main
Report a problem

Apple, Cisco try to make iPhones compatible

Slimy   on 18 April 2007 - 23:55 · 9 comments & 5460 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Incorporated plans to start selling its iPhone (mobile phone, mp3 player & camera) in June while Cisco Systems Incorporated’s iPhone (VoIP phone) is already on sale. The two companies agreed to share the iPhone name for their separate devices in February, averting a potential court case. "Ways in which the companies' products can work together are now being investigated by both technical teams," said Cisco Chief Development Officer Charlie Giancarlo. Cisco wants the Apple iPhone to work with its corporate phone systems – allowing users to get the same services, such as instant messaging and teleconferencing, on their Cisco desk phones and Apple iPhones. Apple predicts it will sell 10 million iPhones next year. The company wouldn't comment beyond what it said in a joint statement issued with Cisco in February. In that statement, the companies said they would "explore opportunities for interoperability."

News source: Seattle PI

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
#1 redeemed on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:04
Won't there be confusion between the brands? iPhone and iPhone?
#2 Galley on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:22
iPhone? No, you phone!
(2 replies) #3 Croquant on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:31
Next from Apple: The iRack.
#3.1 pixels on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:38
OMG That video was so awesome.
#3.2 virtorio on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:46
Fantastic video
#4 +Zhivago on 19 Apr 2007 - 00:58
This is truly a unique example.

Sitting down at table to discuss issues is way better and more civilized than cutting each others' throuts in court rooms.
(1 reply) #5 +Dakkaroth on 19 Apr 2007 - 07:43
Too bad the iPhone looks like a brick.
#5.1 Chad on 19 Apr 2007 - 12:41
Quote - (Dakkaroth said @ #5)
Too bad the iPhone looks like a brick.


Too bad the iPhone is thinner and isn't much longer or wider than the Blackberry Pearl
#6 kickenchicken360 on 19 Apr 2007 - 22:56
10 million?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)