EU is just another step of 'the Westernisation' on which Turkey was founded.

Maybe 20 years ago it could be financially very advantagous to join the EU but today I am affraid not. There are too many new countries, and Turkey would get a little bit of a piece from that cake...
(3 replies) #15 turke on 07 Apr 2007 - 14:17
I gotta tell you, every culture could have its own strict rules about anything, and it is pretty normal. I mean, you can't blame someone because he/she doesn't want to be insulted of his/her ancestors. That is not the point. The point is, our government has no clue what the internet is, and they don't care about it. Unfortunatelly, most members of the parliament can't even answer the most simple science question, but they have the power to decide the fate of the scientific research shares of our universities. Now that's the point.

So please don't blame "people", because of the actions taken by "governments". I don't do that.
#15.1 leesmithg on 07 Apr 2007 - 14:53
I am not blaming the people, however they voted the mp's in, like some of the people that voted for Bush and Bliar.

You want mp's that are up-to-date on science, then quit voting for people that put their religion first and politics second.

It's upto the Turkish electorate to vote with their minds, less being dictated to by religion.

I have grown up with a lot of (origin) Turkish people and the reason they left Turkey was for exactly what you wrote.
#15.2 ricknl on 07 Apr 2007 - 23:44
If it were that easy....

Look at America..... Their education level must be much higher than Turkey, and at the end of the day majority voted for Bush.
#15.3 EJocys on 11 Apr 2007 - 18:00
Quote - (turke said @ #15)
So please don't blame "people", because of the actions taken by "governments". I don't do that.


In democracy people must take full responsibility for actions of their government because in democracy people elect government and government represents will of citizens. A lot of people who gave oath to their country and vote stupid people into government due own stupidity don’t recognize this responsibility. Also, if you don’t vote then you don’t have moral right to complain. Of course, people who don’t have right to vote are not responsible for government actions (like children).
(2 replies) #16 turke on 07 Apr 2007 - 17:18
I don't like your attitude leesmithg. What is "middle east status" ? You know what, just never mind. I don't want to argue. Please don't tell people who they will vote for. It is just stupid.
#16.1 backdrifter on 07 Apr 2007 - 17:33
He has a point about voting the right guys, but there is little to do when you're out of choices. I mean many american exchange students here are against the agenda of the Bush government, yet I don't tell them why they voted for him, they simply didn't. This is what sort of stinks about democracy, the majority gets to choose, but usually the majority isn't the wisest.

I too, am quite irritated about the "middle east status" whatever that is. I suppose there is border around this geography to seperate us from "the wise west". Gee I almost thought we were europeans but well...
#16.2 turke on 07 Apr 2007 - 18:10
Quote - (backdrifter said @ #17.1)
He has a point about voting the right guys, but there is little to do when you're out of choices. I mean many american exchange students here are against the agenda of the Bush government, yet I don't tell them why they voted for him, they simply didn't. This is what sort of stinks about democracy, the majority gets to choose, but usually the majority isn't the wisest.

I too, am quite irritated about the "middle east status" whatever that is. I suppose there is border around this geography to seperate us from "the wise west". Gee I almost thought we were europeans but well...


Yeah that was what i was trying to say, but i was so weary, i let it go Actually your words reminded me an "Everon" song with the lyrics go like that:

Quote -
I don't believe in democracy's voice
I won't rely on a king to be wise
I won't give in to the majority's choice
Because I don't think that the majority's right


As you can see, i am still weary
#17 Septimus on 07 Apr 2007 - 17:57
Great idea, make a backward country even more insular.

That'll go well.
#18 toadeater on 07 Apr 2007 - 18:50
#19 turke on 07 Apr 2007 - 20:34
What was that ? What the hell Vlad Tepes has to do with this topic ? Are you drunk ?
#20 Amnesia on 08 Apr 2007 - 04:55
I'm all up for free speech, but I dont understand why free speech means people have to insult.

OMG!!! I CANST SAY BAD WURDS!!!!

Who cares. I think the world needs more respect and other countries need to realize that each country has their own system.

Sadly certain countries feel that THEIR way is the only way of life...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)